Pith. sign in

REVIEW

An Upper Bound on the Convergence Time for Quantized Consensus

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1208.0788 v2 pith:AKNJLOPS submitted 2012-08-03 stat.AP cs.DCcs.PFmath.OC

An Upper Bound on the Convergence Time for Quantized Consensus

classification stat.AP cs.DCcs.PFmath.OC
keywords consensusquantizedgraphsnetworksboundconvergencetimealgorithm
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

We analyze a class of distributed quantized consen- sus algorithms for arbitrary networks. In the initial setting, each node in the network has an integer value. Nodes exchange their current estimate of the mean value in the network, and then update their estimation by communicating with their neighbors in a limited capacity channel in an asynchronous clock setting. Eventually, all nodes reach consensus with quantized precision. We start the analysis with a special case of a distributed binary voting algorithm, then proceed to the expected convergence time for the general quantized consensus algorithm proposed by Kashyap et al. We use the theory of electric networks, random walks, and couplings of Markov chains to derive an O(N^3log N) upper bound for the expected convergence time on an arbitrary graph of size N, improving on the state of art bound of O(N^4logN) for binary consensus and O(N^5) for quantized consensus algorithms. Our result is not dependent on graph topology. Simulations on special graphs such as star networks, line graphs, lollipop graphs, and Erd\"os-R\'enyi random graphs are performed to validate the analysis. This work has applications to load balancing, coordination of autonomous agents, estimation and detection, decision-making networks, peer-to-peer systems, etc.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.