pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.21158 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-22 · 🪐 quant-ph · cond-mat.mes-hall· physics.chem-ph· physics.optics

Multidimensional semiclassical single- and double-quantum spectroscopy of anharmonic molecular polaritons

Michael Reitz , Harsh Bhakta , Wei Xiong , Joel Yuen-Zhou This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-09 23:43 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph cond-mat.mes-hallphysics.chem-phphysics.optics
keywords molecular polaritonssemiclassical spectroscopyanharmonicitiestwo-dimensional spectroscopyvibrational polaritonsphase cyclingnonlinear signallight-matter coupling
0
0 comments X

The pith

A semiclassical method constructs phase-cycled 2D single- and double-quantum spectra of anharmonic molecular polaritons from nonlinear signals.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops a semiclassical approach that evolves the molecular Hamiltonian and cavity field for many molecules coupled to a photonic mode. This expansion in field amplitudes and phases lets the authors build phase-resolved 2D spectra by isolating specific nonlinear pathways through phase cycling. The method matches measured single-quantum spectra and accounts for the polariton bleach observed at short waiting times. It also shows how double-quantum signals directly reveal different anharmonicities in the double-excitation manifold. A reader would value this because it gives a practical route to interpret and design experiments on strongly coupled light-matter systems.

Core claim

By systematically expanding the response in amplitudes and phases of the input fields, the semiclassical evolution in the large-N limit enables a transparent construction of phase-cycled two-dimensional single- and double-quantum polariton spectra from the underlying nonlinear signal components. Phase cycling isolates the contributing nonlinear pathways in Liouville space and serves as an analogue of phase matching. This framework explains the polariton bleach effect at short waiting times and lets various anharmonicities be probed through double-quantum coherence spectroscopy.

What carries the argument

Semiclassical evolution of the molecular Hamiltonian and cavity field in the large-N limit, with phase cycling isolating Liouville-space pathways.

If this is right

  • The spectra explain the polariton bleach effect observed at short waiting times.
  • Double-quantum coherence spectroscopy directly probes the imprint of various anharmonicities on the double-excitation manifold.
  • The approach supplies a practical framework for modeling nonlinear spectroscopic experiments on strongly coupled light-matter platforms.
  • Results can guide the design of cavity-enhanced molecular platforms.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The method could be tested on electronic polaritons or other light-matter hybrids beyond vibrational cases.
  • It may simplify calculations for systems near the large-N boundary or with modified cavity geometries.
  • Predicted double-quantum signals offer a concrete target for new experiments to confirm anharmonic signatures.

Load-bearing premise

The semiclassical evolution of the molecular Hamiltonian and cavity field in the large-N limit accurately describes anharmonic molecular polaritons and phase cycling isolates the relevant nonlinear pathways.

What would settle it

If computed single-quantum spectra fail to reproduce the experimentally observed polariton bleach at short waiting times, or if double-quantum features do not match measured anharmonic imprints, the central claim would be falsified.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.21158 by Harsh Bhakta, Joel Yuen-Zhou, Michael Reitz, Wei Xiong.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Schematics. An infrared optical cavity containing an [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Overview of the semiclassical perturbative method for multidimensional cavity spectroscopy. (a) Factorizability of light [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Feynman diagrams for the cavity (left) and molecular [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Schematic procedure to obtain phase-cycled 2D cav [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Comparison between (a) theoretical and (b) exper [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Comparison between (a) theoretical and (b) experi [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. 2QC spectra as extracted from the phase combination Φ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Vertical cuts of the 2QC spectra in Fig. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. 2QC spectra as extracted from the phase combination Φ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. Vertical cuts of the 2QC spectra in Fig. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_10.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We present a general and efficient approach to compute phase-resolved multidimensional spectra of anharmonic molecular polaritons, based on a semiclassical evolution of the molecular Hamiltonian and cavity field in the large-$\mathcal{N}$ limit of many molecules coupled to a confined photonic mode. By systematically expanding the response in both amplitudes and phases of the input fields, our method enables a transparent and computationally simple construction of phase-cycled two-dimensional single- and double-quantum polariton spectra from the underlying nonlinear signal components. Here, phase cycling acts as an analogue of phase matching with oblique pulses, allowing for the isolation of the contributing nonlinear pathways in Liouville space. We specialize to vibrational polaritons and benchmark the method through direct comparison with experimentally measured single-quantum spectra, providing an explanation for the longstanding puzzle of the polariton bleach effect observed at short waiting times. Further, we show how the imprint of various types of anharmonicities on the double-excitation manifold can be directly probed and analyzed through double-quantum coherence spectroscopy. Taken together, our results establish a practical and powerful framework for the modeling and interpretation of nonlinear spectroscopic experiments on strongly coupled light-matter platforms and for guiding the design of cavity-enhanced molecular platforms.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents a semiclassical method for computing phase-resolved multidimensional spectra of anharmonic molecular polaritons in the large-N limit. It expands the nonlinear response in field amplitudes and phases, employs phase cycling to isolate Liouville pathways, and constructs 2D single- and double-quantum spectra. The approach is benchmarked against experimental single-quantum spectra to explain the short-time polariton bleach effect and is used to analyze how different anharmonicities imprint on the double-excitation manifold.

Significance. If the large-N semiclassical approximation holds, the work supplies a computationally simple and transparent framework for modeling nonlinear spectra in cavity-molecule systems. The experimental benchmarking for single-quantum spectra and the explicit construction of phase-cycled signals are concrete strengths that could help interpret polariton experiments and guide cavity-enhanced molecular design.

major comments (2)
  1. The extension of the semiclassical large-N trajectories to double-quantum spectra (as described in the abstract and results) assumes that classical-like evolution captures anharmonicity-induced shifts and couplings in the double-excitation manifold. This is load-bearing for the claim that double-quantum coherence spectroscopy can directly probe anharmonicity types, yet the manuscript provides no finite-N quantum benchmarks or discussion of potential missing non-classical correlations that could alter the predicted imprints.
  2. The explanation of the polariton bleach at short waiting times rests on the single-quantum benchmarking. The manuscript should clarify in the methods or results whether the semiclassical evolution reproduces the observed dynamics without post-hoc parameter adjustments, as this directly supports the central validation of the approach.
minor comments (1)
  1. The abstract could more explicitly separate the experimentally benchmarked single-quantum results from the prospective double-quantum analysis to avoid implying equal validation for both.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive comments and positive assessment of our work. We address each major comment point by point below, with revisions incorporated where they strengthen the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The extension of the semiclassical large-N trajectories to double-quantum spectra (as described in the abstract and results) assumes that classical-like evolution captures anharmonicity-induced shifts and couplings in the double-excitation manifold. This is load-bearing for the claim that double-quantum coherence spectroscopy can directly probe anharmonicity types, yet the manuscript provides no finite-N quantum benchmarks or discussion of potential missing non-classical correlations that could alter the predicted imprints.

    Authors: We agree that finite-N quantum benchmarks would be valuable for further validation. In the large-N limit central to our approach, mean-field interactions dominate and non-classical correlations are suppressed, allowing the semiclassical trajectories to capture the leading anharmonic shifts and couplings. We have added a dedicated paragraph in the revised Discussion section that addresses the validity of this approximation, including a qualitative analysis of how residual non-classical correlations at finite N might influence the double-excitation manifold and the resulting spectral imprints. revision: partial

  2. Referee: The explanation of the polariton bleach at short waiting times rests on the single-quantum benchmarking. The manuscript should clarify in the methods or results whether the semiclassical evolution reproduces the observed dynamics without post-hoc parameter adjustments, as this directly supports the central validation of the approach.

    Authors: We appreciate the request for explicit clarification. The benchmarking was performed using cavity and molecular parameters taken directly from the experimental literature and conditions, with no adjustments made to reproduce the short-time bleach dynamics. We have revised the Methods section to state this explicitly and added a confirming sentence in the Results section. This revision underscores that the polariton bleach emerges naturally from the semiclassical evolution. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation relies on external benchmarking and standard approximations

full rationale

The paper's central method expands the nonlinear response function via semiclassical trajectories of the molecular Hamiltonian plus cavity field in the large-N limit, then applies phase cycling to isolate Liouville-space pathways for constructing 2D single- and double-quantum spectra. Single-quantum results are benchmarked directly against experimental measurements to explain the short-time polariton bleach effect, while double-quantum spectra are presented as predictions of anharmonicity imprints. No equations or steps reduce by construction to fitted inputs, self-definitions, or self-citation chains; the large-N semiclassical ansatz is an explicit modeling choice with stated assumptions, not derived from the target spectra. The approach is self-contained against external data and does not rename known results or import uniqueness via author citations.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 3 axioms · 0 invented entities

The method relies on standard approximations in quantum optics and molecular spectroscopy without introducing new free parameters or entities in the abstract description.

axioms (3)
  • domain assumption Semiclassical evolution of the molecular Hamiltonian and cavity field
    Basis for the computation in the large-N limit
  • domain assumption Large-N limit of many molecules coupled to a confined photonic mode
    Enables the semiclassical treatment
  • domain assumption Phase cycling isolates contributing nonlinear pathways in Liouville space
    Allows construction of spectra from signal components

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5532 in / 1542 out tokens · 68570 ms · 2026-05-09T23:43:38.011353+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

108 extracted references · 108 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Multidimensional femtosecond correlation spectroscopies of electronic and vibrational excitations,

    S. Mukamel, “Multidimensional femtosecond correlation spectroscopies of electronic and vibrational excitations,” Ann. Rev. Phys. Chem.51, 691–729 (2000). 13

    work page 2000

  2. [2]

    Signatures of vibrational interactions in coherent two-dimensional infrared spec- troscopy,

    M. Khalil and A. Tokmakoff, “Signatures of vibrational interactions in coherent two-dimensional infrared spec- troscopy,” Chem. Phys.266, 213–230 (2001)

    work page 2001

  3. [3]

    Two-dimensional femtosecond spec- troscopy,

    D. M. Jonas, “Two-dimensional femtosecond spec- troscopy,” Ann. Rev. Phys. Chem.54, 425–463 (2003)

    work page 2003

  4. [4]

    Cross-peak- specific two-dimensional electronic spectroscopy,

    E. L. Read, G. S. Engel, T. R. Calhoun, T. Manˇ cal, T. K. Ahn, R. E. Blankenship, and G. R. Fleming, “Cross-peak- specific two-dimensional electronic spectroscopy,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA104, 14203–14208 (2007)

    work page 2007

  5. [5]

    Two-dimensional spectroscopy at infrared and optical frequencies,

    R. M. Hochstrasser, “Two-dimensional spectroscopy at infrared and optical frequencies,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA104, 14190–14196 (2007)

    work page 2007

  6. [6]

    Two- dimensional electronic double-quantum coherence spec- troscopy,

    J. Kim, S. Mukamel, and G. D. Scholes, “Two- dimensional electronic double-quantum coherence spec- troscopy,” Acc. Chem. Res.42, 1375–1384 (2009)

    work page 2009

  7. [7]

    Ultrafast spectroscopy: State of the art and open challenges,

    M. Maiuri, M. Garavelli, and G. Cerullo, “Ultrafast spectroscopy: State of the art and open challenges,” J. Am. Chem. Soc.142, 3–15 (2020)

    work page 2020

  8. [8]

    Hamm and M

    P. Hamm and M. Zanni,Concepts and Methods of 2D In- frared Spectroscopy(Cambridge University Press, 2011)

    work page 2011

  9. [9]

    Yuen-Zhou, J

    J. Yuen-Zhou, J. J. Krich, I. Kassal, A. S. Johnson, and A. Aspuru-Guzik,Ultrafast Spectroscopy, 2053-2563 (IOP Publishing, 2014)

    work page 2053

  10. [10]

    R. R. Ernst, G. Bodenhausen, and A. Wokaun,Princi- ples of Nuclear Magnetic Resonance in One and Two Dimensions(Oxford University Press, 1990)

    work page 1990

  11. [11]

    Two-dimensional fem- tosecond vibrational spectroscopy of liquids,

    Y. Tanimura and S. Mukamel, “Two-dimensional fem- tosecond vibrational spectroscopy of liquids,” J. Chem. Phys.99, 9496–9511 (1993)

    work page 1993

  12. [12]

    Two-dimensional electronic spectroscopy,

    J. D. Hybl, A. W. Albrecht, S. M. Gallagher Faeder, and D. M. Jonas, “Two-dimensional electronic spectroscopy,” Chem. Phys. Lett.297, 307–313 (1998)

    work page 1998

  13. [13]

    Optical analogs of 2D NMR,

    D. M. Jonas, “Optical analogs of 2D NMR,” Science 300, 1515–1517 (2003)

    work page 2003

  14. [14]

    Two-dimensional spec- troscopy of electronic couplings in photosynthesis,

    T. Brixner, J. Stenger, H. M. Vaswani, M. Cho, R. E. Blankenship, and G. R. Fleming, “Two-dimensional spec- troscopy of electronic couplings in photosynthesis,” Na- ture434, 625–628 (2005)

    work page 2005

  15. [15]

    Femtosecond x-ray spectroscopy of an electro- cyclic ring-opening reaction,

    A. R. Attar, A. Bhattacherjee, C. D. Pemmaraju, K. Schnorr, K. D. Closser, D. Prendergast, and S. R. Leone, “Femtosecond x-ray spectroscopy of an electro- cyclic ring-opening reaction,” Science356, 54–59 (2017)

    work page 2017

  16. [16]

    Ultrafast hydrogen-bond dynamics in the infrared spectroscopy of water,

    C. J. Fecko, J. D. Eaves, J. J. Loparo, A. Tokmakoff, and P. L. Geissler, “Ultrafast hydrogen-bond dynamics in the infrared spectroscopy of water,” Science301, 1698–1702 (2003)

    work page 2003

  17. [17]

    Ultrafast 2D IR vibrational echo spectroscopy,

    J. Zheng, K. Kwak, and M. D. Fayer, “Ultrafast 2D IR vibrational echo spectroscopy,”Acc. Chem. Res., Acc. Chem. Res. , 75–83

    work page

  18. [18]

    Structure of the amide I band of peptides measured by femtosecond nonlinear-infrared spectroscopy,

    P. Hamm, M. Lim, and R. M. Hochstrasser, “Structure of the amide I band of peptides measured by femtosecond nonlinear-infrared spectroscopy,” J. Phys. Chem. B102, 6123–6138 (1998)

    work page 1998

  19. [19]

    Transient 2D IR spectroscopy of ubiquitin unfolding dynamics,

    H. S. Chung, Z. Ganim, K. C. Jones, and A. Tokmakoff, “Transient 2D IR spectroscopy of ubiquitin unfolding dynamics,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA104, 14237– 14242 (2007)

    work page 2007

  20. [20]

    Ultrafast dynamics evidence of strong coupling superconductivity in LaH10±δ,

    Y. L. Wu, X. H. Yu, J. Z. L. Hasaien, F. Hong, P. F. Shan, Z. Y. Tian, Y. N. Zhai, J. P. Hu, J. G. Cheng, and J. Zhao, “Ultrafast dynamics evidence of strong coupling superconductivity in LaH10±δ,” Nat. Commun.15, 9683 (2024)

    work page 2024

  21. [21]

    Principles of two-dimensional terahertz spec- troscopy of collective excitations: The case of Josephson plasmons in layered superconductors,

    A. G´ omez Salvador, P. E. Dolgirev, M. H. Michael, A. Liu, D. Pavicevic, M. Fechner, A. Cavalleri, and E. Demler, “Principles of two-dimensional terahertz spec- troscopy of collective excitations: The case of Josephson plasmons in layered superconductors,” Phys. Rev. B110, 094514 (2024)

    work page 2024

  22. [22]

    Observation of the coupled exciton-photon mode split- ting in a semiconductor quantum microcavity,

    C. Weisbuch, M. Nishioka, A. Ishikawa, and Y. Arakawa, “Observation of the coupled exciton-photon mode split- ting in a semiconductor quantum microcavity,” Phys. Rev. Lett.69, 3314–3317 (1992)

    work page 1992

  23. [23]

    Exciton– polariton condensates,

    T. Byrnes, N. Y. Kim, and Y. Yamamoto, “Exciton– polariton condensates,” Nat. Phys.10, 803–813 (2014)

    work page 2014

  24. [24]

    Molecular vibrational polariton dynamics: What can polaritons do?

    W. Xiong, “Molecular vibrational polariton dynamics: What can polaritons do?” Acc. Chem. Res.56, 776–786 (2023)

    work page 2023

  25. [25]

    Polariton chemistry: Thinking inside the (photon) box,

    J. Yuen-Zhou and V. M. Menon, “Polariton chemistry: Thinking inside the (photon) box,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA116, 5214–5216 (2019)

    work page 2019

  26. [26]

    Molecular polaritons for chem- istry, photonics and quantum technologies,

    B. Xiang and W. Xiong, “Molecular polaritons for chem- istry, photonics and quantum technologies,” Chemical Reviews124, 2512–2552 (2024)

    work page 2024

  27. [27]

    Ultrafast polariton relaxation dynamics in an organic semiconductor microcavity,

    T. Virgili, D. Coles, A. M. Adawi, C. Clark, P. Michetti, S. K. Rajendran, D. Brida, D. Polli, G. Cerullo, and D. G. Lidzey, “Ultrafast polariton relaxation dynamics in an organic semiconductor microcavity,” Phys. Rev. B 83, 245309 (2011)

    work page 2011

  28. [28]

    Real-time observation of ultrafast Rabi oscillations be- tween excitons and plasmons in metal nanostructures with J-aggregates,

    P. Vasa, W. Wang, R. Pomraenke, M. Lammers, M. Maiuri, C. Manzoni, G. Cerullo, and C. Lienau, “Real-time observation of ultrafast Rabi oscillations be- tween excitons and plasmons in metal nanostructures with J-aggregates,” Nat. Photon.7, 128–132 (2013)

    work page 2013

  29. [29]

    Probing ultrafast energy transfer between excitons and plasmons in the ultrastrong coupling regime,

    S. Balci, C. Kocabas, B. K¨ u¸ c¨ uk¨ oz, A. Karatay, E. Akh¨ useyin, H. Gul Yaglioglu, and A. Elmali, “Probing ultrafast energy transfer between excitons and plasmons in the ultrastrong coupling regime,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 105, 051105 (2014)

    work page 2014

  30. [30]

    Dephasing effects on coherent exciton-polaritons and the breakdown of the strong coupling regime,

    N. Takemura, M. D. Anderson, S. Trebaol, S. Biswas, D. Y. Oberli, M. T. Portella-Oberli, and B. Deveaud, “Dephasing effects on coherent exciton-polaritons and the breakdown of the strong coupling regime,” Phys. Rev. B92, 235305 (2015)

    work page 2015

  31. [31]

    Modified relaxation dynamics and coherent energy exchange in coupled vibration-cavity polaritons,

    A. D. Dunkelberger, B. T. Spann, K. P. Fears, B. S. Simp- kins, and J. C. Owrutsky, “Modified relaxation dynamics and coherent energy exchange in coupled vibration-cavity polaritons,” Nat. Commun.7, 13504 (2016)

    work page 2016

  32. [32]

    Understanding radiative transitions and relaxation pathways in plexcitons,

    D. Finkelstein-Shapiro, P.-A. Mante, S. Sarisozen, L. Wittenbecher, I. Minda, S. Balci, T. Pullerits, and D. Zigmantas, “Understanding radiative transitions and relaxation pathways in plexcitons,” Chem7, 1092–1107 (2021)

    work page 2021

  33. [33]

    Sub-picosecond collapse of molecular polaritons to pure molecular transition in plasmonic photoswitch-nanoantennas,

    J. Kuttruff, M. Romanelli, E. Pedrueza-Villalmanzo, J. Allerbeck, J. Fregoni, V. Saavedra-Becerril, J. Andr´ easson, D. Brida, A. Dmitriev, S. Corni, and N. Maccaferri, “Sub-picosecond collapse of molecular polaritons to pure molecular transition in plasmonic photoswitch-nanoantennas,” Nat. Commun.14, 3875 (2023)

    work page 2023

  34. [34]

    Two-dimensional fourier transform spectroscopy of exciton-polaritons and their interactions,

    N. Takemura, S. Trebaol, M. D. Anderson, V. Kohnle, Y. L´ eger, D. Y. Oberli, M. T. Portella-Oberli, and B. De- veaud, “Two-dimensional fourier transform spectroscopy of exciton-polaritons and their interactions,” Phys. Rev. B92, 125415 (2015)

    work page 2015

  35. [35]

    Two-dimensional infrared spectroscopy of vibrational polaritons,

    B. Xiang, R. F. Ribeiro, A. D. Dunkelberger, J. Wang, Y. Li, B. S. Simpkins, J. C. Owrutsky, J. Yuen-Zhou, and W. Xiong, “Two-dimensional infrared spectroscopy of vibrational polaritons,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 14 115, 4845–4850 (2018)

    work page 2018

  36. [36]

    Manipu- lating optical nonlinearities of molecular polaritons by delocalization,

    B. Xiang, R. F. Ribeiro, Y. Li, A. D. Dunkelberger, B. B. Simpkins, J. Yuen-Zhou, and W. Xiong, “Manipu- lating optical nonlinearities of molecular polaritons by delocalization,” Sci. Adv.5, eaax5196 (2019)

    work page 2019

  37. [37]

    Plasmon mediated coherent population oscillations in molecular aggregates,

    D. Timmer, M. Gittinger, T. Quenzel, S. Stephan, Y. Zhang, M. F. Schumacher, A. L¨ utzen, M. Silies, S. Tre- tiak, J.-H. Zhong, A. De Sio, and C. Lienau, “Plasmon mediated coherent population oscillations in molecular aggregates,” Nat. Commun.14, 8035 (2023)

    work page 2023

  38. [38]

    Direct evidence of ultrafast energy delo- calization between optically hybridized J-aggregates in a strongly coupled microcavity,

    M. Russo, K. Georgiou, A. Genco, S. De Liberato, G. Cerullo, D. G. Lidzey, A. Othonos, M. Maiuri, and T. Virgili, “Direct evidence of ultrafast energy delo- calization between optically hybridized J-aggregates in a strongly coupled microcavity,” Adv. Opt. Mat.12, 2470079 (2024)

    work page 2024

  39. [39]

    Tracking relaxation dynamics of polaritons and reservoir states in organic exciton- polaritons,

    H. Chen, J. Ai, X. Bai, S. Hou, S. R. Forrest, J. P. Ogilvie, and Y. Song, “Tracking relaxation dynamics of polaritons and reservoir states in organic exciton- polaritons,” J. Phys. Chem. Lett.16, 5265–5271 (2025)

    work page 2025

  40. [40]

    Phase-resolved two-dimensional infrared spectroscopy of solution-phase vibrational polaritons on gold antenna meta-surfaces,

    S. Sufrin, B. Cohn, and L. Chuntonov, “Phase-resolved two-dimensional infrared spectroscopy of solution-phase vibrational polaritons on gold antenna meta-surfaces,” J. Phys. Chem. Lett.17, 2644–2653 (2026)

    work page 2026

  41. [41]

    State-selective polariton to dark state relaxation dynamics,

    B. Xiang, R. F. Ribeiro, L. Chen, J. Wang, M. Du, J. Yuen-Zhou, and W. Xiong, “State-selective polariton to dark state relaxation dynamics,” J. Phys. Chem. A 123, 5918–5927 (2019)

    work page 2019

  42. [42]

    The role of IR inactive mode in W(CO)6 polariton relaxation process,

    O. Hirschmann, H. H. Bhakta, and W. Xiong, “The role of IR inactive mode in W(CO)6 polariton relaxation process,” Nanophotonics13, 2029–2034 (2024)

    work page 2029

  43. [43]

    Intermolecular vibrational energy transfer enabled by microcavity strong light–matter coupling,

    B. Xiang, R. F. Ribeiro, M. Du, L. Chen, Z. Yang, J. Wang, J. Yuen-Zhou, and W. Xiong, “Intermolecular vibrational energy transfer enabled by microcavity strong light–matter coupling,” Science368, 665–667 (2020)

    work page 2020

  44. [44]

    Energy relaxation pathways between light- matter states revealed by coherent two-dimensional spec- troscopy,

    L. Mewes, M. Wang, R. A. Ingle, K. B¨ orjesson, and M. Chergui, “Energy relaxation pathways between light- matter states revealed by coherent two-dimensional spec- troscopy,” Commun. Phys.3, 157 (2020)

    work page 2020

  45. [45]

    Cavity-enabled enhancement of ultrafast intramolecular vibrational redistribution over pseudoro- tation,

    T.-T. Chen, M. Du, Z. Yang, J. Yuen-Zhou, and W. Xiong, “Cavity-enabled enhancement of ultrafast intramolecular vibrational redistribution over pseudoro- tation,” Science378, 790–794 (2022)

    work page 2022

  46. [46]

    Prob- ing the anharmonicity of vibrational polaritons with double-quantum two-dimensional infrared spectroscopy,

    S. Sufrin, B. Cohn, and L. Chuntonov, “Prob- ing the anharmonicity of vibrational polaritons with double-quantum two-dimensional infrared spectroscopy,” Nanophotonics13, 2523–2530 (2024)

    work page 2024

  47. [47]

    Resolving exciton and polariton multiparticle correlations in an optical microcavity in the strong-coupling regime,

    V. Quir´ os-Cordero, E. Rojas-Gatjens, M. Gomez- Dominguez, H. Li, C. A. R. Perini, N. Stingelin, J.-P. Correa-Baena, E. R. Bittner, A. R. Srimath Kandada, and C. Silva-Acu˜ na, “Resolving exciton and polariton multiparticle correlations in an optical microcavity in the strong-coupling regime,” Phys. Rev. B113, L041102 (2026)

    work page 2026

  48. [48]

    Influence of multi-exciton correlations on nonlin- ear polariton dynamics in semiconductor microcavities,

    P. Wen, G. Christmann, J. J. Baumberg, and K. A. Nel- son, “Influence of multi-exciton correlations on nonlin- ear polariton dynamics in semiconductor microcavities,” New J. Phys.15, 025005 (2013)

    work page 2013

  49. [49]

    Addressing the dark state problem in strongly coupled organic exciton-polariton systems,

    E. Michail, K. Rashidi, B. Liu, G. He, V. M. Menon, and M. Y. Sfeir, “Addressing the dark state problem in strongly coupled organic exciton-polariton systems,” Nano Lett.24, 557–565 (2024)

    work page 2024

  50. [50]

    Polariton transitions in femtosecond transient absorption studies of ultrastrong light–molecule coupling,

    C. A. DelPo, B. Kudisch, K. H. Park, S.-U.-Z. Khan, F. Fassioli, D. Fausti, B. P. Rand, and G. D. Scholes, “Polariton transitions in femtosecond transient absorption studies of ultrastrong light–molecule coupling,” J. Phys. Chem. Lett.11, 2667–2674 (2020)

    work page 2020

  51. [51]

    Femtosecond photophysics of molecular polaritons,

    F. Fassioli, K. H. Park, S. E. Bard, and G. D. Scholes, “Femtosecond photophysics of molecular polaritons,” J. Phys. Chem. Lett.12, 11444–11459 (2021)

    work page 2021

  52. [52]

    Excitation ladder of cavity polaritons,

    T. M. Autry, G. Nardin, C. L. Smallwood, K. Silverman, D. Bajoni, A. Lemaˆ ıtre, S. Bouchoule, J. Bloch, and S. Cundiff, “Excitation ladder of cavity polaritons,” Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 067403 (2020)

    work page 2020

  53. [53]

    Excited-state vibration-polariton transitions and dynamics in nitroprusside,

    A. B. Grafton, A. D. Dunkelberger, B. S. Simpkins, J. F. Triana, F. J. Hern´ andez, F. Herrera, and J. C. Owrutsky, “Excited-state vibration-polariton transitions and dynamics in nitroprusside,” Nat. Commun.12, 214 (2021)

    work page 2021

  54. [54]

    Biexciton-polariton coupling mediated by dark states,

    G. Fumero, J. Paul, J. K. Wahlstrand, and A. D. Bristow, “Biexciton-polariton coupling mediated by dark states,” (2025), arXiv:2507.07363 [cond-mat.mes-hall]

    work page arXiv 2025

  55. [55]

    Yuen-Zhou, N

    J. Yuen-Zhou, N. C. Giebink, and R. F. Ribeiro, eds., Polariton Chemistry: Molecules in Cavities(John Wiley & Sons, 2025)

    work page 2025

  56. [56]

    The- ory for nonlinear spectroscopy of vibrational polaritons,

    R. F. Ribeiro, A. D. Dunkelberger, B. Xiang, W. Xiong, B. S. Simpkins, J. C. Owrutsky, and J. Yuen-Zhou, “The- ory for nonlinear spectroscopy of vibrational polaritons,” J. Phys. Chem. Lett.9, 3766–3771 (2018)

    work page 2018

  57. [57]

    Quan- tum dynamics simulations of the 2D spectroscopy for exciton polaritons,

    M. E. Mondal, E. R. Koessler, J. Provazza, A. N. Vami- vakas, S. T. Cundiff, T. D. Krauss, and P. Huo, “Quan- tum dynamics simulations of the 2D spectroscopy for exciton polaritons,” J. Chem. Phys.159, 094102 (2023)

    work page 2023

  58. [58]

    Multidi- mensional coherent spectroscopy of molecular polari- tons: Langevin approach,

    Z. Zhang, X. Nie, D. Lei, and S. Mukamel, “Multidi- mensional coherent spectroscopy of molecular polari- tons: Langevin approach,” Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 103001 (2023)

    work page 2023

  59. [59]

    QuDPy: A Python-based tool for computing ultrafast non-linear optical responses,

    S. Shah, H. Li, E. R. Bittner, C. Silva, and A. Piryatinski, “QuDPy: A Python-based tool for computing ultrafast non-linear optical responses,” Comput. Phys. Commun. 292, 108891 (2023)

    work page 2023

  60. [60]

    Coherent multidimensional spectroscopy in polariton systems,

    D. Gallego-Valencia, L. Mewes, J. Feist, and J. L. Sanz- Vicario, “Coherent multidimensional spectroscopy in polariton systems,” Phys. Rev. A109, 063704 (2024)

    work page 2024

  61. [61]

    Dis- entangling collective coupling in vibrational polaritons with double quantum coherence spectroscopy,

    T. Schnappinger, C. Falvo, and M. Kowalewski, “Dis- entangling collective coupling in vibrational polaritons with double quantum coherence spectroscopy,” J. Chem. Phys.161, 244107 (2024)

    work page 2024

  62. [62]

    Line shapes in pump–probe spectroscopy of polaritons,

    L. N. Philipp, E. M¨ unzel, J. L¨ uttig, and R. Mitri´ c, “Line shapes in pump–probe spectroscopy of polaritons,” J. Chem. Phys.163, 124112 (2025)

    work page 2025

  63. [63]

    Process tensor approaches to modeling two-dimensional spectroscopy,

    R. de Wit, J. Keeling, B. W. Lovett, and A. W. Chin, “Process tensor approaches to modeling two-dimensional spectroscopy,” Phys. Rev. Res.7, 013209 (2025)

    work page 2025

  64. [64]

    Polariton spectra under the col- lective coupling regime. II. 2D non-linear spectra,

    M. E. Mondal, A. N. Vamivakas, S. T. Cundiff, T. D. Krauss, and P. Huo, “Polariton spectra under the col- lective coupling regime. II. 2D non-linear spectra,” J. Chem. Phys.162, 074110 (2025)

    work page 2025

  65. [65]

    Untargeted effects in organic exciton–polariton transient spectroscopy: A cautionary tale,

    S. Renken, R. Pandya, K. Georgiou, R. Jayaprakash, L. Gai, Z. Shen, D. G. Lidzey, A. Rao, and A. J. Musser, “Untargeted effects in organic exciton–polariton transient spectroscopy: A cautionary tale,” J. Chem. Phys.155, 154701 (2021)

    work page 2021

  66. [66]

    Isolating polaritonic 2D-IR transmission spectra,

    R. Duan, J. N. Mastron, Y. Song, and K. J. Kubarych, “Isolating polaritonic 2D-IR transmission spectra,” J. Chem. Phys. Lett.12, 11406–11414 (2021)

    work page 2021

  67. [67]

    Comment on 15 “Isolating polaritonic 2D-IR transmission spectra

    B. S. Simpkins, Z. Yang, A. D. Dunkelberger, I. Vur- gaftman, J. C. Owrutsky, and W. Xiong, “Comment on 15 “Isolating polaritonic 2D-IR transmission spectra”,” J. Phys. Chem. Lett.14, 983–988 (2023)

    work page 2023

  68. [68]

    Reply to “Comment on: ‘Isolating vibrational polariton 2D-IR transmission spectra

    R. Duan, J. N. Mastron, Y. Song, and K. J. Kubarych, “Reply to “Comment on: ‘Isolating vibrational polariton 2D-IR transmission spectra”’,” J. Phys. Chem. Lett.14, 1046–1051 (2023)

    work page 2023

  69. [69]

    Revisiting cavity-coupled 2DIR: A classical approach implicates reservoir modes,

    C. G. Pyles, B. S. Simpkins, I. Vurgaftman, J. C. Owrut- sky, and A. D. Dunkelberger, “Revisiting cavity-coupled 2DIR: A classical approach implicates reservoir modes,” J. Chem. Phys.161, 234202 (2024)

    work page 2024

  70. [70]

    Nonlinear semi- classical spectroscopy of ultrafast molecular polariton dynamics,

    M. Reitz, A. Koner, and J. Yuen-Zhou, “Nonlinear semi- classical spectroscopy of ultrafast molecular polariton dynamics,” Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 193803 (2025)

    work page 2025

  71. [71]

    Excitonic non- linearities of semiconductor microcavities in the non- perturbative regime,

    F. Jahnke, M. Kira, S. W. Koch, G. Khitrova, E. K. Lindmark, T. R. Nelson, Jr., D. V. Wick, J. D. Berger, O. Lyngnes, H. M. Gibbs, and K. Tai, “Excitonic non- linearities of semiconductor microcavities in the non- perturbative regime,” Phys. Rev. Lett.77, 5257–5260 (1996)

    work page 1996

  72. [72]

    Multiscale Maxwell–Schr¨ odinger modeling: A split field finite-difference time-domain approach to molecu- lar nanopolaritonics,

    K. Lopata and D. Neuhauser, “Multiscale Maxwell–Schr¨ odinger modeling: A split field finite-difference time-domain approach to molecu- lar nanopolaritonics,” J. Chem. Phys.130, 104707 (2009)

    work page 2009

  73. [73]

    Numerical studies of the interaction of an atomic sample with the electromagnetic field in two dimensions,

    M. Sukharev and A. Nitzan, “Numerical studies of the interaction of an atomic sample with the electromagnetic field in two dimensions,” Phys. Rev. A84, 043802 (2011)

    work page 2011

  74. [74]

    Optics of exciton-plasmon nanomaterials,

    M. Sukharev and A. Nitzan, “Optics of exciton-plasmon nanomaterials,” J. Phys.: Condens. Matter29, 443003 (2017)

    work page 2017

  75. [75]

    Opto- electronic device simulations based on macroscopic Maxwell–Bloch equations,

    C. Jirauschek, M. Riesch, and P. Tzenov, “Opto- electronic device simulations based on macroscopic Maxwell–Bloch equations,” Adv. Theory Simul.2, 1900018 (2019)

    work page 2019

  76. [76]

    Full minimal coupling Maxwell-TDDFT: An ab initio framework for light-matter interaction beyond the dipole approximation,

    F. P. Bonaf´ e, E. I. Albar, S. T. Ohlmann, V. P. Kosheleva, C. M. Bustamante, F. Troisi, A. Rubio, and H. Appel, “Full minimal coupling Maxwell-TDDFT: An ab initio framework for light-matter interaction beyond the dipole approximation,” Phys. Rev. B111, 085114 (2025)

    work page 2025

  77. [77]

    Enhanced op- tical nonlinearities under collective strong light-matter coupling,

    R. F. Ribeiro, J. A. Campos-Gonzalez-Angulo, N. C. Giebink, W. Xiong, and J. Yuen-Zhou, “Enhanced op- tical nonlinearities under collective strong light-matter coupling,” Phys. Rev. A103, 063111 (2021)

    work page 2021

  78. [78]

    Map- ping molecular polariton transport via pump-probe mi- croscopy,

    P. Fowler-Wright, M. Reitz, and J. Yuen-Zhou, “Map- ping molecular polariton transport via pump-probe mi- croscopy,” (2025), arXiv:2504.15501 [quant-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2025

  79. [79]

    Biexcitons or bipolaritons in a semicon- ductor microcavity,

    P. Borri, W. Langbein, U. Woggon, J. R. Jensen, and J. M. Hvam, “Biexcitons or bipolaritons in a semicon- ductor microcavity,” Phys. Rev. B62, R7763–R7766 (2000)

    work page 2000

  80. [80]

    Two-quantum 2D FT elec- tronic spectroscopy of biexcitons in gaas quantum wells,

    K. W. Stone, K. Gundogdu, D. B. Turner, X. Li, S. T. Cundiff, and K. A. Nelson, “Two-quantum 2D FT elec- tronic spectroscopy of biexcitons in gaas quantum wells,” Science324, 1169–1173 (2009)

    work page 2009

Showing first 80 references.