Pith.

General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology · arXiv:1101.3636 v2 · submitted 19 Jan 2011

Non-Gaussianity Consistency Relation for Multi-field Inflation

Naonori S. Sugiyama, Eiichiro Komatsu, Toshifumi Futamase

The paper says

“We show that multi-field models described by the δN formalism obey an inequality between $f_{\rm NL}$ and one of the local-form {\it trispectrum} amplitudes, $\tau_{\rm NL}$, such that $\tau_{\rm NL}>\frac12(\frac65f_{\rm NL})^2$ with a possible logarithmic scale dependence, provided that 2-loop terms are small.”

from the abstract · picked out as the main claim by a classifier

Pith says

Pith has not reviewed this paper.

Get a Pith Review, $5

Reviews

Reviews by people

No person has reviewed this paper on Pith yet. A scientist listed on Pith can review it for a fee, and their review is published here whatever it concludes.

Request a human review

How Pith checks papers · The full audit of this paper

The paper

Abstract

While detection of the "local form" bispectrum of primordial perturbations would rule out all single-field inflation models, multi-field models would still be allowed. We show that multi-field models described by the δN formalism obey an inequality between $f_{\rm NL}$ and one of the local-form {\it trispectrum} amplitudes, $\tau_{\rm NL}$, such that $\tau_{\rm NL}>\frac12(\frac65f_{\rm NL})^2$ with a possible logarithmic scale dependence, provided that 2-loop terms are small. Detection of a violation of this inequality would rule out most of multi-field models, challenging inflation as a mechanism for generating the primoridal perturbations.

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

How the main claim is stated: asserted 1.00

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.04 · states limitation 0.88 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.06 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.97 · compares with prior results 0.25 · mentions code or data availability 0.01

The abstract, sentence by sentence

This table labels the abstract only (arXiv listing abstract v2). The number is the probability the classifier gave the label.

SentenceRoleThe authors' own workStates the main conclusionStrength
While detection of the "local form" bispectrum of primordial perturbations would rule out all single-field inflation models, multi-field models would still be allowed. background 0.99 0.05 0.04 asserted 0.81
We show that multi-field models described by the $\delta N$ formalism obey an inequality between $f_{\rm NL}$ and one of the local-form {\it trispectrum} amplitudes, $\tau_{\rm NL}$, such that $\tau_{\rm NL}>\frac12(\frac65f_{\rm NL})^2$ with a possible logarithmic scale dependence, provided that 2-loop terms are small. result 0.93 0.94 0.89 asserted 1.00
Detection of a violation of this inequality would rule out most of multi-field models, challenging inflation as a mechanism for generating the primoridal perturbations. interpretation 0.99 0.22 0.39 asserted 0.54

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 1.00 · evidence from proof or derivation 1.00

What was examined, and what was not

Sources read

  • arXiv listing abstract v2

Not examined

  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers

Levels run

  • P abstract

Not run

  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

How the labels were made

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 3,114 input tokens, $0.0001 reported.

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. This record as JSON

Cited by 6 Pith papers
How the literature uses it

24 arXiv papers cite this in 33 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 25 sentences without a confident label

Contests it 1 paper
Compares with it 1 paper
  • Pln(kL) +(15 2A_3^2 A_1^2 + 2A_3^3 A_2^2 A_1)(Pln(kL))^2 +. 52A_3^4 A_2^2 A_1^2(Pln(kL))^3 ] g_NL^equi. = A_3 A_1^3 N^6 [1+3A_2^2 A_1^2Pln(kL) +(3A_3 A_2^2 A_1^3+32A_3^2 A_1^2)(Pln(kL))^2 +A_3^3 A_1^3(Pln(kL))^3] The expression for $τ_NL^equi.$ is consistent with the one-loop expression given in [ref] .

    Local Scale-Dependent Non-Gaussian Curvature Perturbations at Cubic Order · Trispectrum · 0.80

Cites it as background 5 papers

What it cites · 3 sentences without a confident label

Builds on 1 paper
Uses data or values from 1 paper
Cites as background 1 paper

Challenges and discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment.

No comments yet.

Sign in to comment