RECORD
The Halos of Satellite Galaxies: the Companion of the Massive Elliptical Lens SL2S J08544-0121
Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics · Submitted 27 Jul 2010
abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review
The authors' main claim Our measurement of the halo size is compatible with the estimated tidal radius of the satellite galaxy, suggesting that halos of galaxies in groups experience significant tidal stripping, a process that has been previously observed on galaxies in clusters.
The compiled record
The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.
Open the compiled record
The abstract, sentence by sentence
Strong gravitational lensing by groups or clusters of galaxies provides a powerful technique to measure the dark matter properties of individual lens galaxies. We study in detail the mass distribution of the satellite lens galaxy in the group-scale lens SL2S J08544-0121 by modelling simultaneously the spatially extended surface brightness distribution of the source galaxy and the lens mass distribution using Markov chain Monte Carlo methods. In particular, we measure the dark matter halo size of the satellite lens galaxy to be 6.0^{+2.9}_{-2.0} kpc with a fiducial velocity dispersion of 127^{+21}_{-12} km/s. This is the first time the size of an individual galaxy halo in a galaxy group has been measured using strong gravitational lensing without assumptions of mass following light. We verify the robustness of our halo size measurement using mock data resembling our lens system. Our measurement of the halo size is compatible with the estimated tidal radius of the satellite galaxy, suggesting that halos of galaxies in groups experience significant tidal stripping, a process that has been previously observed on galaxies in clusters. Our mass model of the satellite galaxy is elliptical with its major axis misaligned with that of the light by ~50 deg. The major axis of the total matter distribution is oriented more towards the centre of the host halo, exhibiting the radial alignment found in N-body simulations and observational studies of satellite galaxies. This misalignment between mass and light poses a significant challenge to modified Newtonian dynamics.
background contribution method result interpretation main claim
| # | sentence | role | the authors' own work | states the main conclusion | strength |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| s0 | Strong gravitational lensing by groups or clusters of galaxies provides a powerful technique to measure the dark matter properties of individual lens galaxies. | background 1.00 | 0.05 | 0.03 | asserted 1.00 |
| s1 | We study in detail the mass distribution of the satellite lens galaxy in the group-scale lens SL2S J08544-0121 by modelling simultaneously the spatially extended surface brightness distribution of the source galaxy and the lens mass distribution using Markov chain Monte Carlo methods. | contribution 0.68 | 0.97 | 0.05 | asserted 0.96 |
| s2 | In particular, we measure the dark matter halo size of the satellite lens galaxy to be 6.0^{+2.9}_{-2.0} kpc with a fiducial velocity dispersion of 127^{+21}_{-12} km/s. | result 1.00 | 0.98 | 0.55 | asserted 1.00 |
| s3 | This is the first time the size of an individual galaxy halo in a galaxy group has been measured using strong gravitational lensing without assumptions of mass following light. | contribution 0.79 | 0.91 | 0.38 | asserted 1.00 |
| s4 | We verify the robustness of our halo size measurement using mock data resembling our lens system. | method 0.93 | 0.96 | 0.03 | asserted 1.00 |
| s5 | Our measurement of the halo size is compatible with the estimated tidal radius of the satellite galaxy, suggesting that halos of galaxies in groups experience significant tidal stripping, a process that has been previously observed on galaxies in clusters. | interpretation 0.98 | 0.83 | 0.29 | hedged possibility 0.98 |
| s6 | Our mass model of the satellite galaxy is elliptical with its major axis misaligned with that of the light by ~50 deg. | result 1.00 | 0.95 | 0.07 | asserted 1.00 |
| s7 | The major axis of the total matter distribution is oriented more towards the centre of the host halo, exhibiting the radial alignment found in N-body simulations and observational studies of satellite galaxies. | result 0.75 | 0.81 | 0.11 | asserted 1.00 |
| s8 | This misalignment between mass and light poses a significant challenge to modified Newtonian dynamics. | interpretation 1.00 | 0.46 | 0.11 | asserted 1.00 |
What was examined, and what was not
- arXiv listing abstract v2
- full text
- figures and tables
- references and citing sentences
- relations to other papers
- P abstract
- S sections
- T body sentences
- C citations
- R cross-paper relations
The paper
Original abstract
Strong gravitational lensing by groups or clusters of galaxies provides a powerful technique to measure the dark matter properties of individual lens galaxies. We study in detail the mass distribution of the satellite lens galaxy in the group-scale lens SL2S J08544-0121 by modelling simultaneously the spatially extended surface brightness distribution of the source galaxy and the lens mass distribution using Markov chain Monte Carlo methods. In particular, we measure the dark matter halo size of the satellite lens galaxy to be 6.0^{+2.9}_{-2.0} kpc with a fiducial velocity dispersion of 127^{+21}_{-12} km/s. This is the first time the size of an individual galaxy halo in a galaxy group has been measured using strong gravitational lensing without assumptions of mass following light. We verify the robustness of our halo size measurement using mock data resembling our lens system. Our measurement of the halo size is compatible with the estimated tidal radius of the satellite galaxy, suggesting that halos of galaxies in groups experience significant tidal stripping, a process that has been previously observed on galaxies in clusters. Our mass model of the satellite galaxy is elliptical with its major axis misaligned with that of the light by ~50 deg. The major axis of the total matter distribution is oriented more towards the centre of the host halo, exhibiting the radial alignment found in N-body simulations and observational studies of satellite galaxies. This misalignment between mass and light poses a significant challenge to modified Newtonian dynamics.
Human review
References
How the literature uses it
8 arXiv papers cite this in 10 sentences
Papers citing it · 2 sentences without a confident label
Uses its method or tool 4 papers
-
First, it was decided to consider only the two models that are based on codes designed to do high-precision cosmography, glee [ref] and glafic [ref] , weighted by their agreement with observables independent of , yielding $H_0=66.6^+4.1_-3.3$ .
Strong Lensing and $H_0$ · Supernova time delay cosmography: the “Refsdal” case study · 0.95
-
In this work, we make use of two well-established, independent, lens modeling algorithms, [ref] and Glee [ref] .
Supernova 2025wny: High-angular resolution Keck/NIRC2 observations and preliminary lens modeling · Lens modeling methodology · 1.00
-
The lensing configurations are generated using our -based [ref] simulation pipeline [ref] .
HOLISMOKES XXI: Detecting strongly lensed type Ia supernovae from time series of multi-band LSST-like imaging data -- Part II · Summary of the datasets · 0.99
Uses its data or values 1 paper
-
We adopt the average magnification from the two parametric reconstructions provided; [ref] and [ref] .
(Re)solving the Complex Multiscale Morphology and V-shaped Spectral Energy Distribution of a Newly Discovered Strongly Lensed Little Red Dot in A383 · Lens Model · 0.81
Compares with it 1 paper
-
From the observation, the time delay between S1 and SX is measured to $∼350$ days, which is in excellent agreement with several model predictions, in particular those made with glafic [ref] and GLEE [ref] .
Strong gravitational lensing of explosive transients · Discovery of SN Refsdal. · 0.86
Discussion
Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.