RECORD
Physical boundary Hilbert space and volume operator in the Lorentzian new spin-foam theory
General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology · Submitted 7 Jun 2010
abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review
The authors' main claim The vanishing is exact (and not just in the large quantum number limit.) We also generalize the definition of the volume operator in the spinfoam model to the Lorentzian signature, and show that it matches the one of loop quantum gravity, as does in the Euclidean case.
The compiled record
The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.
Open the compiled record
The abstract, sentence by sentence
A covariant spin-foam formulation of quantum gravity has been recently developed, characterized by a kinematics which appears to match well the one of canonical loop quantum gravity. In this paper we reconsider the implementation of the constraints that defines the model. We define in a simple way the boundary Hilbert space of the theory, introducing a slight modification of the embedding of the SU(2) representations into the SL(2,C) ones. We then show directly that all constraints vanish on this space in a weak sense. The vanishing is exact (and not just in the large quantum number limit.) We also generalize the definition of the volume operator in the spinfoam model to the Lorentzian signature, and show that it matches the one of loop quantum gravity, as does in the Euclidean case.
background contribution method result interpretation main claim
| # | sentence | role | the authors' own work | states the main conclusion | strength |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| s0 | A covariant spin-foam formulation of quantum gravity has been recently developed, characterized by a kinematics which appears to match well the one of canonical loop quantum gravity. | background 1.00 | 0.07 | 0.03 | asserted 0.52 |
| s1 | In this paper we reconsider the implementation of the constraints that defines the model. | contribution 0.80 | 0.68 | 0.03 | asserted 0.58 |
| s2 | We define in a simple way the boundary Hilbert space of the theory, introducing a slight modification of the embedding of the SU(2) representations into the SL(2,C) ones. | contribution 0.57 | 0.96 | 0.08 | asserted 1.00 |
| s3 | We then show directly that all constraints vanish on this space in a weak sense. | result 0.99 | 0.95 | 0.29 | asserted 1.00 |
| s4 | The vanishing is exact (and not just in the large quantum number limit.) We also generalize the definition of the volume operator in the spinfoam model to the Lorentzian signature, and show that it matches the one of loop quantum gravity, as does in the Euclidean case. | result 0.82 | 0.95 | 0.54 | asserted 1.00 |
What was examined, and what was not
- arXiv listing abstract v3
- full text
- figures and tables
- references and citing sentences
- relations to other papers
- P abstract
- S sections
- T body sentences
- C citations
- R cross-paper relations
The paper
Original abstract
A covariant spin-foam formulation of quantum gravity has been recently developed, characterized by a kinematics which appears to match well the one of canonical loop quantum gravity. In this paper we reconsider the implementation of the constraints that defines the model. We define in a simple way the boundary Hilbert space of the theory, introducing a slight modification of the embedding of the SU(2) representations into the SL(2,C) ones. We then show directly that all constraints vanish on this space in a weak sense. The vanishing is exact (and not just in the large quantum number limit.) We also generalize the definition of the volume operator in the spinfoam model to the Lorentzian signature, and show that it matches the one of loop quantum gravity, as does in the Euclidean case.
Human review
References
How the literature uses it
20 arXiv papers cite this in 35 sentences
Papers citing it · 29 sentences without a confident label
Builds on it 1 paper
-
In a path integral framework, the EPRL spinfoam amplitudes [ref] are straightforward to adapt to this new setting with relaxed area matching along spin network edges by projected onto different spins at the ends of every edges as suggested in [ref] .
Area Propagator and Boosted Spin Networks in Loop Quantum Gravity · Conclusion & Outlook · 0.95
Cites it as support 2 papers
-
In fact, not only the states are identified, but there is also a way of defining quantum operators of area and volume in the spin foam context such that their spectra coincide with those of the canonical quantization [ref] .
Spin Foams and Canonical Quantization · Identification of kinematical states · 1.00
-
Moreover, geometric operators such as volume and area defined in the covariant context are shown to coincide with the corresponding operators defined in the canonical formulation [ref] .
The Spin Foam Approach to Quantum Gravity · Boundary Data for the New Models and Relationship with the Canonical Theory · 0.99
Cites it as background 3 papers
-
Currently one of the successful spin foam models is the EPRL/FK model defined in [ref] , whose implementation of simplicity constraint is understood in the sense of [ref] .
Asymptotics of Spinfoam Amplitude on Simplicial Manifold: Euclidean Theory · Introduction · 0.90
-
One can identify two types of studies: One involving canonical analysis and weak imposition of the constraints [ref] and another one involving the use of coherent states [ref] .
Edge modes of gravity. Part III. Corner simplicity constraints · Algebra of simplicity constraints · 0.98
-
A very important topic that will be left out are the new insights regarding how the 3d and the 4d picture can come together [ref] , [ref] , [ref] .
New insights in quantum geometry · Introduction · 0.98
What it cites · 57 sentences without a confident label
Builds on 2 papers
-
In this section, we use the matrix element approach to construct the physical boundary Hilbert space of the new spin-foam theory with Lorentzian signature [ref] .
Lorentzian LQG vertex amplitude · Physical boundary Hilbert space of the new theory · 0.80
-
In this section, we use the matrix element approach to construct the physical boundary Hilbert space of the new spin-foam theory with Lorentzian signature [ref] .
LQG vertex with finite Immirzi parameter · Physical boundary Hilbert space of the new theory · 0.80
Compares with 4 papers
-
The model we construct contains in fact a slight modification with respect to the one in [ref] (corresponding to a slightly different factor ordering of the constraints).
The loop-quantum-gravity vertex-amplitude · Introduction · 0.83
-
The model we construct contains in fact a slight modification with respect to the one in [ref] (corresponding to a slightly different factor ordering of the constraints).
Flipped spinfoam vertex and loop gravity · Introduction · 0.83
-
The model we construct contains in fact a slight modification with respect to the one in [ref] (corresponding to a slightly different factor ordering of the constraints).
Lorentzian LQG vertex amplitude · Introduction · 0.83
Cites as background 6 papers
-
The spinfoam formalism [ref] and canonical loop quantum gravity (LQG) [ref] can ideally be viewed as the covariant and the canonical versions, respectively, of a background-independent quantum theory of gravity [ref] .
A new look at loop quantum gravity · Introduction · 0.99
-
The spinfoam formalism [ref] and canonical loop quantum gravity (LQG) [ref] can ideally be viewed as the covariant and the canonical versions, respectively, of a background-independent quantum theory of gravity [ref] .
An Introduction to Loop Quantum Gravity Through Cosmology · Introduction · 0.99
-
The spinfoam formalism [ref] and canonical loop quantum gravity (LQG) [ref] can ideally be viewed as the covariant and the canonical versions, respectively, of a background-independent quantum theory of gravity [ref] .
Worldsheet formulations of gauge theories and gravity · Introduction · 0.99
Discussion
Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.