RECORD
A Collective Breaking of R-Parity
High Energy Physics - Phenomenology · Submitted 24 Jul 2012
abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review
The authors' main claim Cascade decays can proceed normally, with each step only sensitive to one or two couplings at a time, but B and L violation requires the full set, yielding a highly suppressed constraint. s-channel production of new scalar states, typically small for standard RPV, can be large when RPV is broken collectively.
The compiled record
The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.
Open the compiled record
The abstract, sentence by sentence
Supersymmetric theories with an R-parity generally yield a striking missing energy signature, with cascade decays concluding in a neutralino that escapes the detector. In theories where R-parity is broken the missing energy is replaced with additional jets or leptons, often making traditional search strategies ineffective. Such R-parity violation is very constrained, however, by resulting B and L violating signals, requiring couplings so small that LSPs will decay outside the detector in all but a few scenarios. In theories with additional matter fields, R-parity can be broken collectively, such that R-parity is not broken by any single coupling, but only by an ensemble of couplings. Cascade decays can proceed normally, with each step only sensitive to one or two couplings at a time, but B and L violation requires the full set, yielding a highly suppressed constraint. s-channel production of new scalar states, typically small for standard RPV, can be large when RPV is broken collectively. While missing energy is absent, making these models difficult to discover by traditional SUSY searches, they produce complicated many object resonances (MORes), with many different possible numbers of jets and leptons. We outline a simple model and discuss its discoverability at the LHC.
background contribution method result interpretation main claim
| # | sentence | role | the authors' own work | states the main conclusion | strength |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| s0 | Supersymmetric theories with an R-parity generally yield a striking missing energy signature, with cascade decays concluding in a neutralino that escapes the detector. | background 1.00 | 0.04 | 0.03 | asserted 0.98 |
| s1 | In theories where R-parity is broken the missing energy is replaced with additional jets or leptons, often making traditional search strategies ineffective. | background 1.00 | 0.05 | 0.04 | asserted 0.94 |
| s2 | Such R-parity violation is very constrained, however, by resulting B and L violating signals, requiring couplings so small that LSPs will decay outside the detector in all but a few scenarios. | background 0.97 | 0.06 | 0.04 | asserted 1.00 |
| s3 | In theories with additional matter fields, R-parity can be broken collectively, such that R-parity is not broken by any single coupling, but only by an ensemble of couplings. | background 0.90 | 0.07 | 0.09 | hedged possibility 0.63 |
| s4 | Cascade decays can proceed normally, with each step only sensitive to one or two couplings at a time, but B and L violation requires the full set, yielding a highly suppressed constraint. s-channel production of new scalar states, typically small for standard RPV, can be large when RPV is broken collectively. | result 0.43 | 0.29 | 0.38 | asserted 0.95 |
| s5 | While missing energy is absent, making these models difficult to discover by traditional SUSY searches, they produce complicated many object resonances (MORes), with many different possible numbers of jets and leptons. | result 0.36 | 0.22 | 0.14 | asserted 0.98 |
| s6 | We outline a simple model and discuss its discoverability at the LHC. | contribution 1.00 | 0.89 | 0.10 | asserted 0.57 |
What was examined, and what was not
- arXiv listing abstract v1
- full text
- figures and tables
- references and citing sentences
- relations to other papers
- P abstract
- S sections
- T body sentences
- C citations
- R cross-paper relations
The paper
Original abstract
Supersymmetric theories with an R-parity generally yield a striking missing energy signature, with cascade decays concluding in a neutralino that escapes the detector. In theories where R-parity is broken the missing energy is replaced with additional jets or leptons, often making traditional search strategies ineffective. Such R-parity violation is very constrained, however, by resulting B and L violating signals, requiring couplings so small that LSPs will decay outside the detector in all but a few scenarios. In theories with additional matter fields, R-parity can be broken collectively, such that R-parity is not broken by any single coupling, but only by an ensemble of couplings. Cascade decays can proceed normally, with each step only sensitive to one or two couplings at a time, but B and L violation requires the full set, yielding a highly suppressed constraint. s-channel production of new scalar states, typically small for standard RPV, can be large when RPV is broken collectively. While missing energy is absent, making these models difficult to discover by traditional SUSY searches, they produce complicated many object resonances (MORes), with many different possible numbers of jets and leptons. We outline a simple model and discuss its discoverability at the LHC.
Human review
References
How the literature uses it
15 arXiv papers cite this in 16 sentences
Papers citing it · 14 sentences without a confident label
Cites it as background 2 papers
-
[ref] ), but more recently high multiplicity searches have been advocated as an effective technique for helping to probe scenarios with natural supersymmetry as well as those with baryonic R-parity violating supersymmetry [ref] .
Learning How to Count: A High Multiplicity Search for the LHC · Introduction · 0.87
-
Related models as well as recent studies on the LHC phenomenology of baryonic RPV models can be found in [ref] .
Dynamical R-Parity Violation · Introduction · 0.98
What it cites · 24 sentences without a confident label
Builds on 2 papers
-
It should be possible to constrain these channels if the CDF/CMS search strategy [ref] is extended to look for excesses in the 4-jet mass.
First Search for Multijet Resonances in $\sqrt{s} = 1.96$ TeV $ p\bar{p}$ Collisions · Quadjets in CRPV · 0.81
-
It should be possible to constrain these channels if the CDF/CMS search strategy [ref] is extended to look for excesses in the 4-jet mass.
Search for Three-Jet Resonances in pp Collisions at sqrt(s) = 7 TeV · Quadjets in CRPV · 0.81
Uses the method or tool of 2 papers
-
Fixing $m_D̃ = 600$ GeV and $m_U=200$ GeV, we have simulated the process of figure [ref] using Madgraph 5 [ref] for the parton-level process and Pythia 6 [ref] for showering, but not hadronization.
MadGraph 5 : Going Beyond · Quadjets in CRPV · 0.99
-
As in section [ref], the Pythia output is passed through an idealized calorimeter before clustering with Fastjet [ref] , this time using anti-$k_T$ with $R = 0.4$.
FastJet user manual · Quadjets in CRPV · 1.00
Uses data or values from 1 paper
-
For example, if we allow $λ_UD^1 = 1$, then we find that dijet limits constrain $λ_D^11 < 0.6$ [ref] at 95% C.L.
Search for New Physics in Dijet Mass and Angular Distributions in pp Collisions at sqrt(s) = 7 TeV Measured with the ATLAS Detector · Quadjets in CRPV · 0.82
Cites as background 4 papers
-
The pair production of three-jet resonances has also been searched for by CDF [ref] and CMS [ref] .
First Search for Multijet Resonances in $\sqrt{s} = 1.96$ TeV $ p\bar{p}$ Collisions · Trijets in CRPV · 0.91
-
The pair production of three-jet resonances has also been searched for by CDF [ref] and CMS [ref] .
Search for Three-Jet Resonances in pp Collisions at sqrt(s) = 7 TeV · Trijets in CRPV · 0.91
-
For recent phenomenological studies of hidden SUSY with RPV see Refs. [ref] .
Displaced Supersymmetry · Introduction · 0.87
Discussion
Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.