High Energy Physics - Phenomenology · arXiv:1301.2448 v1 · submitted 11 Jan 2013
Exotic MSSM
The paper says
“We discuss how the model can work quantum mechanically and also resolve some of the pressing issues of the regular MSSM.”
from the abstract · picked out as the main claim by a classifier
Reviews
Reviews by people
No person has reviewed this paper on Pith yet. A scientist listed on Pith can review it for a fee, and their review is published here whatever it concludes.
The paper
Abstract
We present an exotic version of the MSSM with the same particle content but with some of the states with negative kinetic energies. We discuss how the model can work quantum mechanically and also resolve some of the pressing issues of the regular MSSM.
The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. No sentence in this record was written by a model.
abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review
How the main claim is stated: asserted 0.74
What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.04 · states limitation 0.16 · human participants 0.02 · controlled comparison 0.15 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.03 · compares with prior results 0.41 · mentions code or data availability 0.02
The abstract, sentence by sentence
This table labels the abstract only (arXiv listing abstract v1). The number is the probability the classifier gave the label.
| Sentence | Role | The authors' own work | States the main conclusion | Strength |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| We present an exotic version of the MSSM with the same particle content but with some of the states with negative kinetic energies. | contribution 1.00 | 0.86 | 0.26 | asserted 1.00 |
| We discuss how the model can work quantum mechanically and also resolve some of the pressing issues of the regular MSSM. | contribution 0.92 | 0.81 | 0.32 | asserted 0.74 |
What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 1.00 · evidence from argument 0.90
What was examined, and what was not
Sources read
- arXiv listing abstract v1
Not examined
- full text
- figures and tables
- references and citing sentences
- relations to other papers
Levels run
- P abstract
Not run
- S sections
- T body sentences
- C citations
- R cross-paper relations
How the labels were made
Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 2,218 input tokens, $0.0001 reported.
Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. This record as JSON
How the literature uses it
What this paper does with the arXiv papers it cites
What it cites · 6 sentences without a confident label
Cites as background 2 papers
-
Here $Φ$, $Ψ$ form the chiral multiplet and $A^a_μ$ and $λ^a$ form the gauge supermultiplet (We refer the reader to the thorough review in [ref] , [ref] for details.) This Lagrangian is invariant under the following supersymmetry transformations: [equation] and [equation]
Supersymmetry and the MSSM: An Elementary Introduction · Short review of a gauge and chiral supermultiplet lagrangian · 1.00
-
Here $Φ$, $Ψ$ form the chiral multiplet and $A^a_μ$ and $λ^a$ form the gauge supermultiplet (We refer the reader to the thorough review in [ref] , [ref] for details.) This Lagrangian is invariant under the following supersymmetry transformations: [equation] and [equation]
A Supersymmetry Primer · Short review of a gauge and chiral supermultiplet lagrangian · 1.00
Challenges and discussion
Know something about this paper? Leave a comment.
Come back by email
A short list of the week's newly reviewed papers. Nothing is sent until you confirm from your inbox, and every email has a link that stops it. No account.
No comments yet.
Sign in to comment