Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Systematic Improvement of Parton Showers with Effective Theory

High Energy Physics - Phenomenology · Submitted 5 Jul 2010

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim We carry out a systematic classification and computation of next-to-leading order kinematic power corrections to the fully differential cross section in the parton shower.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID1007.0758 (version 2)
Pith IDQ7WHTTZF, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationClaudio Marcantonini, Iain W. Stewart, Matthew Baumgart. "Systematic Improvement of Parton Showers with Effective Theory." arXiv:1007.0758 (2010). https://pith.science/paper/Q7WHTTZF
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 5,544 input tokens, $0.0002 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.06 · states limitation 0.19 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.03 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.04 · compares with prior results 0.09 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v2. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

We carry out a systematic classification and computation of next-to-leading order kinematic power corrections to the fully differential cross section in the parton shower. To do this we devise a map between ingredients in a parton shower and operators in a traditional effective field theory framework using a chain of soft-collinear effective theories. Our approach overcomes several difficulties including avoiding double counting and distinguishing approximations that are coordinate choices from true power corrections. Branching corrections can be classified as hard-scattering, that occur near the top of the shower, and jet-structure, that can occur at any point inside it. Hard-scattering corrections include matrix elements with additional hard partons, as well as power suppressed contributions to the branching for the leading jet. Jet-structure corrections require simultaneous consideration of potential 1 -> 2 and 1 -> 3 branchings. The interference structure induced by collinear terms with subleading powers remains localized in the shower.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 We carry out a systematic classification and computation of next-to-leading order kinematic power corrections to the fully differential cross section in the parton shower. contribution 1.00 0.96 0.19 asserted 1.00
s1 To do this we devise a map between ingredients in a parton shower and operators in a traditional effective field theory framework using a chain of soft-collinear effective theories. method 0.99 0.94 0.06 asserted 1.00
s2 Our approach overcomes several difficulties including avoiding double counting and distinguishing approximations that are coordinate choices from true power corrections. contribution 0.63 0.84 0.12 asserted 1.00
s3 Branching corrections can be classified as hard-scattering, that occur near the top of the shower, and jet-structure, that can occur at any point inside it. contribution 0.44 0.81 0.12 asserted 1.00
s4 Hard-scattering corrections include matrix elements with additional hard partons, as well as power suppressed contributions to the branching for the leading jet. result 0.47 0.71 0.08 asserted 1.00
s5 Jet-structure corrections require simultaneous consideration of potential 1 -> 2 and 1 -> 3 branchings. contribution 0.52 0.68 0.07 asserted 1.00
s6 The interference structure induced by collinear terms with subleading powers remains localized in the shower. result 0.97 0.75 0.10 asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: method or tool 0.51 · evidence from proof or derivation 0.91.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v2
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

We carry out a systematic classification and computation of next-to-leading order kinematic power corrections to the fully differential cross section in the parton shower. To do this we devise a map between ingredients in a parton shower and operators in a traditional effective field theory framework using a chain of soft-collinear effective theories. Our approach overcomes several difficulties including avoiding double counting and distinguishing approximations that are coordinate choices from true power corrections. Branching corrections can be classified as hard-scattering, that occur near the top of the shower, and jet-structure, that can occur at any point inside it. Hard-scattering corrections include matrix elements with additional hard partons, as well as power suppressed contributions to the branching for the leading jet. Jet-structure corrections require simultaneous consideration of potential 1 -> 2 and 1 -> 3 branchings. The interference structure induced by collinear terms with subleading powers remains localized in the shower.

Human review
References
How the literature uses it

7 arXiv papers cite this in 8 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 6 sentences without a confident label

Uses its method or tool 1 paper
Cites it as background 1 paper

What it cites · 96 sentences without a confident label

Builds on 3 papers
Uses the method or tool of 4 papers
Compares with 2 papers
Cites as background 27 papers

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.