pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.05153 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-06 · 🌀 gr-qc

Quantum gravitational contrast in creating Schr\"odinger cat state

Anupam Mazumdar , Tian Zhou This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-08 15:46 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc
keywords Schrödinger cat statematter-wave interferometerquantum gravitygraviton coherent stategravitational contrastmatter-graviton entanglementeffective field theory
0
0 comments X

The pith

A Schrödinger cat state created in a matter-wave interferometer displaces the graviton vacuum into coherent states whose overlap defines the contrast between quantum geometries.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that quantizing gravity perturbatively around a non-relativistic matter superposition causes the graviton field to develop coherent displacements for each branch of the superposition. The overlap between the left-branch and right-branch graviton coherent states serves as a gravitational contrast that quantifies the distinguishability of the associated quantum geometries. This framework treats matter and gravity on equal quantum footing at low energies and shows how their coupling produces entanglement that reduces observable interference contrast.

Core claim

In this setup Einstein gravity is treated via effective field theory by quantizing the massless spin-2 graviton in the presence of a quantum spatial superposition of matter. The matter-graviton coupling displaces the graviton vacuum analogously to a coherent state for each superposition branch. The contrast or overlap between the coherent states of the left and right matter positions defines a gravitational contrast, which is the overlap of the quantum geometries and is directly related to the entanglement generated between matter and the graviton field.

What carries the argument

The displacement of the graviton vacuum into coherent states by matter-graviton coupling, with the overlap between left and right coherent states serving as the gravitational contrast measuring quantum-geometry distinguishability.

If this is right

  • The gravitational contrast falls with greater spatial separation or longer evolution time, directly reducing the visibility of the matter interference pattern.
  • The degree of entanglement between matter and the graviton field is quantitatively tied to the value of this overlap.
  • The same overlap calculation applies to other time-dependent bosonic systems, as shown by the explicit harmonic-oscillator example.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Precision matter-wave interferometers with increasing mass could eventually reach the regime where this gravitational contrast becomes measurable.
  • The same mechanism may link to other low-energy quantum-gravity signatures such as gravity-induced decoherence in larger superpositions.
  • Relaxing the non-relativistic assumption would require checking how relativistic corrections modify the coherent-state overlap.

Load-bearing premise

The perturbative effective-field-theory quantization of gravity remains valid together with the non-relativistic limit for matter when the superposition separation grows large enough for gravitational effects to appear.

What would settle it

A precision measurement of interference visibility in a matter-wave interferometer whose mass and arm separation are chosen so that the predicted graviton-state overlap produces a detectable reduction in contrast would confirm or refute the central claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.05153 by Anupam Mazumdar, Tian Zhou.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. The entanglement entropy between the matter and the c view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Evolution of the coherent state parameter view at source ↗
read the original abstract

In this paper, we illustrate how a Schr\"odinger cat state created via a matter-wave interferometer can be viewed as the simplest quantum-gravity setup where we can treat both matter and gravity on an equal footing at a perturbative level. Here we treat Einstein's theory of general relativity using an effective field theory approach, quantising the massless spin-2 graviton in the presence of a quantum spatial superposition of matter that creates a matter-wave interferometer in the non-relativistic limit. We show that due to the matter-graviton coupling the graviton vacuum is displaced analogous to the coherent state. We study the contrast/overlap between the coherent states of the left and right superpositions in the matter-wave interferometer. We also study the entanglement between matter and the graviton in this setup and relate it to a gravitational contrast, or the overlap of the quantum geometries led by the coherent states. In the appendix, we provide an example of a time-dependent harmonic oscillator and study the contrast/overlap of such coherent states of the graviton.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper claims that a Schrödinger cat state in a matter-wave interferometer can be treated as a perturbative quantum-gravity setup by quantizing linearized gravity via effective field theory and coupling it to non-relativistic matter in spatial superposition. The matter-graviton interaction displaces the graviton vacuum into coherent states for the left and right branches; the overlap between these states defines a gravitational contrast (overlap of quantum geometries) that is related to matter-graviton entanglement. An appendix illustrates the overlap calculation with a time-dependent harmonic oscillator.

Significance. If the central derivations hold, the work supplies a concrete perturbative framework linking laboratory-scale matter superpositions to quantized gravitational degrees of freedom, with the gravitational contrast providing a geometric interpretation of the entanglement generated by the coupling.

major comments (2)
  1. [Main text (sections describing the EFT quantization and coherent-state displacement)] The displacement of the graviton vacuum into coherent states and the subsequent overlap calculation are asserted in the abstract and main text but lack explicit derivations, mode expansions, or the interaction Hamiltonian used to obtain the displacement parameter. This is load-bearing for the gravitational-contrast claim.
  2. [Setup and results sections] No error estimates, limiting-case checks (e.g., vanishing superposition separation or infinite mass), or regime-of-validity analysis are provided for the joint assumptions of perturbative EFT gravity and the non-relativistic matter limit. The regime in which the contrast deviates appreciably from unity is precisely where these approximations are most questionable.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Appendix] The appendix example of the time-dependent harmonic oscillator is useful but would be strengthened by an explicit mapping of its parameters (frequency, driving term) onto the graviton modes and the interferometer geometry.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and constructive comments, which have helped us identify areas where the manuscript can be strengthened. We address each major comment below and will incorporate revisions to improve clarity and rigor.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Main text (sections describing the EFT quantization and coherent-state displacement)] The displacement of the graviton vacuum into coherent states and the subsequent overlap calculation are asserted in the abstract and main text but lack explicit derivations, mode expansions, or the interaction Hamiltonian used to obtain the displacement parameter. This is load-bearing for the gravitational-contrast claim.

    Authors: We agree that the main text would benefit from explicit derivations of these central elements. In the revised version, we will add the interaction Hamiltonian arising from the effective-field-theory coupling of linearized gravity to non-relativistic matter in spatial superposition. We will include the mode expansion of the graviton field, derive the coherent-state displacement parameter for each branch of the interferometer, and present the overlap calculation step by step. The appendix example of the time-dependent harmonic oscillator will remain as an illustration, while the main text will contain the full derivation supporting the gravitational-contrast claim. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Setup and results sections] No error estimates, limiting-case checks (e.g., vanishing superposition separation or infinite mass), or regime-of-validity analysis are provided for the joint assumptions of perturbative EFT gravity and the non-relativistic matter limit. The regime in which the contrast deviates appreciably from unity is precisely where these approximations are most questionable.

    Authors: We acknowledge the validity of this observation. In the revision we will insert a new subsection on the regime of validity that includes the requested limiting-case checks: vanishing separation (displacement vanishes and contrast approaches unity) and the large-mass limit (with discussion of the breakdown of the non-relativistic approximation). We will supply order-of-magnitude estimates for the perturbative parameter and delineate the parameter region where the leading-order EFT result remains reliable. We will also note explicitly that, for laboratory-scale parameters, the contrast deviation remains small enough that higher-order corrections are negligible at the level of the present analysis; a full non-perturbative treatment lies beyond the scope of this work. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation computes overlap from EFT dynamics

full rationale

The paper quantizes linearized gravity via standard EFT, couples it to non-relativistic matter in spatial superposition, obtains displaced graviton vacua (coherent states) from the interaction Hamiltonian, and computes their overlap as a direct inner-product evaluation. This overlap is then labeled 'gravitational contrast' or 'overlap of quantum geometries,' but the numerical value follows from solving the model rather than being presupposed. No load-bearing self-citations, fitted parameters renamed as predictions, or ansatzes smuggled via prior work appear in the abstract or described chain. The appendix example is a standard time-dependent oscillator. The result is therefore self-contained within perturbative QFT and not equivalent to its inputs by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard domain assumptions of effective field theory for gravity and the non-relativistic limit; no new free parameters or invented entities are introduced in the abstract description.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Effective field theory quantization of the massless spin-2 graviton
    Invoked to treat gravity perturbatively alongside the quantum matter superposition.
  • domain assumption Non-relativistic limit for the matter-wave interferometer
    Used to simplify the matter dynamics while retaining gravitational coupling.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5474 in / 1392 out tokens · 76057 ms · 2026-05-08T15:46:26.668433+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

68 extracted references · 68 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    We can ask a similar ques- tion about the overlap of the coherent state of the gravitons emitted during the oscillations

    A similar analysis can be performed in a time-dependent case, where, for illustration, we consider ed a quantum harmonic oscillator in a Gaussian state that emits gravitational waves, see [ 17, 49]. We can ask a similar ques- tion about the overlap of the coherent state of the gravitons emitted during the oscillations. We have shown this computa - tion in...

    work page

  2. [2]

    By applying parametric modulation (heating) at a resonance frequency, the particle can be transferred to the first potential well

    in a perturbative treatment of gravity. 5 GM2 = 2 π 0 1 2 3 4 5 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 δx/σ S δx / σ = 5 0 2 4 6 8 10 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 GM2 S FIG. 1. The entanglement entropy between the matter and the c oher- ent state of the graviton as a function of the superposition s ize δx and the mass M of the matter, where we set GM 2 = 2π a...

    work page doi:10.37807/gbmf12328 2023

  3. [3]

    and (6), one can ob- tain the following equations D(α µν,α )PρσD†(α µν,α ) = Pρσ − 2α ρσ , (A1) D(α µν,α )P † ρσD†(α µν,α ) = Pρσ − 2α ∗ ρσ , (A2) D(α µν,α )PD†(α µν,α ) = P +α, (A3) D(α µν,α )P †D†(α µν,α ) = P † +α ∗. (A4) Then, we have DP † µν P µνD† =P † µν P µν − 2(α ∗ µν P µν +α µν P † µν ) + 4|α µν |2, (A5) DP †PD† = P †P + (α ∗ P +α P †) + |α |2, ...

    work page

  4. [4]

    +ikX0 cosθ(cos Ωt1 − cos Ωt2) − σ 2ω 2 k ] [ ∑ λ e11 λ (n)e11 λ (n)] = C2 ∫ t 0 dt′ 1dt′ 2 ∫ ∞ 0 dk ∫ π 0 dθ ∫ 2π 0 dφk2(sinθ)3 2ω k exp [ iω k(t′ 1 − t′

    work page

  5. [5]

    (B19) Similarly, we have ∫ dk ∑ λ |α − k,λ |2 = ∫ dk ∑ λ |α + k,λ |2

    +ikX0 cosθ(cos Ωt1 − cos Ωt2) − σ 2ω 2 k ] = 4π C2 ∫ t 0 dt′ 1dt′ 2 ∫ ∞ 0 dk sin(kXt) − kXt cos(kXt) k2X 3 t eik(t′ 1− t′ 2)− σ 2k2 = 8π C2 ∫ t 0 dt′ 1 ∫ t′ 1 0 dt′ 2 ∫ ∞ 0 dk sin(kXt) − kXt cos(kXt) k2X 3 t cos[k(t′ 1 − t′ 2)]e− σ 2k2 (B16) whereθ is the angle between k and ˆx− axis and we have de- fined C2 ≡ GM 2 16π 5 Ω 4X 4 0, (B17) Xt ≡ X0(cos Ωt′ 1 −...

    work page

  6. [6]

    (B23) where the integral kernel K(k,t ′ 1,t ′

    cos(k(t′ 1 − t′ 2))e− σ 2k2 ] . (B23) where the integral kernel K(k,t ′ 1,t ′

    work page

  7. [7]

    is defined by K(k,t ′ 1,t ′

    work page

  8. [8]

    (B24) Here, we focus on a special case in which the amplitude of the harmonic oscillation is much smaller than the wave lengt h of the gravitational waves, namely kX0 ≪ 1

    = sin(kXt) − kXt cos(kXt) k2X 3 t − sin(kX ′ t) − kX ′ t cos(kX ′ t) k2(X ′ t)3 . (B24) Here, we focus on a special case in which the amplitude of the harmonic oscillation is much smaller than the wave lengt h of the gravitational waves, namely kX0 ≪ 1. In this case, the integral kernel (B24) is K(k,t ′ 1,t ′

    work page

  9. [9]

    ≈ k3 30 [(X ′ t)2 − X 2 t ]. (B25) Therefore, one can compute the overlap between the coherent states of the gravitons when the matter wave trajectories ar e 8 closed, namelyt = 2π/ Ω , C(t = 2π/ Ω) ≈ exp [ − GM 2 30π 2 Ω 6X 6 0 ] . (B26) As we can see for a large superposition size ∼ X0 and mass ∼ M , the overlap between the coherent states of graviton o...

    work page

  10. [10]

    Colella, A

    R. Colella, A. W. Overhauser, and S. A. Werner, Ob- servation of gravitationally induced quantum interferenc e, Phys. Rev. Lett. 34, 1472 (1975)

    work page 1975

  11. [11]

    S. A. Werner, J. L. Staudenmann, and R. Colella, EF- FECT OF EARTH’S ROTA TION ON THE QUAN- TUM MECHANICAL PHASE OF THE NEUTRON, Phys. Rev. Lett. 42, 1103 (1979)

    work page 1979

  12. [12]

    J. B. Fixler, G. T. Foster, J. M. McGuirk, and M. A. Kasevich, Atom interferometer measurement of the Newtonian constant of gravity, Science 315, 74 (2007)

    work page 2007

  13. [13]

    Asenbaum, C

    P . Asenbaum, C. Overstreet, T. Kovachy, D. D. Brown, J. M. Hogan, and M. A. Kasevich, Phase Shift in an Atom Interferometer due to Spacetime Curvature across its Wave Function, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 183602 (2017) , arXiv:1610.03832 [physics.atom-ph]

    work page arXiv 2017

  14. [14]

    Schaff, T

    J.-F. Schaff, T. Langen, and J. Schmiedmayer, Interferomet ry with atoms, La Rivista del Nuovo Cimento 37, 509 (2014)

    work page 2014

  15. [15]

    Kovachy, Quantum superposition at the half-metre scale, et.al, Nature 528, 530–533 (2015)

    T. Kovachy, Quantum superposition at the half-metre scale, et.al, Nature 528, 530–533 (2015)

    work page 2015

  16. [16]

    Asenbaum, C

    P . Asenbaum, C. Overstreet, T. Kovachy, D. D. Brown, J. M. Hogan, and M. A. Kasevich, Phase shift in an atom interfer- ometer due to spacetime curvature across its wave function, Physical review letters 118, 183602 (2017)

    work page 2017

  17. [17]

    Arndt, O

    M. Arndt, O. Nairz, J. V os-Andreae, C. Keller, G. V an der Zouw, and A. Zeilinger, Wave–particle duality of c60 molecules, Nature 401, 680 (1999)

    work page 1999

  18. [18]

    Eibenberger, S

    S. Eibenberger, S. Gerlich, M. Arndt, M. Mayor, and J. T¨ uxen, Matter-wave interference with particles se- lected from a molecular library with masses exceeding 10000 amu, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 15, 14696 (2013) , arXiv:1310.8343 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2013

  19. [19]

    Haslinger, N

    P . Haslinger, N. D¨ orre, P . Geyer, J. Rodewald, S. Nimm- richter, and M. Arndt, A universal matter-wave interferom- eter with optical ionization gratings in the time domain, Nature Phys. 9, 144 (2014) , arXiv:1402.1364 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2014

  20. [20]

    Arndt and K

    M. Arndt and K. Hornberger, Testing the limits of quantum me- chanical superpositions, Nature Physics 10, 271 (2014)

    work page 2014

  21. [21]

    Y . Y . Fein, P . Geyer, P . Zwick, F. Kiałka, S. Pedalino, M. Mayor, S. Gerlich, and M. Arndt, Quantum superposition of molecule s beyond 25 kDa, Nature Phys. 15, 1242 (2019)

    work page 2019

  22. [22]

    Pedalino, B

    S. Pedalino, B. E. Ram´ ırez-Galindo, R. Ferstl, K. Horn- berger, M. Arndt, and S. Gerlich, Probing quantum mechanics with nanoparticle matter-wave interferometry, Nature 649, 866 (2026)

    work page 2026

  23. [23]

    Margalit, O

    Y . Margalit, O. Dobkowski, Z. Zhou, O. Amit, Y . Japha, S. Moukouri, D. Rohrlich, A. Mazumdar, S. Bose, C. Henkel, et al. , Realization of a complete stern- gerlach interferometer: Toward a test of quantum gravity, Science advances 7, eabg2879 (2021)

    work page 2021

  24. [24]

    S. N. Gupta, Quantization of einstein’s gravitational field: General treatment, Proceedings of the Physical Society. Section A 65, 608 (1952)

    work page 1952

  25. [25]

    J. F. Donoghue, General relativity as an effec- tive field theory: The leading quantum corrections, Phys. Rev. D 50, 3874 (1994) , arXiv:gr-qc/9405057

    work page Pith review arXiv 1994

  26. [26]

    Toroˇ s, A

    M. Toroˇ s, A. Mazumdar, and S. Bose, Loss of co- herence and coherence protection from a graviton bath, Physical Review D 109, 084050 (2024)

    work page 2024

  27. [27]

    P . G. C. Rufo, A. Mazumdar, and C. Sab´ ın, Gen- uine tripartite entanglement in graviton-matter interactions, Phys. Rev. A 111, 022444 (2025) , arXiv:2411.03293 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  28. [28]

    S. Bose, A. Mazumdar, G. W. Morley, H. Ulbricht, M. Toroˇ s, M. Paternostro, A. Geraci, P . Barker, M. S. Kim, and G. Milburn, Spin Entanglement Witness for Quantum Gravity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 240401 (2017) , arXiv:1707.06050 [quant-ph]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2017

  29. [29]

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0Fv-0k13s_k (2016), accessed 1/11/22

    work page 2016

  30. [30]

    Marletto and V

    C. Marletto and V . V edral, Gravitationally induced entanglement between two massive particles is suf- ficient evidence of quantum effects in gravity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 240402 (2017)

    work page 2017

  31. [31]

    A Spin-Based Pathway to Testing the Quantum Nature of Gravity,

    S. Bose et al. , A Spin-Based Pathway to Testing the Quantum Nature of Gravity (2025) arXiv:2509.01586 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  32. [32]

    R. J. Marshman, A. Mazumdar, and S. Bose, Locality and en- tanglement in table-top testing of the quantum nature of lin - earized gravity, Physical Review A 101, 052110 (2020)

    work page 2020

  33. [33]

    S. Bose, A. Mazumdar, M. Schut, and M. Toroˇ s, Mecha- nism for the quantum natured gravitons to entangle masses, Phys. Rev. D 105, 106028 (2022) , arXiv:2201.03583 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2022

  34. [34]

    U. K. Beckering Vinckers, ´A. De La Cruz- Dombriz, and A. Mazumdar, Quantum entanglement of masses with nonlocal gravitational interaction, Physical Review D 107, 124036 (2023)

    work page 2023

  35. [35]

    Belenchia et al

    A. Belenchia et al. , Quantum Superposition of Massive Objects and the Quantization of Gravity, Phys. Rev. D 98, 126009 (2018)

    work page 2018

  36. [36]

    Christodoulou, A

    M. Christodoulou, A. Di Biagio, M. Aspelmeyer, ˇC. Brukner, C. Rovelli, and R. Howl, Locally me- diated entanglement in linearized quantum gravity, Physical Review Letters 130, 100202 (2023)

    work page 2023

  37. [37]

    Christodoulou and C

    M. Christodoulou and C. Rovelli, On the possibility of lab- oratory evidence for quantum superposition of geometries, Physics Letters B 792, 64 (2019)

    work page 2019

  38. [38]

    Newton, entanglement, and the graviton,

    D. Carney, Newton, entanglement, and the graviton, Phys. Rev. D 105, 024029 (2022) , arXiv:2108.06320 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2022

  39. [39]

    Carney, P

    D. Carney, P . C. E. Stamp, and J. M. Taylor, Table- top experiments for quantum gravity: a user’s manual, Class. Quant. Grav. 36, 034001 (2019)

    work page 2019

  40. [40]

    D. L. Danielson, G. Satishchandran, and R. M. Wald, Gravita- tionally mediated entanglement: Newtonian field versus gra vi- tons, Phys. Rev. D 105, 086001 (2022)

    work page 2022

  41. [41]

    S. Bose, A. Mazumdar, M. Schut, and M. Toroˇ s, En- tanglement Witness for the Weak Equivalence Principle, Entropy 25, 448 (2023) , arXiv:2203.11628 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2023

  42. [42]

    Chakraborty, A

    S. Chakraborty, A. Mazumdar, and R. Pradhan, Distinguish- 9 ing jordan and einstein frames in gravity through entanglem ent, Physical Review D 108, L121505 (2023)

    work page 2023

  43. [43]

    Biswas, S

    D. Biswas, S. Bose, A. Mazumdar, and M. Toroˇ s, Grav- itational optomechanics: Photon-matter entanglement via graviton exchange, Phys. Rev. D 108, 064023 (2023) , arXiv:2209.09273 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2023

  44. [44]

    Englert, J

    B. Englert, J. Schwinger, and M. O. Scully, Is spin co- herence like humpty-dumpty? i. simplified treatment, Foundations of Physics 18, 1045 (1988)

    work page 1988

  45. [45]

    Schwinger, M

    J. Schwinger, M. O. Scully, and B. G. En- glert, Is spin coherence like Humpty-Dumpty?, Zeitschrift fur Physik D Atoms Molecules Clusters 10, 135 (1988)

    work page 1988

  46. [46]

    M. O. Scully, B.-G. Englert, and J. Schwinger, Spin co- herence and humpty-dumpty. iii. the effects of observation , Phys. Rev. A 40, 1775 (1989)

    work page 1989

  47. [47]

    Calzetta and B

    E. Calzetta and B. L. Hu, Noise and fluctuations in semiclassi - cal gravity, Physical Review D 49, 6636–6655 (1994)

    work page 1994

  48. [48]

    Anastopoulos, Quantum theory of nonrelativistic parti- cles interacting with gravity, Phys

    C. Anastopoulos, Quantum theory of nonrelativistic parti- cles interacting with gravity, Phys. Rev. D 54, 1600 (1996) , arXiv:gr-qc/9511004

    work page arXiv 1996

  49. [49]

    Anastopoulos and B

    C. Anastopoulos and B. L. Hu, A Master Equation for Gravitational Decoherence: Probing the Textures of Spacetime, Class. Quant. Grav. 30, 165007 (2013) , arXiv:1305.5231 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2013

  50. [50]

    M. P . Blencowe, Effective field theory approach to gravitati on- ally induced decoherence, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 021302 (2013)

    work page 2013

  51. [51]

    V . A. De Lorenci and L. H. Ford, Decoherence induced by long wavelength gravitons, Phys. Rev. D 91, 044038 (2015)

    work page 2015

  52. [52]

    Oniga and C

    T. Oniga and C. H.-T. Wang, Quantum coherence, radiance, and resistance of gravitational systems, Phys. Rev. D 96, 084014 (2017)

    work page 2017

  53. [53]

    D. L. Danielson, G. Satishchandran, and R. M. Wald, Black holes decohere quantum superpo- sitions, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 31, 2241003 (2022) , arXiv:2205.06279 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2022

  54. [54]

    D. L. Danielson, G. Satishchandran, and R. M. Wald, Killing horizons decohere quantum superpositions, Phys. Rev. D 108, 025007 (2023) , arXiv:2301.00026 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2023

  55. [55]

    Parikh, F

    M. Parikh, F. Wilczek, and G. Za- hariade, The noise of gravitons, International Journal of Modern Physics D 29, 2042001 (2020)

    work page 2020

  56. [56]

    Toro ˇs, T

    M. Toroˇ s, T. W. V an De Kamp, R. J. Marshman, M. S. Kim, A. Mazumdar, and S. Bose, Relative acceleration noise mitigation for nanocrystal matter-wave interferome - try: Applications to entangling masses via quantum gravity , Phys. Rev. Res. 3, 023178 (2021) , arXiv:2007.15029 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2021

  57. [57]

    Biggs and J

    A. Biggs and J. Maldacena, Comparing the decoherence effects due to black holes versus ordinary matter (2024) arXiv:2405.02227 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  58. [58]

    De Sabbata and M

    V . De Sabbata and M. Gasperini, Introduction to gravitation (World Scientific Publishing Company, 1986)

    work page 1986

  59. [59]

    Towards singularity and ghost free theories of gravity

    T. Biswas, E. Gerwick, T. Koivisto, and A. Mazum- dar, Towards singularity and ghost free theories of gravity , Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 031101 (2012) , arXiv:1110.5249 [gr-qc]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2012

  60. [60]

    Nonlocal theories of gravity: the flat space propagator

    T. Biswas, T. Koivisto, and A. Mazumdar, Nonlocal theo- ries of gravity: the flat space propagator, in Barcelona Post- grad Encounters on Fundamental Physics (2013) pp. 13–24, arXiv:1302.0532 [gr-qc]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2013

  61. [61]

    S. Bose, A. Mazumdar, and M. Toroˇ s, Infrared scaling for a graviton condensate, Nuclear Physics B 977, 115730 (2022)

    work page 2022

  62. [62]

    S. Bose, A. Mazumdar, and M. Toroˇ s, Gravitons in a box, Physical Review D 104, 066019 (2021)

    work page 2021

  63. [63]

    Machluf, Y

    S. Machluf, Y . Japha, and R. Folman, Coherent stern–gerlach momentum splitting on an atom chip, Nature Communications 4, 2424 (2013)

    work page 2013

  64. [64]

    O. Amit, Y . Margalit, O. Dobkowski, Z. Zhou, Y . Japha, M. Zimmermann, M. A. Efremov, F. A. Narducci, E. M. Rasel, W. P . Schleich, and R. Folman, T 3 stern-gerlach matter-wave interferometer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 083601 (2019)

    work page 2019

  65. [65]

    C. Wan, M. Scala, G. Morley, A. Rahman, H. Ulbricht, J. Bateman, P . Barker, S. Bose, and M. Kim, Free nano- object Ramsey interferometry for large quantum superposi- tions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 143003 (2016)

    work page 2016

  66. [66]

    C. Wan, M. Scala, S. Bose, A. C. Frangeskou, A. T. M. A. Rahman, G. W. Morley, P . F. Barker, and M. S. Kim, Toler- ance in the Ramsey interference of a trapped nanodiamond, Phys. Rev. A 93, 043852 (2016)

    work page 2016

  67. [67]

    J. S. Pedernales, G. W. Morley, and M. B. Plenio, Motional dy- namical decoupling for interferometry with macroscopic pa rti- cles, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 023602 (2020)

    work page 2020

  68. [68]

    R. J. Marshman, A. Mazumdar, R. Folman, and S. Bose, Constructing nano-object quantum superpositions with a St ern- Gerlach interferometer, Phys. Rev. Res. 4, 023087 (2022), arXiv:2105.01094 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2022