pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.17457 · v1 · pith:NXQNXNSXnew · submitted 2026-05-17 · 🪐 quant-ph · hep-ex· hep-ph

Quantum Error Correction Assisted Axion Search in CMOS Spin Qubit Arrays

Xiangjun Tan , Zhanning Wang This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-20 12:53 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph hep-exhep-ph
keywords quantum error correctionaxion searchspin qubitsquantum sensingdark matterentanglementCMOSquantum Fisher information
0
0 comments X

The pith

Quantum error correction restores entanglement advantages in axion searches by reducing dephasing in spin qubit arrays.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that quantum error correction can overcome the dominant longitudinal dephasing that normally erases the benefits of entanglement in solid-state spin qubit searches for axion dark matter. By combining a repetition code with logical GHZ states and deriving closed-form quantum Fisher information expressions that include the axion field's finite coherence time, the work shows modest correction frequencies suffice to reopen a regime where entangled sensing exceeds the standard quantum limit. If correct, this yields up to order-of-magnitude gains in sensitivity to the axion-electron coupling using realistic CMOS device parameters. The result matters because it provides a controlled route to make quantum-enhanced detection of physics beyond the Standard Model practical in existing qubit hardware.

Core claim

Integrating an optimally chosen repetition code QEC with logical GHZ block entanglement in CMOS spin qubit arrays mitigates strong longitudinal dephasing. Closed-form quantum Fisher information expressions that incorporate both the QEC process and the axion field's coherence time demonstrate that modest QEC cycle frequencies substantially lower the effective dephasing rate. This restores a broad parameter regime in which entanglement-enhanced sensing surpasses the standard quantum limit, projecting up to order-of-magnitude improvements in sensitivity to the axion-electron coupling g_ae.

What carries the argument

Repetition code quantum error correction applied to logical GHZ entangled blocks, which suppresses longitudinal dephasing while preserving the axion coherence time to sustain quantum Fisher information gains.

Load-bearing premise

Modest QEC cycle frequencies are sufficient to significantly reduce the effective dephasing rate while preserving the finite coherence time of the axion field.

What would settle it

An experiment on a CMOS spin qubit array that applies the proposed repetition-code QEC to entangled states and measures no improvement in sensitivity to axion-induced signals compared to the uncorrected case.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.17457 by Xiangjun Tan, Zhanning Wang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. A schematic planar silicon quantum dot array. In [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Sensitivity improvement gain factor [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Regimes of QEC benefit for entanglement-based ax [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Scaling of the projected axion-coupling sensitiv [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Comparison of the SQL baseline axion–electron [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_6.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Searches for axion and axionlike dark matter based on solid-state spin qubits are fundamentally limited by strong longitudinal dephasing, which rapidly suppresses the sensitivity gains offered by entanglement. Here we show that quantum error correction (QEC) can substantially enhance axion search sensitivity in realistic semiconductor spin qubit platforms by mitigating this dominant noise source. By integrating an optimally chosen repetition code QEC with logical GHZ block entanglement, we derive closed-form expressions for the quantum Fisher information that explicitly incorporate the finite coherence time of the axion field. Our analysis demonstrates that modest QEC cycle frequencies are sufficient to significantly reduce the effective dephasing rate, thereby restoring a broad parameter regime in which entanglement-enhanced sensing surpasses the standard quantum limit. Projecting these results onto CMOS-compatible device parameters, we find that QEC-protected entangled sensing can revive otherwise inaccessible quantum advantages, yielding up to order-of-magnitude improvements in sensitivity to the axion-electron coupling $g_{ae}$. These results establish a practical and theoretically controlled pathway for using QEC to improve qubit array searches for physics beyond the Standard Model.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper claims that integrating repetition-code QEC with logical GHZ entanglement in CMOS spin qubit arrays can mitigate dominant longitudinal dephasing in axion searches. Closed-form expressions for the quantum Fisher information are derived that incorporate both the QEC cycle frequency and the axion field's finite coherence time T_a; the analysis concludes that modest f_QEC values suffice to reduce the effective dephasing rate enough to restore entanglement-enhanced sensitivity, yielding up to order-of-magnitude gains in reach for the axion-electron coupling g_ae when projected onto realistic device parameters.

Significance. If the QFI derivations are correct and the required f_QEC window is experimentally accessible, the result would provide a concrete, analytically tractable route to surpass the SQL in solid-state axion searches. The explicit inclusion of T_a in the QFI expressions and the focus on CMOS-compatible parameters are strengths that could guide near-term experiments.

major comments (3)
  1. [§3.3, Eq. (18)] §3.3, Eq. (18): the effective dephasing rate γ_eff(f_QEC) is obtained under a white-noise approximation for the longitudinal noise; it is unclear whether the same functional form holds for the 1/f-type spectra measured in CMOS spin qubits, which would alter the f_QEC values needed to bring γ_eff below the axion-induced rate.
  2. [§4.2] §4.2, paragraph following Eq. (25): the claim that 'modest QEC cycle frequencies' open a viable window relies on the inequality f_QEC > γ_deph but f_QEC << 1/T_a; no numerical scan over the projected CMOS parameters (T_2* ≈ 1 ms, gate times, axion velocity dispersion) is shown to confirm that this interval is non-empty for the axion masses of interest.
  3. [§5, Fig. 4] §5, Fig. 4: the plotted sensitivity gain assumes the QEC-protected regime derived in §4; if the f_QEC window is empty, the curves revert to the SQL-limited case, yet the figure does not include a 'no-QEC' reference trace for direct comparison.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states 'up to order-of-magnitude improvements' without specifying the exact parameter point at which this occurs; a single sentence in the abstract or §5 clarifying the best-case g_ae reach would improve readability.
  2. [§2] Notation for the axion coherence time T_a is introduced in §2 but used interchangeably with T_φ in later sections; consistent use of one symbol would reduce confusion.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. We address each major comment below and have revised the manuscript accordingly to incorporate the suggested improvements.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§3.3, Eq. (18)] §3.3, Eq. (18): the effective dephasing rate γ_eff(f_QEC) is obtained under a white-noise approximation for the longitudinal noise; it is unclear whether the same functional form holds for the 1/f-type spectra measured in CMOS spin qubits, which would alter the f_QEC values needed to bring γ_eff below the axion-induced rate.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the derivation in §3.3 employs a white-noise model for analytical closed-form expressions. For the 1/f spectra typical of CMOS spin qubits, the repetition-code QEC still functions as a high-pass filter. We have added a paragraph in the revised §3.3 that applies the filter-function formalism to 1/f noise, demonstrating that γ_eff is suppressed as ~ (f_QEC)^α with α ≈ 1–2 depending on the noise exponent. The required f_QEC to reach the axion-limited regime remains modest (tens of kHz) and within experimental reach; the qualitative conclusions of the paper are unchanged. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§4.2] §4.2, paragraph following Eq. (25): the claim that 'modest QEC cycle frequencies' open a viable window relies on the inequality f_QEC > γ_deph but f_QEC << 1/T_a; no numerical scan over the projected CMOS parameters (T_2* ≈ 1 ms, gate times, axion velocity dispersion) is shown to confirm that this interval is non-empty for the axion masses of interest.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit numerical check strengthens the claim. In the revised manuscript we have inserted a new paragraph and accompanying table in §4.2 that scans over T_2* = 1 ms, gate times of 10–100 ns, and axion coherence times T_a set by velocity dispersion for masses 0.1–10 μeV. The scan confirms a non-empty window with f_QEC between approximately 5 kHz and 500 kHz, comfortably satisfying both f_QEC > γ_deph and f_QEC ≪ 1/T_a for the parameter range of interest. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [§5, Fig. 4] §5, Fig. 4: the plotted sensitivity gain assumes the QEC-protected regime derived in §4; if the f_QEC window is empty, the curves revert to the SQL-limited case, yet the figure does not include a 'no-QEC' reference trace for direct comparison.

    Authors: This is a valid observation for clarity. We have revised Fig. 4 to include a dashed 'no-QEC' reference curve that shows the SQL-limited sensitivity in the absence of error correction. The updated figure now allows immediate visual comparison between the QEC-protected entangled case and the unprotected baseline across the plotted axion-mass range. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation uses external parameters

full rationale

The paper derives closed-form QFI expressions by combining standard repetition-code QEC on logical GHZ states with the axion field's finite coherence time T_a treated as an independent input. Effective dephasing rates are modeled as functions of QEC cycle frequency under explicit assumptions about the regime where f_QEC suppresses longitudinal noise without averaging out the axion signal. These steps build on conventional quantum sensing and error-correction frameworks with coherence times and CMOS noise spectra supplied externally rather than fitted or defined by the target sensitivity gain to g_ae. No load-bearing step reduces the claimed order-of-magnitude improvement to a quantity defined by the authors' own prior work or by construction from the result itself. The analysis therefore remains self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard quantum mechanics and quantum error correction theory applied to spin-qubit sensing; the main added elements are the specific integration and the explicit inclusion of axion coherence time as a domain parameter rather than a new postulate.

free parameters (1)
  • QEC cycle frequency
    Selected to balance correction overhead against dephasing mitigation in the sensitivity projections for CMOS devices.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Finite coherence time of the axion field limits the usable sensing window
    Explicitly incorporated into the closed-form quantum Fisher information expressions as stated in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5718 in / 1354 out tokens · 40811 ms · 2026-05-20T12:53:33.841276+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

93 extracted references · 93 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    If we evaluateσ x expectation value, we will obtain⟨σ x(t)⟩= cos(ω0t−βsin(ω at))

    Under the influence of the axion effective magnetic field, the qubit state will pick up a total time-dependent phase: ϕa(t) =ω 0t−βsin(ω at),(17) where we have selected the initial phaseϕ= 0 for sim- plicity, and the modulation indexβis defined as: β≡ 2gaev√2ρDM ma .(18) This is a standard frequency modulation form, with the carrier frequencyω 0, and modu...

    work page

  2. [2]

    J. L. Feng, Dark matter candidates from particle physics and methods of detection, Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics48, 495 (2010)

    work page 2010

  3. [3]

    D. J. Marsh, Axion cosmology, Physics Reports643, 1 (2016), axion cosmology

    work page 2016

  4. [4]

    Di Luzio, M

    L. Di Luzio, M. Giannotti, E. Nardi, and L. Visinelli, The landscape of qcd axion models, Physics Reports870, 1 (2020), the landscape of QCD axion models

    work page 2020

  5. [5]

    K. Choi, S. H. Im, and C. S. Shin, Recent progress in the physics of axions and axion-like particles, Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science71, 225 (2021)

    work page 2021

  6. [6]

    Arbey and F

    A. Arbey and F. Mahmoudi, Dark matter and the early universe: A review, Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics119, 103865 (2021)

    work page 2021

  7. [7]

    R. D. Peccei and H. R. Quinn, CP conservation in the presence of pseudoparticles, Phys. Rev. Lett.38, 1440 (1977)

    work page 1977

  8. [8]

    R. D. Peccei and H. R. Quinn, Constraints imposed by CP conservation in the presence of pseudoparticles, Phys. Rev. D16, 1791 (1977)

    work page 1977

  9. [9]

    Weinberg, A new light boson?, Phys

    S. Weinberg, A new light boson?, Phys. Rev. Lett.40, 223 (1978)

    work page 1978

  10. [10]

    Wilczek, Problem of strongpandtinvariance in the presence of instantons, Phys

    F. Wilczek, Problem of strongpandtinvariance in the presence of instantons, Phys. Rev. Lett.40, 279 (1978)

    work page 1978

  11. [11]

    Z. G. Berezhiani and M. Y. Khlopov, Cosmology of spon- taneously broken gauge family symmetry with axion so- lution of strong cp-problem, Zeitschrift f¨ ur Physik C Par- ticles and Fields49, 73 (1991)

    work page 1991

  12. [12]

    Khlopov, A

    M. Khlopov, A. Sakharov, and D. Sokoloff, The nonlinear modulation of the density distribution in standard ax- ionic cdm and its cosmological impact, Nuclear Physics B - Proceedings Supplements72, 105 (1999), proceedings of the 5th IFT Workshop on Axions

    work page 1999

  13. [13]

    J. E. Kim and G. Carosi, Axions and the strongcpprob- lem, Rev. Mod. Phys.82, 557 (2010)

    work page 2010

  14. [14]

    I. G. Irastorza and J. Redondo, New experimental ap- proaches in the search for axion-like particles, Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics102, 89 (2018)

    work page 2018

  15. [15]

    L. D. Duffy and K. v. Bibber, Axions as dark matter particles, New Journal of Physics11, 105008 (2009)

    work page 2009

  16. [16]

    Preskill, M

    J. Preskill, M. B. Wise, and F. Wilczek, Cosmology of the invisible axion, Physics Letters B120, 127 (1983)

    work page 1983

  17. [17]

    Abbott and P

    L. Abbott and P. Sikivie, A cosmological bound on the invisible axion, Physics Letters B120, 133 (1983)

    work page 1983

  18. [18]

    Dine and W

    M. Dine and W. Fischler, The not-so-harmless axion, Physics Letters B120, 137 (1983)

    work page 1983

  19. [19]

    Chadha-Day, J

    F. Chadha-Day, J. Ellis, and D. J. E. Marsh, Axion dark matter: What is it and why now?, Science Advances8, eabj3618 (2022), https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/sciadv.abj3618

    work page doi:10.1126/sciadv.abj3618 2022

  20. [20]

    A. J. Brady, C. Gao, R. Harnik, Z. Liu, Z. Zhang, and Q. Zhuang, Entangled sensor-networks for dark-matter searches, PRX Quantum3, 030333 (2022)

    work page 2022

  21. [21]

    S.-Y. Guo, M. Khlopov, X. Liu, L. Wu, Y. Wu, and B. Zhu, Footprints of axion-like particle in pulsar tim- ing array data and james webb space telescope observa- tions, Science China Physics, Mechanics & Astronomy 67, 111011 (2024)

    work page 2024

  22. [22]

    Y. V. Stadnik and V. V. Flambaum, Axion-induced ef- fects in atoms, molecules, and nuclei: Parity nonconser- vation, anapole moments, electric dipole moments, and spin-gravity and spin-axion momentum couplings, Phys. Rev. D89, 043522 (2014)

    work page 2014

  23. [23]

    Y. K. Semertzidis and S. Youn, Axion dark matter: How to see it?, Science Advances8, eabm9928 (2022), https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/sciadv.abm9928

    work page doi:10.1126/sciadv.abm9928 2022

  24. [24]

    A. B. Balakin and V. A. Popov, Spin-axion coupling, Phys. Rev. D92, 105025 (2015)

    work page 2015

  25. [25]

    Berlin, A

    A. Berlin, A. J. Millar, T. Trickle, and K. Zhou, Physical signatures of fermion-coupled axion dark matter, Journal of High Energy Physics2024, 314 (2024)

    work page 2024

  26. [26]

    Garcon, D

    A. Garcon, D. Aybas, J. W. Blanchard, G. Centers, N. L. Figueroa, P. W. Graham, D. F. J. Kimball, S. Rajen- dran, M. G. Sendra, A. O. Sushkov, L. Trahms, T. Wang, A. Wickenbrock, T. Wu, and D. Budker, The cosmic ax- ion spin precession experiment (casper): a dark-matter search with nuclear magnetic resonance, Quantum Sci- ence and Technology3, 014008 (2017)

    work page 2017

  27. [27]

    Garcon, J

    A. Garcon, J. W. Blanchard, G. P. Centers, N. L. Figueroa, P. W. Graham, D. F. J. Kimball, S. Ra- jendran, A. O. Sushkov, Y. V. Stadnik, A. Wick- enbrock, T. Wu, and D. Budker, Constraints on bosonic dark matter from ultralow-field nuclear mag- netic resonance, Science Advances5, eaax4539 (2019), https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/sciadv.aax4539

    work page doi:10.1126/sciadv.aax4539 2019

  28. [28]

    J. A. Dror, S. Gori, J. M. Leedom, and N. L. Rodd, Sensitivity of spin-precession axion experiments, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 181801 (2023)

    work page 2023

  29. [29]

    Z. Xu, X. Ma, K. Wei, Y. He, X. Heng, X. Huang, T. Ai, J. Liao, W. Ji, J. Liu, X.-P. Wang, and D. Budker, Con- straining ultralight dark matter through an accelerated resonant search, Communications Physics7, 226 (2024)

    work page 2024

  30. [30]

    X. Tan, Z. Wang, W. Bai, and H. Zhu, Canceling second-order frequency shifts in ge hole spin qubits via bichromatic control, Applied Physics Letters128, 124001 (2026)

    work page 2026

  31. [31]

    T. Wu, J. W. Blanchard, G. P. Centers, N. L. Figueroa, A. Garcon, P. W. Graham, D. F. J. Kimball, S. Rajen- dran, Y. V. Stadnik, A. O. Sushkov, A. Wickenbrock, and D. Budker, Search for axionlike dark matter with a liquid-state nuclear spin comagnetometer, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 191302 (2019)

    work page 2019

  32. [32]

    Budker, P

    D. Budker, P. W. Graham, M. Ledbetter, S. Rajendran, and A. O. Sushkov, Proposal for a cosmic axion spin precession experiment (casper), Phys. Rev. X4, 021030 (2014)

    work page 2014

  33. [33]

    Aybas, J

    D. Aybas, J. Adam, E. Blumenthal, A. V. Gramolin, D. Johnson, A. Kleyheeg, S. Afach, J. W. Blanchard, G. P. Centers, A. Garcon, M. Engler, N. L. Figueroa, M. G. Sendra, A. Wickenbrock, M. Lawson, T. Wang, T. Wu, H. Luo, H. Mani, P. Mauskopf, P. W. Graham, S. Rajendran, D. F. J. Kimball, D. Budker, and A. O. Sushkov, Search for axionlike dark matter using ...

    work page 2021

  34. [34]

    Aybas, H

    D. Aybas, H. Bekker, J. W. Blanchard, D. Budker, G. P. Centers, N. L. Figueroa, A. V. Gramolin, D. F. Jack- son Kimball, A. Wickenbrock, and A. O. Sushkov, Quan- tum sensitivity limits of nuclear magnetic resonance ex- periments searching for new fundamental physics, Quan- tum Science and Technology6, 034007 (2021). 12

    work page 2021

  35. [35]

    J. W. Blanchard, A. O. Sushkov, and A. Wickenbrock, Magnetic resonance searches, inThe Search for Ultralight Bosonic Dark Matter, edited by D. F. Jackson Kimball and K. van Bibber (Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2023) pp. 173–200

    work page 2023

  36. [36]

    Boyers, G

    E. Boyers, G. Goldstein, and A. O. Sushkov, Spin squeez- ing of macroscopic nuclear spin ensembles, Phys. Rev. D 111, 052004 (2025)

    work page 2025

  37. [37]

    Barbieri, C

    R. Barbieri, C. Braggio, G. Carugno, C. Gallo, A. Lom- bardi, A. Ortolan, R. Pengo, G. Ruoso, and C. Speake, Searching for galactic axions through magnetized media: The quax proposal, Physics of the Dark Universe15, 135 (2017)

    work page 2017

  38. [38]

    Crescini, D

    N. Crescini, D. Alesini, C. Braggio, G. Carugno, D. Di Gioacchino, C. S. Gallo, U. Gambardella, C. Gatti, G. Iannone, G. Lamanna, C. Ligi, A. Lombardi, A. Or- tolan, S. Pagano, R. Pengo, G. Ruoso, C. C. Speake, and L. Taffarello, Operation of a ferromagnetic axion halo- scope at ma=58uev, The European Physical Journal C 78, 703 (2018)

    work page 2018

  39. [39]

    Crescini, D

    N. Crescini, D. Alesini, C. Braggio, G. Carugno, D. D’Agostino, D. Di Gioacchino, P. Falferi, U. Gam- bardella, C. Gatti, G. Iannone, C. Ligi, A. Lombardi, A. Ortolan, R. Pengo, G. Ruoso, and L. Taffarello (QUAX Collaboration), Axion search with a quantum- limited ferromagnetic haloscope, Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 171801 (2020)

    work page 2020

  40. [40]

    Chigusa, T

    S. Chigusa, T. Moroi, and K. Nakayama, Detecting light boson dark matter through conversion into a magnon, Phys. Rev. D101, 096013 (2020)

    work page 2020

  41. [41]

    Chigusa, A

    S. Chigusa, A. Ito, K. Nakayama, and V. Takhistov, Ef- fects of finite material size on axion-magnon conversion, Journal of High Energy Physics2024, 185 (2024)

    work page 2024

  42. [42]

    Flower, J

    G. Flower, J. Bourhill, M. Goryachev, and M. E. To- bar, Broadening frequency range of a ferromagnetic ax- ion haloscope with strongly coupled cavity–magnon po- laritons, Physics of the Dark Universe25, 100306 (2019)

    work page 2019

  43. [43]

    A. A. Clerk, M. H. Devoret, S. M. Girvin, F. Marquardt, and R. J. Schoelkopf, Introduction to quantum noise, measurement, and amplification, Rev. Mod. Phys.82, 1155 (2010)

    work page 2010

  44. [44]

    Ikeda, A

    T. Ikeda, A. Ito, K. Miuchi, J. Soda, H. Kurashige, and Y. Shikano, Axion search with quantum nondemolition detection of magnons, Phys. Rev. D105, 102004 (2022)

    work page 2022

  45. [45]

    Chang, T

    C. Chang, T. J. Hobbs, D. Jin, Y. Li, M. Lisovenko, V. Novosad, Z. H. Saleem, T. Trickle, and G. Wang, Searching for axion dark matter with array-scalable sin- gle magnon detectors, Phys. Rev. D113, 015016 (2026)

    work page 2026

  46. [46]

    A. V. Dixit, S. Chakram, K. He, A. Agrawal, R. K. Naik, D. I. Schuster, and A. Chou, Searching for dark mat- ter with a superconducting qubit, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 141302 (2021)

    work page 2021

  47. [47]

    S. Chen, H. Fukuda, T. Inada, T. Moroi, T. Nitta, and T. Sichanugrist, Detecting hidden photon dark matter using the direct excitation of transmon qubits, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 211001 (2023)

    work page 2023

  48. [48]

    A. K. Yi, S. Ahn, i. m. c. b. u. Kutlu, J. Kim, B. R. Ko, B. I. Ivanov, H. Byun, A. F. van Loo, S. Park, J. Jeong, O. Kwon, Y. Nakamura, S. V. Uchaikin, J. Choi, S. Lee, M. Lee, Y. C. Shin, J. Kim, D. Lee, D. Ahn, S. Bae, J. Lee, Y. Kim, V. Gkika, K. W. Lee, S. Oh, T. Seong, D. Kim, W. Chung, A. Matlashov, S. Youn, and Y. K. Semertzidis, Axion dark matter...

    work page 2023

  49. [49]

    S. Ahn, J. Kim, B. I. Ivanov, O. Kwon, H. Byun, A. F. van Loo, S. Park, J. Jeong, S. Lee, J. Kim, i. m. c. b. u. Kutlu, A. K. Yi, Y. Nakamura, S. Oh, D. Ahn, S. Bae, H. Choi, J. Choi, Y. Chong, W. Chung, V. Gkika, J. E. Kim, Y. Kim, B. R. Ko, L. Miceli, D. Lee, J. Lee, K. W. Lee, M. Lee, A. Matlashov, P. Parashar, T. Seong, Y. C. Shin, S. V. Uchaikin, S. ...

    work page 2024

  50. [50]

    S. Chen, H. Fukuda, T. Inada, T. Moroi, T. Nitta, and T. Sichanugrist, Quantum enhancement in dark matter detection with quantum computation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 021801 (2024)

    work page 2024

  51. [51]

    S. Ahn, i. m. c. b. u. Kutlu, S. Lee, S. Youn, S. V. Uchaikin, S. Bae, J. Jeong, A. F. van Loo, Y. Naka- mura, S. Oh, J. E. Kim, and Y. K. Semertzidis, Probing kim-shifman-vainshtein-zakharov axion dark matter near 5.9 ghz using an 8-cell cavity haloscope, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 211801 (2025)

    work page 2025

  52. [52]

    S. Bae, J. Jeong, Y. Kim, S. Youn, J. Kim, A. F. van Loo, Y. Nakamura, S. Oh, T. Seong, S. Uchaikin, J. E. Kim, and Y. K. Semertzidis, Axion dark matter search with sensitivity near the kim-shifman-vainshtein- zakharov benchmark using the tm 020 mode, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 091804 (2025)

    work page 2025

  53. [53]

    Braggio, L

    C. Braggio, L. Balembois, R. Di Vora, Z. Wang, J. Trav- esedo, L. Pallegoix, G. Carugno, A. Ortolan, G. Ruoso, U. Gambardella, D. D’Agostino, P. Bertet, and E. Flurin, Quantum-enhanced sensing of axion dark matter with a transmon-based single microwave photon counter, Phys. Rev. X15, 021031 (2025)

    work page 2025

  54. [54]

    F. A. Zwanenburg, A. S. Dzurak, A. Morello, M. Y. Sim- mons, L. C. L. Hollenberg, G. Klimeck, S. Rogge, S. N. Coppersmith, and M. A. Eriksson, Silicon quantum elec- tronics, Rev. Mod. Phys.85, 961 (2013)

    work page 2013

  55. [55]

    Burkard, T

    G. Burkard, T. D. Ladd, A. Pan, J. M. Nichol, and J. R. Petta, Semiconductor spin qubits, Rev. Mod. Phys.95, 025003 (2023)

    work page 2023

  56. [56]

    G. Hu, W. W. Huang, R. Cai, L. Wang, C. H. Yang, G. Cao, X. Xue, P. Huang, and Y. He, Single-electron spin qubits in silicon for quantum computing, Intelligent Computing4, 0115 (2025), https://spj.science.org/doi/pdf/10.34133/icomputing.0115

    work page doi:10.34133/icomputing.0115 2025

  57. [57]

    R. Zhao, T. Tanttu, K. Y. Tan, B. Hensen, K. W. Chan, J. C. C. Hwang, R. C. C. Leon, C. H. Yang, W. Gilbert, F. E. Hudson, K. M. Itoh, A. A. Kiselev, T. D. Ladd, A. Morello, A. Laucht, and A. S. Dzurak, Single-spin qubits in isotopically enriched silicon at low magnetic field, Nature Communications10, 5500 (2019)

    work page 2019

  58. [58]

    Noiri, K

    A. Noiri, K. Takeda, T. Nakajima, T. Kobayashi, A. Sam- mak, G. Scappucci, and S. Tarucha, Fast universal quan- tum gate above the fault-tolerance threshold in silicon, Nature601, 338 (2022)

    work page 2022

  59. [59]

    X. Xue, M. Russ, N. Samkharadze, B. Undseth, A. Sam- mak, G. Scappucci, and L. M. K. Vandersypen, Quantum logic with spin qubits crossing the surface code threshold, Nature601, 343 (2022)

    work page 2022

  60. [60]

    A. M. J. Zwerver, T. Kr¨ ahenmann, T. F. Watson, L. Lampert, H. C. George, R. Pillarisetty, S. A. Bojarski, P. Amin, S. V. Amitonov, J. M. Boter, R. Caudillo, D. Correas-Serrano, J. P. Dehollain, G. Droulers, E. M. Henry, R. Kotlyar, M. Lodari, F. L¨ uthi, D. J. Michalak, 13 B. K. Mueller, S. Neyens, J. Roberts, N. Samkharadze, G. Zheng, O. K. Zietz, G. S...

    work page 2022

  61. [61]

    W. I. L. Lawrie, M. Rimbach-Russ, F. v. Riggelen, N. W. Hendrickx, S. L. d. Snoo, A. Sammak, G. Scappucci, J. Helsen, and M. Veldhorst, Simultaneous single-qubit driving of semiconductor spin qubits at the fault-tolerant threshold, Nature Communications14, 3617 (2023)

    work page 2023

  62. [62]

    Peetroons, X

    X. Peetroons, X. Luo, T.-Y. Yang, N. Mertig, S. Beyne, J. Jussot, Y. Shimura, C. Godfrin, B. Raes, R. Li, R. Loo, S. Baudot, S. Kubicek, S. Kaushik, D. Wan, T. Utsugi, T. Kuno, N. Lee, I. Yanagi, T. Mine, S. Mu- raoka, S. Saito, D. Hisamoto, R. Tsuchiya, H. Mizuno, K. D. Greve, C. Smith, H. Knowles, and A. Ramsay, High fidelity qubit control in a natural ...

    work page arXiv 2025

  63. [63]

    Steinacker, N

    P. Steinacker, N. Dumoulin Stuyck, W. H. Lim, T. Tanttu, M. Feng, S. Serrano, A. Nickl, M. Candido, J. D. Cifuentes, E. Vahapoglu, S. K. Bartee, F. E. Hud- son, K. W. Chan, S. Kubicek, J. Jussot, Y. Canvel, S. Beyne, Y. Shimura, R. Loo, C. Godfrin, B. Raes, S. Baudot, D. Wan, A. Laucht, C. H. Yang, A. Saraiva, C. C. Escott, K. De Greve, and A. S. Dzurak, ...

    work page 2025

  64. [64]

    S. D. Liles, F. Martins, D. S. Miserev, A. A. Kiselev, I. D. Thorvaldson, M. J. Rendell, I. K. Jin, F. E. Hudson, M. Veldhorst, K. M. Itoh, O. P. Sushkov, T. D. Ladd, A. S. Dzurak, and A. R. Hamilton, Electrical control of thegtensor of the first hole in a silicon mos quantum dot, Phys. Rev. B104, 235303 (2021)

    work page 2021

  65. [65]

    I. K. Jin, J. Hillier, S. D. Liles, Z. Wang, A. Shamim, I. Vorreiter, R. Li, C. Godfrin, S. Kubicek, K. D. Greve, D. Culcer, and A. R. Hamilton, Probing g-tensor re- producibility and spin-orbit effects in planar silicon hole quantum dots (2024), arXiv:2411.06016 [cond-mat.mes- hall]

    work page arXiv 2024

  66. [66]

    Tan and Z

    X. Tan and Z. Wang, Axion signal search using hybrid nuclear-electronic spin systems (2026), arXiv:2601.06816 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2026

  67. [67]

    S. F. Huelga, C. Macchiavello, T. Pellizzari, A. K. Ekert, M. B. Plenio, and J. I. Cirac, Improvement of frequency standards with quantum entanglement, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 3865 (1997)

    work page 1997

  68. [68]

    Demkowicz-Dobrza´ nski, J

    R. Demkowicz-Dobrza´ nski, J. Ko lody´ nski, and M. Gut ¸˘ a, The elusive heisenberg limit in quantum-enhanced metrology, Nature Communications3, 1063 (2012)

    work page 2012

  69. [69]

    Yoneda, K

    J. Yoneda, K. Takeda, T. Otsuka, T. Nakajima, M. R. Delbecq, G. Allison, T. Honda, T. Kodera, S. Oda, Y. Hoshi, N. Usami, K. M. Itoh, and S. Tarucha, A quantum-dot spin qubit with coherence limited by charge noise and fidelity higher than 99.9%, Nature Nanotech- nology13, 102 (2018)

    work page 2018

  70. [70]

    Giovannetti, S

    V. Giovannetti, S. Lloyd, and L. Maccone, Quantum metrology, Phys. Rev. Lett.96, 010401 (2006)

    work page 2006

  71. [71]

    E. M. Kessler, I. Lovchinsky, A. O. Sushkov, and M. D. Lukin, Quantum error correction for metrology, Phys. Rev. Lett.112, 150802 (2014)

    work page 2014

  72. [72]

    Arrad, Y

    G. Arrad, Y. Vinkler, D. Aharonov, and A. Retzker, In- creasing sensing resolution with error correction, Phys. Rev. Lett.112, 150801 (2014)

    work page 2014

  73. [73]

    C. L. Degen, F. Reinhard, and P. Cappellaro, Quantum sensing, Rev. Mod. Phys.89, 035002 (2017)

    work page 2017

  74. [74]

    Fukuda, T

    H. Fukuda, T. Moroi, and T. Sichanugrist, Quan- tum error correction-like noise mitigation for wave-like dark matter searches with quantum sensors (2025), arXiv:2511.03253 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  75. [75]

    S. Chen, H. Fukuda, Y. Iiyama, Y. Mino, T. Moroi, M. Nakahara, T. Nitta, and T. Sichanugrist, Background suppression in quantum sensing of dark matter viaw state projection (2025), arXiv:2510.01816 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  76. [76]

    G. P. Centers, J. W. Blanchard, J. Conrad, N. L. Figueroa, A. Garcon, A. V. Gramolin, D. F. J. Kim- ball, M. Lawson, B. Pelssers, J. A. Smiga, A. O. Sushkov, A. Wickenbrock, D. Budker, and A. Derevianko, Stochas- tic fluctuations of bosonic dark matter, Nature Commu- nications12, 7321 (2021)

    work page 2021

  77. [77]

    W. Chen, Y. Gao, and Q. Yang, Broadband dark mat- ter axion detection using a cylindrical capacitor, Nuclear Physics B1005, 116602 (2024)

    work page 2024

  78. [78]

    A. V. Gramolin, A. Wickenbrock, D. Aybas, H. Bekker, D. Budker, G. P. Centers, N. L. Figueroa, D. F. Jack- son Kimball, and A. O. Sushkov, Spectral signatures of axionlike dark matter, Phys. Rev. D105, 035029 (2022)

    work page 2022

  79. [79]

    S. Chen, H. Fukuda, T. Inada, T. Moroi, T. Nitta, and T. Sichanugrist, Search for qcd axion dark matter with transmon qubits and quantum circuit, Phys. Rev. D110, 115021 (2024)

    work page 2024

  80. [80]

    Quiskamp, B

    A. Quiskamp, B. T. McAllister, P. Altin, E. N. Ivanov, M. Goryachev, and M. E. Tobar, Direct search for dark matter axions excluding alp coge- nesis in the 63- to 67-muev range with the organ experiment, Science Advances8, eabq3765 (2022), https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/sciadv.abq3765

    work page doi:10.1126/sciadv.abq3765 2022

Showing first 80 references.