pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.13575 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-15 · ❄️ cond-mat.soft · cond-mat.stat-mech· physics.bio-ph

Various phases of active matter emerging from bacteria and their implications

Kazumasa A. Takeuchi , Daiki Nishiguchi This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 12:22 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.soft cond-mat.stat-mechphysics.bio-ph
keywords active matterbacterial populationsactive gasactive liquidactive glassactive liquid crystalsnon-equilibrium phasescollective behavior
0
0 comments X

The pith

Bacterial populations model active gas, liquid, glass and liquid crystal phases distinct from equilibrium matter.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This perspective argues that bacterial populations serve as an accessible experimental system for studying phases of active matter. Researchers can identify collective behaviors in bacteria that correspond to active gas, active liquid, active glass, and active liquid crystal states. These states arise from self-propelled motion rather than thermal fluctuations, leading to properties unlike those in passive systems. The work connects these physical observations to biological processes such as swarming or biofilm formation. It also outlines directions for future study to strengthen links between active matter physics and living systems.

Core claim

Bacterial populations allow for the exploration and characterization of various phases of active matter and bring rich implications for both physics and biology. Specifically, active gas, active liquid, active glass and active liquid crystal states observed in bacterial populations differ from their thermal counterparts.

What carries the argument

Bacterial populations as a model system realizing active analogs of gas, liquid, glass, and liquid crystal states through collective self-propulsion.

If this is right

  • Bacterial systems enable direct observation of how activity alters phase boundaries compared with thermal equilibrium.
  • Active liquid crystal states in bacteria may underlie oriented collective motion seen in certain biological processes.
  • Active glass states could relate to jammed or arrested dynamics in dense bacterial communities.
  • Implications extend to designing experiments that treat bacteria as tunable active materials.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The approach could be tested in other self-propelled systems like synthetic microswimmers to check if the same phase distinctions hold.
  • If the mappings are robust, they might guide predictions for phase behavior in larger multicellular aggregates.
  • Controlled removal of signaling pathways could provide a direct test of the active-matter classification.

Load-bearing premise

Observed bacterial collective behaviors can be classified as active matter phases without major confounding from biological signaling or genetic regulation.

What would settle it

An experiment isolating bacterial motion while suppressing chemotaxis and gene regulation, then showing the resulting states do not match active gas-liquid-glass-liquid-crystal classifications.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.13575 by Daiki Nishiguchi, Kazumasa A. Takeuchi.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Various phases of active matter observed in bacteria. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Characteristic transport phenomena in active gas [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Transitions to glassy states of bacterial populations. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Roles of nematic order in bacterial populations. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

In this perspective article, we discuss bacterial populations as a model system of active matter. It allows for the exploration and characterization of various phases of active matter and brings rich implications for both physics and biology. Specifically, we focus on active gas, active liquid, active glass and active liquid crystal states observed in bacterial populations and describe how these differ from their thermal counterparts. A few future directions are also discussed that will deepen the physical interest in active matter as a new type of material, with its implications for several life phenomena observed in bacterial populations and other biological systems.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. This perspective article argues that bacterial populations serve as an effective model system for exploring and characterizing various phases of active matter, including active gas, active liquid, active glass, and active liquid crystal states. It contrasts these with their thermal equilibrium counterparts, notes differences arising from self-propulsion and activity, and outlines implications for physics and biology along with suggested future directions.

Significance. If the phase classifications and distinctions hold under closer scrutiny, the perspective usefully synthesizes how bacterial collectives can illuminate active matter as a new class of materials while linking physical principles to biological collective behaviors, potentially guiding experiments that test activity-driven transitions in living systems.

major comments (2)
  1. [sections on active liquid and active glass states] The central mapping of observed bacterial states to active gas/liquid/glass/liquid-crystal phases (as stated in the abstract and the sections describing each phase) rests on the assumption that self-propulsion dominates over biological regulation; however, the text does not quantify or bound the relative contributions of quorum sensing, chemotaxis, or genetic motility control in the cited experiments, leaving the classification vulnerable to confounding.
  2. [implications and future directions] In the discussion of differences from thermal counterparts (abstract and implications section), the perspective notes qualitative distinctions but provides no concrete metrics or comparisons (e.g., effective temperatures, persistence lengths, or order parameters) that would allow readers to assess how robustly the bacterial observations align with minimal active-matter models versus biologically driven mechanisms.
minor comments (2)
  1. [abstract] The abstract and introduction could more explicitly state the scope as a perspective synthesizing prior work rather than presenting new derivations or data.
  2. [phase description sections] Figure captions (if present) or phase descriptions would benefit from clearer notation distinguishing bacterial-specific parameters from standard active-matter variables.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive assessment of our perspective article and for the constructive comments, which help clarify the scope and limitations of our discussion. We address each major comment point by point below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [sections on active liquid and active glass states] The central mapping of observed bacterial states to active gas/liquid/glass/liquid-crystal phases (as stated in the abstract and the sections describing each phase) rests on the assumption that self-propulsion dominates over biological regulation; however, the text does not quantify or bound the relative contributions of quorum sensing, chemotaxis, or genetic motility control in the cited experiments, leaving the classification vulnerable to confounding.

    Authors: We agree that the perspective would benefit from a more explicit acknowledgment of the potential confounding roles of biological regulation. As a synthesis of existing literature rather than a new experimental study, our classification draws on the standard active-matter interpretation of the cited bacterial experiments, where self-propulsion is taken as the dominant driver at the relevant scales. Nevertheless, we will add a concise paragraph in the introduction (or integrated into the phase sections) that reviews literature estimates on the relative magnitudes of quorum sensing, chemotaxis, and motility control versus physical activity in the density and length-scale regimes discussed. This will help readers assess the robustness of the mapping without changing the overall perspective character of the manuscript. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [implications and future directions] In the discussion of differences from thermal counterparts (abstract and implications section), the perspective notes qualitative distinctions but provides no concrete metrics or comparisons (e.g., effective temperatures, persistence lengths, or order parameters) that would allow readers to assess how robustly the bacterial observations align with minimal active-matter models versus biologically driven mechanisms.

    Authors: The referee correctly identifies that our treatment of distinctions from equilibrium systems remains largely qualitative. While this choice was deliberate to maintain accessibility in a perspective format, we accept that including illustrative quantitative anchors would strengthen the argument. In the revised implications section we will insert specific examples drawn from the literature, such as reported effective temperatures in bacterial baths, persistence lengths in bacterial active nematics, and orientational order parameters in bacterial liquid crystals, together with brief comparisons to minimal-model predictions. These additions will be kept concise and will not alter the forward-looking nature of the discussion. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: perspective article reviews observations without derivations or self-referential reductions

full rationale

This is a perspective article that summarizes and discusses existing experimental observations of bacterial collective behaviors mapped to active-matter phases (gas, liquid, glass, liquid crystal). No new equations, derivations, fitted parameters, or predictions are presented that could reduce to inputs by construction. Central claims rest on cited literature describing observed states and their differences from thermal systems, without load-bearing self-citations that would make the mapping circular. The text is self-contained as a review of external benchmarks and does not invoke uniqueness theorems, ansatzes, or renamings that collapse to prior author work.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The perspective applies standard active matter concepts to bacterial motility without introducing new free parameters, axioms beyond domain assumptions, or invented entities.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Bacterial self-propulsion can be modeled within the active matter framework
    Invoked when classifying observed collective states as active phases.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5390 in / 1101 out tokens · 28928 ms · 2026-05-10T12:22:49.690484+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

58 extracted references · 58 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    DiSTNet2D

    [Fig. 2(e)]. The realization and exploration of such phenomena that are not possible for thermal systems un- derscores the significant potential of active matter as an exotic material. TRANSITIONS TO GLASSY ST A TES As stated earlier, self-propulsion may not be the only active aspect of constituent particles of active matter. Growth and division, and resu...

    work page

  2. [2]

    More is Different

    [Fig. 4(a,b)]. This attraction and repulsion of cells for +1/2 and−1/2 defects is consistent with an earlier obser- vation for neural progenitor cells [55] and was successfully explained theoretically on the basis of two-dimensional active nematics [48, 55]. However, while bacteria grow two-dimensionally at the early stage of colony develop- ment, they st...

    work page

  3. [3]

    te Vrugt, B

    M. te Vrugt, B. Liebchen, and M. E. Cates, What exactly is ’active matter’?, arXiv:2507.21621

    work page arXiv

  4. [4]

    Zhang and H

    Y. Zhang and H. Hess, Enhanced diffusion of catalytically active enzymes, ACS Cent. Sci.5, 939 (2019)

    work page 2019

  5. [5]

    Hallatschek, S

    O. Hallatschek, S. S. Datta, K. Drescher, J. Dunkel, J. El- geti, B. Waclaw, and N. S. Wingreen, Proliferating active matter, Nat. Rev. Phys.5, 407 (2023)

    work page 2023

  6. [6]

    I. S. Aranson, Bacterial active matter, Rep. Prog. Phys. 85, 076601 (2022)

    work page 2022

  7. [7]

    Miyata, R

    M. Miyata, R. C. Robinson, T. Q. P. Uyeda, Y. Fuku- mori, S. ichi Fukushima, S. Haruta, M. Homma, K. In- 6 aba, M. Ito, C. Kaito, K. Kato, T. Kenri, Y. Ki- nosita, S. Kojima, T. Minamino, H. Mori, S. Nakamura, D. Nakane, K. Nakayama, M. Nishiyama, S. Shibata, K. Shimabukuro, M. Tamakoshi, A. Taoka, Y. Tashiro, I. Tulum, H. Wada, and K. ichi Wakabayashi, T...

    work page 2020

  8. [8]

    Wadhwa and H

    N. Wadhwa and H. C. Berg, Bacterial motility: machin- ery and mechanisms, Nat. Rev. Microbiol.20, 161 (2021)

    work page 2021

  9. [9]

    Lauga,The Fluid Dynamics of Cell Motility(Cam- bridge Univ

    E. Lauga,The Fluid Dynamics of Cell Motility(Cam- bridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 2020)

    work page 2020

  10. [10]

    Y. M. Bar-On, R. Phillips, and R. Milo, The biomass distribution on earth, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA115, 6506 (2018)

    work page 2018

  11. [11]

    Flemming, J

    H.-C. Flemming, J. Wingender, U. Szewzyk, P. Stein- berg, S. A. Rice, and S. Kjelleberg, Biofilms: an emer- gent form of bacterial life, Nat. Rev. Microbiol.14, 563 (2016)

    work page 2016

  12. [12]

    H. Lama, M. J. Yamamoto, Y. Furuta, T. Shimaya, and K. A. Takeuchi, Emergence of bacterial glass, PNAS Nexus3, pgae238 (2024)

    work page 2024

  13. [13]

    Shimaya and K

    T. Shimaya and K. A. Takeuchi, Tilt-induced polar order and topological defects in growing bacterial populations, PNAS Nexus1, pgac269 (2022)

    work page 2022

  14. [14]

    S. E. Hulme, W. R. DiLuzio, S. S. Shevkoplyas, L. Turner, M. Mayer, H. C. Berg, and G. M. Whitesides, Using ratchets and sorters to fractionate motile cells of escherichia coli by length, Lab Chip8, 1888 (2008)

    work page 2008

  15. [15]

    Galajda, J

    P. Galajda, J. Keymer, P. Chaikin, and R. Austin, A wall of funnels concentrates swimming bacteria, J. Bacteriol. 189, 8704 (2007)

    work page 2007

  16. [16]

    Nishiguchi, S

    D. Nishiguchi, S. Shiratani, K. A. Takeuchi, and I. S. Aranson, Vortex reversal is a precursor of confined bacterial turbulence, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA122, e2414446122 (2025)

    work page 2025

  17. [17]

    Di Leonardo, L

    R. Di Leonardo, L. Angelani, D. Dell’Arciprete, G. Ruocco, V. Iebba, S. Schippa, M. P. Conte, F. Mecarini, F. De Angelis, and E. Di Fabrizio, Bacterial ratchet motors, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA107, 9541 (2010)

    work page 2010

  18. [18]

    Sokolov, M

    A. Sokolov, M. M. Apodaca, B. A. Grzybowski, and I. S. Aranson, Swimming bacteria power microscopic gears, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA107, 969 (2010)

    work page 2010

  19. [19]

    Uchida, D

    Y. Uchida, D. Nishiguchi, and K. A. Takeuchi, Design- ing topological edge states in bacterial active matter, arXiv:2601.08243

    work page arXiv

  20. [20]

    A. P. Berke, L. Turner, H. C. Berg, and E. Lauga, Hy- drodynamic attraction of swimming microorganisms by surfaces, Phys. Rev. Lett.101, 038102 (2008)

    work page 2008

  21. [21]

    Li and J

    G. Li and J. X. Tang, Accumulation of microswimmers near a surface mediated by collision and rotational brow- nian motion, Phys. Rev. Lett.103, 078101 (2009)

    work page 2009

  22. [22]

    Bianchi, F

    S. Bianchi, F. Saglimbeni, and R. Di Leonardo, Holo- graphic imaging reveals the mechanism of wall entrap- ment in swimming bacteria, Phys. Rev. X7, 011010 (2017)

    work page 2017

  23. [23]

    Takaha and D

    Y. Takaha and D. Nishiguchi, Quasi-two-dimensional bacterial swimming around pillars: Enhanced trapping efficiency and curvature dependence, Phys. Rev. E107, 014602 (2023)

    work page 2023

  24. [24]

    W. R. DiLuzio, L. Turner, M. Mayer, P. Garstecki, D. B. Weibel, H. C. Berg, and G. M. Whitesides, Es- cherichia coli swim on the right-hand side, Nature435, 1271 (2005)

    work page 2005

  25. [25]

    Di Leonardo, D

    R. Di Leonardo, D. Dell’Arciprete, L. Angelani, and V. Iebba, Swimming with an image, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 038101 (2011)

    work page 2011

  26. [26]

    C. O. Reichhardt and C. Reichhardt, Ratchet effects in active matter systems, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys.8, 51 (2017)

    work page 2017

  27. [27]

    Alert, J

    R. Alert, J. Casademunt, and J.-F. Joanny, Active turbu- lence, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys.13, 143 (2022)

    work page 2022

  28. [28]

    Nishiguchi, Deciphering long-range order in active matter: Insights from swimming bacteria in quasi-2d and electrokinetic janus particles, J

    D. Nishiguchi, Deciphering long-range order in active matter: Insights from swimming bacteria in quasi-2d and electrokinetic janus particles, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.92, 121007 (2023)

    work page 2023

  29. [29]

    Perez-Estay, V

    B. Perez-Estay, V. Martinez, C. Douarche, J. Schwarz- Linek, J. Arlt, P.-H. Delville, G. McConnell, W. C. K. Poon, A. Lindner, and E. Clement, Bacteria collective motion is scale-free, arXiv:2509.15918

    work page arXiv

  30. [30]

    Wioland, F

    H. Wioland, F. G. Woodhouse, J. Dunkel, J. O. Kessler, and R. E. Goldstein, Confinement stabilizes a bacterial suspension into a spiral vortex, Phys. Rev. Lett.110, 268102 (2013)

    work page 2013

  31. [31]

    Beppu, Z

    K. Beppu, Z. Izri, J. Gohya, K. Eto, M. Ichikawa, and Y. T. Maeda, Geometry-driven collective ordering of bac- terial vortices, Soft Matter13, 5038 (2017)

    work page 2017

  32. [32]

    Nishiguchi, I

    D. Nishiguchi, I. S. Aranson, A. Snezhko, and A. Sokolov, Engineering bacterial vortex lattice via direct laser lithography, Nat. Commun.9, 4486 (2018)

    work page 2018

  33. [33]

    J. P. Eckmann, Roads to turbulence in dissipative dy- namical systems, Rev. Mod. Phys.53, 643 (1981)

    work page 1981

  34. [34]

    Shimaya, R

    T. Shimaya, R. Okura, Y. Wakamoto, and K. A. Takeuchi, Scale invariance of cell size fluctuations in starving bacteria, Commun. Phys.4, 238 (2021)

    work page 2021

  35. [35]

    Maliet, N

    M. Maliet, N. Fix-Boulier, L. Berthier, and M. Deforet, Bacterial glass transition, arXiv:2504.04205

    work page arXiv

  36. [36]

    S. C. Takatori and K. K. Mandadapu, Motility-induced buckling and glassy dynamics regulate three-dimensional transitions of bacterial monolayers, arXiv:2003.05618

    work page arXiv 2003

  37. [37]

    M. Letz, R. Schilling, and A. Latz, Ideal glass transitions for hard ellipsoids, Phys. Rev. E62, 5173 (2000)

    work page 2000

  38. [38]

    Zheng, F

    Z. Zheng, F. Wang, and Y. Han, Glass transitions in quasi-two-dimensional suspensions of colloidal ellipsoids, Phys. Rev. Lett.107, 065702 (2011)

    work page 2011

  39. [39]

    Zheng, R

    Z. Zheng, R. Ni, F. Wang, M. Dijkstra, Y. Wang, and Y. Han, Structural signatures of dynamic heterogeneities in monolayers of colloidal ellipsoids, Nat. Commun.5, 3829 (2014)

    work page 2014

  40. [40]

    C. K. Mishra, A. Rangarajan, and R. Ganapathy, Two- step glass transition induced by attractive interactions in quasi-two-dimensional suspensions of ellipsoidal parti- cles, Phys. Rev. Lett.110, 188301 (2013)

    work page 2013

  41. [41]

    Ollion, M

    J. Ollion, M. Maliet, C. Giuglaris, E. Vacher, and M. De- foret, Distnet2d: Leveraging long-range temporal infor- mation for efficient segmentation and tracking, PRX Life 2, 023004 (2024)

    work page 2024

  42. [42]

    L. M. C. Janssen, Active glasses, J. Phys.: Condens. Mat- ter31, 503002 (2019)

    work page 2019

  43. [43]

    Nishizawa, K

    K. Nishizawa, K. Fujiwara, M. Ikenaga, N. Nakajo, M. Yanagisawa, and D. Mizuno, Universal glass-forming behavior of in vitro and living cytoplasm, Sci. Rep.7, 15143 (2017)

    work page 2017

  44. [44]

    T. C. Boothby, H. Tapia, A. H. Brozena, S. Piszkiewicz, A. E. Smith, I. Giovannini, L. Rebecchi, G. J. Pielak, D. Koshland, and B. Goldstein, Tardigrades use intrinsi- cally disordered proteins to survive desiccation, Mol. Cell 65, 975 (2017). 7

    work page 2017

  45. [45]

    Doostmohammadi, J

    A. Doostmohammadi, J. Ign´ es-Mullol, J. M. Yeomans, and F. Sagu´ es, Active nematics, Nat. Commun.9, 3246 (2018)

    work page 2018

  46. [46]

    Doostmohammadi and B

    A. Doostmohammadi and B. Ladoux, Physics of liquid crystals in cell biology, Trends Cell Biol.32, 140 (2022)

    work page 2022

  47. [47]

    Maroudas-Sacks, L

    Y. Maroudas-Sacks, L. Garion, L. Shani-Zerbib, A. Livshits, E. Braun, and K. Keren, Topological defects in the nematic order of actin fibres as organization cen- tres of hydra morphogenesis, Nat. Phys.17, 251 (2021)

    work page 2021

  48. [48]

    Ravichandran, M

    Y. Ravichandran, M. Vogg, K. Kruse, D. J. G. Pearce, and A. Roux, Topology changes of hydra define actin orientation defects as organizers of morphogenesis, Sci. Adv.11, eadr9855 (2025)

    work page 2025

  49. [49]

    Doostmohammadi, S

    A. Doostmohammadi, S. P. Thampi, and J. M. Yeomans, Defect-mediated morphologies in growing cell colonies, Phys. Rev. Lett.117, 048102 (2016)

    work page 2016

  50. [50]

    Copenhagen, R

    K. Copenhagen, R. Alert, N. S. Wingreen, and J. W. Shaevitz, Topological defects promote layer formation in myxococcus xanthus colonies, Nat. Phys.17, 211 (2021)

    work page 2021

  51. [51]

    Drescher, J

    K. Drescher, J. Dunkel, C. D. Nadell, S. van Teeffelen, I. Grnja, N. S. Wingreen, H. A. Stone, and B. L. Bassler, Architectural transitions in vibrio cholerae biofilms at single-cell resolution, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA113, E2066 (2016)

    work page 2016

  52. [52]

    Hartmann, P

    R. Hartmann, P. K. Singh, P. Pearce, R. Mok, B. Song, F. D´ ıaz-Pascual, J. Dunkel, and K. Drescher, Emer- gence of three-dimensional order and structure in growing biofilms, Nat. Phys.15, 251 (2018)

    work page 2018

  53. [53]

    Zhang, J

    Q. Zhang, J. Li, J. Nijjer, H. Lu, M. Kothari, R. Alert, T. Cohen, and J. Yan, Morphogenesis and cell ordering in confined bacterial biofilms, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2107107118 (2021)

    work page 2021

  54. [54]

    Prasad, N

    M. Prasad, N. Obana, S.-Z. Lin, S. Zhao, K. Sakai, C. Blanch-Mercader, J. Prost, N. Nomura, J.-F. Rup- precht, J. Fattaccioli, and A. S. Utada, Alcanivorax borkumensis biofilms enhance oil degradation by inter- facial tubulation, Science381, 748 (2023)

    work page 2023

  55. [55]

    Giomi, M

    L. Giomi, M. J. Bowick, X. Ma, and M. C. Marchetti, Defect annihilation and proliferation in active nematics, Phys. Rev. Lett.110, 228101 (2013)

    work page 2013

  56. [56]

    Yokoyama and K

    F. Yokoyama and K. A. Takeuchi, Biofilm initiation via extracellular matrix production driven by cell orientation patterning in growing escherichia coli populations (2026), DOI:10.64898/2026.03.26.714369, bioRxiv

    work page doi:10.64898/2026.03.26.714369 2026

  57. [57]

    Kawaguchi, R

    K. Kawaguchi, R. Kageyama, and M. Sano, Topological defects control collective dynamics in neural progenitor cell cultures, Nature545, 327 (2017)

    work page 2017

  58. [58]

    P. W. Anderson, More is different, Science177, 393 (1972)

    work page 1972