pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.09740 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-09 · 🌀 gr-qc · astro-ph.HE· hep-th

Recognition: unknown

Spin-(0, 1, frac{1}{2}) Field Perturbations, Quasinormal Modes, Overtones, Greybody Factors and Strong Cosmic Censorship of Einstein-Skyrme Black Holes

Faizuddin Ahmed , Ahmad Al-Badawi , \.Izzet Sakall{\i}
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 16:42 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc astro-ph.HEhep-th
keywords Einstein-Skyrme black holesquasinormal modesstrong cosmic censorshipgreybody factorsblack hole perturbationsAdS black holesovertones
0
0 comments X

The pith

Einstein-Skyrme black holes satisfy strong cosmic censorship because their quasinormal modes yield a Christodoulou parameter well below the critical value.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines perturbations of scalar, electromagnetic and Dirac fields around an Einstein-Skyrme AdS black hole. The metric is determined by two parameters from the Skyrme model that are related by the theory. Quasinormal modes are found using the sixth-order WKB approximation, verified with Padé expansion and time-domain methods. Greybody factors are calculated for each spin. The central result is that the Christodoulou parameter beta is always less than 4 times 10 to the minus 3, protecting strong cosmic censorship.

Core claim

We compute the quasinormal modes of the Einstein-Skyrme black hole for different spins and use them to evaluate the Christodoulou parameter at the Cauchy horizon. Across the allowed range of the Skyrme couplings K and e, this parameter remains at or below 4×10^{-3}, which is more than two orders of magnitude smaller than the 1/2 value that would allow violation of strong cosmic censorship. The ordering of greybody factors is T for electromagnetic less than scalar less than Dirac, and a mild anomaly appears in the first overtone ratios.

What carries the argument

Quasinormal mode frequencies computed via the WKB method on the Einstein-Skyrme background, from which the Christodoulou parameter β is derived to test strong cosmic censorship.

If this is right

  • The strong cosmic censorship conjecture holds for Einstein-Skyrme black holes with significant margin.
  • The ratio of imaginary parts of the first overtone to the fundamental mode is between 2.42 and 2.54 for scalar and electromagnetic perturbations.
  • Greybody factors increase from electromagnetic to scalar to Dirac fields.
  • The WKB results for the dominant mode are confirmed by independent time-domain Prony fits to within 0.2 percent.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The fixed coupling relation in the Skyrme model may be responsible for the robust protection of cosmic censorship.
  • This approach of using theory-constrained metrics could be applied to other modified gravity models to check censorship.
  • If higher-order corrections to the WKB method alter the frequencies significantly, the small beta value might change.

Load-bearing premise

The lapse function derived from the Skyrme model is the precise background metric and the numerical methods for quasinormal modes introduce negligible errors in the relevant parameter range.

What would settle it

A calculation or observation that the dominant quasinormal mode frequency has an imaginary part small enough to push the Christodoulou parameter above one half for some value of the Skyrme parameters would disprove the conclusion.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.09740 by Ahmad Al-Badawi, Faizuddin Ahmed, \.Izzet Sakall{\i}.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Behaviour of the scalar effective potential Vscalar as a function of the radial distance r, for M = 1, ℓ = 2. Left: K = 0.002 fixed, e varying. Right: e = 6 fixed, K varying [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Behaviour of the Dirac effective potential V+ as a function of the radial distance r, for M = 1, j = 1/2. Left: K = 0.002 fixed, e varying. Right: e = 6 fixed, K varying. with κ = 1 at j = 1/2, roughly a factor of six below the ℓ(ℓ + 1) = 6 of the scalar reference curve. This is the direct counterpart of the well-known softening of the Dirac barrier in the Schwarzschild limit, and it provides the ES-AdS pr… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Transmission coefficient as a function of frequency [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Reflection coefficient as a function of frequency [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Transmission coefficient as a function of frequency [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Transmission coefficient as a function of frequency [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_6.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We carry out a multi-spin perturbation-theory study of the four-dimensional Einstein-Skyrme (ES) anti-de Sitter (AdS) black hole (BH), whose lapse $f(r)=1-8\pi K-2M/r+4\pi K\lambda/r^{2}$ inherits two couplings from the hadronic model -- the pion combination $K=F_{\pi}^{2}/4$ and the Skyrme coupling $e$ -- with $K\lambda=1/e^{2}$ pinned by the theory rather than being a free integration constant. After deriving the Klein-Gordon, Maxwell and Dirac effective potentials on this background, we compute the quasinormal modes (QNMs) with the sixth-order WKB formula and cross-check them against the thirteenth-order Pad\'e-improved expansion and the eikonal limit set by the unstable photon sphere. The first overtone $(n=1)$ of the scalar and electromagnetic channels reveals a mild Konoplya-Zhidenko anomaly: the ratio $|\mathrm{Im}\,\omega_{1}|/|\mathrm{Im}\,\omega_{0}|$ drifts monotonically from $2.42$ to $2.54$, sitting noticeably below the Schwarzschild value near $3$. The dominant scalar mode is independently reproduced to better than $0.2\%$ by a time-domain Prony fit. Greybody factors for all three spins follow the ordering $T_{\rm EM}<T_{\rm scalar}<T_{\rm Dirac}$. Testing strong cosmic censorship at the Cauchy horizon, we find the Christodoulou parameter $\beta\lesssim 4\times 10^{-3}$ across the admissible $(K,e)$ window -- more than two orders of magnitude below the threshold $1/2$ -- with the margin protected by the theory itself.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript analyzes scalar (spin-0), electromagnetic (spin-1), and Dirac (spin-1/2) perturbations on the four-dimensional Einstein-Skyrme AdS black hole with lapse function f(r)=1-8πK-2M/r+4πKλ/r², where K and e are fixed by the Skyrme model and λ=K/e² is not free. Effective potentials are derived for each field; quasinormal modes are computed with the sixth-order WKB formula plus thirteenth-order Padé approximant, cross-validated against the eikonal limit and a time-domain Prony fit (0.2% agreement on the dominant scalar mode). Greybody factors satisfy T_EM < T_scalar < T_Dirac. Strong cosmic censorship is tested via the Christodoulou parameter β, which remains ≲4×10^{-3} over the admissible (K,e) window, more than two orders of magnitude below the 1/2 threshold.

Significance. If the reported quasinormal-mode spectra hold, the work supplies concrete numerical support that strong cosmic censorship is satisfied with a wide margin in a black-hole model whose parameters are anchored in hadronic physics rather than chosen ad hoc. The multi-method verification (WKB/Padé, eikonal, time-domain) and the internal consistency between greybody ordering and potential shapes strengthen the central claim. The result illustrates how the Skyrme coupling itself protects the censorship bound, offering a bridge between particle-physics input and gravitational censorship tests.

minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the statement that the dominant scalar mode agrees to better than 0.2% with the Prony fit is given without accompanying error bars, convergence tests, or the precise (K,e) values over which the agreement was verified. Adding a short clause on numerical precision and parameter coverage would make the summary self-contained.
  2. [Quasinormal-mode section] The sixth-order WKB plus thirteenth-order Padé results are presented for selected modes, yet the text does not include explicit tables or figures demonstrating convergence with WKB order or Padé order across the full admissible (K,e) range. Such supplementary material would allow readers to assess robustness for higher overtones and near-extremal parameters.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive assessment of our manuscript and for the recommendation of minor revision. Their summary correctly captures the scope of our multi-spin perturbation analysis, the verification methods employed for the quasinormal modes, the ordering of the greybody factors, and the strong margin by which the Christodoulou parameter satisfies the strong cosmic censorship bound in the Einstein-Skyrme model.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected

full rationale

The derivation begins from the exact Einstein-Skyrme lapse function whose parameters K and λ are fixed by the underlying Skyrme model (Kλ = 1/e²) rather than fitted to the target observables. Effective potentials for scalar, electromagnetic and Dirac perturbations are obtained by direct substitution into the standard wave equations on this background. Quasinormal frequencies are then extracted via the sixth-order WKB formula supplemented by Padé approximants, with independent cross-checks against the eikonal limit and a time-domain Prony fit; none of these numerical steps redefine or presuppose the final Christodoulou parameter β. The reported bound β ≲ 4×10^{-3} is therefore a downstream numerical output, not a tautological restatement of the input metric or of any self-citation. The entire chain remains self-contained against external benchmarks and contains no self-definitional, fitted-input, or load-bearing self-citation reductions.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 3 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the Skyrme model supplying the exact metric form and on standard assumptions of black hole perturbation theory; no new entities are postulated.

free parameters (2)
  • K
    Pion-related coupling constant F_π²/4 from the hadronic Skyrme model
  • e
    Skyrme coupling constant with λ=1/e² fixed by the model
axioms (3)
  • domain assumption The four-dimensional Einstein-Skyrme AdS black hole with the stated lapse function is a valid exact solution
    Taken directly from integration of the Skyrme model into Einstein gravity
  • domain assumption The WKB approximation with Padé improvement and the eikonal limit reliably compute the quasinormal modes
    Standard technique in black hole perturbation theory
  • domain assumption The Christodoulou parameter β is the correct diagnostic for strong cosmic censorship at the Cauchy horizon
    Adopted from existing literature on the conjecture

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5670 in / 1679 out tokens · 70315 ms · 2026-05-10T16:42:18.102271+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

82 extracted references · 67 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    2019a, ApJ, 875, L1, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ab0ec7 Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration, Akiyama, K.,

    Kazunori Akiyama et al. First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. I. The Shadow of the Supermassive Black Hole.Astrophys. J. Lett., 875: L1, 2019. URLhttps://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/ab0ec7

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ab0ec7 2019

  2. [2]

    First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results

    Kazunori Akiyama et al. First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. IV. Imaging the Central Supermassive Black Hole.Astrophys. J. Lett., 875:L4, 2019. URLhttps://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/ab0e85

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ab0e85 2019

  3. [3]

    2019b, ApJL, 875, L6, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ab1141 Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration, et al

    Kazunori Akiyama et al. First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. VI. The Shadow and Mass of the Central Black Hole.Astrophys. J. Lett., 875:L6, 2019. URLhttps://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/ab1141

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ab1141 2019

  4. [4]

    2022a, Astrophys

    Kazunori Akiyama et al. First Sagittarius A* Event Horizon Telescope Results. I. The Shadow of the Supermassive Black Hole in the Center of the Milky Way.Astrophys. J. Lett., 930:L12, 2022. URLhttps://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/ac6674

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac6674 2022

  5. [5]

    2022b, The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 930, L16, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ac6672

    Kazunori Akiyama et al. First Sagittarius A* Event Horizon Telescope Results. V. Testing Astrophysical Models of the Galactic Center Black Hole.Astrophys. J. Lett., 930:L16, 2022. URLhttps://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/ac6672

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac6672 2022

  6. [6]

    2022b, Astrophys

    Kazunori Akiyama et al. First Sagittarius A* Event Horizon Telescope Results. VI. Testing the Black Hole Metric.Astrophys. J. Lett., 930: L17, 2022. URLhttps://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/ac6756

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac6756 2022

  7. [7]

    Aghanim et al

    N. Aghanim et al. Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters.Astron. Astrophys., 641:A6, 2020. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1051/ 0004-6361/201833910. [Erratum: Astron.Astrophys. 652, C4 (2021)]

    2018

  8. [8]

    B. P. Abbott et al. Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger.Phys. Rev. Lett., 116:061102, 2016. URLhttps: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.061102

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.116.061102 2016

  9. [9]

    B. P. Abbott et al. Localization and Broadband Follow-up of the Gravitational-wave Transient GW150914.Astrophys. J. Lett., 826:L13, 2016. URLhttps://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8205/826/1/L13

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8205/826/1/l13 2016

  10. [10]

    B. P. Abbott et al. GW170608: Observation of a 19-solar-mass Binary Black Hole Coalescence.Phys. Rev. Lett., 119:161101, 2017. URL https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.161101. 24

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.119.161101 2017

  11. [11]

    and others

    R. Abbott et al. GW190412: Observation of a Binary-Black-Hole Coalescence with Asymmetric Masses.Phys. Rev. D, 102:043015, 2020. URL https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.102.043015

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.102.043015 2020

  12. [12]

    S. E. Woosley, A. Heger, and T. A. Weaver. The evolution and explosion of massive stars.Rev. Mod. Phys., 74:1015–1071, 2002. URL https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.74.1015

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.74.1015 2002

  13. [13]

    The maximum mass of a neutron star.Astrophys

    Vassiliki Kalogera and Gordon Baym. The Maximum mass of a neutron star.Astrophys. J. Lett., 470:L61–L64, 1996. URLhttps://doi.org/ 10.1086/310296

    work page doi:10.1086/310296 1996

  14. [14]

    S. Hawking. Gravitationally collapsed objects of very low mass.Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc., 152:75, 1971. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1093/ mnras/152.1.75

    1971

  15. [15]

    Chandrasekhar.The Mathematical Theory of Black Holes

    S. Chandrasekhar.The Mathematical Theory of Black Holes. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1998

    1998

  16. [16]

    J. P. Cavalcante and B. C. da Cunha. Scalar and Dirac perturbations of the Reissner-Nordstrom black hole and Painleve transcendents.Phys. Rev. D, 104:124040, 2021. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.104.124040

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.104.124040 2021

  17. [17]

    R. A. Konoplya. Quasinormal modes of four-dimensional regular black holes in quasi-topological gravity: Overtones’ outburst via wkb method,

  18. [18]

    URLhttps://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2603.03189

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2603.03189

  19. [19]

    Quasinormal modes and greybody factors of black holes corrected by nonlinear electrodynamics

    Jie Liang, Dong Liu, and Zheng-Wen Long. Quasinormal modes and greybody factors of black holes corrected by nonlinear electrodynamics. Eur. Phys. J. C, 86:17, 2026. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-025-15245-z

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-025-15245-z 2026

  20. [20]

    Scalar, Electromagnetic and Gravitational Perturbations of Kerr-Newman Black Holes in the Slow-Rotation Limit.Phys

    Paolo Pani, Emanuele Berti, and Leonardo Gualtieri. Scalar, Electromagnetic and Gravitational Perturbations of Kerr-Newman Black Holes in the Slow-Rotation Limit.Phys. Rev. D, 88:064048, 2013. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.88.064048

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.88.064048 2013

  21. [21]

    Dirac, Schroedinger, and Maxwell equations in scalar and vector field quantum mechanics

    B. Chichkov. Dirac, schroedinger, and maxwell equations in scalar and vector field quantum mechanics, 2025. URLhttps://doi.org/10.48550/ arXiv.2508.14583

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  22. [22]

    Z. Malik. Grey-Body Factors for Scalar and Dirac Fields in the Euler-Heisenberg Electrodynamics.Int. J. Grav. Theor. Phys., 1(1):6, 2025. URLhttps://doi.org/10.53941/ijgtp.2025.100006

    work page doi:10.53941/ijgtp.2025.100006 2025

  23. [23]

    Sekhmani, D

    Y. Sekhmani, D. J. Gogoi, S. K. Maurya, K. Boshkayev, and M. K. Jasim. Quasinormal modes and greybody bounds of black holes endowed with modified Chaplygin gas.J. High Energy Astrophys., 45:200–214, 2025. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jheap.2024.11.008

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jheap.2024.11.008 2025

  24. [24]

    S. V. Bolokhov. Long-lived quasinormal modes and overtones’ behavior of holonomy-corrected black holes.Phys. Rev. D, 110:024010, 2024. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.110.024010

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.110.024010 2024

  25. [25]

    Al-Badawi, S

    A. Al-Badawi, S. Kanzi, and ˙I. Sakallı. Solutions of the Dirac equation in Bonnor-Melvin-Lambda space-time.Annals Phys., 452:169294, 2023. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.aop.2023.169294

    work page doi:10.1016/j.aop.2023.169294 2023

  26. [27]

    A. G. Abac et al. Observation of Gravitational Waves from the Coalescence of a 2.5–4.5 Solar-Mass Compact Object and a Neutron Star.Phys. Rev. Lett., 135:111403, 2025. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.135.111403

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.135.111403 2025

  27. [28]

    R. A. Konoplya and Alexander Zhidenko. Quasinormal modes of black holes: From astrophysics to string theory.Rev. Mod. Phys., 83:793–836,

  28. [29]

    URLhttps://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.83.793

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.83.793

  29. [30]

    S. V. Bolokhov and M. Skvortsova. Quasinormal Ringing and Shadows of Black Holes and Wormholes in Dark Matter Inspired Weyl Gravity. Grav. Cosmol., 31:423, 2025. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1134/S0202289325700306

    work page doi:10.1134/s0202289325700306 2025

  30. [31]

    Living Rev Rel 2:2

    Kostas D. Kokkotas and Bernd G. Schmidt. Quasinormal modes of stars and black holes.Living Rev. Rel., 2:2, 1999. URLhttps://doi.org/ 10.12942/lrr-1999-2

    work page doi:10.12942/lrr-1999-2 1999

  31. [32]

    R. A. Konoplya. The sound of the event horizon.Int. J. Mod. Phys. D, 32(14):2342014, 2023. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1142/S0218271823420142

    work page doi:10.1142/s0218271823420142 2023

  32. [34]

    Starinets

    Emanuele Berti, Vitor Cardoso, and Andrei O. Starinets. Quasinormal modes of black holes and black branes.Class. Quant. Grav., 26:163001,

  33. [35]

    URLhttps://doi.org/10.1088/0264-9381/26/16/163001

    work page doi:10.1088/0264-9381/26/16/163001

  34. [36]

    R. A. Konoplya and A. Zhidenko. First few overtones probe the event horizon geometry.Journal of High Energy Astrophysics, 44:419–426, November 2024. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jheap.2024.10.015

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jheap.2024.10.015 2024

  35. [37]

    Greybody radiation of scalar and Dirac perturbations of NUT black holes.Eur

    Ahmad Al-Badawi, Sara Kanzi, and ˙Izzet Sakallı. Greybody radiation of scalar and Dirac perturbations of NUT black holes.Eur. Phys. J. Plus, 137(1):94, 2022. doi: 10.1140/epjp/s13360-021-02227-9. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/s13360-021-02227-9

    work page doi:10.1140/epjp/s13360-021-02227-9 2022

  36. [38]

    Al-Badawi, ˙I

    A. Al-Badawi, ˙I. Sakallı, and S. Kanzi. Solution of Dirac equation and greybody radiation around a regular Bardeen black hole surrounded by quintessence.Annals Phys., 412:168026, 2020. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.aop.2019.168026

    work page doi:10.1016/j.aop.2019.168026 2020

  37. [39]

    Al-Badawi, S

    A. Al-Badawi, S. Kanzi, and ˙I. Sakallı. Greybody factor and Hawking radiation for a Schwarzschild black hole surrounded by quintessence.Eur. Phys. J. Plus, 135:219, 2020. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/s13360-020-00245-7

    work page doi:10.1140/epjp/s13360-020-00245-7 2020

  38. [40]

    Kanzi, S

    S. Kanzi, S. H. Mazharimousavi, and ˙I. Sakallı. Greybody factors of black holes in dRGT massive gravity coupled with nonlinear electrodynamics. Annals Phys., 422:168301, 2020. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.aop.2020.168301

    work page doi:10.1016/j.aop.2020.168301 2020

  39. [41]

    Kanzi and ˙I

    S. Kanzi and ˙I. Sakallı. Greybody radiation and quasinormal modes of Kerr-like black hole in Bumblebee gravity model.Eur. Phys. J. C, 81: 501, 2021. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-021-09299-y. 25

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-021-09299-y 2021

  40. [42]

    Sakallı and S

    ˙I. Sakallı and S. Kanzi. Physical properties of brane-world black hole solutions via a confining potential.Annals Phys., 439:168803, 2022. URL https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aop.2022.168803

    work page doi:10.1016/j.aop.2022.168803 2022

  41. [43]

    Heidari, J

    Dhruba Jyoti Gogoi, N. Heidari, J. Kriz, and H. Hassanabadi. Quasinormal modes and greybody factors of black holes in modified gravity. Fortsch. Phys., 72:2300245, 2024. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1002/prop.202300245

    work page doi:10.1002/prop.202300245 2024

  42. [44]

    Hosseinifar, A

    F. Hosseinifar, A. A. Ara´ ujo Filho, M. Y. Zhang, H. Chen, and H. Hassanabadi. Shadows, greybody factors, emission rate, topological charge, and phase transitions for a charged black hole with a kalb-ramond field background, 2024

    2024

  43. [45]

    Sekhmani, D

    Y. Sekhmani, D. J. Gogoi, S. K. Maurya, K. Boshkayev, and M. K. Jasim. Effects of modified Chaplygin gas and quintessence on black hole field propagation.JHEAp, 45:200, 2025. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jheap.2024.12.012

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jheap.2024.12.012 2025

  44. [46]

    Sakallı and S

    ˙I. Sakallı and S. Kanzi. Topical review on greybody factors and quasinormal modes in various theories.Turk. J. Phys., 46(2):51, 2022. URL https://doi.org/10.55730/1300-0101.2691

    work page doi:10.55730/1300-0101.2691 2022

  45. [47]

    Costa, Kyriakos Destounis, Peter Hintz, and Aron Jansen

    Vitor Cardoso, Jo˜ ao L. Costa, Kyriakos Destounis, Peter Hintz, and Aron Jansen. Quasinormal modes and Strong Cosmic Censorship.Phys. Rev. Lett., 120:031103, 2018. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.031103

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.120.031103 2018

  46. [48]

    Oscar J. C. Dias, Felicity C. Eperon, Harvey S. Reall, and Jorge E. Santos. Strong cosmic censorship in de Sitter space.Phys. Rev. D, 97: 104060, 2018. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.97.104060

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.97.104060 2018

  47. [49]

    Quasinormal modes and strong cosmic censorship in near-extremal Kerr-Newman-de Sitter black-hole spacetimes.Phys

    Shahar Hod. Quasinormal modes and strong cosmic censorship in near-extremal Kerr-Newman-de Sitter black-hole spacetimes.Phys. Lett. B, 780:221–226, 2018. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2018.03.020

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2018.03.020 2018

  48. [50]

    Oscar J. C. Dias, Harvey S. Reall, and Jorge E. Santos. Strong cosmic censorship for charged de Sitter black holes with a charged scalar field. Class. Quant. Grav., 36:045005, 2019. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6382/aafcf2

    work page doi:10.1088/1361-6382/aafcf2 2019

  49. [51]

    T. H. R. Skyrme. A non-linear field theory.Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A, 260:127–138, 1961. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1961.0018

    work page doi:10.1098/rspa.1961.0018 1961

  50. [52]

    T. H. R. Skyrme. Particle states of a quantized meson field.Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A, 262:237–245, 1961. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1098/rspa. 1961.0115

    work page doi:10.1098/rspa 1961

  51. [53]

    T. H. R. Skyrme. A unified field theory of mesons and baryons.Nucl. Phys., 31:556–569, 1962. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1016/0029-5582(62) 90775-7

    work page doi:10.1016/0029-5582(62 1962

  52. [54]

    Hedgehog ansatz and its generalization for self-gravitating Skyrmions.Phys

    Fabrizio Canfora and Hideki Maeda. Hedgehog ansatz and its generalization for self-gravitating Skyrmions.Phys. Rev. D, 87:084049, 2013. URL https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.87.084049

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.87.084049 2013

  53. [55]

    S. Droz, M. Heusler, and N. Straumann. New black hole solutions with hair.Phys. Lett. B, 268:371–376, 1991. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1016/ 0370-2693(91)91592-J

    1991

  54. [56]

    Exact meron Black Holes in four dimensional SU(2) Einstein-Yang-Mills theory.Phys

    Fabrizio Canfora, Francisco Correa, Alex Giacomini, and Julio Oliva. Exact meron Black Holes in four dimensional SU(2) Einstein-Yang-Mills theory.Phys. Lett. B, 722:364–371, 2013. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2013.04.029

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2013.04.029 2013

  55. [57]

    Exact multisoliton solutions in the four dimensional Skyrme model.Phys

    Fabrizio Canfora, Francisco Correa, and Jorge Zanelli. Exact multisoliton solutions in the four dimensional Skyrme model.Phys. Rev. D, 90: 085002, 2014. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.90.085002

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.90.085002 2014

  56. [58]

    Canfora, E

    F. Canfora, E. F. Eiroa, and C. M. Sendra. Spherically symmetric black holes with Skyrme hair and their shadows.Eur. Phys. J. C, 78:9, 2018. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-017-5476-3

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-017-5476-3 2018

  57. [59]

    Ay´ on-Beato, F

    E. Ay´ on-Beato, F. Canfora, and J. Zanelli. Analytic self-gravitating Skyrmions, cosmological bounces and AdS wormholes.Phys. Lett. B, 752: 201–205, 2016. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2015.11.065

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2015.11.065 2016

  58. [60]

    Black hole and black string solutions with Skyrme hair.Phys

    Marco Astorino, Fabrizio Canfora, Marcela Lagos, and Aldo Vera. Black hole and black string solutions with Skyrme hair.Phys. Rev. D, 97: 124032, 2018. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.97.124032

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.97.124032 2018

  59. [61]

    Adkins, Chiara R

    Gregory S. Adkins, Chiara R. Nappi, and Edward Witten. Static properties of nucleons in the Skyrme model.Nucl. Phys. B, 228:552–566, 1983. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1016/0550-3213(83)90559-X

    work page doi:10.1016/0550-3213(83)90559-x 1983

  60. [62]

    Gravitational Field of a Global Monopole.Phys

    Manuel Barriola and Alexander Vilenkin. Gravitational Field of a Global Monopole.Phys. Rev. Lett., 63:341–343, 1989. URLhttps://doi.org/ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.63.341

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.63.341 1989

  61. [63]

    C. V. Vishveshwara. Scattering of gravitational radiation by a Schwarzschild black hole.Nature, 227:936–938, 1970. URLhttps://doi.org/10. 1038/227936a0

    1970

  62. [64]

    New approach to the quasinormal modes of a black hole.Phys

    Valeria Ferrari and Bahram Mashhoon. New approach to the quasinormal modes of a black hole.Phys. Rev. D, 30:295–304, 1984. URL https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.30.295

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.30.295 1984

  63. [65]

    Superradiance and stability of the regularized 4D charged Einstein- Gauss-Bonnet black hole.JHEP, 08:105, 2020

    Cheng-Yong Zhang, Sheng-Jie Zhang, Peng-Cheng Li, and Minyong Guo. Superradiance and stability of the regularized 4D charged Einstein- Gauss-Bonnet black hole.JHEP, 08:105, 2020. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP08(2020)105

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep08(2020)105 2020

  64. [66]

    Wheeler.Geometrodynamics

    John A. Wheeler.Geometrodynamics. Academic Press, New York, 1973

    1973

  65. [67]

    A. R. Ruffini.Black Holes: Les Astres Occlus. Gordon and Breach Science Publishers, New York, 1973

    1973

  66. [68]

    W. G. Unruh. Separability of the neutrino equations in a Kerr background.Phys. Rev. Lett., 31:1265–1267, 1973. URLhttps://doi.org/10. 1103/PhysRevLett.31.1265

    1973

  67. [69]

    Chandrasekhar

    S. Chandrasekhar. The solution of Dirac’s equation in Kerr geometry.Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A, 349:571–575, 1976. URLhttps://doi.org/10. 1098/rspa.1976.0090. 26

    work page arXiv 1976

  68. [71]

    Mashhoon

    B. Mashhoon. Stability of charged rotating black holes in the eikonal approximation. In H. Ning, editor,Proc. 3rd Marcel Grossmann Meeting on General Relativity, pages 599–608, Amsterdam, 1983. North-Holland

    1983

  69. [72]

    Blome and B

    H.-J. Blome and B. Mashhoon. Quasi-normal oscillations of a Schwarzschild black hole.Phys. Lett. A, 110:231–234, 1984. URLhttps: //doi.org/10.1016/0375-9601(84)90058-7

    work page doi:10.1016/0375-9601(84)90058-7 1984

  70. [73]

    Liu and B

    H. Liu and B. Mashhoon. On the spectrum of oscillations of a Schwarzschild black hole.Class. Quant. Grav., 13:233–252, 1996. URL https://doi.org/10.1088/0264-9381/13/2/009

    work page doi:10.1088/0264-9381/13/2/009 1996

  71. [74]

    Sai Iyer and Clifford M. Will. Black Hole Normal Modes: A WKB Approach. 1. Foundations and Application of a Higher Order WKB Analysis of Potential Barrier Scattering.Phys. Rev. D, 35:3621, 1987. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.35.3621

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.35.3621 1987

  72. [75]

    R. A. Konoplya. Quasinormal behavior of the D-dimensional Schwarzschild black hole and higher order WKB approach.Phys. Rev. D, 68: 024018, 2003. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.68.024018

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.68.024018 2003

  73. [76]

    R. A. Konoplya. Gravitational quasinormal radiation of higher dimensional black holes.J. Phys. Stud., 8:93–100, 2004

    2004

  74. [77]

    Matyjasek and M

    Jerzy Matyjasek and Michal Opala. Quasinormal modes of black holes: The improved semianalytic approach.Phys. Rev. D, 96:024011, 2017. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.96.024011

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.96.024011 2017

  75. [78]

    R. A. Konoplya, A. Zhidenko, and A. F. Zinhailo. Higher order WKB formula for quasinormal modes and grey-body factors: recipes for quick and accurate calculations.Class. Quant. Grav., 36:155002, 2019. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6382/ab2e25

    work page doi:10.1088/1361-6382/ab2e25 2019

  76. [79]

    Cardoso, A

    Vitor Cardoso, Alex S. Miranda, Emanuele Berti, Helvi Witek, and Vilson T. Zanchin. Geodesic stability, Lyapunov exponents and quasinormal modes.Phys. Rev. D, 79:064016, 2009. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.79.064016

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.79.064016 2009

  77. [80]

    Schutz and Clifford M

    Bernard F. Schutz and Clifford M. Will. Black hole normal modes: a semianalytic approach.Astrophys. J. Lett., 291:L33–L36, 1985. URL https://doi.org/10.1086/184453

    work page doi:10.1086/184453 1985

  78. [81]

    Sai Iyer and Clifford M. Will. Black Hole Normal Modes: A WKB Approach. 1.Phys. Rev. D, 35:3621, 1987. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevD.35.3621

    1987

  79. [82]

    Boehmer and Tiberiu Harko

    Christian G. Boehmer and Tiberiu Harko. Can dark matter be a Bose-Einstein condensate?Class. Quant. Grav., 23:6479–6491, 2006. URL https://doi.org/10.1088/0264-9381/23/22/017

    work page doi:10.1088/0264-9381/23/22/017 2006

  80. [83]

    Greybody factors of charged dilaton black holes in 2+1 dimensions.Gen

    Sharmanthie Fernando. Greybody factors of charged dilaton black holes in 2+1 dimensions.Gen. Rel. Grav., 37:585–604, 2005. URLhttps: //doi.org/10.1007/s10714-005-0049-4

    work page doi:10.1007/s10714-005-0049-4 2005

Showing first 80 references.