Pith.

Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics · arXiv:1012.0784 v1 · submitted 3 Dec 2010

Backreaction as an alternative to dark energy and modified gravity

Syksy Rasanen

The paper says

“We review how inhomogeneities affect the average expansion rate and can lead to acceleration, and consider a semi-realistic model where the observed timescale of ten billion years emerges from structure formation.”

from the abstract · picked out as the main claim by a classifier

Pith says

Pith has not reviewed this paper.

Get a Pith Review, $5

Reviews

Reviews by people

No person has reviewed this paper on Pith yet. A scientist listed on Pith can review it for a fee, and their review is published here whatever it concludes.

Request a human review

How Pith checks papers · The full audit of this paper

The paper

Abstract

The predictions of homogeneous and isotropic cosmological models with ordinary matter and gravity are off by a factor of two in the late universe. One possible explanation is the known breakdown of homogeneity and isotropy due to the formation of non-linear structures. We review how inhomogeneities affect the average expansion rate and can lead to acceleration, and consider a semi-realistic model where the observed timescale of ten billion years emerges from structure formation. We also discuss the relation between the average expansion rate and observed quantities.

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

How the main claim is stated: hedged possibility 0.55

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.03 · states limitation 0.27 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.14 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.82 · compares with prior results 0.44 · mentions code or data availability 0.02

The abstract, sentence by sentence

This table labels the abstract only (arXiv listing abstract v1). The number is the probability the classifier gave the label.

SentenceRoleThe authors' own workStates the main conclusionStrength
The predictions of homogeneous and isotropic cosmological models with ordinary matter and gravity are off by a factor of two in the late universe. background 0.98 0.12 0.06 asserted 1.00
One possible explanation is the known breakdown of homogeneity and isotropy due to the formation of non-linear structures. background 0.96 0.05 0.08 hedged possibility 0.96
We review how inhomogeneities affect the average expansion rate and can lead to acceleration, and consider a semi-realistic model where the observed timescale of ten billion years emerges from structure formation. contribution 0.98 0.71 0.60 hedged possibility 0.55
We also discuss the relation between the average expansion rate and observed quantities. contribution 0.99 0.60 0.04 unclear 0.84

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: review 0.99 · evidence from literature 0.59

What was examined, and what was not

Sources read

  • arXiv listing abstract v1

Not examined

  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers

Levels run

  • P abstract

Not run

  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

How the labels were made

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 3,548 input tokens, $0.0001 reported.

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. This record as JSON

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers on Pith that cite this one. The full citation record

  1. Average expansion rate and light propagation in a cosmological Tardis spacetime astro-ph.CO · Aug 2013
  2. Backreaction: directions of progress astro-ph.CO · Feb 2011
How the literature uses it

10 arXiv papers cite this in 16 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 8 sentences without a confident label

Cites it as support 1 paper
Cites it as background 7 papers

What it cites · 36 sentences without a confident label

Uses the method or tool of 2 papers
Uses data or values from 1 paper
Cites as support 5 papers
Cites as background 3 papers

Challenges and discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment.

No comments yet.

Sign in to comment