Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Microlensify: a Transformer Based Machine Learning Classifier for Microlensing Events Trained on TESS Light Curves

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2608.19419 v1 pith:PBITD5SW submitted 2026-08-19 astro-ph.IM astro-ph.EPastro-ph.GAastro-ph.SRcs.LG

classification astro-ph.IMastro-ph.EPastro-ph.GAastro-ph.SRcs.LG
keywords microlensingtesssurveyscurveslightacrosscandidatesdifferent
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
abstract

Microlensing can reveal populations of faint compact objects that are otherwise difficult to detect. Depending on their design, all-sky surveys have the potential to search for these objects across the sky. The Transiting Exoplanet Survey Satellite (TESS), primarily designed to detect transiting exoplanets, also provides near all-sky coverage with high cadence. In this work, we use TESS data to search for microlensing candidates using both traditional and machine-learning methods and to identify associated false positives in high-cadence surveys. Microlensify is a physics-informed, transformer-based variational autoencoder trained on simulated single-lens microlensing light curves and real TESS Sector 12 data. The model classifies events, reconstructs light curves, and estimates microlensing event durations. Applied to $\sim 5.6$ million TESS light curves, it identified between $0.036\%$ and $1.89\%$ as microlensing candidates across different TESS pipelines. After applying microlensing detection metrics and cross-matching with SIMBAD, we obtained a final list of candidates and identified false positives including long-period variables, Mira variables, cataclysmic variables, red giants, and transients. We also found Gaussian-like peaks caused by asteroid crossings, a potential source of false positives in high-cadence microlensing surveys. The model also predicts event duration with an accuracy of $R^2 = 0.97$. The model was further tested on published events from different ground-based microlensing surveys, confirming 92.7% as microlensing, demonstrating its applicability across surveys with different cadences.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools