Pith. Sign in

RECORD

A Note on the Lower Bound of Black Hole Area Change in Tunneling Formalism

High Energy Physics - Theory · Submitted 10 May 2010

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim Depending on the value of this constant one can get either Bekenstein's lower bound or Hod's one for the change in the black hole area.

how it is stated · hedged possibility 0.78 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID1005.1499 (version 2)
Pith IDRV2NB2ZD, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationBibhas Ranjan Majhi, Elias C. Vagenas, Rabin Banerjee. "A Note on the Lower Bound of Black Hole Area Change in Tunneling Formalism." arXiv:1005.1499 (2010). https://pith.science/paper/RV2NB2ZD
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 2,289 input tokens, $0.0001 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.03 · states limitation 0.68 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.02 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.30 · compares with prior results 0.77 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v2. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

In the framework of tunneling mechanism and employing Bekenstein's general expression for the variation of the black hole area, we determine the area quantum up to a constant. Depending on the value of this constant one can get either Bekenstein's lower bound or Hod's one for the change in the black hole area.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 In the framework of tunneling mechanism and employing Bekenstein's general expression for the variation of the black hole area, we determine the area quantum up to a constant. contribution 0.69 0.92 0.46 asserted 1.00
s1 Depending on the value of this constant one can get either Bekenstein's lower bound or Hod's one for the change in the black hole area. interpretation 0.62 0.43 0.45 hedged possibility 0.78

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 0.99 · evidence from proof or derivation 1.00.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v2
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

In the framework of tunneling mechanism and employing Bekenstein's general expression for the variation of the black hole area, we determine the area quantum up to a constant. Depending on the value of this constant one can get either Bekenstein's lower bound or Hod's one for the change in the black hole area.

Human review
How the literature uses it

6 arXiv papers cite this in 10 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 4 sentences without a confident label

Contests it 1 paper
Compares with it 1 paper
Cites it as background 4 papers

What it cites · 17 sentences without a confident label

Uses the method or tool of 2 papers
  • Now consider the massless Klein-Gordon equation $g^μν∇_μ∇_νϕ=0$ under the metric given in equation ([ref]) [equation] Taking the standard WKB ansatz $ϕ(r,t)=e^-i/ħS(r,t)$ and substituting the expansion for $S(r,t)$ [equation] in equation ([ref]) we obtain the solutions for $ϕ$ in the semiclassical limit, i.e. $ħ→0$, [ref] ϕ^(R)_in=e^-i/ħωu_in ; ϕ^(L)_in=e^-i/ħωv_in

    Connecting anomaly and tunneling methods for Hawking effect through chirality · Introduction · 0.93

  • Now consider the massless Klein-Gordon equation $g^μν∇_μ∇_νϕ=0$ under the metric given in equation ([ref]) [equation] Taking the standard WKB ansatz $ϕ(r,t)=e^-i/ħS(r,t)$ and substituting the expansion for $S(r,t)$ [equation] in equation ([ref]) we obtain the solutions for $ϕ$ in the semiclassical limit, i.e. $ħ→0$, [ref] ϕ^(R)_in=e^-i/ħωu_in ; ϕ^(L)_in=e^-i/ħωv_in

    Hawking black body spectrum from tunneling mechanism · Introduction · 0.93

Compares with 1 paper
Cites as background 7 papers

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.