RECORD
Trapped and marginally trapped surfaces in Weyl-distorted Schwarzschild solutions
General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology · Submitted 4 Feb 2011
abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review
The authors' main claim However we show that for large distortions the isolated horizon is neither a future outer trapping horizon (FOTH) nor even a marginally trapped surface: slices of the horizon cannot be infinitesimally deformed into (outer) trapped surfaces.
The compiled record
The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.
Open the compiled record
The abstract, sentence by sentence
To better understand the allowed range of black hole geometries, we study Weyl-distorted Schwarzschild solutions. They always contain trapped surfaces, a singularity and an isolated horizon and so should be understood to be (geometric) black holes. However we show that for large distortions the isolated horizon is neither a future outer trapping horizon (FOTH) nor even a marginally trapped surface: slices of the horizon cannot be infinitesimally deformed into (outer) trapped surfaces. We consider the implications of this result for popular quasilocal definitions of black holes.
background contribution method result interpretation main claim
| # | sentence | role | the authors' own work | states the main conclusion | strength |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| s0 | To better understand the allowed range of black hole geometries, we study Weyl-distorted Schwarzschild solutions. | contribution 0.62 | 0.64 | 0.03 | asserted 0.60 |
| s1 | They always contain trapped surfaces, a singularity and an isolated horizon and so should be understood to be (geometric) black holes. | result 0.70 | 0.35 | 0.14 | asserted 1.00 |
| s2 | However we show that for large distortions the isolated horizon is neither a future outer trapping horizon (FOTH) nor even a marginally trapped surface: slices of the horizon cannot be infinitesimally deformed into (outer) trapped surfaces. | result 1.00 | 0.96 | 0.82 | asserted 1.00 |
| s3 | We consider the implications of this result for popular quasilocal definitions of black holes. | interpretation 0.91 | 0.46 | 0.05 | unclear 0.95 |
What was examined, and what was not
- arXiv listing abstract v2
- full text
- figures and tables
- references and citing sentences
- relations to other papers
- P abstract
- S sections
- T body sentences
- C citations
- R cross-paper relations
The paper
Original abstract
To better understand the allowed range of black hole geometries, we study Weyl-distorted Schwarzschild solutions. They always contain trapped surfaces, a singularity and an isolated horizon and so should be understood to be (geometric) black holes. However we show that for large distortions the isolated horizon is neither a future outer trapping horizon (FOTH) nor even a marginally trapped surface: slices of the horizon cannot be infinitesimally deformed into (outer) trapped surfaces. We consider the implications of this result for popular quasilocal definitions of black holes.
Human review
How the literature uses it
5 arXiv papers cite this in 8 sentences
What it cites · 21 sentences without a confident label
Cites as background 9 papers
-
is a trapping horizon if the $S_λ$ are all marginally outer trapped [ref] .
General Laws of Black-Hole Dynamics · Stationary black hole boundaries · 0.92
-
Such variations are standard in differential geometry however a discussion of them using the same language and notation as this paper may be found in [ref] .
Isolated, slowly evolving, and dynamical trapping horizons: geometry and mechanics from surface deformations · Trapped and marginally trapped surfaces · 0.82
-
The inequivalence of the definitions has been most intensively studied for the Vaidya spacetimes [ref] .
On the boundary of the region containing trapped surfaces · Introduction · 0.92
Discussion
Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.