Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Timelike U-dualities in Generalised Geometry

High Energy Physics - Theory · Submitted 3 Jan 2013

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim Using generalised geometry, we find that timelike U-dualities, despite previous conjectures, do not change the signature of the spacetime.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID1301.0543 (version 3)
Pith IDO44HWXX3, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationEmanuel Malek. "Timelike U-dualities in Generalised Geometry." arXiv:1301.0543 (2013). https://pith.science/paper/O44HWXX3
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 8,410 input tokens, $0.0004 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.04 · states limitation 0.54 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.03 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.23 · compares with prior results 0.79 · mentions code or data availability 0.01.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v3. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

We study timelike U-dualities acting in three and four directions of 11-dimensional supergravity, which form the groups $SL(2)\times SL(3)$ and SL(5). Using generalised geometry, we find that timelike U-dualities, despite previous conjectures, do not change the signature of the spacetime. Furthermore, we prove that the spacetime signature must be $(-,+,...,+)$ when the U-duality modular group is either $\frac{SL(2)\times SL(3)}{SO(1,1)\times SO(2,1)}$ or $\frac{SL(5)}{SO(3,2)}$. We find that for some dual solutions it is necessary to include a trivector field which is related to the existence of non-geometric fluxes in lower dimensions. In the second part of the paper, we explicitly study the action of the dualities on supergravity solutions corresponding to M2-branes. For a finite range of the transformation, the action of $SL(2)\otimes SL(3)$ on the worldvolume of uncharged M2-branes charges them while it changes the charge of extreme M2-branes. It thus acts as a Harrison transformation. At the limits of the range, we obtain the "subtracted geometries" which correspond to an infinite Harrison boost. Outside this range the trivector field becomes non-zero and we obtain a dual solution that cannot be uniquely written in terms of a metric, 3-form and trivector. Instead it corresponds to a family of solutions linked by a local SO(1,1) rotation. The SL(5) duality is used to act on a smeared extreme M2-brane giving a brane-like solution carrying momentum in the transverse direction that the brane was delocalised along.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 We study timelike U-dualities acting in three and four directions of 11-dimensional supergravity, which form the groups $SL(2)\times SL(3)$ and SL(5). contribution 0.92 0.82 0.06 asserted 0.99
s1 Using generalised geometry, we find that timelike U-dualities, despite previous conjectures, do not change the signature of the spacetime. result 0.99 0.95 0.52 asserted 1.00
s2 Furthermore, we prove that the spacetime signature must be $(-,+,...,+)$ when the U-duality modular group is either $\frac{SL(2)\times SL(3)}{SO(1,1)\times SO(2,1)}$ or $\frac{SL(5)}{SO(3,2)}$. result 1.00 0.93 0.37 asserted 1.00
s3 We find that for some dual solutions it is necessary to include a trivector field which is related to the existence of non-geometric fluxes in lower dimensions. result 0.99 0.95 0.06 asserted 0.99
s4 In the second part of the paper, we explicitly study the action of the dualities on supergravity solutions corresponding to M2-branes. contribution 0.99 0.94 0.04 asserted 1.00
s5 For a finite range of the transformation, the action of $SL(2)\otimes SL(3)$ on the worldvolume of uncharged M2-branes charges them while it changes the charge of extreme M2-branes. result 1.00 0.93 0.07 asserted 1.00
s6 It thus acts as a Harrison transformation. interpretation 0.92 0.79 0.05 asserted 1.00
s7 At the limits of the range, we obtain the "subtracted geometries" which correspond to an infinite Harrison boost. result 0.97 0.89 0.05 asserted 1.00
s8 Outside this range the trivector field becomes non-zero and we obtain a dual solution that cannot be uniquely written in terms of a metric, 3-form and trivector. result 1.00 0.92 0.05 asserted 1.00
s9 Instead it corresponds to a family of solutions linked by a local SO(1,1) rotation. result 0.92 0.87 0.06 asserted 1.00
s10 The SL(5) duality is used to act on a smeared extreme M2-brane giving a brane-like solution carrying momentum in the transverse direction that the brane was delocalised along. result 0.82 0.94 0.08 asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 1.00 · evidence from proof or derivation 1.00.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v3
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

We study timelike U-dualities acting in three and four directions of 11-dimensional supergravity, which form the groups $SL(2)\times SL(3)$ and SL(5). Using generalised geometry, we find that timelike U-dualities, despite previous conjectures, do not change the signature of the spacetime. Furthermore, we prove that the spacetime signature must be $(-,+,...,+)$ when the U-duality modular group is either $\frac{SL(2)\times SL(3)}{SO(1,1)\times SO(2,1)}$ or $\frac{SL(5)}{SO(3,2)}$. We find that for some dual solutions it is necessary to include a trivector field which is related to the existence of non-geometric fluxes in lower dimensions. In the second part of the paper, we explicitly study the action of the dualities on supergravity solutions corresponding to M2-branes. For a finite range of the transformation, the action of $SL(2)\otimes SL(3)$ on the worldvolume of uncharged M2-branes charges them while it changes the charge of extreme M2-branes. It thus acts as a Harrison transformation. At the limits of the range, we obtain the "subtracted geometries" which correspond to an infinite Harrison boost. Outside this range the trivector field becomes non-zero and we obtain a dual solution that cannot be uniquely written in terms of a metric, 3-form and trivector. Instead it corresponds to a family of solutions linked by a local SO(1,1) rotation. The SL(5) duality is used to act on a smeared extreme M2-brane giving a brane-like solution carrying momentum in the transverse direction that the brane was delocalised along.

Human review
References
How the literature uses it

23 arXiv papers cite this in 33 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 30 sentences without a confident label

Cites it as background 3 papers

What it cites · 49 sentences without a confident label

Contests 1 paper
  • The difficulties found in the examples in [ref] are now removed, forcing us instead to describe the dual solutions using a trivector for those cases.

    U-duality in three and four dimensions · Introduction · contest 0.83

Builds on 1 paper
  • We can now repeat the analysis in [ref] including time amongst the dualisable coordinates in order to find the bosonic fields after the action of a duality.

    U-duality in three and four dimensions · The transformation rules · 0.98

Uses the method or tool of 14 papers
Compares with 1 paper
  • This is the same result as obtained by Wick-rotations in [ref] and corresponds to a new extreme M2-brane of different tension and charge.

    U-duality in three and four dimensions · $U_Ω$ acting on extreme M2-brane · 0.99

Cites as background 3 papers

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.