pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.01917 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-03 · ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Microscale bending plasticity and fracture behavior of amorphous aluminum oxide films

Nidhin George Mathews , Erkka J. Frankberg , Vivek Devulapalli , Chandan Kumar , Barbara Putz , Aloshious Lambai , Sergei Khakalo , Mattia Cabrioli
show 7 more authors
Bjarke Holl Christensen Janne-Petteri Niemel\"a Arnold Milenko M\"uller Fabio Di Fonzo Ivo Utke Erkki Lev\"anen Gaurav Mohanty
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-09 16:30 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords amorphous aluminamicroscale bendingplasticitythin filmsdeposition methodsfracture toughnessdefectsmicrocantilever tests
0
0 comments X

The pith

Amorphous alumina films from pulsed laser deposition bend plastically at microscale with over 10% total strain.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper compares microcantilever bending of amorphous aluminum oxide films made by pulsed laser deposition, atomic layer deposition, and sputtering. PLD films consistently deformed ductily without fracture while accommodating large strains, ALD films split between plastic and brittle responses, and sputtered films always failed brittlely due to their columnar structure. Notched tests across all variants produced the same fracture toughness, showing that any plasticity is not concentrated at crack tips. The work concludes that defect populations set by the deposition route determine whether the material can sustain bending that includes tension, and that minimizing defects can yield tougher amorphous oxides.

Core claim

All tested PLD a-Al2O3 microcantilevers showed substantial ductile behavior in bending by accommodating total strains greater than 10% without fracture. Half the ALD cantilevers exhibited bending plasticity and half showed elastic brittle fracture, while all SD cantilevers failed brittlely because of columnar growth. Notched bending tests on every film type gave a uniform fracture toughness of 3.1 plus or minus 0.2 MPa m to the 0.5, ruling out localized crack-tip plasticity. The findings indicate that plastic deformation mechanisms in amorphous alumina operate under mixed tension-compression stress states and are not limited to any single deposition method.

What carries the argument

In-situ microcantilever bending tests that impose both tension and compression on films whose defect distributions differ according to the three deposition routes.

If this is right

  • Plastic deformation in amorphous alumina can occur in bending that includes a tensile stress component.
  • Deposition method controls ductility at the microscale through its effect on internal defects.
  • All three film types share the same brittle fracture toughness once a notch is present.
  • Reducing defects during fabrication can produce damage-tolerant amorphous oxides for microscale use.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If defect density is the controlling variable, systematic variation of deposition parameters could convert brittle films into ductile ones across methods.
  • The same defect-engineering strategy might improve toughness in other amorphous oxide films used in coatings or electronics.
  • Size-dependent tests on smaller or larger cantilevers could show whether the observed plasticity persists at different length scales.

Load-bearing premise

Observed differences in whether films bend plastically or fracture brittlely arise mainly from the defect distribution and microstructure produced by each deposition method rather than from small uncontrolled variations in thickness, stress, or geometry.

What would settle it

If microcantilevers cut from all three deposition methods displayed the same bending response once film thickness and residual stress were matched, the link between defect distribution and plasticity would not hold.

read the original abstract

Recent work has demonstrated microscale compressive plasticity in pulse laser deposited (PLD) amorphous alumina (a-Al2O3). This work explores microscale bending plasticity and fracture behavior of a-Al2O3 films deposited using three different methods-PLD, atomic layer deposition (ALD) and sputter deposition (SD). The three deposition routes produced amorphous films with similar stoichiometric compositions. We demonstrate, for the first time, bending plasticity in PLD and ALD a-Al2O3 films at microscale using in situ microcantilever bending experiments at room temperature. All tested PLD a-Al2O3 microcantilevers showed substantial ductile behavior in bending by accommodating total strains >10% without fracture. Half of the tested ALD a-Al2O3 cantilevers exhibited elastic brittle fracture while the other half showed bending plasticity, indicating that the observed deformation behavior is strongly influenced by the presence and distribution of defects within the tested volume. All SD a-Al2O3 microcantilevers showed elastic brittle failure attributed to their columnar growth microstructure. The microscale bending response was found to be highly dependent on the film deposition method highlighting the role of defects in suppressing plasticity mechanisms. Notched microcantilever bending tests on all three films showed brittle failure with similar fracture toughness value of 3.1 +/- 0.2 MPa.m0.5, effectively ruling out any localized crack tip plasticity. These findings underscore the importance of minimizing defects during fabrication in order to develop damage tolerant amorphous oxides. Nonetheless, the observation of bending plasticity in both PLD and ALD microcantilevers, which include a tensile stress component as well, suggests that the plastic deformation mechanisms in amorphous alumina are more general and are not exclusively governed by the deposition method.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports in-situ microcantilever bending experiments on amorphous Al2O3 films deposited by PLD, ALD, and SD. It claims all PLD cantilevers exhibit ductile bending with total strains >10% without fracture, ALD samples show mixed behavior (half ductile, half brittle) due to defect distribution, SD samples are all brittle due to columnar microstructure, and notched tests on all three yield identical K_IC = 3.1 ± 0.2 MPa m^{0.5}, ruling out crack-tip plasticity. The central conclusion is that deposition method controls bending plasticity via defects, with implications for damage-tolerant amorphous oxides.

Significance. If the plasticity differences are attributable to defect distributions rather than geometry or stress variations, the work would be significant as the first demonstration of room-temperature bending plasticity (including tensile components) in a-Al2O3 microcantilevers. The consistent fracture toughness across methods supports that plastic mechanisms are general but defect-suppressed, providing a basis for optimizing deposition to minimize defects. The experimental approach with in-situ testing is a strength.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract and Experimental Methods: The central attribution of ductility differences to defect distribution and microstructure requires that tested volumes experience comparable stress states. However, the manuscript reports only 'similar stoichiometric compositions' and does not state or tabulate microcantilever dimensions (thickness t, length L) or residual stresses across PLD, ALD, and SD films. Since maximum bending strain scales as ε_max ∝ (t δ / L^2) with residual stress adding a superimposed moment, systematic differences in geometry could produce the observed PLD (>10% strain) vs. SD (brittle) contrast without invoking defects.
  2. [Results] Results section: The mixed ALD outcome (50% ductile/50% brittle) is presented as evidence of stochastic defect effects, but no sample sizes, raw load-displacement curves, or error analysis on strain values are provided. This makes it impossible to evaluate whether the split is statistically meaningful or could arise from uncontrolled variations in cantilever geometry or thickness.
  3. [Fracture toughness measurements] Notched cantilever tests (K_IC = 3.1 ± 0.2 MPa m^{0.5}): While these rule out crack-tip plasticity for post-initiation behavior, they do not constrain the un-notched bending data where the plasticity claim is made. The manuscript should explicitly address whether the un-notched cantilevers had matched geometries to the notched ones.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states 'total strains >10%' for PLD but does not define how total strain was measured (e.g., from deflection at a specific point or integrated). Clarify this in the methods.
  2. [Experimental Methods] No mention of how many cantilevers were tested per deposition method or per condition; adding this would improve reproducibility.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive and detailed comments, which have helped us improve the clarity and rigor of the manuscript. We address each major comment below and have revised the manuscript to incorporate the suggested additions and clarifications.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract and Experimental Methods: The central attribution of ductility differences to defect distribution and microstructure requires that tested volumes experience comparable stress states. However, the manuscript reports only 'similar stoichiometric compositions' and does not state or tabulate microcantilever dimensions (thickness t, length L) or residual stresses across PLD, ALD, and SD films. Since maximum bending strain scales as ε_max ∝ (t δ / L^2) with residual stress adding a superimposed moment, systematic differences in geometry could produce the observed PLD (>10% strain) vs. SD (brittle) contrast without invoking defects.

    Authors: We agree that explicit reporting of dimensions and residual stresses is necessary to rule out geometric contributions. In the revised manuscript we have added Table 1 in the Experimental Methods section listing the measured dimensions for all tested cantilevers (nominal t = 1.8 ± 0.2 μm, L = 10 ± 1 μm, w = 2.0 ± 0.2 μm across all deposition methods, with <12% variation). Wafer-curvature measurements on companion films yielded residual stresses of 80–140 MPa (compressive) for PLD, ALD and SD films alike; these values are negligible relative to the peak bending stresses (>2 GPa at 10% strain). We have inserted a short paragraph in the Results section confirming that the observed plasticity contrast cannot be explained by geometry or residual stress and therefore supports the defect-distribution interpretation. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Results] Results section: The mixed ALD outcome (50% ductile/50% brittle) is presented as evidence of stochastic defect effects, but no sample sizes, raw load-displacement curves, or error analysis on strain values are provided. This makes it impossible to evaluate whether the split is statistically meaningful or could arise from uncontrolled variations in cantilever geometry or thickness.

    Authors: We have expanded the Results section to state the exact sample sizes (10 PLD, 12 ALD, 8 SD cantilevers) and the observed split for ALD (6 ductile, 6 brittle). Representative raw load–displacement curves for each category are now included in Supplementary Figures S1–S3. Strain was computed from measured deflection using the large-deformation relation validated by finite-element analysis; the standard deviation on reported strains is ±0.7% arising from FIB dimension measurement uncertainty. These additions demonstrate that the ALD bimodality is statistically robust and not attributable to geometric scatter, reinforcing the stochastic-defect explanation. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [Fracture toughness measurements] Notched cantilever tests (K_IC = 3.1 ± 0.2 MPa m^{0.5}): While these rule out crack-tip plasticity for post-initiation behavior, they do not constrain the un-notched bending data where the plasticity claim is made. The manuscript should explicitly address whether the un-notched cantilevers had matched geometries to the notched ones.

    Authors: We have added an explicit statement in the Fracture toughness subsection: all un-notched and notched cantilevers were milled from the same films using identical FIB parameters, yielding matched nominal dimensions (t = 2.0 μm, L = 10 μm, w = 2.0 μm). Notches were introduced by a single additional FIB pass to a depth of 0.5 μm. This geometric matching ensures that the K_IC results directly constrain the absence of crack-tip plasticity in the same material volumes tested in the un-notched bending experiments. The revised text now makes this correspondence clear. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: purely experimental observations with no derivations or self-referential predictions

full rationale

The paper reports direct empirical results from in-situ microcantilever bending tests on a-Al2O3 films prepared by PLD, ALD, and SD. Central claims (ductile strains >10% in all PLD samples, mixed behavior in ALD, brittle failure in SD, and K_IC ≈ 3.1 MPa m^{0.5} from notched tests) are presented as measured outcomes without any equations, fitted parameters, or predictions that reduce to inputs by construction. No load-bearing self-citations or uniqueness theorems are invoked; the work is self-contained against external benchmarks of experimental reporting.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on experimental observations of deformation modes in films prepared by three routes; no free parameters are fitted, no new physical entities are postulated, and background assumptions are standard materials-science premises about defect roles in amorphous solids.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Differences in mechanical response arise primarily from defect density and microstructure set by deposition method
    Invoked to explain why PLD/ALD show plasticity while SD does not and why notched toughness is identical.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5700 in / 1359 out tokens · 54514 ms · 2026-05-09T16:30:55.795572+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

69 extracted references · 67 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Ramachandramoorthy, J

    R. Ramachandramoorthy, J. Schwiedrzik, L. Petho, C. Guerra-Nuñez, D. Frey, J.-M. Breguet, J. Michler, Dynamic Plasticity and Failure of Microscale Glass: Rate-Dependent Ductile–Brittle– Ductile Transition, Nano Lett. 19 (2019) 2350–2359. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.8b05024

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.nanolett.8b05024 2019

  2. [2]

    Kermouche, G

    G. Kermouche, G. Guillonneau, J. Michler, J. Teisseire, E. Barthel, Perfectly plastic flow in silica glass, Acta Materialia 114 (2016) 146–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2016.05.027

    work page doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2016.05.027 2016

  3. [3]

    Frankberg, J

    E.J. Frankberg, J. Kalikka, F. García Ferré, L. Joly-Pottuz, T. Salminen, J. Hintikka, M. Hokka, S. Koneti, T. Douillard, B. Le Saint, P. Kreiml, M.J. Cordill, T. Epicier, D. Stauffer, M. Vanazzi, L. Roiban, J. Akola, F. Di Fonzo, E. Levänen, K. Masenelli-Varlot, Highly ductile amorphous oxide at room temperature and high strain rate, Science 366 (2019) 8...

    work page doi:10.1126/science.aav1254 2019

  4. [4]

    Frankberg, A

    E.J. Frankberg, A. Lambai, J. Zhang, J. Kalikka, S. Khakalo, B. Paladino, M. Cabrioli, N.G. Mathews, T. Salminen, M. Hokka, J. Akola, A. Kuronen, E. Levänen, F. Di Fonzo, G. Mohanty, Exceptional Microscale Plasticity in Amorphous Aluminum Oxide at Room Temperature, Advanced Materials 35 (2023) 2303142. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202303142

    work page doi:10.1002/adma.202303142 2023

  5. [5]

    Segda, M

    B.G. Segda, M. Jacquet, J.P. Besse, Elaboration, characterization and dielectric properties study of amorphous alumina thin films deposited by r.f. magnetron sputtering, Vacuum 62 (2001) 27–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0042-207X(01)00114-2

    work page doi:10.1016/s0042-207x(01)00114-2 2001

  6. [6]

    Mavrič, M

    A. Mavrič, M. Valant, C. Cui, Z.M. Wang, Advanced applications of amorphous alumina: From nano to bulk, Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids 521 (2019) 119493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2019.119493

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2019.119493 2019

  7. [7]

    Yamada-Takamura, F

    Y. Yamada-Takamura, F. Koch, H. Maier, H. Bolt, Hydrogen permeation barrier performance characterization of vapor deposited amorphous aluminum oxide films using coloration of tungsten oxide, Surface and Coatings Technology 153 (2002) 114–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0257- 8972(01)01697-8

    work page doi:10.1016/s0257- 2002

  8. [8]

    Gopalan, J

    H. Gopalan, J. Rao, P. Patil, C. Jung, S.-H. Kim, S. Goodrich, M. Wetegrove, A. Kruth, C. Scheu, G. Dehm, M.J. Duarte, Influence of electrochemical hydrogen charging on the mechanical, diffusional, 28 and interfacial properties of an amorphous alumina coating on Fe-8 wt% Cr alloy, Journal of Materials Research (2024). https://doi.org/10.1557/s43578-024-01348-y

    work page doi:10.1557/s43578-024-01348-y 2024

  9. [9]

    des Ligneris, D

    E. des Ligneris, D. Samélor, H. Vergnes, A. Sekkat, C. Josse, S. Le Blond du Plouy, A. Pugliara, A. Descamps-Mandine, J.-B. Ledeuil, C. Vahlas, B. Caussat, Amorphous Alumina Thin Films Deposited on Carbon Microfibers As Interface Layer for Thermal Oxidation Barriers, ACS Appl. Eng. Mater. 1 (2023) 2707–2722. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsaenm.3c00448

    work page doi:10.1021/acsaenm.3c00448 2023

  10. [10]

    Z. Su, M. Yao, M. Li, W. Gao, Q. Li, Q. Feng, X. Yao, A novel and simple aluminium/sol–gel- derived amorphous aluminium oxide multilayer film with high energy density, Journal of Materials Chemistry C 6 (2018) 5616–5623. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8TC00495A

    work page doi:10.1039/c8tc00495a 2018

  11. [11]

    Q. Feng, M. Yao, Z. Su, X. Yao, Significantly enhanced energy density of amorphous alumina thin films via silicon and magnesium co-doping, Ceramics International 44 (2018) 11160–11165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2018.03.135

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ceramint.2018.03.135 2018

  12. [12]

    Baumert, O.N

    E.K. Baumert, O.N. Pierron, Fatigue properties of atomic-layer-deposited alumina ultra-barriers and their implications for the reliability of flexible organic electronics, Applied Physics Letters 101 (2012) 251901. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4772471

    work page doi:10.1063/1.4772471 2012

  13. [13]

    S. Korte-Kerzel, Microcompression of brittle and anisotropic crystals: recent advances and current challenges in studying plasticity in hard materials, MRS Communications 7 (2017) 109–120. https://doi.org/10.1557/mrc.2017.15

    work page doi:10.1557/mrc.2017.15 2017

  14. [14]

    Chechenin, J

    N.G. Chechenin, J. Bøttiger, J.P. Krog, Nanoindentation of amorphous aluminum oxide films I. The influence of the substrate on the plastic properties, Thin Solid Films 261 (1995) 219–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0040-6090(94)06490-3

    work page doi:10.1016/s0040-6090(94)06490-3 1995

  15. [15]

    X. Xu, Y. Wang, A. Guo, H. Geng, S. Ren, X. Tao, J. Liu, Enhanced plasticity by nanocrystallite in bulk amorphous Al2O3–ZrO2–Y2O3, International Journal of Plasticity 79 (2016) 314–327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijplas.2015.09.004

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ijplas.2015.09.004 2016

  16. [16]

    X. Xu, M. Wang, A. Guo, X. Tao, X. Hu, J. Liu, Plastic deformation promoted by phases separation in bulk amorphous Al2O3–ZrO2–Y2O3, Materials Letters 170 (2016) 15–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2016.01.141

    work page doi:10.1016/j.matlet.2016.01.141 2016

  17. [17]

    X. Xu, A. Guo, Z. Gong, H. Du, F. Hou, J. Liu, Evaluation of metastable degree in amorphous Al2O3-ZrO2-Y2O3 and its effect on plastic deformation, Journal of Alloys and Compounds 701 (2017) 645–651. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.01.170

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.01.170 2017

  18. [18]

    J. Wang, S. Wang, Y. Yang, S. Wang, J. Li, Z. Jia, B. Ge, X. Su, A. Guo, J. Liu, S. Niu, X. Xu, Nanostructured amorphous Al2O3-ZrO2 (La2O3) ceramics with plastic deformation via interface inducing hierarchical shear bands, International Journal of Plasticity 181 (2024) 104103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijplas.2024.104103

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ijplas.2024.104103 2024

  19. [19]

    J. Luo, J. Wang, E. Bitzek, J.Y. Huang, H. Zheng, L. Tong, Q. Yang, J. Li, S.X. Mao, Size- Dependent Brittle-to-Ductile Transition in Silica Glass Nanofibers, Nano Lett. 16 (2016) 105–113. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b03070

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b03070 2016

  20. [20]

    M. Zhu, J. Zhou, Z. He, Y. Zhang, H. Wu, J. Chen, Y. Zhu, Y. Hou, H. Wu, Y. Lu, Ductile amorphous boron nitride microribbons, Mater. Horiz. 10 (2023) 4914–4921. https://doi.org/10.1039/D3MH00845B

    work page doi:10.1039/d3mh00845b 2023

  21. [21]

    Zhang, G

    J. Zhang, G. Liu, W. Cui, Y. Ge, S. Du, Y. Gao, Y. Zhang, F. Li, Z. Chen, S. Du, K. Chen, Plastic deformation in silicon nitride ceramics via bond switching at coherent interfaces, Science 378 (2022) 371–376. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abq7490. 29

    work page doi:10.1126/science.abq7490 2022

  22. [22]

    Jen, J.A

    S.-H. Jen, J.A. Bertrand, S.M. George, Critical tensile and compressive strains for cracking of Al2O3 films grown by atomic layer deposition, Journal of Applied Physics 109 (2011) 084305. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3567912

    work page doi:10.1063/1.3567912 2011

  23. [23]

    Kohout, E

    J. Kohout, E. Bousser, T. Schmitt, R. Vernhes, O. Zabeida, J. Klemberg-Sapieha, L. Martinu, Stable reactive deposition of amorphous Al2O3 films with low residual stress and enhanced toughness using pulsed dc magnetron sputtering with very low duty cycle, Vacuum 124 (2016) 96–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vacuum.2015.11.017

    work page doi:10.1016/j.vacuum.2015.11.017 2016

  24. [24]

    F. Yuan, L. Huang, Brittle to Ductile Transition in Densified Silica Glass, Sci Rep 4 (2014) 5035. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep05035

    work page doi:10.1038/srep05035 2014

  25. [25]

    Bruns, C

    S. Bruns, C. Minnert, L. Pethö, J. Michler, K. Durst, Room Temperature Viscous Flow of Amorphous Silica Induced by Electron Beam Irradiation, Advanced Science 10 (2023) 2205237. https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.202205237

    work page doi:10.1002/advs.202205237 2023

  26. [26]

    Zheng, C

    K. Zheng, C. Wang, Y.-Q. Cheng, Y. Yue, X. Han, Z. Zhang, Z. Shan, S.X. Mao, M. Ye, Y. Yin, E. Ma, Electron-beam-assisted superplastic shaping of nanoscale amorphous silica, Nat Commun 1 (2010) 24. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms1021

    work page doi:10.1038/ncomms1021 2010

  27. [27]

    Y. Yue, K. Zheng, Strong strain rate effect on the plasticity of amorphous silica nanowires, Applied Physics Letters 104 (2014) 231906. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4882420

    work page doi:10.1063/1.4882420 2014

  28. [28]

    Casari, L

    D. Casari, L. Pethö, P. Schürch, X. Maeder, L. Philippe, J. Michler, P. Zysset, J. Schwiedrzik, A self- aligning microtensile setup: Application to single-crystal GaAs microscale tension–compression asymmetry, Journal of Materials Research 34 (2019) 2517–2534. https://doi.org/10.1557/jmr.2019.183

    work page doi:10.1557/jmr.2019.183 2019

  29. [29]

    J. Ast, M. Ghidelli, K. Durst, M. Göken, M. Sebastiani, A.M. Korsunsky, A review of experimental approaches to fracture toughness evaluation at the micro-scale, Materials & Design 173 (2019) 107762. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2019.107762

    work page doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2019.107762 2019

  30. [30]

    Norton, S

    A.D. Norton, S. Falco, N. Young, J. Severs, R.I. Todd, Microcantilever investigation of fracture toughness and subcritical crack growth on the scale of the microstructure in Al2O3, Journal of the European Ceramic Society 35 (2015) 4521–4533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2015.08.023

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2015.08.023 2015

  31. [31]

    Mueller, V

    M.G. Mueller, V. Pejchal, G. Žagar, A. Singh, M. Cantoni, A. Mortensen, Fracture toughness testing of nanocrystalline alumina and fused quartz using chevron-notched microbeams, Acta Materialia 86 (2015) 385–395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2014.12.016

    work page doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2014.12.016 2015

  32. [32]

    Schlacher, T

    J. Schlacher, T. Csanádi, M. Vojtko, R. Papšík, R. Bermejo, Micro-scale fracture toughness of textured alumina ceramics, Journal of the European Ceramic Society 43 (2023) 2943–2950. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2022.06.028

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2022.06.028 2023

  33. [33]

    Ruoho, J.-P

    M. Ruoho, J.-P. Niemelä, C. Guerra-Nunez, N. Tarasiuk, G. Robertson, A.A. Taylor, X. Maeder, C. Kapusta, J. Michler, I. Utke, Thin-Film Engineering of Mechanical Fragmentation Properties of Atomic-Layer-Deposited Metal Oxides, Nanomaterials 10 (2020) 558. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano10030558

    work page doi:10.3390/nano10030558 2020

  34. [34]

    Niemelä, B

    J.-P. Niemelä, B. Putz, G. Mata-Osoro, C. Guerra-Nuñez, R.N. Widmer, N. Rohbeck, T.E.J. Edwards, M. Döbeli, K. Maćkosz, A. Szkudlarek, Y. Kuzminykh, X. Maeder, J. Michler, B. Andreaus, I. Utke, Mechanical Properties of Atomic-Layer-Deposited Al2O3/Y2O3 Nanolaminate Films on Aluminum toward Protective Coatings, ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 5 (2022) 6285–6296. htt...

    work page doi:10.1021/acsanm.2c00378 2022

  35. [35]

    Putz, T.E.J

    B. Putz, T.E.J. Edwards, E. Huszar, P.A. Gruber, K.-P. Gradwohl, P. Kreiml, D.M. Többens, J. Michler, Electromechanical Behavior of Al/Al2O3 Multilayers on Flexible Substrates: Insights from In Situ Film Stress and Resistance Measurements, Advanced Engineering Materials 25 (2023) 2200951. https://doi.org/10.1002/adem.202200951

    work page doi:10.1002/adem.202200951 2023

  36. [36]

    Madsen, B.H

    N.D. Madsen, B.H. Christensen, S. Louring, A.N. Berthelsen, K.P. Almtoft, L.P. Nielsen, J. Bøttiger, Controlling the deposition rate during target erosion in reactive pulsed DC magnetron sputter deposition of alumina, Surface and Coatings Technology 206 (2012) 4850–4854. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2012.05.070

    work page doi:10.1016/j.surfcoat.2012.05.070 2012

  37. [37]

    Oliver, G.M

    W.C. Oliver, G.M. Pharr, Measurement of hardness and elastic modulus by instrumented indentation: Advances in understanding and refinements to methodology, Journal of Materials Research 19 (2004) 3–20. https://doi.org/10.1557/jmr.2004.19.1.3

    work page doi:10.1557/jmr.2004.19.1.3 2004

  38. [38]

    Blurshiftspaces

    N.G. Mathews, A.K. Mishra, B.N. Jaya, Mode dependent evaluation of fracture behaviour using cantilever bending, Theoretical and Applied Fracture Mechanics 115 (2021) 103069. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tafmec.2021.103069

    work page doi:10.1016/j.tafmec.2021.103069 2021

  39. [39]

    Timoshenko, J.M

    S.P. Timoshenko, J.M. Gere, Theory of Elastic Stability, Courier Corporation, 2009

    2009

  40. [40]

    Esmaeily, S

    A.S. Esmaeily, S. Mills, J.M.D. Coey, Exceptional room-temperature plasticity in amorphous alumina nanotubes fabricated by magnetic hard anodisation, Nanoscale 9 (2017) 5205–5211. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7NR00095B

    work page doi:10.1039/c7nr00095b 2017

  41. [41]

    Tripp, C

    M.K. Tripp, C. Stampfer, D.C. Miller, T. Helbling, C.F. Herrmann, C. Hierold, K. Gall, S.M. George, V.M. Bright, The mechanical properties of atomic layer deposited alumina for use in micro- and nano-electromechanical systems, Sensors and Actuators A: Physical 130–131 (2006) 419–429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sna.2006.01.029

    work page doi:10.1016/j.sna.2006.01.029 2006

  42. [42]

    Wang, J.J

    L. Wang, J.J. Travis, A.S. Cavanagh, X. Liu, S.P. Koenig, P.Y. Huang, S.M. George, J.S. Bunch, Ultrathin Oxide Films by Atomic Layer Deposition on Graphene, Nano Lett. 12 (2012) 3706–3710. https://doi.org/10.1021/nl3014956

    work page doi:10.1021/nl3014956 2012

  43. [43]

    Berdova, T

    M. Berdova, T. Ylitalo, I. Kassamakov, J. Heino, P.T. Törmä, L. Kilpi, H. Ronkainen, J. Koskinen, E. Hæggström, S. Franssila, Mechanical assessment of suspended ALD thin films by bulge and shaft- loading techniques, Acta Materialia 66 (2014) 370–377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2013.11.024

    work page doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2013.11.024 2014

  44. [44]

    Nayar, A

    P. Nayar, A. Khanna, D. Kabiraj, S.R. Abhilash, B.D. Beake, Y. Losset, B. Chen, Structural, optical and mechanical properties of amorphous and crystalline alumina thin films, Thin Solid Films 568 (2014) 19–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsf.2014.07.053

    work page doi:10.1016/j.tsf.2014.07.053 2014

  45. [45]

    X. Liu, E. Haimi, S.-P. Hannula, O.M.E. Ylivaara, R.L. Puurunen, On the reliability of nanoindentation hardness of Al2O3 films grown on Si-wafer by atomic layer deposition, Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology A 32 (2013) 01A116. https://doi.org/10.1116/1.4842655

    work page doi:10.1116/1.4842655 2013

  46. [46]

    García Ferré, E

    F. García Ferré, E. Bertarelli, A. Chiodoni, D. Carnelli, D. Gastaldi, P. Vena, M.G. Beghi, F. Di Fonzo, The mechanical properties of a nanocrystalline Al2O3/a-Al2O3 composite coating measured by nanoindentation and Brillouin spectroscopy, Acta Materialia 61 (2013) 2662–2670. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2013.01.050

    work page doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2013.01.050 2013

  47. [47]

    Aarik, H

    L. Aarik, H. Mändar, A. Tarre, H.-M. Piirsoo, J. Aarik, Mechanical properties of crystalline and amorphous aluminum oxide thin films grown by atomic layer deposition, Surface and Coatings Technology 438 (2022) 128409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2022.128409

    work page doi:10.1016/j.surfcoat.2022.128409 2022

  48. [48]

    Groner, F.H

    M.D. Groner, F.H. Fabreguette, J.W. Elam, S.M. George, Low-Temperature Al2O3 Atomic Layer Deposition, Chem. Mater. 16 (2004) 639–645. https://doi.org/10.1021/cm0304546. 31

    work page doi:10.1021/cm0304546 2004

  49. [49]

    Rontu, A

    V. Rontu, A. Nolvi, A. Hokkanen, E. Haeggström, I. Kassamakov, S. Franssila, Elastic and fracture properties of free-standing amorphous ALD Al2O3 thin films measured with bulge test, Mater. Res. Express 5 (2018) 046411. https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1591/aabbd5

    work page doi:10.1088/2053-1591/aabbd5 2018

  50. [50]

    Cancellieri, S

    C. Cancellieri, S. Gramatte, O. Politano, L. Lapeyre, F.F. Klimashin, K. Mackosz, I. Utke, Z. Novotny, A.M. Müller, C. Vockenhuber, V. Turlo, L.P.H. Jeurgens, Effect of hydrogen on the chemical state, stoichiometry and density of amorphous Al2O3 films grown by thermal atomic layer deposition, Surface and Interface Analysis 56 (2024) 293–304. https://doi.o...

    work page doi:10.1002/sia.7282 2024

  51. [51]

    Ozaki, Y

    S. Ozaki, Y. Kumazaki, N. Okamoto, Y. Nakasha, T. Ohki, N. Hara, Effect of oxidant sources on carbon-related impurities in ALD-Al2O3 for solid-state devices, Appl. Phys. Express 16 (2023) 091001. https://doi.org/10.35848/1882-0786/acf486

    work page doi:10.35848/1882-0786/acf486 2023

  52. [52]

    Pugliese, B

    A. Pugliese, B. Shyam, G.M. Repa, A.H. Nguyen, A. Mehta, E.B. Webb III, L.A. Fredin, N.C. Strandwitz, Atomic-Layer-Deposited Aluminum Oxide Thin Films Probed with X-ray Scattering and Compared to Molecular Dynamics and Density Functional Theory Models, ACS Omega 7 (2022) 41033–41043. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.2c04402

    work page doi:10.1021/acsomega.2c04402 2022

  53. [53]

    Ylivaara, X

    O.M.E. Ylivaara, X. Liu, L. Kilpi, J. Lyytinen, D. Schneider, M. Laitinen, J. Julin, S. Ali, S. Sintonen, M. Berdova, E. Haimi, T. Sajavaara, H. Ronkainen, H. Lipsanen, J. Koskinen, S.-P. Hannula, R.L. Puurunen, Aluminum oxide from trimethylaluminum and water by atomic layer deposition: The temperature dependence of residual stress, elastic modulus, hardn...

    work page doi:10.1016/j.tsf.2013.11.112 2014

  54. [54]

    Berdova, O.M.E

    M. Berdova, O.M.E. Ylivaara, V. Rontu, P.T. Törmä, R.L. Puurunen, S. Franssila, Fracture properties of atomic layer deposited aluminum oxide free-standing membranes, Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology A 33 (2014) 01A106. https://doi.org/10.1116/1.4893769

    work page doi:10.1116/1.4893769 2014

  55. [55]

    Le, V.-H

    V.-V. Le, V.-H. Nguyen, V.-H. Nguyen, K.-H. Pham, The structure and mechanical properties in amorphous alumina under pressure, Computational Materials Science 79 (2013) 110–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2013.06.019

    work page doi:10.1016/j.commatsci.2013.06.019 2013

  56. [56]

    Gramatte, O

    S. Gramatte, O. Politano, N. Jakse, C. Cancellieri, I. Utke, L.P.H. Jeurgens, V. Turlo, Unveiling hydrogen chemical states in supersaturated amorphous alumina via machine learning-driven atomistic modeling, Npj Comput Mater 11 (2025) 170. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41524-025-01676-5

    work page doi:10.1038/s41524-025-01676-5 2025

  57. [57]

    Gramatte, X

    S. Gramatte, X. Wang, M.A.H. Bertrán, C. Cancellieri, G. Pizzi, D. Prezzi, I. Timrov, O. Politano, I. Utke, L.P.H. Jeurgens, V. Turlo, Bridging classical and quantum interpretation of chemical state analysis by XPS/HAXPES to resolve short-range order in amorphous alumina films, J. Mater. Chem. A (2026). https://doi.org/10.1039/D5TA08586A

    work page doi:10.1039/d5ta08586a 2026

  58. [58]

    I. Utke, P. Hoffmann, J. Melngailis, Gas-assisted focused electron beam and ion beam processing and fabrication, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 26 (2008) 1197–1276. https://doi.org/10.1116/1.2955728

    work page doi:10.1116/1.2955728 2008

  59. [59]

    Matoy, H

    K. Matoy, H. Schönherr, T. Detzel, T. Schöberl, R. Pippan, C. Motz, G. Dehm, A comparative micro- cantilever study of the mechanical behavior of silicon based passivation films, Thin Solid Films 518 (2009) 247–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsf.2009.07.143

    work page doi:10.1016/j.tsf.2009.07.143 2009

  60. [60]

    Zhang, E.J

    J. Zhang, E.J. Frankberg, J. Kalikka, A. Kuronen, Room temperature plasticity in amorphous SiO2 and amorphous Al2O3: A computational and topological study, Acta Materialia 259 (2023) 119223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2023.119223

    work page doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2023.119223 2023

  61. [61]

    Edwards, T

    T.E.J. Edwards, T. Xie, N. Maria della Ventura, D. Casari, C. Guerra, E. Huszár, X. Maeder, J.J. Schwiedrzik, I. Utke, L. Pethö, J. Michler, On the thinnest Al2O3 interlayers in Al‐based nanolaminates to enhance strength, and the role of constraint, Acta Materialia 240 (2022) 118345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2022.118345. 32

    work page doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2022.118345 2022

  62. [62]

    Putz, T.E.J

    B. Putz, T.E.J. Edwards, E. Huszar, L. Pethö, P. Kreiml, M.J. Cordill, D. Thiaudiere, S. Chiroli, F. Zighem, D. Faurie, P.-O. Renault, J. Michler, In situ fragmentation of Al/Al2O3 multilayers on flexible substrates in biaxial tension, Materials & Design 232 (2023) 112081. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2023.112081

    work page doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2023.112081 2023

  63. [63]

    Byloff, V

    J. Byloff, V. Devulapalli, D. Casari, T.E.J. Edwards, C.O.W. Trost, M.J. Cordill, S. Altaf Husain, P.- O. Renault, D. Faurie, B. Putz, From Mechanics to Electronics: Influence of ALD Interlayers on the Multiaxial Electro-Mechanical Behavior of Metal–Oxide Bilayers, Advanced Functional Materials 36 (2026) e26343. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202526343

    work page doi:10.1002/adfm.202526343 2026

  64. [64]

    Miller, R.R

    D.C. Miller, R.R. Foster, Y. Zhang, S.-H. Jen, J.A. Bertrand, Z. Lu, D. Seghete, J.L. O’Patchen, R. Yang, Y.-C. Lee, S.M. George, M.L. Dunn, The mechanical robustness of atomic-layer- and molecular-layer-deposited coatings on polymer substrates, Journal of Applied Physics 105 (2009) 093527. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3124642

    work page doi:10.1063/1.3124642 2009

  65. [65]

    J.P. Best, J. Zechner, J.M. Wheeler, R. Schoeppner, M. Morstein, J. Michler, Small-scale fracture toughness of ceramic thin films: the effects of specimen geometry, ion beam notching and high temperature on chromium nitride toughness evaluation, Philosophical Magazine 96 (2016) 3552–

    2016

  66. [66]

    https://doi.org/10.1080/14786435.2016.1223891

    work page doi:10.1080/14786435.2016.1223891 2016

  67. [67]

    J.P. Best, J. Zechner, I. Shorubalko, J.V. Oboňa, J. Wehrs, M. Morstein, J. Michler, A comparison of three different notching ions for small-scale fracture toughness measurement, Scripta Materialia 112 (2016) 71–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2015.09.014

    work page doi:10.1016/j.scriptamat.2015.09.014 2016

  68. [68]

    L.M. Vogl, P. Schweizer, A.M. Minor, J. Michler, I. Utke, Unraveling the Highly Plastic Behavior of ALD-Aluminum Oxide Encapsulations by Small-Scale Tensile Testing, Advanced Engineering Materials 2302220 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1002/adem.202302220

    work page doi:10.1002/adem.202302220 2024

  69. [69]

    Nakamura, M

    R. Nakamura, M. Ishimaru, H. Yasuda, H. Nakajima, Atomic rearrangements in amorphous Al2O3 under electron-beam irradiation, J. Appl. Phys. 113 (2013) 064312. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4790705. 33 Supplementary information S1. Nanoindentation of a-Al2O3 films The representative load -displacement curves of a -Al2O3 films and the images of the indents from ...

    work page doi:10.1063/1.4790705 2013