REVIEW 4 cited by
Non-singular inflationary universe from polymer matter
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
We consider a polymer quantization of a free massless scalar field in a homogeneous and isotropic cosmological spacetime. This quantization method assumes that field translations are fundamentally discrete, and is related to but distinct from that used in loop quantum gravity. The semi-classical Friedman equation yields a universe that is non-singular and non-bouncing, without quantum gravity. The model has an early de Sitter-like inflationary phase with sufficient expansion to resolve the horizon and entropy problems, and a built in mechanism for a graceful exit from inflation.
Forward citations
Cited by 4 Pith papers
-
An effective Friedmann equation for a bouncing anisotropic universe
Derives the effective Friedmann equation and the exact parabolic shear–density relation at the bounce for polymer Bianchi-I, with constants −4, 4, 0 in the sharply peaked limit.
-
Polymer Bianchi-I with polymer matter
In a Bianchi-I universe with polymer quantization of both geometry and a massless scalar, the matter polymer scale shifts the quantum bounce and alters volume and anisotropy evolution.
-
Polymer cosmology with polymer matter: Effective dynamics
A polymer-quantized scalar field on a polymer-quantized FLRW background produces a bounce whose location depends on the matter polymer scale, with generic asymmetric evolution across the bounce.
-
Einstein@Home all-sky "bucket" search for continuous gravitational waves in LIGO O3 public data
A non-detection and upper limit for continuous gravitational waves is claimed, but the body text is an unrelated cosmology paper, making the result unverifiable.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.