Pith. Sign in

RECORD

One-side Forward-backward Asymmetry in Top Quark Pair Production at CERN Large Hadron Collider

High Energy Physics - Phenomenology · Submitted 16 Aug 2010

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim In this paper, we explore how to examine the {\em same} higher-order QCD effects at the more powerful Large Hadron Collider.

how it is stated · unclear 0.50 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID1008.2685 (version 3)
Pith IDZGUHTW2Q, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationBo Xiao, Shou-hua Zhu, You-kai Wang. "One-side Forward-backward Asymmetry in Top Quark Pair Production at CERN Large Hadron Collider." arXiv:1008.2685 (2010). https://pith.science/paper/ZGUHTW2Q
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 2,294 input tokens, $0.0001 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.06 · states limitation 0.08 · human participants 0.02 · controlled comparison 0.21 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.04 · compares with prior results 0.53 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v3. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

Both D0 and CDF at Tevatron reported the measurements of forward-backward asymmetry in top pair production, which showed possible deviation from the standard model QCD prediction. In this paper, we explore how to examine the {\em same} higher-order QCD effects at the more powerful Large Hadron Collider.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 Both D0 and CDF at Tevatron reported the measurements of forward-backward asymmetry in top pair production, which showed possible deviation from the standard model QCD prediction. background 1.00 0.03 0.04 hedged possibility 0.83
s1 In this paper, we explore how to examine the {\em same} higher-order QCD effects at the more powerful Large Hadron Collider. contribution 0.99 0.45 0.07 unclear 0.50

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: position or commentary 0.41 · evidence from literature 0.49.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v3
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

Both D0 and CDF at Tevatron reported the measurements of forward-backward asymmetry in top pair production, which showed possible deviation from the standard model QCD prediction. In this paper, we explore how to examine the {\em same} higher-order QCD effects at the more powerful Large Hadron Collider.

Human review
References
How the literature uses it

19 arXiv papers cite this in 42 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 27 sentences without a confident label

Builds on it 1 paper
Uses its method or tool 3 papers
Compares with it 1 paper
Cites it as support 2 papers
  • The first one comes from the proton parton density functions (PDF's): since valence quarks are more likely to have more momentum than the gluons and the sea quarks, then the events in which the $tt̅$ pair is boosted along the beam axis have an incremental probability of coming from quark-fusion production [ref] .

    Enhancing the sensitivity to New Physics in the top-antitop invariant mass distribution · Introduction · 0.97

  • The choice of $β$ instead of the momentum $|p_t^z+p_t̅^z|$ to increase the asymmetry [ref] is motivated by its small correlation with other energy variables such as $$, as well as by the fact that it is experimentally a more robust observable, less affected by uncertainties on the jet energy scale and resolution.

    Boosting the t tbar charge asymmetry · Introduction · 0.97

Cites it as background 4 papers
  • However, as it has been studied in the last years [ref] , it is possible to induce an asymmetry by setting an algorithm which indicates when an event should add to $N_+$ and when to $N_-$ (see below).

    Improving top quark induced charge asymmetries at the LHC using ttbar transverse momentum · Significance of an induced asymmetry at the LHC · 0.88

  • The search for kinematic cuts that increase in a given $tt̅$ sample has been studied in the last years [ref] mainly to increase the sensitivity in the top charge-asymmetry at the LHC and very few in the $m_tt̅$-spectrum [ref] .

    Top-antitop resonance searches beyond 1 TeV · Introduction · 0.93

  • Many analyses have already been proposed with this aim, including an LHC measurement of the top-quark forward-central asymmetry [ref] , studies making use of the polarization/spin-correlation in the $tt̅$ system [ref] , and more specialized analysis designed to look for the signatures of particular models [ref] .

    Measuring the Bottom-Quark Forward-Central Asymmetry at the LHC · Introduction · 0.80

What it cites · 15 sentences without a confident label

Uses the method or tool of 4 papers
Uses data or values from 3 papers
Compares with 2 papers
Cites as support 1 paper
Cites as background 5 papers

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.