pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.31867 · v1 · pith:WKMVF7RQnew · submitted 2026-06-30 · ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci · cond-mat.mes-hall· cond-mat.str-el· quant-ph

Giant perpendicular Edelstein polarization in 2D compensated magnets via bichromatic Floquet driving

Mohsen Yarmohammadi , Daegeun Jo , Marco Berritta , Libor \v{S}mejkal , James K. Freericks , Peter M. Oppeneer This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-07-01 04:11 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci cond-mat.mes-hallcond-mat.str-elquant-ph
keywords altermagnetsEdelstein polarizationFloquet drivingRashba spin-orbit couplingbichromatic driving2D magnetsperpendicular magnetizationspintronics
0
0 comments X

The pith

Bichromatic Floquet driving with Rashba spin-orbit coupling generates giant perpendicular Edelstein polarizations in 2D altermagnets by creating an effective in-plane Zeeman-like field.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that two-frequency light driving, when combined with Rashba spin-orbit coupling, produces large perpendicular Edelstein polarizations in 2D compensated magnets such as altermagnets. Single-frequency driving cannot achieve this because it leaves the two-fold rotational symmetry intact. The bichromatic drive breaks that symmetry dynamically and creates a stray-field-free in-plane effective field whose orbital response yields polarizations between 0.5 and 1.5 Bohr magnetons. The size and direction of the effect are controlled by universal selection rules that depend on the magnet's parity and the harmonic content of the second beam. This mechanism supplies a route to perpendicular magnetization switching without external stray fields.

Core claim

Combining Rashba spin-orbit coupling with bichromatic Floquet driving activates giant perpendicular Edelstein polarizations across 2D altermagnets and broader classes of unconventional spin-polarized magnets, a feat monochromatic driving cannot achieve. By dynamically breaking two-fold rotational symmetry, the two-frequency drive induces a stray-field-free in-plane Zeeman-like field that generates orbitally dominated PEPs of 0.5--1.5 μ_B. These emergent PEPs are governed by universal selection rules tied to the system's magnetic parity and the second beam's harmonics and provide a mechanism for perpendicular memory writing.

What carries the argument

Bichromatic Floquet driving (bilinear, bicircular, or circular-linear configurations) that dynamically breaks two-fold rotational symmetry to induce an in-plane Zeeman-like field.

If this is right

  • The induced PEPs enable stray-field-free perpendicular memory writing in compensated magnets.
  • The response magnitude reaches 0.5--1.5 μ_B and is orbitally dominated.
  • The effect extends to wider classes of unconventional spin-polarized magnets beyond altermagnets.
  • Response strength and sign follow selection rules fixed by magnetic parity and second-beam harmonics.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same symmetry-breaking principle might be tested in other 2D van der Waals magnets that host Rashba coupling.
  • Dual-frequency optical control could reduce the need for external magnetic fields in spintronic devices.
  • Time-resolved Kerr or Faraday measurements under two-color illumination would provide a direct experimental test.

Load-bearing premise

The bichromatic drive configurations break two-fold rotational symmetry in a way that produces the Zeeman-like field without introducing other effects that cancel or suppress the perpendicular polarization in the 2D system.

What would settle it

A numerical simulation or experiment on a 2D altermagnet model showing perpendicular Edelstein polarization remaining below 0.1 μ_B under any of the listed bichromatic drive configurations would falsify the central claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.31867 by Daegeun Jo, James K. Freericks, Libor \v{S}mejkal, Marco Berritta, Mohsen Yarmohammadi, Peter M. Oppeneer.

Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Intraband (a) and interband (b) contributions to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Spin (a) and orbital (b) contributions to the total [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. (a) Total out-of-plane Edelstein response [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

While unconventional $p$-wave magnets can generate nonrelativistic Edelstein polarizations, spin-group symmetries strictly forbid these responses in unconventional magnets with higher-order harmonics, such as $d$-wave altermagnets. Here, we demonstrate that combining Rashba spin-orbit coupling with bichromatic Floquet driving activates giant perpendicular Edelstein polarizations (PEPs) across 2D altermagnets and broader classes of unconventional spin-polarized magnets -- a feat monochromatic driving cannot achieve. By dynamically breaking two-fold rotational symmetry, the two-frequency drive (including bilinear, bicircular, and circular-linear configurations) induces a stray-field-free in-plane Zeeman-like field that generates orbitally dominated PEPs (0.5--1.5 $\mu_{\rm B}$). This massive response is governed by universal selection rules tied to the system's magnetic parity and the second beam's harmonics. These emergent PEPs provide a powerful mechanism for perpendicular memory writing.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims that combining Rashba spin-orbit coupling with bichromatic Floquet driving (in bilinear, bicircular, and circular-linear configurations) dynamically breaks two-fold rotational symmetry in 2D altermagnets and related unconventional magnets, inducing a stray-field-free in-plane Zeeman-like field that generates orbitally dominated perpendicular Edelstein polarizations (PEPs) of 0.5--1.5 μ_B; this is impossible with monochromatic driving and is governed by universal selection rules based on magnetic parity and the second beam's harmonics, enabling perpendicular memory writing.

Significance. If the central symmetry-breaking mechanism and resulting PEP magnitudes hold, the work would provide a general route to activate forbidden responses in compensated magnets, with direct relevance to stray-field-free spintronic devices.

minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the quoted PEP range (0.5--1.5 μ_B) should be tied explicitly to the model parameters or specific lattice examples used in the calculations.
  2. The manuscript should clarify whether the orbitally dominated character of the PEP is shown via explicit decomposition of the response function or via orbital-projected quantities.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive summary of our work and the recommendation of minor revision. No specific major comments were provided in the report.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation self-contained via symmetry and driving configurations

full rationale

The paper's central claim rests on symmetry arguments showing that bichromatic Floquet driving (bilinear, bicircular, circular-linear) plus Rashba SOC dynamically breaks C2 symmetry to induce an in-plane Zeeman-like field, yielding PEPs that monochromatic driving cannot produce. This follows directly from the two-frequency construction and magnetic parity selection rules without any reduction to fitted parameters, self-definitional loops, or load-bearing self-citations. No equations rename inputs as predictions or smuggle ansatzes via prior work by the same authors. The derivation is externally falsifiable via the stated driving configurations and remains independent of the target PEP magnitudes.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

Limited information from abstract; no free parameters or invented entities explicitly mentioned.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The presence of Rashba spin-orbit coupling in the 2D compensated magnets
    Invoked as the key ingredient combined with the driving.
  • standard math Floquet theory applies to the periodic driving in the system
    Standard for time-periodic perturbations in quantum systems.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5741 in / 1282 out tokens · 49724 ms · 2026-07-01T04:11:23.388369+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

86 extracted references · 12 canonical work pages · 3 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Šmejkal, R

    L. Šmejkal, R. González-Hernández, T. Jungwirth, and J. Sinova, Crystal time-reversal symmetry breaking and spontaneousHalleffectincollinearantiferromagnets,Sci- ence Advances6, eaaz8809 (2020)

    2020

  2. [2]

    Hayami, Y

    S. Hayami, Y. Yanagi, and H. Kusunose, Momentum- 6 dependent spin splitting by collinear antiferromagnetic ordering, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan88, 123702 (2019)

    2019

  3. [3]

    Šmejkal, J

    L. Šmejkal, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Beyond conven- tional ferromagnetism and antiferromagnetism: A phase with nonrelativistic spin and crystal rotation symmetry, Phys. Rev. X12, 031042 (2022)

    2022

  4. [4]

    Šmejkal, J

    L. Šmejkal, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Emerging re- search landscape of altermagnetism, Phys. Rev. X12, 040501 (2022)

    2022

  5. [5]

    L. Bai, W. Feng, S. Liu, L. Šmejkal, Y. Mokrousov, and Y.Yao,Altermagnetism: Exploringnewfrontiersinmag- netism and spintronics, Advanced Functional Materials 34, 2409327 (2024)

    2024

  6. [6]

    Q. Liu, X. Dai, and S. Blügel, Different facets of uncon- ventional magnetism, Nature Physics21, 329 (2025)

    2025

  7. [7]

    Krempaský, L

    J. Krempaský, L. Šmejkal, S. W. D’Souza, M. Hajlaoui, G. Springholz, K. Uhlířová, F. Alarab, P. C. Constanti- nou, V. Strocov, D. Usanov,et al., Altermagnetic lifting of Kramers spin degeneracy, Nature626, 517 (2024)

    2024

  8. [8]

    S. Lee, S. Lee, S. Jung, J. Jung, D. Kim, Y. Lee, B. Seok, J. Kim, B. G. Park, L. Šmejkal, C.-J. Kang, and C. Kim, Broken Kramers degeneracy in altermag- netic MnTe, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 036702 (2024)

    2024

  9. [9]

    Osumi, S

    T. Osumi, S. Souma, T. Aoyama, K. Yamauchi, A. Honma, K. Nakayama, T. Takahashi, K. Ohgushi, and T. Sato, Observation of a giant band splitting in alter- magnetic MnTe, Phys. Rev. B109, 115102 (2024)

    2024

  10. [10]

    M. Naka, S. Hayami, H. Kusunose, Y. Yanagi, Y. Mo- tome, and H. Seo, Spin current generation in organic an- tiferromagnets, Nature Communications10, 4305 (2019)

    2019

  11. [11]

    I. I. Mazin, K. Koepernik, M. D. Johannes, R. González- Hernández, and L. Šmejkal, Prediction of unconventional magnetism in doped FeSb2, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences118, e2108924118 (2021)

    2021

  12. [12]

    Shao, S.-H

    D.-F. Shao, S.-H. Zhang, M. Li, C.-B. Eom, and E. Y. Tsymbal, Spin-neutral currents for spintronics, Nature Communications12, 7061 (2021)

    2021

  13. [13]

    Z. Feng, X. Zhou, L. Šmejkal, L. Wu, Z. Zhu, H. Guo, R. González-Hernández, X. Wang, H. Yan, P. Qin,et al., An anomalous Hall effect in altermagnetic ruthenium dioxide, Nature Electronics5, 735 (2022)

    2022

  14. [14]

    González-Hernández, L

    R. González-Hernández, L. Šmejkal, K. Výborný, Y. Ya- hagi, J. Sinova, T. Jungwirth, and J. Železný, Ef- ficient electrical spin splitter based on nonrelativis- tic collinear antiferromagnetism, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 127701 (2021)

    2021

  15. [15]

    H. Bai, L. Han, X. Y. Feng, Y. J. Zhou, R. X. Su, Q. Wang, L. Y. Liao, W. X. Zhu, X. Z. Chen,et al., Observation of spin splitting torque in a collinear anti- ferromagnet RuO2, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 197202 (2022)

    2022

  16. [16]

    Karube, T

    S. Karube, T. Tanaka, D. Sugawara, N. Kadoguchi, M. Kohda, and J. Nitta, Observation of spin-splitter torque in collinear antiferromagnetic RuO2, Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 137201 (2022)

    2022

  17. [17]

    V. M. Edelstein, Spin polarization of conduction elec- trons induced by electric current in two-dimensional asymmetric electron systems, Solid State Communica- tions73, 233 (1990)

    1990

  18. [18]

    Y. A. Bychkov and É. I. Rashba, Properties of a 2D elec- tron gas with lifted spectral degeneracy, Soviet Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics Letters39, 78 (1984)

    1984

  19. [19]

    Manchon, H

    A. Manchon, H. C. Koo, J. Nitta, S. M. Frolov, and R. A. Duine, New perspectives for Rashba spin–orbit coupling, Nature Materials14, 871 (2015)

    2015

  20. [20]

    Johansson, J

    A. Johansson, J. Henk, and I. Mertig, Theoretical aspects of the Edelstein effect for anisotropic two-dimensional electron gas and topological insulators, Phys. Rev. B93, 195440 (2016)

    2016

  21. [21]

    Gaiardoni, M

    I. Gaiardoni, M. Trama, A. Maiellaro, C. Guarcello, F. Romeo, and R. Citro, Edelstein effect in isotropic and anisotropic Rashba models, Condensed Matter10, 10.3390/condmat10010015 (2025)

    work page doi:10.3390/condmat10010015 2025

  22. [22]

    A. B. Hellenes, T. Jungwirth, R. Jaeschke-Ubiergo, A. Chakraborty, J. Sinova, and L. Šmejkal, P-wave mag- nets, (2024), arXiv:2309.01607

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  23. [23]

    Chakraborty, A

    A. Chakraborty, A. Birk Hellenes, R. Jaeschke-Ubiergo, T. Jungwirth, L. Šmejkal, and J. Sinova, Highly efficient non-relativistic Edelstein effect in nodalp-wave magnets, Nature Communications16, 7270 (2025)

    2025

  24. [24]

    N. A. A. Pari, R. Jaeschke-Ubiergo, A. Chakraborty, L. Šmejkal, and J. Sinova, Nonrelativistic linear Edel- steineffectinhelicalEuIn 2As2,Phys.Rev.B112,024404 (2025)

    2025

  25. [25]

    Q. Shao, P. Li, L. Liu, H. Yang, S. Fukami, A. Razavi, H. Wu, K. Wang, F. Freimuth, Y. Mokrousov,et al., Roadmap of spin–orbit torques, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics57, 1 (2021)

    2021

  26. [26]

    M.-G. Kang, S. Lee, and B.-G. Park, Field-free spin-orbit torques switching and its applications, npj Spintronics3, 8 (2025)

    2025

  27. [27]

    V. D. Nguyen, S. Rao, K. Wostyn, and S. Couet, Recent progress in spin-orbit torque magnetic random-access memory, npj Spintronics2, 48 (2024)

    2024

  28. [28]

    H. Wu, J. Zhang, B. Cui, S. A. Razavi, X. Che, Q. Pan, D. Wu, G. Yu, X. Han, and K. L. Wang, Field-free ap- proaches for deterministic spin-orbit torque switching of the perpendicular magnet, Materials Futures1, 022201 (2022)

    2022

  29. [29]

    Manchon, J

    A. Manchon, J. Železný, I. M. Miron, T. Jungwirth, J. Sinova, A. Thiaville, K. Garello, and P. Gambardella, Current-induced spin-orbit torques in ferromagnetic and antiferromagnetic systems, Rev. Mod. Phys.91, 035004 (2019)

    2019

  30. [30]

    M. Wang, J. Zhou, X. Xu, T. Zhang, Z. Zhu, Z. Guo, Y. Deng, M. Yang, K. Meng, B. He,etal., Field-free spin- orbit torque switching via out-of-plane spin-polarization induced by an antiferromagnetic insulator/heavy metal interface, Nature Communications14, 2871 (2023)

    2023

  31. [31]

    I.-H. Kao, R. Muzzio, H. Zhang, M. Zhu, J. Gobbo, S. Yuan, D. Weber, R. Rao, J. Li, J. H. Edgar,et al., De- terministic switching of a perpendicularly polarized mag- net using unconventional spin–orbit torques in WTe2, Nature Materials21, 1029 (2022)

    2022

  32. [32]

    Salemi, M

    L. Salemi, M. Berritta, A. K. Nandy, and P. M. Op- peneer, Orbitally dominated Rashba-Edelstein effect in noncentrosymmetric antiferromagnets, Nature Commu- nications10, 5381 (2019)

    2019

  33. [33]

    Fukunaga, S

    R. Fukunaga, S. Haku, H. Hayashi, and K. Ando, Orbital torque originating from orbital Hall effect in Zr, Physical Review Research5, 023054 (2023)

    2023

  34. [34]

    Y. Yang, P. Wang, J. Chen, D. Zhang, C. Pan, S. Hu, T. Wang, W. Yue, C. Chen, W. Jiang,et al., Orbital torque switching in perpendicularly magnetized materi- als, Nature Communications15, 8645 (2024)

    2024

  35. [35]

    Ding, M.-G

    S. Ding, M.-G. Kang, W. Legrand, and P. Gambardella, Orbital torque in rare-earth transition-metal ferrimag- 7 nets, Physical Review Letters132, 236702 (2024)

    2024

  36. [36]

    A. Fert, R. Ramesh, V. Garcia, F. Casanova, and M. Bibes, Electrical control of magnetism by electric field and current-induced torques, Rev. Mod. Phys.96, 015005 (2024)

    2024

  37. [37]

    Dieny, I

    B. Dieny, I. L. Prejbeanu, K. Garello, P. Gambardella, P. Freitas, R. Lehndorff, W. Raberg, U. Ebels, S. O. Demokritov, J. Akerman,et al., Opportunities and chal- lenges for spintronics in the microelectronics industry, Nature Electronics3, 446 (2020)

    2020

  38. [38]

    G. Ji, Y. Zhang, Y. Chai, and T. Nan, Recent progress on controlling spin-orbit torques by materials design, npj Spintronics2, 56 (2024)

    2024

  39. [39]

    S. Yu, J. Tang, Y. Wang, F. Xu, X. Li, and X. Wang, Recent advances in two-dimensional ferromagnetism: strain-, doping-, structural- and electric field-engineering toward spintronic applications, Science and Technology of Advanced Materials23, 140 (2022)

    2022

  40. [40]

    Zunger and O

    A. Zunger and O. I. Malyi, Understanding doping of quantum materials, Chemical Reviews121, 3031 (2021)

    2021

  41. [41]

    Matsukura, Y

    F. Matsukura, Y. Tokura, and H. Ohno, Control of mag- netism by electric fields, Nature Nanotechnology10, 209 (2015)

    2015

  42. [42]

    Barla, V

    P. Barla, V. K. Joshi, and S. Bhat, Spintronic devices: a promising alternative to CMOS devices, Journal of Com- putational Electronics20, 805 (2021)

    2021

  43. [43]

    L. E. Golub and L. Šmejkal, Spin orientation by electric current in altermagnets, (2025), arXiv:2503.12203 [cond- mat.mes-hall]

    work page arXiv 2025

  44. [44]

    A. D. Din, D. A. Usanov, L. Šmejkal, S. W. D’Souza, F. Guo, O. J. Amin, E. M. Dawa, R. P. Campion, K. W. Edmonds, B. Kiraly, A. W. Rushforth, C. Pol- ley, M. Leandersson, E. Golias, Y. Niu, S. Telkamp, F. Krizek, A. B. Hellenes, J. Priessnitz, W. H. Cam- pos, J. Krempaský, J. Minár, T. Jungwirth, J. H. Dil, and P. Wadley, Unconventional relativistic spin ...

    work page arXiv 2025

  45. [45]

    W. H. Campos, F. C. F. Mbognou, A. B. Hellenes, J. Poata, T. Chen, J. Priessnitz, and L. Šmejkal, Per- sistent altermagnetism, (2026), arXiv:2603.12223 [cond- mat.mes-hall]

    work page arXiv 2026

  46. [46]

    Freimuth, S

    F. Freimuth, S. Blügel, and Y. Mokrousov, Laser-induced torques in metallic antiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. B103, 174429 (2021)

    2021

  47. [47]

    A. V. Kimel and M. Li, Writing magnetic memory with ultrashort light pulses, Nature Reviews Materials4, 189 (2019)

    2019

  48. [48]

    Yarmohammadi, M

    M. Yarmohammadi, M. Berritta, M. Bukov, L. Šme- jkal, J. Linder, and P. M. Oppeneer, Spin polarization engineering ind-wave altermagnets, Phys. Rev. B113, L060403 (2026)

    2026

  49. [49]

    Floquet-induced anisotropic magnetoresistance and anomalous Hall effect in 2D $d$-wave altermagnets with Rashba spin-orbit coupling

    M. Yarmohammadi, P. M. Gunnink, J. Sinova, and J. K. Freericks, Floquet-induced anisotropic magnetore- sistance and anomalous Hall effect in 2Dd-wave al- termagnets with Rashba spin-orbit coupling, (2026), arXiv:2606.21281

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  50. [50]

    Yarmohammadi, P.-H

    M. Yarmohammadi, P.-H. Fu, and J. K. Freericks, Effi- cient two-color floquet control of the rkky interaction in altermagnets, (2026), arXiv:2602.20862

    work page arXiv 2026

  51. [51]

    Ezawa, Tunneling magnetoresistance in a junction made ofx-wave magnets withx=p, d, f, g, i, Phys

    M. Ezawa, Tunneling magnetoresistance in a junction made ofx-wave magnets withx=p, d, f, g, i, Phys. Rev. B113, 155303 (2026)

    2026

  52. [52]

    Ezawa, Almost half-quantized planar Hall effects in x-wave magnets withx=p, d, f, g, i, Phys

    M. Ezawa, Almost half-quantized planar Hall effects in x-wave magnets withx=p, d, f, g, i, Phys. Rev. B112, 235307 (2025)

    2025

  53. [53]

    Ezawa, Third-order and fifth-order nonlinear spin- current generation ing-wave andi-wave altermagnets and perfectly nonreciprocal spin current inf-wave mag- nets, Phys

    M. Ezawa, Third-order and fifth-order nonlinear spin- current generation ing-wave andi-wave altermagnets and perfectly nonreciprocal spin current inf-wave mag- nets, Phys. Rev. B111, 125420 (2025)

    2025

  54. [54]

    Khodas, L

    M. Khodas, L. Šmejkal, and I. I. Mazin, Nonrelativistic- ising superconductivity in p-wave magnets, (2026), arXiv:2601.19829

    work page arXiv 2026

  55. [55]

    Mitscherling, J

    J. Mitscherling, J. Priessnitz, C. K. Geschner, and L. Šmejkal, Microscopic origin ofp-wave magnetism, (2026), arXiv:2603.09736

    work page arXiv 2026

  56. [56]

    Sato and T

    M. Sato and T. N. Ikeda, Floquet theory and applications in open quantum and classical systems, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan94, 111007 (2025)

    2025

  57. [57]

    Oka and S

    T. Oka and S. Kitamura, Floquet engineering of quantum materials, Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics 10, 387 (2019)

    2019

  58. [58]

    Castro, U

    A. Castro, U. De Giovannini, S. A. Sato, H. Hübener, and A. Rubio, Floquet engineering the band structure of materials with optimal control theory, Phys. Rev. Res.4, 033213 (2022)

    2022

  59. [59]

    M. S. Rudner and N. H. Lindner, Band structure engi- neering and non-equilibrium dynamics in Floquet topo- logical insulators, Nature Reviews Physics2, 229 (2020)

    2020

  60. [60]

    U. D. Giovannini and H. Hübener, Floquet analysis of excitations in materials, Journal of Physics: Materials3, 012001 (2019)

    2019

  61. [61]

    Bukov, L

    M. Bukov, L. D’Alessio, and A. Polkovnikov, Universal high-frequency behavior of periodically driven systems: from dynamical stabilization to Floquet engineering, Ad- vances in Physics64, 139 (2015)

    2015

  62. [62]

    Eckardt, Colloquium: Atomic quantum gases in pe- riodically driven optical lattices, Rev

    A. Eckardt, Colloquium: Atomic quantum gases in pe- riodically driven optical lattices, Rev. Mod. Phys.89, 011004 (2017)

    2017

  63. [63]

    Oka and H

    T. Oka and H. Aoki, Photovoltaic Hall effect in graphene, Phys. Rev. B79, 081406(R) (2009)

    2009

  64. [64]

    Kitagawa, E

    T. Kitagawa, E. Berg, M. Rudner, and E. Demler, Topo- logical characterization of periodically driven quantum systems, Phys. Rev. B82, 235114 (2010)

    2010

  65. [65]

    M. S. Rudner, N. H. Lindner, E. Berg, and M. Levin, Anomalous edge states and the bulk-edge correspondence for periodically driven two-dimensional systems, Phys. Rev. X3, 031005 (2013)

    2013

  66. [66]

    Grifoni and P

    M. Grifoni and P. Hänggi, Driven quantum tunneling, Physics Reports304, 229 (1998)

    1998

  67. [67]

    Platero and R

    G. Platero and R. Aguado, Photon-assisted transport in semiconductor nanostructures, Physics Reports395, 1 (2004)

    2004

  68. [68]

    P.-H. Fu, S. Mondal, J.-F. Liu, and J. Cayao, Light- induced Floquet spin-triplet cooper pairs in unconven- tional magnets, SciPost Phys.20, 059 (2026)

    2026

  69. [69]

    P.-H. Fu, S. Mondal, J.-F. Liu, Y. Tanaka, and J. Cayao, Floquet engineering spin triplet states in unconventional magnets, Phys. Rev. Lett.136, 066703 (2026)

    2026

  70. [70]

    See Supplemental Material at [URL will be inserted by publisher] for providing effective Hamiltonians of 2D Rashbaℓ-wave magnets driven by two-color polarized light fields

  71. [71]

    Johansson, Theory of spin and orbital Edelstein ef- fects, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter36, 423002 (2024)

    A. Johansson, Theory of spin and orbital Edelstein ef- fects, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter36, 423002 (2024)

    2024

  72. [72]

    L.Salemi, M.Berritta,andP.M.Oppeneer,Quantitative comparison of electrically induced spin and orbital po- 8 larizations in heavy-metal/3d-metal bilayers, Phys. Rev. Mater.5, 074407 (2021)

    2021

  73. [73]

    D. Xiao, J. Shi, and Q. Niu, Berry phase correction to electron density of states in solids, Phys. Rev. Lett.95, 137204 (2005)

    2005

  74. [74]

    Jiang, M

    B. Jiang, M. Hu, J. Bai, Z. Song, C. Mu, G. Qu, W. Li, W. Zhu, H. Pi, Z. Wei,et al., A metallic room- temperatured-wave altermagnet, Nature Physics21, 754 (2025)

    2025

  75. [75]

    Weber, K

    M. Weber, K. Leckron, L. F. Haag, R. Jaeschke-Ubiergo, L. Šmejkal, J. Sinova, and H. C. Schneider, Ultrafast elec- tron dynamics in a planard-wave altermagnet, Newton 1, 10.1016/j.newton.2025.100266 (2025)

    work page doi:10.1016/j.newton.2025.100266 2025

  76. [76]

    Reichlova, R

    H. Reichlova, R. Lopes Seeger, R. González-Hernández, I. Kounta, R. Schlitz, D. Kriegner, P. Ritzinger, M. Lam- mel, M. Leiviskä, A. Birk Hellenes,et al., Observation of a spontaneous anomalous Hall response in the Mn5Si3 d-wave altermagnet candidate, Nature Communications 15, 4961 (2024)

    2024

  77. [77]

    All optical excitation of spin polarization in d-wave altermagnets

    M. Weber, S. Wust, L. Haag, A. Akashdeep, K. Leckron, C. Schmitt, R. Ramos, T. Kikkawa, E. Saitoh, M. Kläui, et al., All optical excitation of spin polarization ind-wave altermagnets, (2024), arXiv:2408.05187

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  78. [78]

    J. A. Mendoza-Rodarte, M. Cosset-Chéneau, B. J. van Wees, and M. H. D. Guimarães, Efficient magnon injec- tion and detection via the orbital Rashba-Edelstein ef- fect, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 226704 (2024)

    2024

  79. [79]

    Santos, J

    E. Santos, J. E. Abrão, A. S. Vieira, J. B. S. Mendes, R. L. Rodríguez-Suárez, and A. Azevedo, Exploring orbital-charge conversion mediated by interfaces with CuOx through spin-orbital pumping, Phys. Rev. B109, 014420 (2024)

    2024

  80. [80]

    Ding, M.-G

    S. Ding, M.-G. Kang, W. Legrand, and P. Gambardella, Orbital torque in rare-earth transition-metal ferrimag- nets, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 236702 (2024)

    2024

Showing first 80 references.