Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Confronting Top AFB with Parity Violation Constraints

High Energy Physics - Phenomenology · Submitted 6 Mar 2012

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim As a result, atomic parity violation constraints disfavor at >3 sigma t-channel models that give rise to a greater than 20% AFB at the parton level for M_tt > 450 GeV while not producing too large a top cross-section.

how it is stated · asserted 0.99 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID1203.1320 (version 1)
Pith ID4BATP5DC, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationIan-Woo Kim, Kathryn M. Zurek, Moira I. Gresham, Sean Tulin. "Confronting Top AFB with Parity Violation Constraints." arXiv:1203.1320 (2012). https://pith.science/paper/4BATP5DC
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 3,650 input tokens, $0.0002 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.03 · states limitation 0.40 · human participants 0.02 · controlled comparison 0.07 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.98 · compares with prior results 0.22 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

We consider the implications of low-energy precision tests of parity violation on t-channel mediator models explaining the top AFB excess measured by CDF and D0. Flavor-violating u-t or d-t couplings of new scalar or vector mediators generate at one-loop an anomalous contribution to the nuclear weak charge. As a result, atomic parity violation constraints disfavor at >3 sigma t-channel models that give rise to a greater than 20% AFB at the parton level for M_tt > 450 GeV while not producing too large a top cross-section. Even stronger constraints are expected through future measurements of the proton weak charge by the Q-Weak experiment.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 We consider the implications of low-energy precision tests of parity violation on t-channel mediator models explaining the top AFB excess measured by CDF and D0. contribution 0.83 0.55 0.06 unclear 0.62
s1 Flavor-violating u-t or d-t couplings of new scalar or vector mediators generate at one-loop an anomalous contribution to the nuclear weak charge. method 0.31 0.28 0.04 asserted 1.00
s2 As a result, atomic parity violation constraints disfavor at >3 sigma t-channel models that give rise to a greater than 20% AFB at the parton level for M_tt > 450 GeV while not producing too large a top cross-section. result 0.98 0.73 0.88 asserted 0.99
s3 Even stronger constraints are expected through future measurements of the proton weak charge by the Q-Weak experiment. future work 0.64 0.15 0.06 hedged possibility 0.80

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 0.99 · evidence from analysis of existing data 0.41.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

We consider the implications of low-energy precision tests of parity violation on t-channel mediator models explaining the top AFB excess measured by CDF and D0. Flavor-violating u-t or d-t couplings of new scalar or vector mediators generate at one-loop an anomalous contribution to the nuclear weak charge. As a result, atomic parity violation constraints disfavor at >3 sigma t-channel models that give rise to a greater than 20% AFB at the parton level for M_tt > 450 GeV while not producing too large a top cross-section. Even stronger constraints are expected through future measurements of the proton weak charge by the Q-Weak experiment.

Human review
References
How the literature uses it

21 arXiv papers cite this in 37 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 32 sentences without a confident label

Uses its method or tool 2 papers
  • Matching onto the nuclear weak charge [ref] [equation] where $Z$ is the proton number and $N$ is the neutron number, we find [equation] We do not match $V_2$ due to an additional $d_R$-quark coupling [ref] .

    Flavor & new physics opportunities with rare charm decays into leptons · Leptoquark Constraints · 0.89

  • To this end, we rewrite the operator $Q_2^1111$, using Fierz relations [ref] , as [equation] The effective Lagrangian leading to atomic parity violation can be written as [ref] [equation] The precise measurement of atomic parity violation in cesium ($^133$Cs) atoms together with the precision prediction of the corresponding Standard Model contributions constrains new physics contributions to $C_1u$ to the $10^-3$ level.

    The Coannihilation Codex · Flavor physics in the leptoquark case study · 0.96

Cites it as support 1 paper
Cites it as background 2 papers

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.