Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 1 cited by

FSD-VLN: Fast-Slow Dual-System Modeling for Aerial Long-Horizon Vision-Language Navigation

T0 review · 3 major / 0 minor · reviewed 2026-07-10 · grok-4.5

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Decoupling high-level language understanding from low-latency flight control doubles success and halves runtime in long-horizon aerial vision-language navigation.

desk verdict Useful dual-system engineering for aerial VLN: real joint gains on success and latency in sim, but the 2× SR headline is thin without error bars and everything stays Unreal-only. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.08359 v1 pith:NTTLRT4I submitted 2026-07-09 cs.RO cs.AI

Xueke Zhu , Qingyan Meng , Liutao Yu , Wei Zhang , Zhengyu Ma , Huihui Zhou , Yonghong Tian This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.ROcs.AI
keywords Vision-LanguageNavigationAerialVLNFast-SlowDual-SystemDiffusionTransformerLong-HorizonModelingLow-LatencyDecisionMakingUAV
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Long-horizon drone navigation from natural language is hard because deep multimodal reasoning is slow while stable flight needs frequent, smooth commands. Existing systems either react frame-by-frame and jitter, or run large models every step and lag. This paper claims that an asynchronous fast–slow dual system fixes the mismatch: a slow stream pulls stable semantic priors from a frozen vision–language model, while a fast Diffusion Transformer stream generates multi-step actions that respect cross-time dependencies. With a time-weighted training loss that damps gradient oscillation, the approach roughly doubles success rate on unseen simulated cities and cuts single-action latency and total mission time by more than half. A sympathetic reader cares because the result offers a concrete architectural pattern for putting language-guided drones into real-time, long-distance flight without sacrificing either meaning or control smoothness.

What carries the argument

FSD-VLN fast–slow dual system: a slow VLM stream that writes vision–language semantic features into a buffer, plus a DiT-based fast stream that conditions action denoising on those features, UAV state, and prior actions, trained with a time-weighted MSE loss that up-weights later timesteps.

What would settle it

Fly the same instruction set on a physical multirotor in an unseen outdoor urban corridor: if success rate does not rise relative to a strong single-stream baseline and end-to-end latency does not fall by roughly half under identical sensors and compute, the central claim fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The structural conflict between global multimodal reasoning and high-frequency flight control can be resolved by explicitly decoupling them into asynchronous slow and fast pathways. When the slow pathway supplies stable semantic priors and the fast pathway models temporally coherent action distributions with a Diffusion Transformer, long-horizon aerial vision-language navigation becomes both more successful and substantially lower-latency than prior reactive or fully autoregressive designs.

Load-bearing premise

Gains measured only inside high-fidelity city simulators with a discrete eight-action set will transfer to real UAV dynamics, continuous control, and real-world visual shift.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Long-horizon aerial VLN systems can keep a heavy vision–language model offline or low-rate while still issuing smooth, low-latency flight commands.
  • Explicit cross-temporal action modeling reduces oscillatory trajectories and compounding error without requiring denser online reasoning.
  • Time-weighted supervision becomes a practical lever for stabilizing multi-step action learning on long UAV trajectories.
  • The same slow-semantic / fast-control split can be reused as a design template for other latency-sensitive embodied agents that must fuse language with continuous motion.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the slow buffer is refreshed only at keyframes or landmarks rather than every frame, compute budgets on small onboard GPUs could drop further while preserving most of the reported gains.
  • The same DiT action head conditioned on a frozen multimodal prior may transfer to ground or underwater platforms that face analogous reasoning-versus-control frequency conflicts.
  • A natural next stress test is continuous rather than discrete action spaces; if the hybrid mapping still holds, the architecture would support finer-grained agile flight.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 0 minor

Summary. The paper proposes FSD-VLN, a fast-slow dual-system architecture for long-horizon aerial vision-language navigation. A slow pathway uses a frozen pretrained VLM to maintain a vision-language semantic feature buffer, while a fast pathway based on a Diffusion Transformer (DiT) with alternating self- and cross-attention generates temporally coherent discrete flight actions conditioned on UAV state, prior actions, and the semantic buffer. A time-weighted MSE loss is introduced to stabilize long-horizon training. Evaluated in large-scale Unreal Engine urban simulations (AirVLN-S + OpenFly trajectories), the method reports higher success rates and SPL than several baselines (including a self-reproduced OpenFly) on both seen and unseen splits, together with substantially lower single-action latency and end-to-end task time.

Significance. If the reported gains hold under stronger statistical controls, the work offers a practical and timely paradigm for aerial VLN: explicitly decoupling heavy multimodal reasoning from high-frequency control, while using generative temporal modeling (DiT) rather than purely reactive or fully autoregressive policies. The latency reductions (Tables 2–3) and the closed-loop asynchronous design are especially relevant for real-time UAV deployment. Strengths include a clear architectural separation, concrete ablations on the time-weighted loss and action horizon, and end-to-end timing measurements beyond single-step latency. The absolute success rates remain modest and all evidence is simulation-only, so the primary contribution is a well-motivated systems design with promising empirical support rather than a definitive solution to aerial VLN.

major comments (3)
  1. Abstract and Table 1: the central claim of “up to 2× higher” unseen SR (13.6 % vs OpenFly 5.1 %) rests on a single self-reproduced OpenFly baseline with no error bars, multi-seed averages, or statistical significance tests for any method. Absolute SR is low, so modest seed/hyperparameter/split variation could erase or reverse the multiplier. At minimum, report means ± std over multiple seeds (or bootstrap CIs) for FSD-VLN and the main baselines on the same test set, and temper the 2× language if the gap is not robust.
  2. §4.2–4.3 and Table 1: OpenFly is marked “self-reproduced … on our test set,” yet the reproduction protocol (checkpoints, action discretization, success threshold, trajectory filtering, number of evaluation episodes) is not specified in enough detail to judge fairness. CityNavAgent (11.7 % unseen SR) is already close to FSD-VLN (13.6 %); without a transparent, multi-run comparison the ranking among recent methods is not secure. Please document the reproduction settings and, if possible, evaluate against the original OpenFly numbers on a shared split.
  3. §3.2–3.3 and Algorithm 1: the dual-system claim is that asynchronous slow/fast operation yields both semantic consistency and low latency. The paper does not quantify how often the VLSF buffer is refreshed relative to action steps, nor the effect of stale semantic features on trajectory quality. An ablation that freezes or delays the slow stream (or measures buffer age vs. NE/SR) would make the “asynchronous coordination” contribution load-bearing rather than architectural description alone.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: empirical dual-system architecture evaluated on held-out simulation splits; success/latency claims do not reduce to fitted inputs or self-definitional equations.

full rationale

FSD-VLN is an engineering/architecture paper whose load-bearing claims are experimental (Table 1 SR/SPL/NE on seen/unseen AirVLN-S+OpenFly trajectories; Tables 2–3 latency). The dual-system decomposition (slow VLM priors + DiT fast action generator, Eqs. 2–4), discrete 8-action set, global adaptive normalization (Eq. 5), and time-weighted MSE (Eq. 6) are design choices trained on trajectories and measured against external metrics (NE, SR, OSR, SPL) on separate test sets. No equation equates a reported success rate or latency figure to a free parameter fitted on the same quantity. Use of the frozen GR00T N1 backbone and self-reproduction of the OpenFly baseline are ordinary engineering practice, not a self-citation chain that forces the 2× SR claim by construction. Ablations (horizon H, TW-MSE vs MSE) are likewise empirical. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained against the paper’s own simulation benchmarks; score 0 is the correct non-finding.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 2 invented entities

The central performance claims rest on standard simulation assumptions, a frozen pre-trained backbone, a hand-chosen discrete action vocabulary, and several free hyper-parameters of the DiT and loss. No new physical entities are postulated; the invented components are architectural modules whose value is measured by the reported metrics.

free parameters (4)
  • action horizon H
    Chosen from {1,2,4}; H=1 is selected after ablation (Table 4). Directly affects reported SR/SPL.
  • time-weight coefficients w_t
    Adaptive temporal weights in the TW-MSE loss (Eq. 6); values not fully specified beyond ‘larger weights to later timesteps’.
  • DiT architecture sizes
    16 blocks, hidden size 1024, input embedding 1536, output dim 1024—hand-chosen and frozen after GR00T initialization.
  • success threshold (20 m)
    SR/OSR defined by termination within 20 m of target; conventional but still a free evaluation parameter that shapes the headline numbers.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption High-fidelity Unreal Engine city simulations (AirVLN-S + OpenFly) are a valid proxy for real low-altitude UAV navigation performance.
    All quantitative claims (Tables 1–3) are obtained exclusively inside these simulators; real-world transfer is listed as future work.
  • domain assumption A frozen pre-trained vision-language model supplies sufficiently stable semantic priors for long-horizon aerial tasks.
    Slow system freezes the VLM encoder (GR00T N1 backbone) and only updates the DiT decision modules.
  • domain assumption Discrete 8-action flight primitives (forward 3/6/9 m, ±30°, ascend/descend 3 m, stop) adequately represent continuous UAV control.
    Action space definition in §3.2; continuous diffusion outputs are thresholded onto this set.
  • ad hoc to paper Cross-temporal action dependencies can be captured by alternating self- and cross-attention inside a Diffusion Transformer.
    Core modeling choice of the fast system; justified by empirical gains rather than a formal proof.
invented entities (2)
  • FSD-VLN dual-system architecture (slow VLM + fast DiT + VLSF buffer)
    purpose: Decouple high-level semantic reasoning from low-latency action generation for aerial VLN.
    The paper’s primary architectural contribution; evaluated only inside the authors’ simulation suite.
  • Time-Weighted MSE (TW-MSE) loss
    purpose: Stabilize long-horizon diffusion training by re-weighting later timesteps.
    Introduced in §3.3; ablation shows smoother loss curves, but the weighting schedule itself is new to this paper.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of FSD-VLN: Fast-Slow Dual-System Modeling for Aerial Long-Horizon Vision-Language Navigation." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/NTTLRT4I

@misc{pith2026260708359,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: FSD-VLN: Fast-Slow Dual-System Modeling for Aerial Long-Horizon Vision-Language Navigation},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/NTTLRT4I}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.08359}
}
read the original abstract

Vision-Language Navigation (VLN) enables UAV autonomous navigation in unknown environments by mapping language instructions to real-time visual inputs. Compared with GPS-dependent or pre-programmed navigation, VLN supports intuitive human-machine interaction and stronger environmental adaptability, requiring tight integration of high-level semantic reasoning and low-latency flight control.Existing methods suffer from structural misalignment between global multimodal understanding and sequential action generation, causing jittery trajectories and severe decision latency for long-horizon aerial navigation. To solve this issue, we propose FSD-VLN, a fast-slow dual-system architecture disentangling semantic reasoning and low-latency flight command generation.The framework has two asynchronous branches: a slow stream extracting stable semantic priors from pre-trained vision-language models, and a Diffusion Transformer (DiT) fast stream modeling cross-temporal action distributions to produce consistent flight outputs. We further introduce a time-aware adaptive optimizer to stabilize long-sequence training and reduce gradient oscillation.Large-scale low-altitude simulation experiments show FSD-VLN achieves up to 2X higher navigation success rates on unseen scenes than SOTA methods, while cutting single-action inference delay and total task runtime by over 50%. Our work validates the benefit of decoupled semantic-control modeling and provides a practical paradigm for long-horizon aerial VLN.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.08359 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. The navigation pipeline of the proposed FSD-VLN framework. During nav [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FSD-VLN architecture:The Slow-System processes visual and language tokens [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Statistical analysis of trajectories on the dataset. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Example aerial navigation:The agent ascends to the initial altitude, adjusts [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Training loss curves of the standard MSE (a) or TW-MSE (b) loss functions. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_5.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. DreamFly: Causal Memory and Receding-Horizon Diffusion Planning for Aerial Vision-Language Navigation

    cs.CV 2026-08 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    On OpenFly aerial vision-language navigation, DreamFly reports 32.04% success on seen and 29.46% on unseen environments, the top numbers among the methods it compares against.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

55 extracted references · 55 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    GPT-4 Technical Report

    Achiam, J., Adler, S., Agarwal, S., Ahmad, L., Akkaya, I., Aleman, F.L., Almeida, D., Altenschmidt, J., Altman, S., Anadkat, S., et al.: Gpt-4 technical report. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.08774 (2023)

    work page Pith review arXiv 2023

  2. [2]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition

    Anderson, P., Wu, Q., Teney, D., Bruce, J., Johnson, M., Sünderhauf, N., Reid, I., Gould, S., Van Den Hengel, A.: Vision-and-language navigation: Interpreting visually-grounded navigation instructions in real environments. In: Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. pp. 3674–3683 (2018)

    work page 2018

  3. [3]

    Qwen Technical Report

    Bai, J., Bai, S., Chu, Y., Cui, Z., Dang, K., Deng, X., Fan, Y., Ge, W., Han, Y., Huang, F., et al.: Qwen technical report. arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.16609 (2023)

    work page Pith review arXiv 2023

  4. [4]

    GR00T N1: An Open Foundation Model for Generalist Humanoid Robots

    Bjorck, J., Castañeda, F., Cherniadev, N., Da, X., Ding, R., Fan, L., Fang, Y., Fox, D., Hu, F., Huang, S., et al.: Gr00t n1: An open foundation model for generalist humanoid robots. arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.14734 (2025)

    work page Pith review arXiv 2025

  5. [5]

    $\pi_0$: A Vision-Language-Action Flow Model for General Robot Control

    Black, K., Brown, N., Driess, D., Esmail, A., Equi, M., Finn, C., Fusai, N., Groom, L., Hausman, K., Ichter, B., et al.:\pi_0: A vision-language-action flow model for general robot control. arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.24164 (2024)

    work page Pith review arXiv 2024

  6. [6]

    In: 2018 IEEE InternationalConferenceonRoboticsandAutomation(ICRA).pp.3818–3825.IEEE (2018)

    Blochliger, F., Fehr, M., Dymczyk, M., Schneider, T., Siegwart, R.: Topomap: Topological mapping and navigation based on visual slam maps. In: 2018 IEEE InternationalConferenceonRoboticsandAutomation(ICRA).pp.3818–3825.IEEE (2018)

    work page 2018

  7. [7]

    Advances in neural information processing systems33, 1877–1901 (2020)

    Brown, T., Mann, B., Ryder, N., Subbiah, M., Kaplan, J.D., Dhariwal, P., Nee- lakantan, A., Shyam, P., Sastry, G., Askell, A., et al.: Language models are few-shot learners. Advances in neural information processing systems33, 1877–1901 (2020)

    work page 1901

  8. [8]

    AgiBot World Colosseo: A Large-scale Manipulation Platform for Scalable and Intelligent Embodied Systems

    Bu, Q., Cai, J., Chen, L., Cui, X., Ding, Y., Feng, S., Gao, S., He, X., Hu, X., Huang, X., et al.: Agibot world colosseo: A large-scale manipulation platform for scalable and intelligent embodied systems. arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.06669 (2025) 14

    work page Pith review arXiv 2025

Show all 55 references
  1. [9]

    IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing (2025)

    Chen, G., Yu, X., Ling, N., Zhong, L.: Chatfly: Low-latency drone planning with large language models. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing (2025)

    2025

  2. [10]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition

    Chen, H., Suhr, A., Misra, D., Snavely, N., Artzi, Y.: Touchdown: Natural language navigation and spatial reasoning in visual street environments. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. pp. 12538–12547 (2019)

    2019

  3. [11]

    Advances in neural information processing sys- tems 34, 5834–5847 (2021)

    Chen, S., Guhur, P.L., Schmid, C., Laptev, I.: Historyawaremultimodaltransformer for vision-and-language navigation. Advances in neural information processing sys- tems 34, 5834–5847 (2021)

    2021

  4. [12]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.10759 (2024)

    Chu, Y., Xu, J., Yang, Q., Wei, H., Wei, X., Guo, Z., Leng, Y., Lv, Y., He, J., Lin, J., et al.: Qwen2-audio technical report. arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.10759 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  5. [13]

    In: Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2023

    Fan, Y., Chen, W., Jiang, T., Zhou, C., Zhang, Y., Wang, X.: Aerial vision-and- dialog navigation. In: Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2023. pp. 3043–3061 (2023)

    2023

  6. [14]

    Advances in neural information processing systems 31 (2018)

    Fried, D., Hu, R., Cirik, V., Rohrbach, A., Andreas, J., Morency, L.P., Berg- Kirkpatrick, T., Saenko, K., Klein, D., Darrell, T.: Speaker-follower models for vision-and-language navigation. Advances in neural information processing systems 31 (2018)

    2018

  7. [15]

    arXiv e-prints pp

    Gao, Y., Li, C., You, Z., Liu, J., Li, Z., Chen, P., Chen, Q., Tang, Z., Wang, L., Yang, P., et al.: Openfly: A versatile toolchain and large-scale benchmark for aerial vision-language navigation. arXiv e-prints pp. arXiv–2502 (2025)

    2025

  8. [16]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision

    Hamdan, S., Sima, C., Yang, Z., Li, H., Guney, F.: Eta: Efficiency through thinking ahead, a dual approach to self-driving with large models. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision. pp. 26529–26538 (2025)

    2025

  9. [17]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF confer- ence on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

    Hong, Y., Wu, Q., Qi, Y., Rodriguez-Opazo, C., Gould, S.: Vln bert: A recurrent vision-and-language bert for navigation. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF confer- ence on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. pp. 1643–1653 (2021)

    2021

  10. [18]

    Autonomous robots 34(3), 189–206 (2013)

    Hornung, A., Wurm, K.M., Bennewitz, M., Stachniss, C., Burgard, W.: Octomap: An efficient probabilistic 3d mapping framework based on octrees. Autonomous robots 34(3), 189–206 (2013)

    2013

  11. [19]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.14803 (2024)

    Hu, Y., Guo, Y., Wang, P., Chen, X., Wang, Y.J., Zhang, J., Sreenath, K., Lu, C., Chen, J.: Video prediction policy: A generalist robot policy with predictive visual representations. arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.14803 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  12. [20]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.05973 (2023)

    Huang, W., Wang, C., Zhang, R., Li, Y., Wu, J., Fei-Fei, L.: Voxposer: Compos- able 3d value maps for robotic manipulation with language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.05973 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  13. [21]

    In: 2021 IEEE international conference on robotics and automation (ICRA)

    Irshad, M.Z., Ma, C.Y., Kira, Z.: Hierarchical cross-modal agent for robotics vision- and-language navigation. In: 2021 IEEE international conference on robotics and automation (ICRA). pp. 13238–13246. IEEE (2021) 15

    2021

  14. [22]

    Transactions on Science and Technology3(1), 31–40 (2016)

    Janis, A., Bade, A.: Path planning algorithm in complex environment: a survey. Transactions on Science and Technology3(1), 31–40 (2016)

    2016

  15. [23]

    IEEE Access (2025)

    Kawaharazuka, K., Oh, J., Yamada, J., Posner, I., Zhu, Y.: Vision-language-action models for robotics: A review towards real-world applications. IEEE Access (2025)

    2025

  16. [24]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.09246 (2024)

    Kim, M.J., Pertsch, K., Karamcheti, S., Xiao, T., Balakrishna, A., Nair, S., Rafailov, R., Foster, E., Lam, G., Sanketi, P., etal.: Openvla: Anopen-sourcevision-language- action model. arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.09246 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  17. [25]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF confer- ence on computer vision and pattern recognition

    Krantz, J., Banerjee, S., Zhu, W., Corso, J., Anderson, P., Lee, S., Thomason, J.: Iterative vision-and-language navigation. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF confer- ence on computer vision and pattern recognition. pp. 14921–14930 (2023)

    2023

  18. [26]

    In: European Confer- ence on Computer Vision

    Krantz, J., Wijmans, E., Majumdar, A., Batra, D., Lee, S.: Beyond the nav-graph: Vision-and-language navigation in continuous environments. In: European Confer- ence on Computer Vision. pp. 104–120. Springer (2020)

    2020

  19. [27]

    Lee, J., Miyanishi, T., Kurita, S., Sakamoto, K., Azuma, D., Matsuo, Y., Inoue, N.: Citynav: Language-goal aerial navigation dataset using geographic information (2024)

    2024

  20. [28]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

    Lin, B., Zhu, Y., Chen, Z., Liang, X., Liu, J., Liang, X.: Adapt: Vision-language navigation with modality-aligned action prompts. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. pp. 15396–15406 (2022)

    2022

  21. [29]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.06182 (2025)

    Lin, P., Sun, G., Liu, C., Li, F., Ren, W., Cong, Y.: Openvln: Open-world aerial vision-language navigation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.06182 (2025)

    2025

  22. [30]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Con- ference on Computer Vision

    Liu, S., Zhang, H., Qi, Y., Wang, P., Zhang, Y., Wu, Q.: Aerialvln: Vision-and- language navigation for uavs. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Con- ference on Computer Vision. pp. 15384–15394 (2023)

    2023

  23. [31]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.15324 (2024)

    Mei, J., Ma, Y., Yang, X., Wen, L., Cai, X., Li, X., Fu, D., Zhang, B., Cai, P., Dou, M., et al.: Continuously learning, adapting, and improving: A dual-process approach to autonomous driving. arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.15324 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  24. [32]

    IEEE transactions on robotics33(5), 1255–1262 (2017)

    Mur-Artal, R., Tardós, J.D.: Orb-slam2: Anopen-sourceslamsystemformonocular, stereo, and rgb-d cameras. IEEE transactions on robotics33(5), 1255–1262 (2017)

    2017

  25. [33]

    In: 2021 Aerial robotic systems physically interacting with the environment (AIRPHARO)

    Oršulić, J., Milijas, R., Batinovic, A., Markovic, L., Ivanovic, A., Bogdan, S.: Flying with cartographer: Adapting the cartographer 3d graph slam stack for uav naviga- tion. In: 2021 Aerial robotic systems physically interacting with the environment (AIRPHARO). pp. 1–7. IEEE (2021)

    2021

  26. [34]

    In: European conference on computer vision

    Qi, Y., Pan, Z., Zhang, S., van den Hengel, A., Wu, Q.: Object-and-action aware model for visual language navigation. In: European conference on computer vision. pp. 303–317. Springer (2020)

    2020

  27. [35]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.18013 (2024) 16

    Qian, K., Ma, Z., He, Y., Luo, Z., Shi, T., Zhu, T., Li, J., Wang, J., Chen, Z., He, X., et al.: Fasionad: Fast and slow fusion thinking systems for human-like autonomous driving with adaptive feedback. arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.18013 (2024) 16

    2024 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Radford, A., Narasimhan, K., Salimans, T., Sutskever, I., et al.: Improving language understanding by generative pre-training (2018)

    2018

  29. [37]

    OpenAI blog1(8), 9 (2019)

    Radford, A., Wu, J., Child, R., Luan, D., Amodei, D., Sutskever, I., et al.: Language models are unsupervised multitask learners. OpenAI blog1(8), 9 (2019)

    2019

  30. [38]

    In: Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long and Short Papers)

    Tan, H., Yu, L., Bansal, M.: Learning to navigate unseen environments: Back translation with environmental dropout. In: Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Lon...

    2019

  31. [39]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.13971 (2023)

    Touvron, H., Lavril, T., Izacard, G., Martinet, X., Lachaux, M.A., Lacroix, T., Rozière, B., Goyal, N., Hambro, E., Azhar, F., et al.: Llama: Open and efficient foundation language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.13971 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Journal of Smart Internet of Things2023(2), 133–141 (2023)

    Ubaid, M.M., Sana, M.S., Salim, K., Khalid, S., Batool, I., Gilani, S.H., Gilani, S.S.: Uavs path planning using visual-slam technique based hybrid particle swarm optimization. Journal of Smart Internet of Things2023(2), 133–141 (2023)

    2023

  33. [41]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.07087 (2024)

    Wang, X., Yang, D., Wang, Z., Kwan, H., Chen, J., Wu, W., Li, H., Liao, Y., Liu, S.: Towards realistic uav vision-language navigation: Platform, benchmark, and methodology. arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.07087 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  34. [42]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.15258 (2025)

    Wu, Y., Zhu, M., Li, X., Du, Y., Fan, Y., Li, W., Han, Z., Zhou, X., Gao, F.: Vla-an: An efficient and onboard vision-language-action framework for aerial navigation in complex environments. arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.15258 (2025)

    2025

  35. [43]

    In: Proceed- ings of the 33rd ACM International Conference on Multimedia

    Xiao, J., Sun, Y., Shao, Y., Gan, B., Liu, R., Wu, Y., Guan, W., Deng, X.: Uav-on: A benchmark for open-world object goal navigation with aerial agents. In: Proceed- ings of the 33rd ACM International Conference on Multimedia. pp. 13023–13029 (2025)

    2025

  36. [44]

    Acta Electronica Sinica45(7), 1764–1769 (2017)

    Yin, G., Zhou, S., Wu, Q.: An improved rrt algorithm for uav path planning. Acta Electronica Sinica45(7), 1764–1769 (2017)

    2017

  37. [45]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.00551 (2026)

    Zhang, D., Chen, P., Xia, X., Su, X., Zhen, R., Xiao, J., Yang, S.: Apex: A decou- pled memory-based explorer for asynchronous aerial object goal navigation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.00551 (2026)

    2026

  38. [46]

    Zhang, J., Guo, Y., Chen, X., Wang, Y.J., Hu, Y., Shi, C., Chen, J.: Hirt: Enhancing roboticcontrolwithhierarchicalrobottransformers.arXivpreprintarXiv:2410.05273 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  39. [47]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.15852 (2024)

    Zhang, J., Wang, K., Xu, R., Zhou, G., Hong, Y., Fang, X., Wu, Q., Zhang, Z., Wang, H.: Navid: Video-based vlm plans the next step for vision-and-language navigation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.15852 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  40. [48]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.16199 (2023) 17

    Zhang, R., Han, J., Liu, C., Gao, P., Zhou, A., Hu, X., Yan, S., Lu, P., Li, H., Qiao, Y.: Llama-adapter: Efficient fine-tuning of language models with zero-init attention. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.16199 (2023) 17

    2023 arXiv

  41. [49]

    In: Proceed- ings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision

    Zhang, R., Xie, J., Zhang, W., Chen, W., Tan, X., Wan, X., Li, G.: Adadrive: Self- adaptive slow-fast system for language-grounded autonomous driving. In: Proceed- ings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision. pp. 5112–5121 (2025)

    2025

  42. [50]

    In: Proceedings of the 63rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers)

    Zhang, W., Gao, C., Yu, S., Peng, R., Zhao, B., Zhang, Q., Cui, J., Chen, X., Li, Y.: Citynavagent: Aerial vision-and-language navigation with hierarchical semantic planning and global memory. In: Proceedings of the 63rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Ling...

    2025

  43. [51]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.10756 (2025)

    Zhang, Y., Yu, H., Xiao, J., Feroskhan, M.: Grounded vision-language navigation for uavs with open-vocabulary goal understanding. arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.10756 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  44. [52]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.11091 (2025)

    Zhao, G., Li, G., Pan, J., Yu, Y.: Aerial vision-and-language navigation with grid- based view selection and map construction. arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.11091 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  45. [53]

    In: European Confer- ence on Computer Vision

    Zhou, G., Hong, Y., Wang, Z., Wang, X.E., Wu, Q.: Navgpt-2: Unleashing naviga- tional reasoning capability for large vision-language models. In: European Confer- ence on Computer Vision. pp. 260–278. Springer (2024)

    2024

  46. [54]

    In: Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence

    Zhou, G., Hong, Y., Wu, Q.: Navgpt: Explicit reasoning in vision-and-language navigation with large language models. In: Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. vol. 38, pp. 7641–7649 (2024)

    2024

  47. [55]

    In: Conference on Robot Learning

    Zitkovich, B., Yu, T., Xu, S., Xu, P., Xiao, T., Xia, F., Wu, J., Wohlhart, P., Welker, S., Wahid, A., et al.: Rt-2: Vision-language-action models transfer web knowledge to robotic control. In: Conference on Robot Learning. pp. 2165–2183. PMLR (2023) 18

    2023

Pith tools

Reviewed July 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.