Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Top-antitop resonance searches beyond 1 TeV

High Energy Physics - Phenomenology · Submitted 21 Dec 2012

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim We observe that $\beta$ is replaced by $\theta$ as a suitable discriminating variable of quark-annihilation processes for invariant masses above 1 TeV.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID1212.5606 (version 1)
Pith IDE2WE4YXL, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationAlejandro Szynkman, Ezequiel Alvarez, Juan Ignacio Sanchez Vietto. "Top-antitop resonance searches beyond 1 TeV." arXiv:1212.5606 (2012). https://pith.science/paper/E2WE4YXL
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 5,021 input tokens, $0.0002 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.03 · states limitation 0.17 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.14 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.53 · compares with prior results 0.25 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

We perform a general parton level analysis for the search of heavy resonant states in the production of top-antitop pairs at the LHC with an integrated luminosity of 30 fb^-1. We assume the existence of resonances that only couple to quarks and propose kinematic cuts in order to increase the amount of events produced through quark-annihilation. We study the interplay between different variables and their impact on the purity of the selected sample. We make focus on the longitudinal ($\beta$) and transverse ($p_T$) momentum of the top-antitop pair, and the scattering angle ($\theta$) in the center of mass reference frame. We observe that $\beta$ is replaced by $\theta$ as a suitable discriminating variable of quark-annihilation processes for invariant masses above 1 TeV. Finally, we illustrate the analysis with a gluon resonance of 1.5 TeV and show the improvement in the sensitivity of the signal when cuts on $\theta$ are imposed.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 We perform a general parton level analysis for the search of heavy resonant states in the production of top-antitop pairs at the LHC with an integrated luminosity of 30 fb^-1. contribution 0.89 0.94 0.04 asserted 0.95
s1 We assume the existence of resonances that only couple to quarks and propose kinematic cuts in order to increase the amount of events produced through quark-annihilation. method 0.91 0.71 0.04 asserted 0.93
s2 We study the interplay between different variables and their impact on the purity of the selected sample. method 0.54 0.89 0.03 asserted 0.59
s3 We make focus on the longitudinal ($\beta$) and transverse ($p_T$) momentum of the top-antitop pair, and the scattering angle ($\theta$) in the center of mass reference frame. method 0.79 0.69 0.04 asserted 0.90
s4 We observe that $\beta$ is replaced by $\theta$ as a suitable discriminating variable of quark-annihilation processes for invariant masses above 1 TeV. result 0.99 0.94 0.68 asserted 1.00
s5 Finally, we illustrate the analysis with a gluon resonance of 1.5 TeV and show the improvement in the sensitivity of the signal when cuts on $\theta$ are imposed. result 0.66 0.94 0.35 asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: simulation study 0.61 · evidence from simulation or computation 0.95.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

We perform a general parton level analysis for the search of heavy resonant states in the production of top-antitop pairs at the LHC with an integrated luminosity of 30 fb^-1. We assume the existence of resonances that only couple to quarks and propose kinematic cuts in order to increase the amount of events produced through quark-annihilation. We study the interplay between different variables and their impact on the purity of the selected sample. We make focus on the longitudinal ($\beta$) and transverse ($p_T$) momentum of the top-antitop pair, and the scattering angle ($\theta$) in the center of mass reference frame. We observe that $\beta$ is replaced by $\theta$ as a suitable discriminating variable of quark-annihilation processes for invariant masses above 1 TeV. Finally, we illustrate the analysis with a gluon resonance of 1.5 TeV and show the improvement in the sensitivity of the signal when cuts on $\theta$ are imposed.

Human review
How the literature uses it

What this paper does with the arXiv papers it cites

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

What it cites · 21 sentences without a confident label

Uses the method or tool of 3 papers
Uses data or values from 1 paper
Cites as background 10 papers

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.