pith. sign in

arxiv: 0712.1100 · v1 · submitted 2007-12-07 · 🌌 astro-ph · gr-qc· hep-ph· nucl-th

Primordial Nucleosynthesis in the Precision Cosmology Era

classification 🌌 astro-ph gr-qchep-phnucl-th
keywords physicsuniverseabundancesalongconstraintscosmologyevolutionmodels
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Primordial nucleosynthesis provides a probe of the Universe during its early evolution. Given the progress exploring the constituents, structure, and recent evolution of the Universe, it is timely to review the status of Big Bang Nucleosynthesis (BBN) and to confront its predictions, along with the constraints which emerge from them, with those derived from independent observations of the Universe at much later epochs in its evolution. Following an overview of the key physics controlling element synthesis in the early Universe, the predictions of BBN in the standard models of cosmology and particle physics are presented, along with those from some non-standard models. The observational data used to infer the primordial abundances are described, with an emphasis on the distinction between precision and accuracy. The observationally inferred relic abundances are compared with the predicted abundances, testing the internal consistency of BBN and enabling a comparison of the BBN-inferred constraints with those derived from the Cosmic Background Radiation and Large Scale Structure data. Emerging from these comparisons is confirmation of a successful standard model along with constraints on (or hints of) physics beyond the standard models of particle physics and of cosmology.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Probing Unification Scenarios with Big Bang Nucleosynthesis

    hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Extending a BBN code yields constraints Δα/α = 2 ± 51 ppm (mass variation) and 2 ± 22 ppm (G variation) at 68% CL, showing these models do not solve the lithium problem.

  2. Einstein or Jordan: seeking answers from the reheating constraints

    gr-qc 2019-07 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Differences in inflationary energy scales between Einstein and Jordan frames produce distinct reheating e-folding numbers and temperatures, leading to contrasting thermal histories with potential observational signatures.

  3. Lectures on Reheating after Inflation

    astro-ph.CO 2019-07 unverdicted

    Lecture notes providing a generic introduction to reheating after inflation, covering its theoretical, phenomenological, and observational aspects.