Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Introductory Lectures on Multiple Membranes

High Energy Physics - Theory · Submitted 2 Dec 2010

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim These lecture notes introduce the multiple membrane theories known as BLG and ABJM.

how it is stated · asserted 0.99 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID1012.0459 (version 1)
Pith IDC2IM3TRY, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationNeil B. Copland. "Introductory Lectures on Multiple Membranes." arXiv:1012.0459 (2010). https://pith.science/paper/C2IM3TRY
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 3,465 input tokens, $0.0001 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.03 · states limitation 0.43 · human participants 0.02 · controlled comparison 0.01 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.02 · compares with prior results 0.03 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

These lecture notes introduce the multiple membrane theories known as BLG and ABJM. We assume the reader is familiar with string theory, but not with M-theory, 11-dimensional supergravity or membranes. We therefore start with a background on M-theory and its extended objects before discussing BLG and ABJM. The link to string theory via dimensional reduction will be maintained throughout.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 These lecture notes introduce the multiple membrane theories known as BLG and ABJM. contribution 0.84 0.34 0.06 asserted 0.99
s1 We assume the reader is familiar with string theory, but not with M-theory, 11-dimensional supergravity or membranes. background 0.96 0.20 0.02 asserted 0.97
s2 We therefore start with a background on M-theory and its extended objects before discussing BLG and ABJM. method 0.65 0.43 0.03 asserted 0.96
s3 The link to string theory via dimensional reduction will be maintained throughout. method 0.80 0.47 0.03 asserted 0.99

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: review 1.00 · evidence from literature 0.69.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

These lecture notes introduce the multiple membrane theories known as BLG and ABJM. We assume the reader is familiar with string theory, but not with M-theory, 11-dimensional supergravity or membranes. We therefore start with a background on M-theory and its extended objects before discussing BLG and ABJM. The link to string theory via dimensional reduction will be maintained throughout.

Human review
How the literature uses it

2 arXiv papers cite this in 3 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 1 sentence without a confident label

Cites it as background 2 papers

What it cites · 54 sentences without a confident label

Cites as background 10 papers
  • The most promising development in recent years has been the BLG (Bagger-Lambert-Gustavsson) [ref] and ABJM (Aharony-Bergman-Jafferis-Maldacena) [ref] theories.

    Algebraic structures on parallel M2-branes · Introduction · 0.80

  • The most promising development in recent years has been the BLG (Bagger-Lambert-Gustavsson) [ref] and ABJM (Aharony-Bergman-Jafferis-Maldacena) [ref] theories.

    Modeling Multiple M2's · Introduction · 0.80

  • The most promising development in recent years has been the BLG (Bagger-Lambert-Gustavsson) [ref] and ABJM (Aharony-Bergman-Jafferis-Maldacena) [ref] theories.

    Gauge Symmetry and Supersymmetry of Multiple M2-Branes · Introduction · 0.80

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.