pith. sign in

arxiv: 0909.3884 · v2 · pith:P5SAIOTBnew · submitted 2009-09-22 · ❄️ cond-mat.stat-mech · physics.comp-ph· physics.data-an

Why are nonlinear fits so challenging?

classification ❄️ cond-mat.stat-mech physics.comp-phphysics.data-an
keywords modelfittingparametersalgorithmschallengingdatalevenberg-marquardtmanifold
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Fitting model parameters to experimental data is a common yet often challenging task, especially if the model contains many parameters. Typically, algorithms get lost in regions of parameter space in which the model is unresponsive to changes in parameters, and one is left to make adjustments by hand. We explain this difficulty by interpreting the fitting process as a generalized interpretation procedure. By considering the manifold of all model predictions in data space, we find that cross sections have a hierarchy of widths and are typically very narrow. Algorithms become stuck as they move near the boundaries. We observe that the model manifold, in addition to being tightly bounded, has low extrinsic curvature, leading to the use of geodesics in the fitting process. We improve the convergence of the Levenberg-Marquardt algorithm by adding the geodesic acceleration to the usual Levenberg-Marquardt step.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Extending OpenKIM with an Uncertainty Quantification Toolkit for Molecular Modeling

    physics.comp-ph 2022-06 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Introduces UQ extension to KLIFF using PTMCMC to quantify uncertainty from parameter variation and IP functional form inadequacy, demonstrated on Stillinger-Weber potential for silicon.