Pith.

High Energy Physics - Phenomenology · arXiv:0707.3342 v2 · submitted 23 Jul 2007

Automated calculations for multi-leg processes

Stefan Weinzierl

The paper says

“Automatisation of at least next-to-leading order calculations for LHC processes is therefore a timely task.”

from the abstract · picked out as the main claim by a classifier

Pith says

Pith has not reviewed this paper.

Get a Pith Review, $5

Reviews

Reviews by people

No person has reviewed this paper on Pith yet. A scientist listed on Pith can review it for a fee, and their review is published here whatever it concludes.

Request a human review

How Pith checks papers · The full audit of this paper

The paper

Abstract

The search for signals of new physics at the forthcoming LHC experiments involves the analysis of final states characterised by a high number of hadronic jets or identified particles. Precise theoretical predictions for these processes require the computation of scattering amplitudes with a large number of external particles and beyond leading order in perturbation theory. The complexity of a calculation grows with the number of internal loops as well as with the number of external legs. Automatisation of at least next-to-leading order calculations for LHC processes is therefore a timely task. I will discuss various approaches.

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

How the main claim is stated: asserted 0.97

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.03 · states limitation 0.07 · human participants 0.02 · controlled comparison 0.02 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.03 · compares with prior results 0.04 · mentions code or data availability 0.03

The abstract, sentence by sentence

This table labels the abstract only (arXiv listing abstract v2). The number is the probability the classifier gave the label.

SentenceRoleThe authors' own workStates the main conclusionStrength
The search for signals of new physics at the forthcoming LHC experiments involves the analysis of final states characterised by a high number of hadronic jets or identified particles. background 1.00 0.04 0.03 asserted 0.98
Precise theoretical predictions for these processes require the computation of scattering amplitudes with a large number of external particles and beyond leading order in perturbation theory. background 0.99 0.05 0.04 asserted 1.00
The complexity of a calculation grows with the number of internal loops as well as with the number of external legs. background 1.00 0.07 0.03 asserted 1.00
Automatisation of at least next-to-leading order calculations for LHC processes is therefore a timely task. background 0.55 0.06 0.26 asserted 0.97
I will discuss various approaches. contribution 0.89 0.28 0.05 unclear 0.71

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: review 0.70 · evidence from argument 0.98

What was examined, and what was not

Sources read

  • arXiv listing abstract v2

Not examined

  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers

Levels run

  • P abstract

Not run

  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

How the labels were made

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 4,144 input tokens, $0.0002 reported.

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. This record as JSON

Cited by 4 Pith papers
How the literature uses it

6 arXiv papers cite this in 10 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 1 sentence without a confident label

Uses its method or tool 1 paper
  • Similar to describing massive momenta in terms of momenta $p^♭$ and $q$, we describe massive Dirac spinors in terms of massless Weyl spinors of momenta $p^♭$ and $q$ [ref] .

    The chirality-flow formalism for the standard model · Dirac spinors from massless Weyl spinors · 0.84

Cites it as background 6 papers
  • See [ref] for a recent review on this subject.].

    Monte Carlo Generators for the LHC · Introduction · 0.97

  • Introductions to the spinor-helicity method itself can be found in for example [ref] .

    The chirality-flow formalism for the standard model · Massless chirality-flow · 1.00

  • In this section we review some basics of the spinor-helicity formalism, focusing on massless fermions and vector bosons (some additional relations are given in sec:conventions, and more detailed introductions can be found in [ref] ).

    The chirality-flow formalism · The basics of the spinor-helicity formalism · 1.00

Challenges and discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment.

No comments yet.

Sign in to comment