pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.16157 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-17 · ✦ hep-ph · hep-ex· physics.ins-det

δ_(rm CP)-free constraints on NSI parameters varepsilon_(eμ) and varepsilon_(eτ) using high-purity ν_μ\,{rm CC} events at IceCube DeepCore

J Krishnamoorthi , Anil Kumar , Sanjib Kumar Agarwalla This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 08:22 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph hep-exphysics.ins-det
keywords non-standard interactionsNSIatmospheric neutrinosIceCube DeepCoreneutrino oscillationsCP phase degeneracy
0
0 comments X

The pith

High-purity muon neutrino events at IceCube DeepCore constrain non-standard interactions without CP phase dependence.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper uses a sample of atmospheric muon neutrino charged-current events collected over 7.5 years at IceCube DeepCore to search for non-standard neutrino interactions. Because these events mainly arise from the muon neutrino survival channel, the resulting limits on the NSI parameters ε_eμ and ε_eτ do not suffer from degeneracies with the CP-violating phase δ_CP that affect appearance-based measurements. The data is consistent with standard oscillations, yielding bounds on ε_eμ, ε_eτ, and ε_ee - ε_μμ that are comparable to existing constraints and serve as a complementary probe to long-baseline experiments.

Core claim

By selecting high-purity ν_μ CC events, which are dominated by the survival probability with little sensitivity to δ_CP, this work extracts constraints on the NSI parameters ε_eμ, ε_eτ, and ε_ee−ε_μμ that are independent of the unknown CP phase. The observed spectrum agrees with standard three-flavor oscillations, allowing the authors to set upper limits on these couplings.

What carries the argument

The high-purity selection of ν_μ charged-current events from atmospheric neutrinos, exploiting the δ_CP-insensitive survival channel P(ν_μ → ν_μ) to bound NSI effects in Earth matter.

If this is right

  • The derived limits provide a cross-check for NSI searches at accelerator-based long-baseline facilities where δ_CP is entangled.
  • Any future detection of NSI in this channel would indicate matter effects independent of oscillation phase.
  • These bounds can be incorporated into global fits to reduce allowed parameter space for NSI.
  • Improvements in event selection purity could further tighten the constraints without introducing δ_CP dependence.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Combining this δ_CP-free data with appearance measurements from other experiments could help disentangle NSI from CP violation in global analyses.
  • This method might extend to other atmospheric neutrino detectors like Super-Kamiokande or future ones to cross-validate the results.
  • The reliance on accurate modeling of atmospheric fluxes and Earth density suggests that improved geophysical data could strengthen the NSI bounds.

Load-bearing premise

The selected ν_μ CC events have negligible dependence on δ_CP and that the atmospheric neutrino flux, Earth density profile, and detector effects are modeled with sufficient accuracy to isolate any NSI signal.

What would settle it

Observation of a statistically significant deviation from standard oscillation predictions in the energy or zenith angle distribution of the high-purity ν_μ CC sample that is better explained by non-zero ε_eμ or ε_eτ, or conversely, if the limits weaken substantially when δ_CP is allowed to vary freely in the analysis.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.16157 by Anil Kumar, J Krishnamoorthi, Sanjib Kumar Agarwalla.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. The differences of the three-flavor neutrino oscillation [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. The differences of the three-flavor neutrino oscillation [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. The differences of the three-flavor neutrino oscillation [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Difference of expected event distributions between the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Difference of expected event distributions between the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Difference of expected event distributions between the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. The observed (solid curve) and expected (dashed [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. Constraints on the real-valued NSI parameters [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_10.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Atmospheric neutrinos provide a unique avenue to probe theories beyond the Standard Model (BSM) over a wide range of energies and path lengths. The theory of non-standard interactions (NSI) of neutrinos is one of the important BSM scenarios, which can modify flavor oscillations of atmospheric neutrinos traveling through the Earth. In this work, we use a high-purity $\nu_{\mu}$ charged-current (CC) sample of atmospheric neutrinos from IceCube DeepCore with a livetime of 7.5 years to search for the NSI parameters $\varepsilon_{e\mu}$, $\varepsilon_{e\tau}$, and $\varepsilon_{ee}-\varepsilon_{\mu\mu}$. The $\nu_{\mu}$ CC events mainly come from the $\nu_{\mu}$ survival channel having no significant dependence on $\delta_{\rm CP}$. Therefore, the constraints on $\varepsilon_{e\mu}$ and $\varepsilon_{e\tau}$ obtained using this $\nu_{\mu}$ CC sample are expected to be free from the $\delta_{\rm CP}$-degeneracy. The data sample is found to be in agreement with the standard neutrino interactions. Therefore, we place bounds on these NSI parameters that are consistent with and comparable to existing experimental constraints. These $\delta_{\rm CP}$-free constraints from IceCube DeepCore are complementary to those from the long-baseline neutrino oscillation experiments, where the appearance channel depends on $\delta_{\rm CP}$.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the assumption that standard three-flavor neutrino oscillations plus a known atmospheric flux and Earth matter profile accurately describe the data in the absence of NSI; the NSI parameters themselves are the quantities being constrained rather than free parameters fitted to produce the result.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Standard three-flavor neutrino oscillation framework with known mixing angles and mass-squared differences from prior global fits
    Invoked when predicting the expected ν_μ survival probability in the absence of NSI
  • domain assumption Atmospheric neutrino flux and detector response are modeled with uncertainties that can be marginalized over without introducing bias in the NSI limits
    Required to interpret the observed event rates as constraints on NSI rather than flux or detector mismodeling

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5593 in / 1285 out tokens · 67320 ms · 2026-05-10T08:22:57.307724+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

74 extracted references · 74 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Evidence for oscillation of atmospheric neutrinos

    Y. Fukudaet al.(Super-Kamiokande), Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 1562 (1998), arXiv:hep-ex/9807003

    work page Pith review arXiv 1998

  2. [2]

    Q. R. Ahmadet al.(SNO), Phys. Rev. Lett.87, 071301 (2001), arXiv:nucl-ex/0106015

    work page Pith review arXiv 2001

  3. [3]

    Q. R. Ahmadet al.(SNO), Phys. Rev. Lett.89, 011301 (2002), arXiv:nucl-ex/0204008

    work page Pith review arXiv 2002

  4. [4]

    Z. Maki, M. Nakagawa, and S. Sakata, Prog. Theor. Phys.28, 870 (1962)

    work page 1962

  5. [5]

    Pontecorvo, Zh

    B. Pontecorvo, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz.53, 1717 (1967)

    work page 1967

  6. [6]

    Navaset al.(Particle Data Group), Phys

    S. Navaset al.(Particle Data Group), Phys. Rev. D110, 030001 (2024)

    work page 2024

  7. [7]

    NuFit-6.0: Updated global analysis of three-flavor neutrino oscillations

    I. Esteban, M. C. Gonzalez-Garcia, M. Maltoni, I. Martinez-Soler, J. P. Pinheiro, and T. Schwetz, JHEP 12, 216 (2024), arXiv:2410.05380 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2024

  8. [8]

    Updated bounds on the (1,2) neutrino oscillation parameters after first JUNO results,

    F. Capozzi, E. Lisi, F. Marcone, A. Marrone, and A. Palazzo, (2025), arXiv:2511.21650 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  9. [9]

    Weinberg, Phys

    S. Weinberg, Phys. Rev. Lett.19, 1264 (1967)

    work page 1967

  10. [10]

    M. B. Gavela, D. Hernandez, T. Ota, and W. Winter, Phys. Rev. D79, 013007 (2009), arXiv:0809.3451 [hep- ph]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2009

  11. [11]

    Bischer and W

    I. Bischer and W. Rodejohann, Nucl. Phys. B947, 114746 (2019), arXiv:1905.08699 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2019

  12. [12]

    Valle, Phys

    J. Valle, Phys. Lett. B199, 432 (1987)

    work page 1987

  13. [13]

    Roulet, Phys

    E. Roulet, Phys. Rev. D44, R935 (1991)

    work page 1991

  14. [14]

    M. M. Guzzo, A. Masiero, and S. T. Petcov, Phys. Lett. B260, 154 (1991)

    work page 1991

  15. [15]

    M. M. Guzzo, H. Nunokawa, P. C. de Holanda, and O. L. G. Peres, Phys. Rev. D64, 097301 (2001), arXiv:hep-ph/0012089

    work page arXiv 2001

  16. [16]

    Huber and J

    P. Huber and J. W. F. Valle, Phys. Lett.B523, 151 (2001), arXiv:hep-ph/0108193 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2001

  17. [17]

    M. C. Gonzalez-Garcia and M. Maltoni, Phys. Rev. D 70, 033010 (2004), arXiv:hep-ph/0404085

    work page Pith review arXiv 2004

  18. [18]

    J. Kopp, M. Lindner, T. Ota, and J. Sato, Phys. Rev. D77, 013007 (2008), arXiv:0708.0152 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2008

  19. [19]

    General bounds on non-standard neutrino interactions

    C. Biggio, M. Blennow, and E. Fernandez-Martinez, JHEP08, 090 (2009), arXiv:0907.0097 [hep-ph]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2009

  20. [20]

    F. J. Escrihuela, M. Tortola, J. W. F. Valle, and O. G. Miranda, Phys. Rev. D83, 093002 (2011), arXiv:1103.1366 [hep-ph]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2011

  21. [21]

    M. C. Gonzalez-Garcia, M. Maltoni, and J. Salvado, JHEP05, 075 (2011), arXiv:1103.4365 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2011

  22. [22]

    S. K. Agarwalla, F. Lombardi, and T. Takeuchi, JHEP 12, 079 (2012), arXiv:1207.3492 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2012

  23. [23]

    Status of non-standard neutrino interactions

    T. Ohlsson, Rept. Prog. Phys.76, 044201 (2013), arXiv:1209.2710 [hep-ph]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2013

  24. [24]

    Esmaili and A

    A. Esmaili and A. Y. Smirnov, JHEP06, 026 (2013), arXiv:1304.1042 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2013

  25. [25]

    M. C. Gonzalez-Garcia and M. Maltoni, JHEP09, 152 (2013), arXiv:1307.3092 [hep-ph]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2013

  26. [26]

    Adamsonet al.(MINOS), Phys

    P. Adamsonet al.(MINOS), Phys. Rev. D88, 072011 (2013), arXiv:1303.5314 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2013

  27. [27]

    Chatterjee, P

    A. Chatterjee, P. Mehta, D. Choudhury, and R. Gandhi, Phys. Rev. D93, 093017 (2016), arXiv:1409.8472 [hep- ph]

    work page arXiv 2016

  28. [28]

    S. K. Agarwalla, P. Bagchi, D. V. Forero, and M. T´ ortola, JHEP07, 060 (2015), arXiv:1412.1064 [hep- ph]. 12 Parameters Best-fit values Nominal values Priors (1σ) εeµ εeτ εee −ε µµ Detector: DOM efficiency 1.062 1.064 1.053 1.0±0.1 Ice absorption 0.973 0.973 0.970 1.0 Unconstrained Ice scattering 0.988 0.989 0.990 1.05 Unconstrained Relative eff.p 0 −0.2...

    work page arXiv 2015

  29. [29]

    Mocioiu and W

    I. Mocioiu and W. Wright, Nucl. Phys. B893, 376 (2015), arXiv:1410.6193 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2015

  30. [30]

    O. G. Miranda and H. Nunokawa, New J. Phys.17, 095002 (2015), arXiv:1505.06254 [hep-ph]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2015

  31. [31]

    S. K. Agarwalla, Y. Kao, D. Saha, and T. Takeuchi, JHEP11, 035 (2015), arXiv:1506.08464 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2015

  32. [32]

    Neutrino Physics with Non-Standard Interactions at INO

    S. Choubey, A. Ghosh, T. Ohlsson, and D. Tiwari, JHEP 12, 126 (2015), arXiv:1507.02211 [hep-ph]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2015

  33. [33]

    S. K. Agarwalla, S. S. Chatterjee, and A. Palazzo, Phys. Lett. B762, 64 (2016), arXiv:1607.01745 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2016

  34. [34]

    Salvado, O

    J. Salvado, O. Mena, S. Palomares-Ruiz, and N. Rius, JHEP01, 141 (2017), arXiv:1609.03450 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2017

  35. [35]

    Neutrino oscillations and Non-Standard Interactions

    Y. Farzan and M. Tortola, Front.in Phys.6, 10 (2018), arXiv:1710.09360 [hep-ph]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2018

  36. [36]

    Curtailing the Dark Side in Non-Standard Neutrino Interactions

    P. Coloma, P. B. Denton, M. C. Gonzalez-Garcia, M. Maltoni, and T. Schwetz, JHEP04, 116 (2017), arXiv:1701.04828 [hep-ph]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2017

  37. [37]

    M. G. Aartsenet al.(IceCube), Phys. Rev. D97, 072009 (2018), arXiv:1709.07079 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2018

  38. [38]

    Esteban, M

    I. Esteban, M. C. Gonzalez-Garcia, M. Maltoni, I. Martinez-Soler, and J. Salvado, JHEP08, 180 (2018), [Addendum: JHEP 12, 152 (2020)], arXiv:1805.04530 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2018

  39. [39]

    S. K. Agarwallaet al.(Borexino), JHEP02, 038 (2020), arXiv:1905.03512 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2020

  40. [40]

    P. S. Bhupal Devet al., SciPost Phys. Proc.2, 001 (2019), arXiv:1907.00991 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2019

  41. [41]

    Khatun, S

    A. Khatun, S. S. Chatterjee, T. Thakore, and S. Ku- mar Agarwalla, Eur. Phys. J. C80, 533 (2020), arXiv:1907.02027 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2020

  42. [42]

    Kumar, A

    A. Kumar, A. Khatun, S. K. Agarwalla, and A. Dighe, JHEP04, 159 (2021), arXiv:2101.02607 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2021

  43. [43]

    S. K. Agarwalla, S. Das, M. Masud, and P. Swain, JHEP 11, 094 (2021), arXiv:2103.13431 [hep-ph]. 13

    work page arXiv 2021

  44. [44]

    Abbasiet al.(IceCube), Phys

    R. Abbasiet al.(IceCube), Phys. Rev. D104, 072006 (2021), arXiv:2106.07755 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2021

  45. [45]

    Abbasiet al.(IceCube), PoSEPS-HEP2021, 245 (2022)

    R. Abbasiet al.(IceCube), PoSEPS-HEP2021, 245 (2022)

    work page 2022

  46. [46]

    Krishnamoorthi, A

    J. Krishnamoorthi, A. K. Upadhyay, A. Ku- mar, and S. K. Agarwalla, JHEP2025(2025), 10.1007/jhep10(2025)213, arXiv:2507.02167 [hep-ph]

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep10(2025)213 2025

  47. [47]

    Coloma, M

    P. Coloma, M. C. Gonzalez-Garcia, M. Maltoni, J. P. Pinheiro, and S. Urrea, JHEP08, 032 (2023), arXiv:2305.07698 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2023

  48. [48]

    M. A. Aceroet al.(NOvA), Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 201802 (2024), arXiv:2403.07266 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2024

  49. [49]

    Aielloet al.(KM3NeT), JCAP02, 073, arXiv:2411.19078 [hep-ex]

    S. Aielloet al.(KM3NeT), JCAP02, 073 (2025), arXiv:2411.19078 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2025

  50. [50]

    Albertet al.(ANTARES), JHEP07, 048, arXiv:2112.14517 [hep-ex]

    A. Albertet al.(ANTARES), JHEP07, 048 (2022), arXiv:2112.14517 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2022

  51. [51]

    Abbasiet al.(IceCube), Phys

    R. Abbasiet al.(IceCube), Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 011804 (2022), arXiv:2201.03566 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2022

  52. [52]

    Study of Non-Standard Neutrino Interactions with Atmospheric Neutrino Data in Super-Kamiokande I and II

    G. Mitsukaet al.(Super-Kamiokande), Phys. Rev. D84, 113008 (2011), arXiv:1109.1889 [hep-ex]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2011

  53. [53]

    Jana and Y

    S. Jana and Y. Porto, JCAP03, 046 (2025), arXiv:2407.06251 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  54. [54]

    Krishnamoorthi, A

    J. Krishnamoorthi, A. Kumar, and S. K. Agarwalla, (2025), arXiv:2512.22632 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  55. [55]

    Replication Data for: Mea- surement of atmospheric neutrino mixing with improved IceCube DeepCore calibration and data processing,

    R. Abbasiet al.(IceCube), “Replication Data for: Mea- surement of atmospheric neutrino mixing with improved IceCube DeepCore calibration and data processing,” (2025)

    work page 2025

  56. [56]

    Abbasiet al.(IceCube), Phys

    R. Abbasiet al.(IceCube), Phys. Rev. D108, 012014 (2023), arXiv:2304.12236 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2023

  57. [57]

    A. M. Gago, H. Minakata, H. Nunokawa, S. Uchi- nami, and R. Zukanovich Funchal, JHEP01, 049 (2010), arXiv:0904.3360 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2010

  58. [58]

    J. Liao, D. Marfatia, and K. Whisnant, Phys. Rev. D 93, 093016 (2016), arXiv:1601.00927 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2016

  59. [59]

    Ge and A

    S.-F. Ge and A. Y. Smirnov, JHEP10, 138 (2016), arXiv:1607.08513 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2016

  60. [60]

    J. M. Hyde, Nucl. Phys. B949, 114804 (2019), arXiv:1806.09221 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2019

  61. [61]

    E. K. Akhmedov, R. Johansson, M. Lindner, T. Ohls- son, and T. Schwetz, JHEP04, 078 (2004), arXiv:hep- ph/0402175

    work page arXiv 2004

  62. [62]

    Opher, Astron

    R. Opher, Astron. Astrophys.37, 135 (1974)

    work page 1974

  63. [63]

    Langacker, J

    P. Langacker, J. P. Leveille, and J. Sheiman, Phys. Rev. D27, 1228 (1983)

    work page 1983

  64. [64]

    Perturbation Theory of Neutrino Oscillation with Nonstandard Neutrino Interactions

    T. Kikuchi, H. Minakata, and S. Uchinami, JHEP03, 114 (2009), arXiv:0809.3312 [hep-ph]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2009

  65. [65]

    M. G. Aartsenet al.(IceCube), JINST12, P03012 (2017), [Erratum: JINST 19, E05001 (2024)], arXiv:1612.05093 [astro-ph.IM]

    work page arXiv 2017

  66. [66]

    Abbasiet al.(IceCube), Astropart

    R. Abbasiet al.(IceCube), Astropart. Phys.35, 615 (2012), arXiv:1109.6096 [astro-ph.IM]

    work page arXiv 2012

  67. [67]

    M. G. Aartsenet al.(IceCube), Phys. Rev. D91, 072004 (2015), arXiv:1410.7227 [hep-ex]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2015

  68. [68]

    J. P. Y´ a˜ nez,Measurement of neutrino oscillations in atmospheric neutrinos with the IceCube DeepCore de- tector, Ph.D. thesis, Humboldt-Universit¨ at zu Berlin, Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Fakult¨ at I (2014)

    work page 2014

  69. [69]

    Terliuk,Measurement of atmospheric neutrino oscilla- tions and search for sterile neutrino mixing with IceCube DeepCore, Ph.D

    A. Terliuk,Measurement of atmospheric neutrino oscilla- tions and search for sterile neutrino mixing with IceCube DeepCore, Ph.D. thesis, Humboldt-Universit¨ at zu Berlin, Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Fakult¨ at I (2018)

    work page 2018

  70. [70]

    Abbasiet al.(IceCube), Eur

    R. Abbasiet al.(IceCube), Eur. Phys. J. C82, 807 (2022), arXiv:2203.02303 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2022

  71. [71]

    J. H. Friedman, Annals Statist.29, 1189 (2001)

    work page 2001

  72. [72]

    M. G. Aartsenet al.(IceCube), Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 071801 (2018), arXiv:1707.07081 [hep-ex]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2018

  73. [73]

    Esteban, M

    I. Esteban, M. C. Gonzalez-Garcia, M. Maltoni, T. Schwetz, and A. Zhou, JHEP09, 178 (2020), arXiv:2007.14792 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2020

  74. [74]

    M. G. Aartsenet al.(IceCube), Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 977, 164332 (2020), arXiv:1803.05390 [physics.data-an]

    work page arXiv 2020