Pith. Sign in

REVIEW

Stability of Schwarzschild-like solutions in f(R,G) gravity models

General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology · Submitted 8 Feb 2011 · 41 references

Pith's verdict: A clean no-go for f(R,G) on Schwarzschild-like backgrounds: the even sector always carries a ghost, and the sign argument is a sum of squares that holds up.

T0 · AI review

How this review was made: An AI referee (selfhosted/deepseek-v4.1-flash) read the paper on November 10, 2026 and answered a fixed list of questions about it. T0 is the starting level every paper gets. The levels describe how deeply Pith has checked the paper, never the authors.

  1. T0 AI review An AI read the paper and answered a fixed list of questions.
  2. T1 Audit Automatic checks that the references and files the paper relies on exist and match.
  3. T2 Compute The paper's code or calculations re-run with the same results.
  4. T3 Formal statement The claims written out in a formal math language a computer can read.
  5. T4 Proof Those claims proved, and the proof checked by computer.

How Pith checks papers →

· 3 major objections · 6 minor · Ask about this paper · The compiled record · Read the full review →
Challenge this review Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID1102.1521 (version 1)
Pith IDFPQSZDJM, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationAntonio De Felice, Takahiro Tanaka, Teruaki Suyama. "Stability of Schwarzschild-like solutions in f(R,G) gravity models." arXiv:1102.1521 (2011). https://pith.science/paper/FPQSZDJM
Cite this reviewBibTeX for Pith's review of this paper
Claim paper

Why Pith says this

Highlight any text to comment on it.

Referee report
The paper

The paper claims

Gravity theories that add a Gauss–Bonnet term to the Ricci scalar carry an unavoidable ghost around any spherically symmetric static vacuum background, so they survive as dark-energy models only if that ghost is made heavy enough to decuple

The reading

The paper asks whether gravity theories built from a general function $f(R,G)$ of the Ricci scalar $R$ and the Gauss–Bonnet term $G$ can have stable, ghost-free stellar backgrounds, or whether the extra scalar content of the theory turns pathological as soon as the background is a star rather than a cosmological model. Working in vacuum around a static spherically symmetric metric, the authors split metric perturbations into odd- and even-parity sectors using the Regge–Wheeler–Zerilli decomposition, derive the quadratic action for each sector, and read off the kinetic matrix that decides whether a mode carries negative kinetic energy. They find that for the even-parity sector one principal minor of that matrix is minus a perfect square, so it can never be positive definite: at least one ghost is present for every multipole, with the only escapes being the degenerate subclass where the Hessian determinant of $f$ vanishes (ordinary $f(R)$ gravity is one such case) or a background more symmetric than Schwarzschild, such as Minkowski or de Sitter. The authors then ask what a viable model would have to do about this, and translate the requirement that the ghost be heavy enough to be integrated out below the effective cutoff into explicit conditions on the second derivatives of $f$.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing device is the Regge–Wheeler–Zerilli decomposition applied to the second-order action, followed by a systematic elimination of the non-propagating fields. For the odd sector the authors introduce a Lagrange multiplier $Q$ to linearise the awkward $(dot{h}_1-h_0')^2$ structure, integrate out $h_0$ and $h_1$, and obtain a canonical Lagrangian whose no-ghost condition is $AF-2Bxi'A'geq 0$ and whose gradient condition is $F-4Bxi''-2B'xi'geq 0$. For the even sector the analogous procedure requires two field redefinitions, $delta F=v_1-(a_1/a_2)delta xi$ and $j^2a_4alpha=a_4v_0-a_3H_2-a_2v_1'$, chosen precisely so that the constraint from $H_0$ loses all second radial derivatives and can be solved for $H_2$; substituting back leaves a $3imes 3$ system of the form $sum[K_{ij}dot{v}_idot{v}_j-L_{ij}v_i'v_j'-D_{ij}v_i'v_j-M_{ij}v_iv_j]$. The sign structure of $K_{ij}$ is what carries the no-go, and the mass matrix $M_{ij}$, rewritten through $(U_{,FF},U_{,Fxi};U_{,Fxi},U_{,xi xi})$ as the inverse Hessian of $f$, is what carries the viability analysis.

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is a no-go statement: on a general spherically symmetric static vacuum solution, the even-parity perturbation sector of any $f(R,G)$ theory with nonvanishing Hessian determinant $f_{,RR}f_{,GG}-f_{,RG}^{2}$ contains a ghost for every value of the multipole index. The proof is an explicit computation of the $3imes 3$ kinetic matrix $K_{ij}$ of the even modes after the non-dynamical fields $H_0$, $H_1$ and $H_2$ have been integrated out; one of its required positivity conditions, $K_{22}K_{33}-K_{23}^{2}$, is proportional to minus the square of the real combination $[4(B-1)G_{,r}-r^{2}F_{,r}]$ divided by a positive factor, so it is non-positive by construction, and the determinant is negative once the odd-sector gradient condition holds. Hence either one ghost (if $K_{33}>0$) or three ghosts (if $K_{33}<0$). The counting of propagating modes is also settled: one odd mode for $lgeq 2$ and none for $l=0,1$; three even modes for $lgeq 2$ and two for $l=0,1$, of which one is the ordinary massless graviton, one is a chameleon-like non-ghost scalar, and one is the ghost. Two of the three even modes share a propagation speed that reduces to the speed of light when $A=B$, while the third matches the odd-mode speed and depends directly on the radial profiles of $F$ and $xi$. Finally, the authors argue that the ghost need not be fatal if it is heavy enough: they derive the mass eigenvalues $m^{2}_{+}$ and $m^{2}_{-}$ from the mass matrix, show that the ghost mass diverges as the background approaches Minkowski (its kinetic term vanishes there), and reduce the viability of a model to the two conditions $|9tilde{G}det(f_{,ij})| ll L_{m exp}^{4}$ and $|3(f_{,RR}-tilde{G}f_{,GG})| ll L_{m exp}^{2}$, where $tilde{G}pprox 16r_{s}^{2}/r^{6}$ and $L_{m exp}$ is the length scale of the experiment being protected.

Load-bearing premise

The mass estimates and the final viability conditions rest on treating the stellar exterior as a near-Schwarzschild vacuum solution with $Fpprox 1$, $F'pprox 0$ and $xi'pprox xi''pprox 0$, even though the authors concede in footnote 2 that matter cannot consistently be included and enters only by shifting the background values of $R$ and $G$.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Any $f(R,G)$ model with a genuinely nondegenerate Hessian is excluded as a ghost-free alternative to general relativity on stellar backgrounds, leaving only the degenerate subclass (including $f(R)$) and near-Minkowski or near-de Sitter backgrounds as safe.
  • A model can still survive if its ghost mass exceeds the effective cutoff, which requires a hierarchy among $f_{,RR}$, $f_{,RG}$ and $f_{,GG}$; the paper exhibits a toy model $f=R+F_R(R)+F_G(G)$ with $F_Rpropto R^{-p}$ and $F_Gpropto G^{-2n}$ and shows the ghost mass scales as $H_0^{2}[H_0^{-2}r_s/r^{3}]^{4n+2}$, easily made huge, while the non-ghost scalar needs $pgeq 4$ to be heavy enough at sola
  • The odd sector yields a definite prediction for the radial propagation speed, $c_{m odd}^{2}=A(AF-2Bxi'A')/(F-4Bxi''-2B'xi')$, which differs from light speed in these theories and is therefore a target for gravitational-wave and pulsar-timing tests.
  • The number of propagating degrees of freedom is background-dependent: it drops by one on Minkowski or de Sitter, exactly as previously found on FLRW, so counting modes in one background does not tell you the theory's degrees of freedom in another.
  • For the degenerate case $f_{,RR}f_{,GG}-f_{,RG}^{2}=0$ the ghost can be absent, and the authors show that ordinary $f(R)$ gravity with $F=partial f/partial R>0$ satisfies the resulting no-ghost condition.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The authors note in passing that $G$ changes sign inside a star (negative in a Schwarzschild interior, positive outside), and their ghost mass formula scales with powers of $G$; combining the two means the ghost mass must pass through zero at some radius near the stellar surface, which is a sharper statement than 'the ghost is heavy outside the star' and would be worth checking against explicit in
  • Because the no-go rests on a sign-definite square, the escape hatch is narrow in a specific sense: any model whose Hessian determinant is nonzero is caught, so the Gauss–Bonnet coupling itself, rather than the choice of function, is the load-bearing ingredient that creates the problem.
  • If the ghost must be heavier than the cutoff everywhere the theory is used, then the required hierarchy among $f_{,ij}$ is itself a fine-tuning that radiative corrections could spoil; the paper does not estimate that stability, and doing so would be a natural next step.
  • The mode-counting result suggests a cleaner observational handle than the ghost itself: the extra scalar speed in the odd sector is a single function of the background, so binary pulsar timing or future gravitational-wave observations of a compact object could in principle constrain the combination $F-4Bxi''-2B'xi'$ directly.
Original abstract

We study linear metric perturbations around a spherically symmetric static spacetime for general f(R,G) theories, where R is the Ricci scalar and G is the Gauss-Bonnet term. We find that unless the determinant of the Hessian of f(R,G) is zero, even-type perturbations have a ghost for any multi-pole mode. In order for these theories to be plausible alternatives to General Relativity, the theory should satisfy the condition that the ghost is massive enough to effectively decouple from the other fields. We study the requirement on the form of f(R,G) which satisfies this condition. We also classify the number of propagating modes both for the odd-type and the even-type perturbations and derive the propagation speeds for each mode.

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged, kept beside the review and separate from it. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 4,295 input tokens, $0.0002 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.03 · states limitation 0.41 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.03 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.17 · compares with prior results 0.10 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

We study linear metric perturbations around a spherically symmetric static spacetime for general f(R,G) theories, where R is the Ricci scalar and G is the Gauss-Bonnet term. We find that unless the determinant of the Hessian of f(R,G) is zero, even-type perturbations have a ghost for any multi-pole mode. In order for these theories to be plausible alternatives to General Relativity, the theory should satisfy the condition that the ghost is massive enough to effectively decouple from the other fields. We study the requirement on the form of f(R,G) which satisfies this condition. We also classify the number of propagating modes both for the odd-type and the even-type perturbations and derive the propagation speeds for each mode.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 We study linear metric perturbations around a spherically symmetric static spacetime for general f(R,G) theories, where R is the Ricci scalar and G is the Gauss-Bonnet term. contribution 0.80 0.87 0.03 asserted 0.88
s1 We find that unless the determinant of the Hessian of f(R,G) is zero, even-type perturbations have a ghost for any multi-pole mode. result 1.00 0.95 0.64 asserted 1.00
s2 In order for these theories to be plausible alternatives to General Relativity, the theory should satisfy the condition that the ghost is massive enough to effectively decouple from the other fields. interpretation 0.83 0.14 0.14 asserted 0.82
s3 We study the requirement on the form of f(R,G) which satisfies this condition. contribution 0.99 0.87 0.06 unclear 0.61
s4 We also classify the number of propagating modes both for the odd-type and the even-type perturbations and derive the propagation speeds for each mode. contribution 0.83 0.96 0.08 asserted 0.99

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 1.00 · evidence from proof or derivation 1.00.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

References
How later papers used it

49 later papers cite it

Evidence: substantial. 40 of the citing papers share no author with it, and 17 of those carry a confident label from Pith's citation classifier.

Pith read 16 of the 65 citing sentences, choosing only those whose citation markers point at this paper alone, and wrote the paraphrases from them. The summary, the counts, the evidence level, the links and the quotes come from code; the summary counts the papers listed below. A later paper is listed under a label when Pith's citation classifier gives one of its sentences that label at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), Pith's reading finds that the citing paper itself did it, and a second check confirms the paraphrase against the sentence. This section lists uses only. It does not list criticism or disagreement, so their absence here says nothing about how the paper has been received. Papers that share an author with this one are listed apart, under "By the same authors". A quote is the citing authors' own sentence, shown when their paper's licence is CC BY, CC BY-SA or CC0. JSON

Uses its method or tool 8 of 20 papers with this label · 3 by the same authors

By the same authors

How the literature uses it

47 arXiv papers cite this in 63 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 23 sentences without a confident label

Builds on it 1 paper
Uses its method or tool 20 papers
Compares with it 2 papers
Cites it as background 14 papers

Discussion

Disagree with the review, or know something it missed? Leave a comment, highlight any passage above to comment on it, or challenge this review formally.