Pith.

Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics · arXiv:1007.5141 v1 · submitted 29 Jul 2010

The latest on Apertif

Tom Oosterloo (1, 2), Marc Verheijen (2), Wim van Cappellen (1) ((1) Netherlands Institute or Radio Astronomy, Dwingeloo, (2) Kapteyn Astronomical Institute, Groningen)

The paper says

“PAFs turn radio telescopes into very effective survey instruments.”

from the abstract · picked out as the main claim by a classifier

Pith says

Pith has not reviewed this paper.

Get a Pith Review, $5

Reviews

Reviews by people

No person has reviewed this paper on Pith yet. A scientist listed on Pith can review it for a fee, and their review is published here whatever it concludes.

Request a human review

How Pith checks papers · The full audit of this paper

The paper

Abstract

We describe a Phased Array Feed (PAF) system, called Apertif, which will be installed in the Westerbork Synthesis Radio Telescope (WSRT). The aim of Apertif is, at frequencies from 1.0 to 1.7 GHz, to increase the instantaneous field of view of the WSRT 8 deg^2 and its observing bandwidth to 300 MHz with high spectral resolution. This system will turn the WSRT into an effective survey telescope with scientific applications ranging from deep surveys of the northern sky of HI and OH emission and polarised continuum to efficient searches for pulsars and transients. We present results obtained with a prototype PAF installed in one of the WSRT dishes. These results demonstrate that at decimetre wavelengths PAFs have excellent performance and that even for a single beam on the sky they outperform single feed radio dishes. PAFs turn radio telescopes into very effective survey instruments. Apertif is now fully funded and the community is invited to express their interest in using Apertif (http://www.astron.nl/radio-observatory/call-expressions-interest-apertif-surveys )

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

How the main claim is stated: asserted 1.00

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.05 · states limitation 0.19 · human participants 0.02 · controlled comparison 0.40 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.78 · compares with prior results 0.74 · mentions code or data availability 0.03

The abstract, sentence by sentence

This table labels the abstract only (arXiv listing abstract v1). The number is the probability the classifier gave the label.

SentenceRoleThe authors' own workStates the main conclusionStrength
We describe a Phased Array Feed (PAF) system, called Apertif, which will be installed in the Westerbork Synthesis Radio Telescope (WSRT). contribution 0.82 0.53 0.04 asserted 0.99
The aim of Apertif is, at frequencies from 1.0 to 1.7 GHz, to increase the instantaneous field of view of the WSRT 8 deg^2 and its observing bandwidth to 300 MHz with high spectral resolution. contribution 0.74 0.13 0.08 asserted 0.98
This system will turn the WSRT into an effective survey telescope with scientific applications ranging from deep surveys of the northern sky of HI and OH emission and polarised continuum to efficient searches for pulsars and transients. contribution 0.44 0.12 0.13 asserted 0.98
We present results obtained with a prototype PAF installed in one of the WSRT dishes. contribution 0.73 0.95 0.04 asserted 0.98
These results demonstrate that at decimetre wavelengths PAFs have excellent performance and that even for a single beam on the sky they outperform single feed radio dishes. interpretation 0.69 0.88 0.41 asserted 1.00
PAFs turn radio telescopes into very effective survey instruments. interpretation 0.99 0.23 0.53 asserted 1.00
Apertif is now fully funded and the community is invited to express their interest in using Apertif (http://www.astron.nl/radio-observatory/call-expressions-interest-apertif-surveys ) future work 0.97 0.18 0.03 asserted 0.99

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: method or tool 0.95 · evidence from observation or experiment 1.00

What was examined, and what was not

Sources read

  • arXiv listing abstract v1

Not examined

  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers

Levels run

  • P abstract

Not run

  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

How the labels were made

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 5,667 input tokens, $0.0002 reported.

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. This record as JSON

Cited by 2 Pith papers
How the literature uses it

18 arXiv papers cite this in 18 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 11 sentences without a confident label

Uses its method or tool 1 paper
Cites it as background 6 papers

Challenges and discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment.

No comments yet.

Sign in to comment