pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.17033 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-18 · ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall · cond-mat.mtrl-sci· physics.app-ph· quant-ph

The origin and promise of transition metal dichalcogenide hosted single photon emitters for quantum technologies

Mayank Chhaperwal , Amartyaraj Kumar , Kausik Majumdar This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 06:32 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall cond-mat.mtrl-sciphysics.app-phquant-ph
keywords single photon emitterstransition metal dichalcogenidesquantum technologiesatomistic origindefect structurescharacterization methodologytwo-dimensional materials
0
0 comments X

The pith

Critical review of disputed atomic origins for single photon emitters in TMDCs clarifies their source and needed improvements for quantum use.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines the conflicting proposals for the atomic structures that produce single photon emission in monolayers of transition metal dichalcogenides. It compares these proposals against existing experimental reports and extracts performance trends across different figures of merit. A standardized characterization protocol is outlined to make future measurements more comparable. The review also maps current TMDC emitter capabilities against requirements in quantum communication, computing, and sensing, specifying the advances still required. A sympathetic reader would care because reliable, on-demand single photon sources are foundational to many quantum technologies, and settling the origin question in these atomically thin, readily fabricated materials could enable scalable device integration.

Core claim

The atomistic origin of single photon emitters in TMDCs is highly debated with contradicting proposals; a critical review of these proposals, trend analysis of figures of merit, and a proposed characterization methodology can elucidate their origin and streamline reporting for quantum technology adoption.

What carries the argument

Critical synthesis of atomistic proposals for the origin of single photon emission in TMDC monolayers, supported by statistical trend analysis of device performance metrics and a recommended characterization protocol.

Load-bearing premise

The published experimental data on TMDC-hosted single photon emitters is complete, consistent, and free of significant reporting biases, allowing a reliable critical synthesis.

What would settle it

A large-scale controlled experiment that systematically varies atomic defects in multiple TMDC materials and finds emission statistics that match none of the reviewed origin proposals, or a meta-analysis of additional papers that shows no reproducible performance trends across studies.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.17033 by Amartyaraj Kumar, Kausik Majumdar, Mayank Chhaperwal.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Schematic of the setup required to measure the second-order correlation function of the SPE. The black arrow shows the direction of the signal from the sample, which is spectrally filtered to pass only the SPE emission peak. The filtered signal then enters the dashed box, which is the HBT setup containing a 50:50 beam splitter and two SPADs at the two output arms of the beam splitter for the measurement of… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Compilation of various assignments of gap states associated with different defect centers as reported in the literature. |CB⟩, |V B⟩, and |d⟩ denote conduction band, valence band, and defect state, respectively. (a-d) Various assignments of the qualitative energy location of the gap states due to VSe center in literature - (a) [30, 70, 72, 74, 76, 79], (b) [67, 73], (c) [68, 77], (d) [71]. (e-g) Various as… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Role of tensile strain in relation to SPEs. (a) Tensile strain reduces the bandgap of WSe2 monolayer proportional to its magnitude, resulting in an energy well for the excitons. Excitons from other parts of the sample then funnel to the strain-induced energy minimum. (b) Conduction band of WSe2 monolayer moves down in energy with tensile strain, resulting in its hybridization with the defect state located … view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Reported values of fine structure splitting and g-factor for defect emitters at different energies in the literature. (a) Reported values of FSS are plotted against the respective g-factor values for multiple emitters in literature. Data from emitters with (without) strain engineering is shown in red (black) circles. The average value is calculated excluding zero values of FSS and g-factor. Histograms of t… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Fine structure splitting as a result of either anisotropic confinement or intervalley mixing. (a) An elliptical confinement potential is shown, which breaks the in￾plane x-y symmetry and splits the exciton peaks into two orthogonal linearly polarized peaks. Each of the two states can be written as the superposition of K and K′ valley excitons[104]. (b) SPE considered as a superposition of two intervalley d… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Analysis of various trends in the figures of merit for different SPE im￾plementations in literature. (a) The maximum emission rate is plotted against the year of publication for different SPE implementations. (b) Maximum emission rate is plotted against the respective g(2)(0) values reported for various SPE implementations. (c) The maximum emis￾sion rate is plotted against the respective lifetimes reported… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: An overview of QKD and QRNG using single photon emitters. (a) Schematic of a QKD experiment. The map shows the quantum channel spanning 18.1 km. A schematic of the experiment using optical components is also shown. Reproduced with permission from ref. [188]. Copyright 2024, under CC BY 4.0 license. (b) A simple implementation of a quantum random number generator by using one SPE, one beam splitter, and two… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Single photon emitters (SPEs) are integral parts of several quantum technology implementations. Over the past decade or so, monolayers of transition metal dichalcogenides (TMDCs) have emerged as one of the promising candidates for SPE platforms with attractive characteristics. To move ahead, it is necessary to understand the atomistic origin of SPEs in TMDCs - a topic which is highly debated with contradicting proposals. In this paper, we critically review these existing proposals to elucidate their origin. Further, we perform a critical trend analysis for different figures of merit of TMDC-based SPEs, and propose a characterization methodology to streamline the reporting process. Finally, we review several quantum technology implementations where solid state SPEs are being used, and identify the advancements required in TMDC-based SPEs for their successful adoption in these technologies.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript is a critical review of the highly debated atomistic origins of single-photon emitters (SPEs) hosted in transition metal dichalcogenide (TMDC) monolayers. It synthesizes conflicting proposals from the literature, performs a trend analysis of key figures of merit (e.g., brightness, purity, and stability), proposes a standardized characterization methodology to improve reporting consistency, and reviews quantum technology applications while identifying performance gaps for TMDC SPE adoption.

Significance. If the literature synthesis is robust, the work could help consolidate fragmented understanding of SPE origins in TMDCs and provide practical guidance for experimental standardization, which is a noted weakness in the field. The proposed characterization protocol directly addresses reproducibility issues, and the mapping to quantum technology requirements (e.g., for communication or sensing) offers a useful roadmap. These elements have the potential to streamline future research and accelerate technology transfer, provided the trend analysis accounts for experimental variability.

major comments (2)
  1. [Trend analysis section] Trend analysis section: The paper performs a critical trend analysis of figures of merit but does not describe explicit controls, normalization procedures, or exclusion criteria for confounding variables such as differing excitation wavelengths, substrate interactions, sample quality metrics, or inconsistent defect identification techniques across the compiled experimental reports. Without these, observed trends risk reflecting methodological heterogeneity rather than intrinsic atomistic physics, directly undermining the central claim that the review elucidates SPE origins.
  2. [Review of origin proposals] Review of origin proposals: While the manuscript critically reviews contradicting proposals for the atomistic origin of TMDC SPEs, it lacks a systematic comparison (e.g., a summary table or weighted evidence assessment) that maps specific experimental observables (such as temperature dependence, magnetic field response, or defect spectroscopy) to each proposed model. This omission makes it difficult to evaluate the relative strength of evidence and weakens the elucidation of origins.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The phrase 'over the past decade or so' is vague; specifying the exact literature search period, database used, or approximate number of papers reviewed would improve transparency and context for the synthesis.
  2. [Characterization methodology proposal] Characterization methodology proposal: The proposed protocol would be more actionable if presented as a concise checklist or flowchart rather than descriptive text, and if it included references to standard measurement techniques or example datasets.
  3. [Quantum technology implementations section] Quantum technology implementations section: Some cited performance targets for applications (e.g., indistinguishability thresholds) could be cross-referenced to specific TMDC FoM trends to make the 'advancements required' discussion more quantitative.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive and detailed comments, which identify opportunities to strengthen the methodological transparency of our trend analysis and the systematic presentation of evidence in our review of origin proposals. We address each major comment below and will incorporate the suggested improvements in the revised manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Trend analysis section] Trend analysis section: The paper performs a critical trend analysis of figures of merit but does not describe explicit controls, normalization procedures, or exclusion criteria for confounding variables such as differing excitation wavelengths, substrate interactions, sample quality metrics, or inconsistent defect identification techniques across the compiled experimental reports. Without these, observed trends risk reflecting methodological heterogeneity rather than intrinsic atomistic physics, directly undermining the central claim that the review elucidates SPE origins.

    Authors: We agree that greater transparency in data compilation is needed to support the robustness of the observed trends. In the revised manuscript, we will add a new subsection detailing our literature selection protocol, including explicit normalization procedures (e.g., scaling brightness values to account for excitation wavelength and collection efficiency differences), exclusion criteria (e.g., omitting reports lacking basic sample quality metrics or defect identification details), and discussion of how substrate and measurement variability were considered. These additions will clarify the distinction between methodological heterogeneity and intrinsic physics while preserving the central insights on SPE origins. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Review of origin proposals] Review of origin proposals: While the manuscript critically reviews contradicting proposals for the atomistic origin of TMDC SPEs, it lacks a systematic comparison (e.g., a summary table or weighted evidence assessment) that maps specific experimental observables (such as temperature dependence, magnetic field response, or defect spectroscopy) to each proposed model. This omission makes it difficult to evaluate the relative strength of evidence and weakens the elucidation of origins.

    Authors: We acknowledge the value of a more structured comparison. We will introduce a summary table in the revised manuscript that maps each proposed origin model to key experimental observables, including temperature dependence, magnetic field response, and defect spectroscopy signatures. The table will also include a qualitative weighting of evidence strength based on the number, consistency, and quality of supporting reports in the literature. This will enable readers to more readily assess the relative merits of competing models. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: literature review with no derivations or self-referential predictions

full rationale

The paper is a critical review synthesizing external literature on TMDC-hosted SPEs, with no equations, fitted parameters, predictions, or derivations present in the abstract or described structure. Central claims (elucidating origin via review, trend analysis of figures of merit, and proposing a characterization methodology) are framed as syntheses of cited prior work rather than reductions to the paper's own inputs. No self-citations are shown to be load-bearing for uniqueness theorems or ansatzes, and no renaming of known results or self-definitional loops appear. The analysis is self-contained against external benchmarks, consistent with the default expectation for non-circular review papers.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

As a review paper the central claims rest on the completeness and representativeness of the cited experimental literature plus the authors' interpretive synthesis; no new free parameters, axioms, or invented physical entities are introduced.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5461 in / 1135 out tokens · 50037 ms · 2026-05-10T06:32:25.968963+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

215 extracted references · 215 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Photonic Quantum Tech- nologies

    Jeremy L. O’Brien, Akira Furusawa, and Jelena Vuˇ ckovi´ c. “Photonic Quantum Tech- nologies”.Nature Photonics3.12 (2009), p. 687

    work page 2009

  2. [2]

    A Scheme for Efficient Quantum Computa- tion with Linear Optics

    E. Knill, R. Laflamme, and G. J. Milburn. “A Scheme for Efficient Quantum Computa- tion with Linear Optics”.Nature409.6816 (2001), p. 46

    work page 2001

  3. [3]

    A versatile single-photon-based quantum computing platform

    Nicolas Maring et al. “A versatile single-photon-based quantum computing platform”. Nature Photonics18.6 (2024), p. 603

    work page 2024

  4. [4]

    Pawe l Wyborski et al.Toward triggered generation of indistinguishable single-photons from MoTe2 quantum emitters. 2025

    work page 2025

  5. [5]

    Photonic quantum simulators

    Al´ an Aspuru-Guzik and Philip Walther. “Photonic quantum simulators”.Nature Physics 8.4 (2012), p. 285

    work page 2012

  6. [6]

    Boson Sampling with Single-Photon Fock States from a Bright Solid-State Source

    J. C. Loredo et al. “Boson Sampling with Single-Photon Fock States from a Bright Solid-State Source”.Physical Review Letters118.13 (2017), p. 130503

    work page 2017

  7. [7]

    Time-Bin-Encoded Boson Sampling with a Single-Photon Device

    Yu He et al. “Time-Bin-Encoded Boson Sampling with a Single-Photon Device”.Physical Review Letters118.19 (2017), p. 1. 39

    work page 2017

  8. [8]

    Toward Scalable Boson Sampling with Photon Loss

    Hui Wang et al. “Toward Scalable Boson Sampling with Photon Loss”.Physical Review Letters120.23 (2018), p. 1

    work page 2018

  9. [9]

    Boson Sampling with 20 Input Photons and a 60-Mode Interferometer in a 1014 -Dimensional Hilbert Space

    Hui Wang et al. “Boson Sampling with 20 Input Photons and a 60-Mode Interferometer in a 1014 -Dimensional Hilbert Space”.Physical Review Letters123.25 (2019), p. 250503

    work page 2019

  10. [10]

    Quantum cryptography: Public key distribu- tion and coin tossing

    Charles H. Bennett and Gilles Brassard. “Quantum cryptography: Public key distribu- tion and coin tossing”.Theoretical Computer Science. Theoretical Aspects of Quantum Cryptography – celebrating 30 years of BB84 560 (2014), p. 7

    work page 2014

  11. [11]

    Quantum cryptography based on Bell’s theorem

    Artur K. Ekert. “Quantum cryptography based on Bell’s theorem”.Physical Review Letters67.6 (1991), p. 661

    work page 1991

  12. [12]

    Single-emitter quantum key distribution over 175 km of fibre with optimised finite key rates

    Christopher L. Morrison et al. “Single-emitter quantum key distribution over 175 km of fibre with optimised finite key rates”.Nature Communications14.1 (2023), p. 3573

    work page 2023

  13. [13]

    Frederik Brooke Barnes et al.Decoy-state quantum key distribution over 227 km with a frequency-converted telecom single-photon source. 2025

    work page 2025

  14. [14]

    Site-Controlled Telecom-Wavelength Single-Photon Emitters in Atomically- Thin MoTe2

    Huan Zhao et al. “Site-Controlled Telecom-Wavelength Single-Photon Emitters in Atomically- Thin MoTe2”.Nature Communications12.1 (2021), p. 6753

    work page 2021

  15. [15]

    Quantum teleportation with dissimilar quantum dots over a hybrid quantum network

    Alessandro Laneve et al. “Quantum teleportation with dissimilar quantum dots over a hybrid quantum network”.Nature Communications16.1 (2025), p. 10028

    work page 2025

  16. [16]

    Telecom-wavelength quantum teleportation using frequency-converted photons from remote quantum dots

    Tim Strobel et al. “Telecom-wavelength quantum teleportation using frequency-converted photons from remote quantum dots”.Nature Communications16.1 (2025), p. 10027

    work page 2025

  17. [17]

    Quantum teleportation using highly coherent emission from telecom C-band quantum dots

    M. Anderson et al. “Quantum teleportation using highly coherent emission from telecom C-band quantum dots”.npj Quantum Information6.1 (2020), p. 14

    work page 2020

  18. [18]

    Single Photon Randomness based on a Defect Center in Diamond

    Xing Chen et al. “Single Photon Randomness based on a Defect Center in Diamond”. Scientific Reports9.1 (2019), p. 18474

    work page 2019

  19. [19]

    Single photon randomness originating from the symmetric dipole emission pattern of quantum emitters

    Michael Hoese et al. “Single photon randomness originating from the symmetric dipole emission pattern of quantum emitters”.Applied Physics Letters120.4 (2022), p. 044001

    work page 2022

  20. [20]

    Voltage-Controlled Quantum Light from an Atomically Thin Semiconductor

    Chitraleema Chakraborty et al. “Voltage-Controlled Quantum Light from an Atomically Thin Semiconductor”.Nature Nanotechnology10.6 (2015), p. 507. 40

    work page 2015

  21. [21]

    Single Quantum Emitters in Monolayer Semiconductors

    Yu-Ming He et al. “Single Quantum Emitters in Monolayer Semiconductors”.Nature Nanotechnology10.6 (2015), p. 497

    work page 2015

  22. [22]

    Single Photon Emitters in Exfoliated WSe 2 Structures

    M. Koperski et al. “Single Photon Emitters in Exfoliated WSe 2 Structures”.Nature Nanotechnology10.6 (2015), p. 503

    work page 2015

  23. [23]

    Optically Active Quantum Dots in Monolayer WSe 2

    Ajit Srivastava et al. “Optically Active Quantum Dots in Monolayer WSe 2”.Nature Nanotechnology10.6 (2015), p. 491

    work page 2015

  24. [24]

    Strain-Induced Spatial and Spectral Isolation of Quantum Emitters in Mono- and Bilayer WSe2

    S. Kumar, A. Kaczmarczyk, and B. D. Gerardot. “Strain-Induced Spatial and Spectral Isolation of Quantum Emitters in Mono- and Bilayer WSe2”.Nano Letters15.11 (2015), p. 7567

    work page 2015

  25. [25]

    Single Defect Light-Emitting Diode in a van Der Waals Het- erostructure

    Genevieve Clark et al. “Single Defect Light-Emitting Diode in a van Der Waals Het- erostructure”.Nano Letters16.6 (2016), p. 3944

    work page 2016

  26. [26]

    Electrically Pumped Single-Defect Light Emitters in WSe 2

    S Schwarz et al. “Electrically Pumped Single-Defect Light Emitters in WSe 2”.2D Ma- terials3.2 (2016), p. 025038

    work page 2016

  27. [27]

    Atomically Thin Quantum Light-Emitting Diodes

    Carmen Palacios-Berraquero et al. “Atomically Thin Quantum Light-Emitting Diodes”. Nature Communications7.1 (2016), p. 12978

    work page 2016

  28. [28]

    Large-Scale Quantum-Emitter Arrays in Atomically Thin Semiconductors

    Carmen Palacios-Berraquero et al. “Large-Scale Quantum-Emitter Arrays in Atomically Thin Semiconductors”.Nature Communications8.1 (2017), p. 15093

    work page 2017

  29. [29]

    Bright Single Photon Emitters with Enhanced Quantum Efficiency in a Two-Dimensional Semiconductor Coupled with Dielectric Nano-Antennas

    Luca Sortino et al. “Bright Single Photon Emitters with Enhanced Quantum Efficiency in a Two-Dimensional Semiconductor Coupled with Dielectric Nano-Antennas”.Nature Communications12.1 (2021), p. 6063

    work page 2021

  30. [30]

    Defect and Strain Engineering of Monolayer WSe 2 Enables Site- Controlled Single-Photon Emission up to 150 K

    Kamyar Parto et al. “Defect and Strain Engineering of Monolayer WSe 2 Enables Site- Controlled Single-Photon Emission up to 150 K”.Nature Communications12.1 (2021), p. 3585

    work page 2021

  31. [31]

    Deterministic Strain-Induced Arrays of Quantum Emitters in a Two-Dimensional Semiconductor

    Artur Branny et al. “Deterministic Strain-Induced Arrays of Quantum Emitters in a Two-Dimensional Semiconductor”.Nature Communications8.1 (2017), p. 15053

    work page 2017

  32. [32]

    Observation of Site-Controlled Localized Charged Excitons in CrI 3 /WSe 2 Heterostructures

    Arunabh Mukherjee et al. “Observation of Site-Controlled Localized Charged Excitons in CrI 3 /WSe 2 Heterostructures.”Nature Communications(2020). 41

    work page 2020

  33. [33]

    Radiative Enhancement of Single Quantum Emitters in WSe 2 Monolayers Using Site-Controlled Metallic Nanopillars

    Tao Cai et al. “Radiative Enhancement of Single Quantum Emitters in WSe 2 Monolayers Using Site-Controlled Metallic Nanopillars”.ACS Photonics5.9 (2018), p. 3466

    work page 2018

  34. [34]

    Single Photon Emission in WSe 2 up 160 K by Quantum Yield Control

    Yue Luo et al. “Single Photon Emission in WSe 2 up 160 K by Quantum Yield Control”. 2D Materials6.3 (2019), p. 035017

    work page 2019

  35. [35]

    Simultaneously Enhancing Brightness and Purity of WSe 2 Single Photon Emitter Using High-Aspect-Ratio Nanopillar Array on Metal

    Mayank Chhaperwal et al. “Simultaneously Enhancing Brightness and Purity of WSe 2 Single Photon Emitter Using High-Aspect-Ratio Nanopillar Array on Metal”.Nano Let- ters24.40 (2024), p. 12461

    work page 2024

  36. [36]

    Site-Controlled Quantum Emitters in Monolayer MoSe 2

    Leo Yu et al. “Site-Controlled Quantum Emitters in Monolayer MoSe 2”.Nano Letters 21.6 (2021), p. 2376

    work page 2021

  37. [37]

    Quantum Light Generation with Ultra-High Spatial Resolution in 2D Semiconductors via Ultra-Low Energy Electron Irradiation

    Ajit Kumar Dash et al. “Quantum Light Generation with Ultra-High Spatial Resolution in 2D Semiconductors via Ultra-Low Energy Electron Irradiation”.Advanced Functional Materials35.27 (2025), p. 2421684

    work page 2025

  38. [38]

    Gate-Switchable Arrays of Quantum Light Emitters in Con- tacted Monolayer MoS2 van Der Waals Heterodevices

    Alexander H¨ otger et al. “Gate-Switchable Arrays of Quantum Light Emitters in Con- tacted Monolayer MoS2 van Der Waals Heterodevices”.Nano Letters21.2 (2021), p. 1040

    work page 2021

  39. [39]

    Nb Impurity-Bound Excitons as Quantum Emitters in Monolayer WS 2

    Leyi Loh et al. “Nb Impurity-Bound Excitons as Quantum Emitters in Monolayer WS 2”. Nature Communications15.1 (2024), p. 10035

    work page 2024

  40. [40]

    Spatially Controlled Single Photon Emitters in hBN-Capped WS2 Domes

    Salvatore Cianci et al. “Spatially Controlled Single Photon Emitters in hBN-Capped WS2 Domes”.Advanced Optical Materials11.12 (2023), p. 2202953

    work page 2023

  41. [41]

    Tunable Emission from Localized Excitons Deterministically Positioned in Monolayerp–nJunctions

    Erik J. Lenferink et al. “Tunable Emission from Localized Excitons Deterministically Positioned in Monolayerp–nJunctions”.ACS Photonics9.9 (2022), p. 3067

    work page 2022

  42. [42]

    Electrically Driven Site-Controlled Single Photon Source

    Shi Guo et al. “Electrically Driven Site-Controlled Single Photon Source”.ACS Photon- ics10.8 (2023), p. 2549

    work page 2023

  43. [43]

    Electrically Driven Strain-Induced Deterministic Single-Photon Emit- ters in a van Der Waals Heterostructure

    Jae-Pil So et al. “Electrically Driven Strain-Induced Deterministic Single-Photon Emit- ters in a van Der Waals Heterostructure”.Science Advances7.43 (2021), eabj3176

    work page 2021

  44. [44]

    Electric Field Tuning of Strain-Induced Quantum Emitters in WSe2

    Arunabh Mukherjee et al. “Electric Field Tuning of Strain-Induced Quantum Emitters in WSe2”.AIP Advances10.7 (2020), p. 075310. 42

    work page 2020

  45. [45]

    Polarization Switching and Electrical Control of Interlayer Excitons in Two-Dimensional van Der Waals Heterostructures

    Alberto Ciarrocchi et al. “Polarization Switching and Electrical Control of Interlayer Excitons in Two-Dimensional van Der Waals Heterostructures”.Nature Photonics13.2 (2019), p. 131

    work page 2019

  46. [46]

    Strain-Tunable Single-Photon Source Based on a Circular Bragg Grating Cavity with Embedded Quantum Dots

    Magdalena Mocza la-Dusanowska et al. “Strain-Tunable Single-Photon Source Based on a Circular Bragg Grating Cavity with Embedded Quantum Dots”.ACS Photonics7.12 (2020), p. 3474

    work page 2020

  47. [47]

    Deterministically fabricated spectrally-tunable quantum dot based single-photon source

    Marco Schmidt et al. “Deterministically fabricated spectrally-tunable quantum dot based single-photon source”. EN.Optical Materials Express10.1 (2020), p. 76

    work page 2020

  48. [48]

    Tunable quantum dots in monolithic Fabry-Perot microcavities for high-performance single-photon sources

    Jiawei Yang et al. “Tunable quantum dots in monolithic Fabry-Perot microcavities for high-performance single-photon sources”. en.Light: Science & Applications13.1 (2024), p. 33

    work page 2024

  49. [49]

    Microcavity Enhanced Single Photon Emission from Two-Dimensional WSe2

    L. C. Flatten et al. “Microcavity Enhanced Single Photon Emission from Two-Dimensional WSe2”.Applied Physics Letters112.19 (2018), p. 191105

    work page 2018

  50. [50]

    Monolayer-Based Single-Photon Source in a Liquid-Helium- Free Open Cavity Featuring 65% Brightness and Quantum Coherence

    Jens-Christian Drawer et al. “Monolayer-Based Single-Photon Source in a Liquid-Helium- Free Open Cavity Featuring 65% Brightness and Quantum Coherence”.Nano Letters 23.18 (2023), p. 8683

    work page 2023

  51. [51]

    Purcell-Enhanced Single Photon Source Based on a Deterministically Placed WSe2 Monolayer Quantum Dot in a Circular Bragg Grating Cavity

    Oliver Iff et al. “Purcell-Enhanced Single Photon Source Based on a Deterministically Placed WSe2 Monolayer Quantum Dot in a Circular Bragg Grating Cavity”.Nano Let- ters21.11 (2021), p. 4715

    work page 2021

  52. [52]

    Purcell Enhancement and Polar- ization Control of Single-Photon Emitters in Monolayer WSe 2 Using Dielectric Nanoan- tennas

    Shaimaa I Azzam, Kamyar Parto, and Galan Moody. “Purcell Enhancement and Polar- ization Control of Single-Photon Emitters in Monolayer WSe 2 Using Dielectric Nanoan- tennas”.Nanophotonics12.3 (2023), p. 477

    work page 2023

  53. [53]

    Deterministic Coupling of Site-Controlled Quantum Emitters in Mono- layer WSe2 to Plasmonic Nanocavities

    Yue Luo et al. “Deterministic Coupling of Site-Controlled Quantum Emitters in Mono- layer WSe2 to Plasmonic Nanocavities”.Nature Nanotechnology13.12 (2018), p. 1137

    work page 2018

  54. [54]

    Polarization Control of Deterministic Single-Photon Emitters in Mono- layer WSe2

    Jae-Pil So et al. “Polarization Control of Deterministic Single-Photon Emitters in Mono- layer WSe2”.Nano Letters21.3 (2021), p. 1546

    work page 2021

  55. [55]

    Integration of Single Photon Emitters in 2D Layered Materials with a Silicon Nitride Photonic Chip

    Fr´ ed´ eric Peyskens et al. “Integration of Single Photon Emitters in 2D Layered Materials with a Silicon Nitride Photonic Chip”.Nature Communications10.1 (2019), p. 4435. 43

    work page 2019

  56. [56]

    Engineering the Impact of Phonon Dephasing on the Co- herence of a${\mathrm{WSe}} {2}$Single-Photon Source via Cavity Quantum Elec- trodynamics

    Victor N. Mitryakhin et al. “Engineering the Impact of Phonon Dephasing on the Co- herence of a${\mathrm{WSe}} {2}$Single-Photon Source via Cavity Quantum Elec- trodynamics”.Physical Review Letters132.20 (2024), p. 206903

    work page 2024

  57. [57]

    Interfacing Single Photons and Single Quantum Dots with Photonic Nanostructures

    Peter Lodahl, Sahand Mahmoodian, and Soren Stobbe. “Interfacing Single Photons and Single Quantum Dots with Photonic Nanostructures”.Reviews of Modern Physics87.2 (2015), p. 347

    work page 2015

  58. [58]

    Deterministic Coupling of a Single Nitrogen Vacancy Center to a Photonic Crystal Cavity

    Dirk Englund et al. “Deterministic Coupling of a Single Nitrogen Vacancy Center to a Photonic Crystal Cavity”.Nano Letters10.10 (2010), p. 3922

    work page 2010

  59. [59]

    Quantum Photon Sources in WSe 2 Monolay- ers Induced by Weakly Localized Strain Fields

    Xinxin Li, Wei Wang, and Xuedan Ma. “Quantum Photon Sources in WSe 2 Monolay- ers Induced by Weakly Localized Strain Fields”.The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 126.47 (2022), p. 20057

    work page 2022

  60. [60]

    High-Performance Semiconduc- tor Quantum-Dot Single-Photon Sources

    Pascale Senellart, Glenn Solomon, and Andrew White. “High-Performance Semiconduc- tor Quantum-Dot Single-Photon Sources”.Nature Nanotechnology12.11 (2017), p. 1026

    work page 2017

  61. [61]

    Broadband Enhancement and High Extraction Efficiency from Single Quantum Dots Embedded in Microlenses Coupled with a Gold Mirror

    Hanqing Liu et al. “Broadband Enhancement and High Extraction Efficiency from Single Quantum Dots Embedded in Microlenses Coupled with a Gold Mirror”.Applied Physics Letters124.4 (2024), p. 041102

    work page 2024

  62. [62]

    Strongly Enhanced Photon Collection from Diamond Defect Cen- ters under Microfabricated Integrated Solid Immersion Lenses

    J. P. Hadden et al. “Strongly Enhanced Photon Collection from Diamond Defect Cen- ters under Microfabricated Integrated Solid Immersion Lenses”.Applied Physics Letters 97.24 (2010), p. 241901

    work page 2010

  63. [63]

    Room Temperature Stable Single-Photon Source

    A. Beveratos et al. “Room Temperature Stable Single-Photon Source”.The European Physical Journal D - Atomic, Molecular, Optical and Plasma Physics18.2 (2002), p. 191

    work page 2002

  64. [64]

    Efficient Extraction of Light from a Nitrogen-Vacancy Center in a Diamond Parabolic Reflector

    Noel H. Wan et al. “Efficient Extraction of Light from a Nitrogen-Vacancy Center in a Diamond Parabolic Reflector”.Nano Letters18.5 (2018), p. 2787

    work page 2018

  65. [65]

    Efficient Photon Detection from Color Centers in a Diamond Optical Waveguide

    D. Le Sage et al. “Efficient Photon Detection from Color Centers in a Diamond Optical Waveguide”.Physical Review B85.12 (2012), p. 121202

    work page 2012

  66. [66]

    Point Defects and Localized Excitons in 2D WSe 2

    Yu Jie Zheng et al. “Point Defects and Localized Excitons in 2D WSe 2”.ACS Nano13.5 (2019), p. 6050. 44

    work page 2019

  67. [67]

    Defect-Mediated Charge-Carrier Trapping and Nonra- diative Recombination in WSe2 Monolayers

    Lesheng Li and Emily A. Carter. “Defect-Mediated Charge-Carrier Trapping and Nonra- diative Recombination in WSe2 Monolayers”.Journal of the American Chemical Society 141.26 (2019), p. 10451

    work page 2019

  68. [68]

    Spectroscopic Studies of Atomic Defects and Bandgap Renor- malization in Semiconducting Monolayer Transition Metal Dichalcogenides

    Tae Young Jeong et al. “Spectroscopic Studies of Atomic Defects and Bandgap Renor- malization in Semiconducting Monolayer Transition Metal Dichalcogenides”.Nature Communications10.1 (2019), p. 3825

    work page 2019

  69. [69]

    Defect Activated Photoluminescence in WSe 2 Monolayer

    Zhangting Wu et al. “Defect Activated Photoluminescence in WSe 2 Monolayer”.The Journal of Physical Chemistry C121.22 (2017), p. 12294

    work page 2017

  70. [70]

    Localized Intervalley Defect Excitons as Single-Photon Emitters in WSe2

    Lukas Linhart et al. “Localized Intervalley Defect Excitons as Single-Photon Emitters in WSe2”.Physical Review Letters123.14 (2019), p. 146401

    work page 2019

  71. [71]

    Chemomechanical Modification of Quantum Emission in Monolayer WSe2

    M. Iqbal Bakti Utama et al. “Chemomechanical Modification of Quantum Emission in Monolayer WSe2”.Nature Communications14.1 (2023), p. 2193

    work page 2023

  72. [72]

    Modulation of Single Photon Emission from Suspended 1L WSe2 under Electrostatically Induced Strain

    Frances Camille M. Wu et al. “Modulation of Single Photon Emission from Suspended 1L WSe2 under Electrostatically Induced Strain”.Nano Letters25.27 (2025), p. 10983

    work page 2025

  73. [73]

    Photoluminescence Imaging of Single Photon Emitters within Nanoscale Strain Profiles in Monolayer WSe 2

    Artem N. Abramov et al. “Photoluminescence Imaging of Single Photon Emitters within Nanoscale Strain Profiles in Monolayer WSe 2”.Nature Communications14.1 (2023), p. 5737

    work page 2023

  74. [74]

    Probing the Nature of Single-Photon Emitters in a WSe 2 Monolayer by Magneto-Photoluminescence Spectroscopy

    Caique Serati De Brito et al. “Probing the Nature of Single-Photon Emitters in a WSe 2 Monolayer by Magneto-Photoluminescence Spectroscopy”.Nano Letters24.42 (2024), p. 13300

    work page 2024

  75. [75]

    Strain Activation of Localized States in WSe 2

    O˘ guzhan Y¨ ucel et al. “Strain Activation of Localized States in WSe 2”.2D Materials 12.3 (2025), p. 035006

    work page 2025

  76. [76]

    Microsecond Valley Lifetime of Defect-Bound Excitons in Monolayer WSe2

    Galan Moody et al. “Microsecond Valley Lifetime of Defect-Bound Excitons in Monolayer WSe2”.Physical Review Letters121.5 (2018), p. 057403

    work page 2018

  77. [77]

    Defect Creation in WSe 2 with a Microsecond Photoluminescence Lifetime by Focused Ion Beam Irradiation

    Qingkai Qian et al. “Defect Creation in WSe 2 with a Microsecond Photoluminescence Lifetime by Focused Ion Beam Irradiation”.Nanoscale12.3 (2020), p. 2047

    work page 2020

  78. [78]

    Gate-Tunable Magnetism via Resonant Se-Vacancy Levels in WSe2

    Tuan Dung Nguyen et al. “Gate-Tunable Magnetism via Resonant Se-Vacancy Levels in WSe2”.Advanced Science8.24 (2021), p. 2102911. 45

    work page 2021

  79. [79]

    Strain Control of Hybridization between Dark and Lo- calized Excitons in a 2D Semiconductor

    Pablo Hern´ andez L´ opez et al. “Strain Control of Hybridization between Dark and Lo- calized Excitons in a 2D Semiconductor”.Nature Communications13.1 (2022), p. 7691

    work page 2022

  80. [80]

    Defect Structure of Localized Excitons in a WSe 2 Monolayer

    Shuai Zhang et al. “Defect Structure of Localized Excitons in a WSe 2 Monolayer”. Physical Review Letters119.4 (2017), p. 046101

    work page 2017

Showing first 80 references.