Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Comment on "On the subtleties of searching for dark matter with liquid xenon detectors"

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1208.5762 v1 pith:QBVVV2IS submitted 2012-08-28 astro-ph.CO astro-ph.IMhep-exhep-ph

Comment on "On the subtleties of searching for dark matter with liquid xenon detectors"

classification astro-ph.CO astro-ph.IMhep-exhep-ph
keywords analysisarxivbelowclaimscommentconfirmconsideringcross
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

In a recent manuscript (arXiv:1208.5046) Peter Sorensen claims that XENON100's upper limits on spin-independent WIMP-nucleon cross sections for WIMP masses below 10 GeV "may be understated by one order of magnitude or more". Having performed a similar, though more detailed analysis prior to the submission of our new result (arXiv:1207.5988), we do not confirm these findings. We point out the rationale for not considering the described effect in our final analysis and list several potential problems with his study.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.