REVIEW 2 cited by
Jet Quenching from QCD Evolution
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
Recent advances in soft-collinear effective theory with Glauber gluons have led to the development of a new method that gives a unified description of inclusive hadron production in reactions with nucleons and heavy nuclei. We show how this approach, based on the generalization of the DGLAP evolution equations to include final-state medium-induced parton showers, can be combined with initial-state effects for applications to jet quenching phenomenology. We demonstrate that the traditional parton energy loss calculations can be regarded as a special soft-gluon emission limit of the general QCD evolution framework. We present phenomenological comparison of the SCET$_{\rm G}$-based results on the suppression of inclusive charged hadron and neutral pion production in $\sqrt{s_{NN}}=2.76$ TeV lead-lead collisions at the Large Hadron Collider to experimental data. We also show theoretical predictions for the upcoming $\sqrt{s_{NN}} \simeq 5.1$ TeV Pb+Pb run at the LHC.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Jet charge modification in dense QCD matter
The authors derive a factorized formula for the average jet charge in heavy-ion collisions from soft-collinear effective theory and predict its modification relative to proton-proton collisions.
-
Measurement of angular and momentum distributions of charged particles within and around jets in Pb+Pb and $pp$ collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV with the ATLAS detector
In central Pb+Pb collisions, charged particles below 4 GeV are enhanced around jets at large angular distances, while particles above 4 GeV are suppressed outside the jet core, relative to pp collisions.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.