pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.27846 · v1 · pith:E54YB4LHnew · submitted 2026-06-26 · ✦ hep-th

Tree-level S matrix for λ-deformed AdS3 strings

Pith reviewed 2026-06-29 04:07 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th
keywords lambda deformationAdS3 stringsworldsheet S-matrixintegrabilitynon-Abelian T-dualitylight-cone gaugetree-level scattering
0
0 comments X

The pith

The tree-level S-matrix for λ-deformed AdS3 strings preserves integrability via cancellation of non-elastic processes for λ < 1 but becomes ill-defined at λ = 1.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper computes the perturbative bosonic tree-level worldsheet S-matrix in light-cone gauge for the supersymmetric λ-deformation of AdS3 × S3 × T4 superstrings. For generic values 0 ≤ λ < 1 it finds that non-elastic scattering processes cancel, leaving the S-matrix compatible with integrability. In the limit λ → 1 the S-matrix instead becomes ill-defined, even though the background geometry approaches the non-Abelian T-dual geometry up to analytic continuation. This indicates that the λ → 1 limit fails to capture the full worldsheet dynamics of the dual theory.

Core claim

For generic values of 0 ≤ λ < 1, the worldsheet scattering remains compatible with integrability due to a non-trivial cancellation of non-elastic scattering processes. By contrast, the S matrix becomes ill-defined for λ → 1, despite the fact that this limit reproduces the non-Abelian T-dual geometry up to an analytic continuation. This suggests that the λ → 1 limit does not capture the full worldsheet dynamics of the T-dual theory.

What carries the argument

The perturbative bosonic tree-level worldsheet S-matrix computed in light-cone gauge, which encodes the cancellation of non-elastic processes for λ < 1.

If this is right

  • Integrability of the deformed worldsheet theory holds at tree level for all 0 ≤ λ < 1.
  • Non-elastic scattering amplitudes cancel exactly for generic λ in that range.
  • The λ → 1 limit on the S-matrix cannot be taken while preserving a well-defined scattering theory.
  • The non-Abelian T-dual background is recovered geometrically but not dynamically on the worldsheet.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The cancellation mechanism may be tied to a symmetry that is lost precisely at λ = 1.
  • A different regularization or inclusion of non-perturbative effects might be needed to define the S-matrix of the T-dual theory.
  • The result raises the question whether the same cancellation pattern survives when the full supersymmetric spectrum is restored.

Load-bearing premise

The perturbative bosonic tree-level calculation in light-cone gauge is sufficient to establish both the cancellation that preserves integrability and the ill-defined nature of the S-matrix at λ → 1, without higher-order corrections or fermionic modes altering the conclusion.

What would settle it

An explicit one-loop or fermionic-inclusive computation of the S-matrix near λ = 1 that either restores a finite elastic S-matrix or confirms persistent divergences would settle the claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.27846 by Alessandro Sfondrini, Marco Costantino, Silvia Penati.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Group velocity v−(p) = ∂ω−/∂p oscillation for λ = 0.25 (blue), and λ = 0.75 (red). The jump discontinuities indicate the presence of different branches in the ω− dispersion relation, which can be treated as distinct types of particles [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: On the left we plot the dispersion relations (44) obtained by setting λ = 0 in the general expression (35). The yellow line indicates ω+, whereas the blue line is ω−. On the right we interpret the particles on the same slope as part of the same branch (see eq. (45)), in line with refs. [36, 49]. Particles of the non-Abelian T-dual model (λ → 1). While at the level of string background the λ → 1 limit requi… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We consider the supersymmetric $\lambda$-deformation of $\text{AdS}_3 \times \text{S}^3 \times \text{T}^4$ superstrings and compute its perturbative bosonic tree-level worldsheet S matrix in the light-cone gauge. For generic values of $0 \leq \lambda < 1$, we show that the worldsheet scattering remains compatible with integrability due to a non-trivial cancellation of non-elastic scattering processes. By contrast, the S matrix becomes ill-defined for $\lambda \to 1$, despite the fact that this limit reproduces the non-Abelian T-dual geometry up to an analytic continuation. This suggests that the $\lambda \to 1$ limit does not capture the full worldsheet dynamics of the T-dual theory.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript computes the tree-level bosonic worldsheet S-matrix in light-cone gauge for the supersymmetric λ-deformed AdS₃ × S³ × T⁴ string. For 0 ≤ λ < 1 it reports a non-trivial cancellation of non-elastic 2→2 processes that preserves compatibility with integrability; for λ → 1 the S-matrix is found to be ill-defined, even though the target-space geometry reproduces the non-Abelian T-dual background (up to analytic continuation). The result is presented as evidence that the λ → 1 limit does not capture the full worldsheet dynamics of the T-dual theory.

Significance. If the reported bosonic cancellation is confirmed by explicit amplitudes, the work supplies a concrete perturbative diagnostic of integrability preservation under λ-deformations and isolates a dynamical distinction at λ = 1 that is invisible from the geometry alone. Such checks are useful for classifying integrable string backgrounds and their limits. The restriction to tree-level bosonic modes, however, caps the immediate implications for the complete supersymmetric theory.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and §1] Abstract and §1: the claim that 'worldsheet scattering remains compatible with integrability' is grounded solely in the bosonic tree-level cancellation. The supersymmetric model contains fermions; without an explicit statement or calculation showing that fermionic channels also cancel (or a clear qualification that the result applies only to the bosonic sector), the integrability conclusion is not fully supported by the presented evidence.
  2. [§4] §4 (λ → 1 limit): the ill-defined character of the S-matrix is demonstrated via the bosonic amplitudes. The manuscript should indicate whether this divergence survives the inclusion of fermions or one-loop corrections, since either could modify the claimed mismatch with the NATD theory.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 1 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and the constructive comments. We address the major comments point by point below.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [Abstract and §1] Abstract and §1: the claim that 'worldsheet scattering remains compatible with integrability' is grounded solely in the bosonic tree-level cancellation. The supersymmetric model contains fermions; without an explicit statement or calculation showing that fermionic channels also cancel (or a clear qualification that the result applies only to the bosonic sector), the integrability conclusion is not fully supported by the presented evidence.

    Authors: We agree that the calculation and the reported cancellation are restricted to the bosonic sector. The abstract and §1 will be revised to include an explicit qualification that the compatibility with integrability is demonstrated for bosonic tree-level scattering processes. No claim is made regarding fermionic channels. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§4] §4 (λ → 1 limit): the ill-defined character of the S-matrix is demonstrated via the bosonic amplitudes. The manuscript should indicate whether this divergence survives the inclusion of fermions or one-loop corrections, since either could modify the claimed mismatch with the NATD theory.

    Authors: The divergence is established at the level of bosonic tree-level amplitudes, which already demonstrates a mismatch with the NATD theory in the bosonic sector. We will add a clarifying remark in §4 stating that the analysis is limited to tree-level bosonic modes and that the effects of fermions or loop corrections lie outside the scope of this work. revision: partial

standing simulated objections not resolved
  • Whether the observed divergence at λ → 1 survives the inclusion of fermions or one-loop corrections cannot be answered without additional calculations not performed in the manuscript.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; direct perturbative computation of S-matrix elements

full rationale

The paper derives the tree-level bosonic S-matrix by explicit computation from the λ-deformed action in light-cone gauge. The reported cancellation of non-elastic processes for λ < 1 and the ill-defined structure at λ → 1 are presented as outcomes of this calculation, not as quantities fitted to data or defined in terms of themselves. No self-citation chains, imported uniqueness theorems, or ansatze smuggled via prior work are invoked to force the central claims. The derivation chain is self-contained against the Lagrangian and gauge choice, with results obtained by direct evaluation of Feynman diagrams or equivalent amplitude methods.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the domain assumptions that the supersymmetric λ-deformation is well-defined, that light-cone gauge fixing is valid for the bosonic sector, and that tree-level perturbation theory captures the integrability property. No free parameters are fitted and no new entities are introduced.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The supersymmetric λ-deformation of AdS3 × S3 × T4 is well-defined for 0 ≤ λ < 1.
    Stated as the starting point of the calculation in the abstract.
  • domain assumption Light-cone gauge is appropriate for extracting the bosonic tree-level S-matrix.
    Invoked without further justification in the abstract for the perturbative computation.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5663 in / 1474 out tokens · 56432 ms · 2026-06-29T04:07:46.989332+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

51 extracted references · 45 canonical work pages · 31 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    The Large N Limit of Superconformal Field Theories and Supergravity

    Juan Martin Maldacena. The LargeNlimit of superconformal field theories and supergravity. Adv. Theor. Math. Phys., 2:231–252, 1998.arXiv:hep-th/9711200,doi:10.4310/ATMP.1998. v2.n2.a1

  2. [2]

    Strings in AdS_3 and the SL(2,R) WZW Model. Part 1: The Spectrum

    Juan Martin Maldacena and Hirosi Ooguri. Strings in AdS(3) and SL(2,R) WZW model 1.: The Spectrum.J. Math. Phys., 42:2929–2960, 2001.arXiv:hep-th/0001053,doi:10.1063/1. 1377273

  3. [3]

    Penrose limits and maximal supersymmetry

    Matthias Blau, Jose M. Figueroa-O’Farrill, Christopher Hull, and George Papadopoulos. Pen- rose limits and maximal supersymmetry.Class. Quant. Grav., 19:L87–L95, 2002.arXiv: hep-th/0201081,doi:10.1088/0264-9381/19/10/101

  4. [4]

    R. R. Metsaev and Arkady A. Tseytlin. Exactly solvable model of superstring in Ramond- Ramond plane wave background.Phys. Rev. D, 65:126004, 2002.arXiv:hep-th/0202109, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.65.126004

  5. [5]

    Foundations of the AdS_5 x S^5 Superstring. Part I

    Gleb Arutyunov and Sergey Frolov. Foundations of the AdS 5 ×S 5 Superstring. Part I.J. Phys. A, 42:254003, 2009.arXiv:0901.4937,doi:10.1088/1751-8113/42/25/254003

  6. [6]

    Review of AdS/CFT Integrability: An Overview

    Niklas Beisert et al. Review of AdS/CFT Integrability: An Overview.Lett. Math. Phys., 99:3–32, 2012.arXiv:1012.3982,doi:10.1007/s11005-011-0529-2

  7. [7]

    Zamolodchikov and Alexei B

    Alexander B. Zamolodchikov and Alexei B. Zamolodchikov. Factorized s Matrices in Two- Dimensions as the Exact Solutions of Certain Relativistic Quantum Field Models.Annals Phys., 120:253–291, 1979.doi:10.1016/0003-4916(79)90391-9

  8. [8]

    A. B. Zamolodchikov. Thermodynamic Bethe Ansatz in Relativistic Models. Scaling Three State Potts and Lee-yang Models.Nucl. Phys. B, 342:695–720, 1990.doi:10.1016/0550-3213(90) 90333-9

  9. [9]

    On String S-matrix, Bound States and TBA

    Gleb Arutyunov and Sergey Frolov. On String S-matrix, Bound States and TBA.JHEP, 12:024, 2007.arXiv:0710.1568,doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2007/12/024

  10. [10]

    Integrable deformations of sigma models.J

    Ben Hoare. Integrable deformations of sigma models.J. Phys. A, 55(9):093001, 2022.arXiv: 2109.14284,doi:10.1088/1751-8121/ac4a1e

  11. [11]

    Seibold and Alessandro Sfondrini

    Fiona K. Seibold and Alessandro Sfondrini. AdS3 integrability tensionless limits, and de- formations: A review. InMATRIX Book Series, volume 7, 8 2024.arXiv:2408.08414, doi:10.1007/978-3-032-16202-1_5

  12. [12]

    Retore, Fiona K

    Saskia Demulder, Sibylle Driezen, Bob Knighton, Gerben Oling, Ana L. Retore, Fiona K. Sei- bold, Alessandro Sfondrini, and Ziqi Yan. Exact approaches on the string worldsheet.J. Phys. A, 57(42):423001, 2024.arXiv:2312.12930,doi:10.1088/1751-8121/ad72be. 15 IOP PublishingJournal of Physics ACostantinoet al

  13. [13]

    Towards a two-parameter q-deformation of AdS_3 x S^3 x M^4 superstrings

    Ben Hoare. Towards a two-parameter q-deformation of AdS 3 ×S 3 ×M 4 superstrings.Nucl. Phys. B, 891:259–295, 2015.arXiv:1411.1266,doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2014.12.012

  14. [14]

    Integrable deformations of theG k1 × Gk2 /Gk1+k2 coset CFTs.Nucl

    Konstantinos Sfetsos and Konstantinos Siampos. Integrable deformations of theG k1 × Gk2 /Gk1+k2 coset CFTs.Nucl. Phys. B, 927:124–139, 2018.arXiv:1710.02515,doi:10.1016/ j.nuclphysb.2017.12.011

  15. [15]

    Fiona K. Seibold. Two-parameter integrable deformations of theAdS 3 ×S 3 ×T 4 superstring. JHEP, 10:049, 2019.arXiv:1907.05430,doi:10.1007/JHEP10(2019)049

  16. [16]

    Seibold, and Arkady A

    Ben Hoare, Fiona K. Seibold, and Arkady A. Tseytlin. Integrable supersymmetric deformations of AdS3×S 3×T 4.JHEP, 09:018, 2022.arXiv:2206.12347,doi:10.1007/JHEP09(2022)018

  17. [17]

    Ben Hoare, Nat Levine, and Fiona K. Seibold. Bi-ηand bi-λdeformations ofZ 4 permutation supercosets.JHEP, 04:024, 2023.arXiv:2212.08625,doi:10.1007/JHEP04(2023)024

  18. [18]

    Seibold and Alessandro Sfondrini

    Fiona K. Seibold and Alessandro Sfondrini. Interpolating families of integrable AdS 3 back- grounds.J. Phys. A, 58(23):235401, 2025.arXiv:2502.07103,doi:10.1088/1751-8121/ addb96

  19. [19]

    Integrable interpolations: From exact CFTs to non-Abelian T-duals

    Konstadinos Sfetsos. Integrable interpolations: From exact CFTs to non-Abelian T-duals.Nucl. Phys. B, 880:225–246, 2014.arXiv:1312.4560,doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2014.01.004

  20. [20]

    Integrable Deformations of Strings on Symmetric Spaces

    Timothy J. Hollowood, J. Luis Miramontes, and David M. Schmidtt. Integrable Defor- mations of Strings on Symmetric Spaces.JHEP, 11:009, 2014.arXiv:1407.2840,doi: 10.1007/JHEP11(2014)009

  21. [21]

    Spacetimes for \lambda-deformations

    Konstantinos Sfetsos and Daniel C. Thompson. Spacetimes forλ-deformations.JHEP, 12:164, 2014.arXiv:1410.1886,doi:10.1007/JHEP12(2014)164

  22. [22]

    An Integrable Deformation of the AdS5 x S5 Superstring

    Timothy J. Hollowood, J. Luis Miramontes, and David M. Schmidtt. An Integrable Deformation of theAdS 5 ×S 5 Superstring.J. Phys. A, 47(49):495402, 2014.arXiv:1409.1538,doi: 10.1088/1751-8113/47/49/495402

  23. [23]

    S-matrix for strings on $\eta$-deformed AdS5 x S5

    Gleb Arutyunov, Riccardo Borsato, and Sergey Frolov. S-matrix for strings onη-deformed AdS5 x S5.JHEP, 04:002, 2014.arXiv:1312.3542,doi:10.1007/JHEP04(2014)002

  24. [24]

    Yang-Baxter $\sigma$-models and dS/AdS T-duality

    Ctirad Klimcik. Yang-Baxter sigma models and dS/AdS T duality.JHEP, 12:051, 2002.arXiv: hep-th/0210095,doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2002/12/051

  25. [25]

    An integrable deformation of theAdS 5 ×S 5 superstring action.Phys

    Francois Delduc, Marc Magro, and Benoit Vicedo. An integrable deformation of theAdS 5 ×S 5 superstring action.Phys. Rev. Lett., 112(5):051601, 2014.arXiv:1309.5850,doi:10.1103/ PhysRevLett.112.051601

  26. [26]

    Jordanian deformations of the AdS_5xS^5 superstring

    Io Kawaguchi, Takuya Matsumoto, and Kentaroh Yoshida. Jordanian deformations of the AdS5xS5 superstring.JHEP, 04:153, 2014.arXiv:1401.4855,doi:10.1007/JHEP04(2014) 153

  27. [27]

    On classical Yang-Baxter based deformations of the AdS_5 x S^5 superstring

    Stijn J. van Tongeren. On classical Yang-Baxter based deformations of the AdS 5 ×S 5 super- string.JHEP, 06:048, 2015.arXiv:1504.05516,doi:10.1007/JHEP06(2015)048

  28. [28]

    Affine q-deformed symmetry and the classical Yang-Baxter sigma-model

    Francois Delduc, Takashi Kameyama, Marc Magro, and Benoit Vicedo. Affineq-deformed symmetry and the classical Yang-Baxterσ-model.JHEP, 03:126, 2017.arXiv:1701.03691, doi:10.1007/JHEP03(2017)126

  29. [29]

    Generalised integrable $\lambda$- and $\eta$-deformations and their relation

    Konstantinos Sfetsos, Konstantinos Siampos, and Daniel C. Thompson. Generalised integrableλ - andη-deformations and their relation.Nucl. Phys. B, 899:489–512, 2015.arXiv:1506.05784, doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2015.08.015

  30. [30]

    On deformations of AdS_n x S^n supercosets

    B. Hoare, R. Roiban, and A. A. Tseytlin. On deformations ofAdS n xS n supercosets.JHEP, 06:002, 2014.arXiv:1403.5517,doi:10.1007/JHEP06(2014)002

  31. [31]

    Hoare and A

    B. Hoare and A. A. Tseytlin. On integrable deformations of superstring sigma models related to AdSn ×S n supercosets.Nucl. Phys. B, 897:448–478, 2015.arXiv:1504.07213,doi:10.1016/ j.nuclphysb.2015.06.001. 16 IOP PublishingJournal of Physics ACostantinoet al

  32. [32]

    Deformed integrable $\sigma$-models, classical $R$-matrices and classical exchange algebra on Drinfel'd doubles

    Benoit Vicedo. Deformed integrableσ-models, classical R-matrices and classical exchange algebra on Drinfel’d doubles.J. Phys. A, 48(35):355203, 2015.arXiv:1504.06303,doi: 10.1088/1751-8113/48/35/355203

  33. [33]

    Supersymmetric backgrounds fromλ-deformations.JHEP, 01:084, 2024.arXiv:2310.17700,doi:10.1007/JHEP01(2024) 084

    Georgios Itsios, Konstantinos Sfetsos, and Konstantinos Siampos. Supersymmetric backgrounds fromλ-deformations.JHEP, 01:084, 2024.arXiv:2310.17700,doi:10.1007/JHEP01(2024) 084

  34. [34]

    The complete AdS3×S 3×T 4 worldsheet S matrix.JHEP, 10:066, 2014.arXiv:1406.0453,doi:10.1007/ JHEP10(2014)066

    Riccardo Borsato, Olof Ohlsson Sax, Alessandro Sfondrini, and Bogdan Stefanski. The complete AdS3×S 3×T 4 worldsheet S matrix.JHEP, 10:066, 2014.arXiv:1406.0453,doi:10.1007/ JHEP10(2014)066

  35. [35]

    The complete worldsheet S matrix of superstrings on AdS_3 x S^3 x T^4 with mixed three-form flux

    Thomas Lloyd, Olof Ohlsson Sax, Alessandro Sfondrini, and Bogdan Stefa´ nski, Jr. The complete worldsheet S matrix of superstrings on AdS 3×S 3×T 4 with mixed three-form flux.Nucl. Phys. B, 891:570–612, 2015.arXiv:1410.0866,doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2014.12.019

  36. [36]

    Integrable spin chain for stringy Wess-Zumino-Witten models

    Andrea Dei and Alessandro Sfondrini. Integrable spin chain for stringy Wess-Zumino-Witten models.JHEP, 07:109, 2018.arXiv:1806.00422,doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2018)109

  37. [37]

    Yang Baxter and Anisotropic Sigma and Lambda Models, Cyclic RG and Exact S-Matrices

    Calan Appadu, Timothy J. Hollowood, Dafydd Price, and Daniel C. Thompson. Yang Baxter and Anisotropic Sigma and Lambda Models, Cyclic RG and Exact S-Matrices.JHEP, 09:035, 2017.arXiv:1706.05322,doi:10.1007/JHEP09(2017)035

  38. [38]

    Strings in flat space and pp waves from ${\cal N}=4$ Super Yang Mills

    David Eliecer Berenstein, Juan Martin Maldacena, and Horatiu Stefan Nastase. Strings in flat space and pp waves from N=4 superYang-Mills.JHEP, 04:013, 2002.arXiv:hep-th/0202021, doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2002/04/013

  39. [39]

    Seibold, Stijn J

    Fiona K. Seibold, Stijn J. van Tongeren, and Yannik Zimmermann. On quantum deformations of AdS3 ×S 3 ×T 4 and mirror duality.JHEP, 09:110, 2021.arXiv:2107.02564,doi:10.1007/ JHEP09(2021)110

  40. [40]

    Uniform Light-Cone Gauge for Strings in AdS_5 x S^5: Solving su(1|1) Sector

    Gleb Arutyunov and Sergey Frolov. Uniform light-cone gauge for strings in AdS(5) x S**5: Solv- ingSU(1|1) sector.JHEP, 01:055, 2006.arXiv:hep-th/0510208,doi:10.1088/1126-6708/ 2006/01/055

  41. [41]

    Strings on NS-NS Backgrounds as Integrable Deformations

    Marco Baggio and Alessandro Sfondrini. Strings on NS-NS Backgrounds as Integrable Defor- mations.Phys. Rev. D, 98(2):021902, 2018.arXiv:1804.01998,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.98. 021902

  42. [42]

    TTbar deformation and the light-cone gauge

    Sergey A. Frolov.T TDeformation and the Light-Cone Gauge.Proc. Steklov Inst. Math., 309(1):107–126, 2020.arXiv:1905.07946,doi:10.1134/S0081543820030098

  43. [43]

    Scattering in integrable pp-wave backgrounds: S- matrix and absence of particle production.Nucl

    George Georgiou and Konstantinos Sfetsos. Scattering in integrable pp-wave backgrounds: S- matrix and absence of particle production.Nucl. Phys. B, 987:116096, 2023.arXiv:2208.01072, doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2023.116096

  44. [44]

    Retore, and Fiona K

    Ben Hoare, Ana L. Retore, and Fiona K. Seibold. Elliptic deformations of the AdS 3 ×S 3 ×T 4 string.JHEP, 04:042, 2024.arXiv:2312.14031,doi:10.1007/JHEP04(2024)042

  45. [45]

    Particle production in a light-cone gauge fixed Jordanian deformation of AdS5×S5.Phys

    Riccardo Borsato and Sibylle Driezen. Particle production in a light-cone gauge fixed Jordanian deformation of AdS5×S5.Phys. Rev. D, 111(8):086010, 2025.arXiv:2412.08411,doi:10. 1103/PhysRevD.111.086010

  46. [46]

    Ben Hoare and Fiona K. Seibold. Supersymmetry and integrability of the elliptic AdS 3×S 3× T4 superstring.JHEP, 02:139, 2026.arXiv:2507.18548,doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2026)139

  47. [47]

    Giant Magnons

    Diego M. Hofman and Juan Martin Maldacena. Giant Magnons.J. Phys. A, 39:13095–13118, 2006.arXiv:hep-th/0604135,doi:10.1088/0305-4470/39/41/S17

  48. [48]

    All-loop worldsheet S matrix for AdS_3 x S^3 x T^4

    Riccardo Borsato, Olof Ohlsson Sax, Alessandro Sfondrini, and Bogdan Stefanski. Towards the All-Loop Worldsheet S Matrix forAdS 3 ×S 3 ×T 4.Phys. Rev. Lett., 113(13):131601, 2014. arXiv:1403.4543,doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.131601

  49. [49]

    On string theory on AdS_3 x S^3 x T^4 with mixed 3-form flux: tree-level S-matrix

    B. Hoare and A. A. Tseytlin. On string theory onAdS 3 ×S 3 ×T 4 with mixed 3-form flux: tree-level S-matrix.Nucl. Phys. B, 873:682–727, 2013.arXiv:1303.1037,doi:10.1016/j. nuclphysb.2013.05.005. 17 IOP PublishingJournal of Physics ACostantinoet al

  50. [50]

    On the worldsheet S matrix of the AdS 3/CFT2 mixed-flux mirror model.JHEP, 05:237, 2024.arXiv:2308.15927, doi:10.1007/JHEP05(2024)237

    Nicola Baglioni, Davide Polvara, Andrea Pone, and Alessandro Sfondrini. On the worldsheet S matrix of the AdS 3/CFT2 mixed-flux mirror model.JHEP, 05:237, 2024.arXiv:2308.15927, doi:10.1007/JHEP05(2024)237

  51. [51]

    Near BMN dynamics of the AdS(3) x S(3) x S(3) x S(1) superstring

    Nitin Rughoonauth, Per Sundin, and Linus Wulff. Near BMN dynamics of the AdS(3) x S(3) x S(3) x S(1) superstring.JHEP, 07:159, 2012.arXiv:1204.4742,doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2012) 159. 18