Pith. sign in

REVIEW

XENON100 Implications for Naturalness in the MSSM, NMSSM and lambda-SUSY

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1208.0833 v2 pith:ACHQBGIA submitted 2012-08-03 hep-ph astro-ph.COastro-ph.IMhep-th

classification hep-phastro-ph.COastro-ph.IMhep-th
keywords fine-tuninglambda-susymssmnmssmxenon100boundbreakingcorrelation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

In a recent paper arXiv:1107.5048, we discussed the correlation between the elastic neutralino-nucleon scattering cross section, constrained by dark matter direct detection experiments, and fine-tuning at tree-level in the electroweak symmetry breaking sector of the Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model (MSSM). Here, we show that the correlation persists in the Next-to-Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model (NMSSM), and its variant, lambda-SUSY. Both models are strongly motivated by the recent discovery of a 125 GeV Higgs-like particle. We also discuss the implications of the recently published bound on the direct detection cross section from 225 live days of XENON100 experiment. In both the MSSM and the NMSSM, most of the parameter space with fine-tuning less than 10% is inconsistent with the XENON100 bound. In lambda-SUSY, on the other hand, large regions of completely natural electroweak symmetry breaking are still allowed, primarily due to a parametric suppression of fine-tuning with large \lambda. The upcoming XENON1T experiment will be able to probe most of the parameter space with less than 1% fine-tuning in all three models.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Pith tools