Carving Out Parameter Space in Type-II Two Higgs Doublets Model

Benjam\'in Grinstein; Patipan Uttayarat

REVIEW

Carving Out Parameter Space in Type-II Two Higgs Doublets Model

High Energy Physics - Phenomenology · Submitted 29 Mar 2013 · 52 references

Pith's verdict: An honest 2HDM-II scan whose qualitative point — the model is a ~1 TeV effective theory — is sturdier than the sharp numbers it quotes.

T0 · AI review

How this review was made: An AI referee (selfhosted/deepseek-v4.1-flash) read the paper on November 10, 2026 and answered a fixed list of questions about it. T0 is the starting level every paper gets. The levels describe how deeply Pith has checked the paper, never the authors.

T0 AI review An AI read the paper and answered a fixed list of questions.
T1 Audit Automatic checks that the references and files the paper relies on exist and match.
T2 Compute The paper's code or calculations re-run with the same results.
T3 Formal statement The claims written out in a formal math language a computer can read.
T4 Proof Those claims proved, and the proof checked by computer.

How Pith checks papers →

· 3 major objections · 8 minor · Ask about this paper · The compiled record · Read the full review →

Challenge this review Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗

Cite ▾

arXiv ID1304.0028 (version 2)

Pith IDWORWFUSL, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review

CitationBenjam\'in Grinstein, Patipan Uttayarat. "Carving Out Parameter Space in Type-II Two Higgs Doublets Model." arXiv:1304.0028 (2013). https://pith.science/paper/WORWFUSL

Cite this reviewBibTeX for Pith's review of this paper

Claim paper

Why Pith says this

Highlight any text to comment on it.

Editor's note

read the letter

The thing worth your time here isn't another 2HDM-II fit to the 125 GeV Higgs data; there were a dozen of those in 2012–13 and the paper cites most of them. It's the move of imposing vacuum stability and perturbativity at all scales up to a cutoff, then asking how high the cutoff can go. Run the one-loop RGEs of Appendix B and Λ = 2 TeV leaves nothing, while Λ = 1 TeV leaves 0.75 ≲ tanβ ≲ 2.75 with MH± squeezed into 380–420 GeV. That reframing — 2HDM-II as a low-scale effective theory with new states near a TeV — is a useful thing to have in the literature, and the heavy-Higgs phenomenology section (H→AZ, low-mass A→γγ and γZ, H±→HW with three or four b's) follows sensibly from the surviving window rather than being bolted on. The authors are also candid about their inputs in a way that's rarer than it should be: Section 4.3 states outright that tightening the perturbativity ceiling to 1/2 kills the whole parameter space and 3/4 leaves only tanβ = 1, 1.25; the MA ≥ 93 GeV bound is flagged as borrowed from MSSM LEP and not strictly applicable; the signal-strength extraction of Eq. 3.2 is crude and they say so. Where I'd push back is on the sharp numbers, which are the weakest part. The upper edge of the MH± window isn't experimental — it's where λ_i(Λ) reaches 4π under one-loop running, exactly where the one-loop truncation is invalid, and no truncation-error estimate is given. The window is only about 10% wide, so a 20% shift in the crossing scale from two-loop running or the neglected second-generation Yukawas either closes it at 1 TeV or reopens it at 2 TeV. The qualitative claim survives that; the 380–420 GeV figure does not. Related and worth saying plainly: the Higgs fit itself barely constrains anything — Fig. 1's 2σ region runs out to tanβ ~ 40 — so most of the binding comes from the theoretical priors, not the data. None of this is fatal, and the paper doesn't oversell; it's a threshold-dependent scan, correctly labeled as such in the body if not the abstract. Read it if you're deciding whether 2HDM-II is still worth treating as a standalone low-energy theory, or if you're planning H/A/H± searches. Send it out.

Referee report

Significance

If the result holds, it is a useful and reasonably sharp statement: the 2HDM-II as a standalone low-energy description of electroweak symmetry breaking is squeezed into a narrow corner and, on the authors' criteria, must be accompanied by new states near 1 TeV. The paper is commendably explicit about its machinery: the one-loop RGEs are listed in full in Appendix B, the perturbativity criterion is written down as Eq. (4.2), and Sec. 4.3 openly reports how the viable region responds to tightening that criterion from 1 to 3/4 to 1/2. That disclosure is a genuine strength and should be preserved. The phenomenological section also yields falsifiable statements, notably the enhanced A→γγ and A→γZ rates for MA between roughly 130 and 200 GeV (Fig. 8) and the photon-plus-multilepton signature from H→AZ, which current data can in principle test. The main reservation is that the sharpest quantitative edges of the surviving region are set by the same perturbativity ceiling that defines the cutoff, so the closure statement is conditional on a criterion evaluated where its own loop expansion is weakest.

Major objections (3)

[Sec. 4.3 and Fig. 2] The upper edge of the charged-Higgs window, MH± ≲ 420 GeV, and the no-go statement for Λ ≥ 2 TeV are not experimental results: they are the scale at which λi(Λ) reaches the ceiling λi/(4π) ≤ 1 of Eq. (4.2) under one-loop running with the beta functions of Appendix B. That crossing occurs precisely where λi ~ 4π, i.e. where the one-loop truncation used to establish it is least reliable, and the same concern applies to the tree-level bounded-from-below conditions of Eq. (4.1) imposed 'at all scales up to the cutoff'. Because the surviving window is only about 10% wide in MH± (380 to 420 GeV), even a modest shift in the crossing scale would either close the window at Λ = 1 TeV or reopen it at Λ = 2 TeV. The authors quantify sensitivity to the threshold value (1/2, 3/4, 1) but give no estimate of the loop-truncation uncertainty, which is the uncertainty that actually controls the headline. A concrete test is requested: repeat the scan with (i) the renormalization scale varied by a factor of two about the electroweak scale, (ii) the two-loop gauge and top-Yukawa contributions to the λi running, and (iii) the second-generation Yukawas included, and report how the 380–420 GeV window and the Λ = 2 TeV exclusion move. If the window is not stable at the stated precision, the abstract's claim that 'only a small parameter space of the model remains viable' and the concluding inference of new physics 'around 1 TeV' should be restated as conditional on the chosen criterion and cutoff.
[Sec. 3.1, Eqs. (3.5) and (3.7)] The fit sets the charged-Higgs loop contribution to h→γγ to zero, with the justification deferred to Sec. 4.2: 'This assumption can be justified once we include experimental constraints from section 4.2.' That ordering is awkward, since the fit of Sec. 3.2 is performed before the MH± ≥ 380 GeV bound is imposed, and the bound itself is imported from Ref. [39] rather than derived here. The relevant question is quantitative: at the boundary of the viable region (MH± = 380 GeV, tanβ = 1, α = 0.78, so that α+β ≈ π/2 and the H+H−h coupling carries a sin(β−α) suppression) how large is the charged-Higgs term in Eq. (A.1) relative to the top and W terms, and how much does it shift the preferred (tanβ, α) region of Fig. 1? Please show this explicitly rather than assert negligibility, or state the residual size of the effect. The same request applies to the h→γZ channel of Eq. (3.7), where the charged-Higgs term is likewise dropped.
[Sec. 3.2 and Table 1] The 24 signal strengths of Table 1 are treated as independent Gaussian measurements, but several entries are statistically overlapping or correlated: the four CMS untagged diphoton categories at 7 TeV and again at 8 TeV are disjoint partitions of one sample, the CMS dijet-tagged/loose/tight entries overlap those samples, and the ATLAS 7 TeV and 8 TeV diphoton and ZZ results share systematics. Treating them as independent inflates the constraining power and therefore the 1σ and 2σ regions drawn in Fig. 1, which in turn feed the viable region of Fig. 2. Please either repeat the fit with the published correlation structure (or with only one representative entry per experiment and channel) and show that the viable region is insensitive, or state explicitly that the fit region is indicative rather than statistical. In addition, the paper reports no χ²_min or degrees of freedom for the global fit; these should be given so the reader can judge the goodness of fit.

Minor objections (8)

[Fig. 1 and Sec. 3.2] The text quotes a best-fit value α ≈ 1.56, but the horizontal axis of Fig. 1 spans roughly −0.4 to 0.4, and the caption states the figure is truncated at α < 0.5. Please clarify the convention used in the figure (for example, whether α is plotted relative to π/2) so that the plotted region can be reconciled with the quoted best fit.
[Footnote 4 and Eq. (5.2)] The footnote states that the result of Ref. [42] for the Φ→φZ partial width 'does not have a correct mass dimension'. Since Ref. [42] is a standard and widely used reference, this claim should be substantiated by displaying the two expressions side by side and identifying the precise discrepancy; it is at least as likely to be a difference in the normalization of the coupling or in the definition of the reduced trilinear vertex as an error in the cited work.
[Sec. 4.2 and Fig. 2] The authors correctly note that the LEP limit MA ≳ 93 GeV applies to the MSSM pseudoscalar and not to the 2HDM studied here, yet they apply it anyway. Since this bound sets part of the lower edge of the viable region in Fig. 2, it would be helpful to show, at least for one representative tanβ, how the allowed region changes if the bound is dropped.
[Sec. 4.2] There is a typographical error: 'we employed this bound in in the rest of the paper' contains a duplicated word.
[Fig. 2 caption] The caption states that MH± = 380 (420) GeV corresponds to blue (red), but it is not stated whether the shaded region lies between the two curves, inside the blue curve, or outside the red one. Please state the meaning of the shading explicitly.
[Sec. 3.1, Eq. (3.2)] The procedure for extracting signal strengths from 95% exclusion limits, μ = Robs − Rexp with σ = Robs/1.96, is crude and can produce negative central values, as indeed occurs for the CMS dijet-loose entry in Table 1. The authors cite Ref. [30] as a more refined alternative; a sentence quantifying how the fit changes under that alternative would strengthen confidence in Fig. 1.
[Table 1] Several entries are preliminary conference notes from 2012 that had been superseded by the time of this version. Since the fit region depends on the input set, please confirm that the conclusions are unchanged when the updated 8 TeV measurements are used.
[Sec. 5.2] The statement that 'the CP-odd boson A has a mass MA ≲ 470 GeV, see figure 2' should be qualified as a consequence of the perturbativity ceiling rather than a model-independent feature, for consistency with the caveats requested above.

How Pith checks papers → · Full audit of this paper →

The paper

The paper claims

If the 125 GeV particle is the light CP-even Higgs of a Type-II two-Higgs-doublet model, combining Higgs data, $B$ to $X_s$ gamma, electroweak precision, vacuum stability, and perturbativity leaves only a narrow viable window, and none at a

The reading

The paper asks whether the 125 GeV Higgs boson can be the light CP-even scalar of the Type-II two-Higgs-doublet model, a setup in which one doublet gives mass to up-type quarks and the other to down-type quarks and leptons. It fits the Higgs signal strengths to the model's mixing parameters, then scans the remaining masses against $B$ to $X_s$ gamma, electroweak precision data, vacuum stability, and a requirement that couplings stay perturbative up to a cutoff $Lambda$. The central result is that the allowed region is small: with $Lambda=1$ TeV, $tan beta$ lies roughly between 0.75 and 2.75 and the charged Higgs mass between about 380 and 420 GeV, while $Lambda=2$ TeV leaves no viable point. This matters because it turns a generic extended Higgs sector into a constrained low-energy effective theory with a predicted scale for new states, and it gives concrete targets for searches for the heavier neutral and charged Higgs bosons.

What carries the argument

The machinery is a constrained global scan. Higgs production and decay rates are rescaled from the Standard Model by coupling factors $c_t=cos alpha/sin beta$, $c_b=sin alpha/cos beta$, and $c_V=sin(alpha+beta)$, and these are fitted to the reported signal strengths. The scalar couplings are then run from the weak scale to $Lambda$ with one-loop $\beta$ functions, and each point is tested against vacuum-stability inequalities and the perturbativity conditions $lambda_i/(4 pi)<=1$ and $y_i^2/(4 pi)<=1$. The viable region is the intersection of that theoretical survival region with the experimental cuts from $B$ to $X_s$ gamma, the $S$ and $T$ parameters, and direct mass bounds. Related coupling factors then control the phenomenology of $H$, $A$, and $H^pm$.

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the result is that the Type-II two-Higgs-doublet model does not remain viable over a broad parameter range once one insists that it be a consistent effective theory up to a cutoff. The global Higgs fit alone prefers very small $tan beta$, where the top Yukawa is non-perturbative, so the authors instead ask where the model can satisfy all constraints simultaneously. The intersection is narrow: the charged Higgs is pushed above 380 GeV by $B$ to $X_s$ gamma and below about 420 GeV by perturbativity, and $tan beta$ is confined to roughly 0.75 to 2.75 for $Lambda=1$ TeV. Raising the cutoff to 2 TeV eliminates the parameter space entirely, which the authors read as evidence that if the two-Higgs-doublet model describes electroweak symmetry breaking, new particles should appear around 1 TeV.

Load-bearing premise

That the model must remain perturbative and vacuum-stable all the way to a chosen cutoff, with perturbativity defined by the hand-set thresholds $lambda_i/(4 pi)<=1$ and $y_i^2/(4 pi)<=1$, is the load-bearing premise; the paper itself shows that tightening the threshold to $1/2$ removes all viable points and relaxing it to $3/4$ leaves only $tan beta=1$ and $1.25$.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

If the result holds, the Type-II two-Higgs-doublet model can be only a low-energy description: some new physics should enter near 1 TeV, since a 2 TeV cutoff admits no consistent point.
The charged Higgs is predicted to sit in a narrow band, 380 to 420 GeV, heavy enough that its main production is with top and bottom quarks and its dominant decay is to $t bar b$, making it hard to see at the LHC.
The heavy CP-even $H$ and CP-odd $A$ can still be light; when $H$ to $A Z$ opens, it can dominate and lead to photon-plus-lepton or multiphoton signatures.
A low-mass pseudoscalar $A$ has enhanced $gamma gamma$ and $gamma Z$ rates relative to a Standard Model Higgs of the same mass, so existing diphoton and $Z gamma$ searches can test this corner.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The claimed window is conditional on the cutoff and perturbativity threshold; embedding the model in a supersymmetric or composite completion with new states below 1 TeV would change which parameter points are counted as viable.
The paper neglects the charged-Higgs loop in $h$ to $gamma gamma$; a full calculation could shift the fitted $alpha$-$tan beta$ region and therefore the boundaries of the surviving window, especially where $M_{H^pm}$ is near 380 GeV.
Reanalyzing existing 8 TeV data above 150 GeV in the $gamma gamma$ and $Z gamma$ channels would test the low-mass pseudoscalar corner without waiting for a new run.

Original abstract

We analyze the Type-II two Higgs doublets model in light of the newly discovered Higgs-like particle with mass 125 GeV. The observed 125 GeV particle is identified with the light CP-even Higgs boson in the two Higgs doublets model. We study the parameter space of the model consistent with the Higgs data, branching ratio of $\bar{B}\to X_s\gamma$ as well as precision electroweak measurements. We also incorporate theoretical constraints--- perturbativity of the couplings and vacuum stability, in our study. We find that only a small parameter space of the model remains viable. The phenomenology of the heavy Higgs bosons in the surviving parameter space is studied.

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged, kept beside the review and separate from it. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 4,845 input tokens, $0.0002 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.02 · states limitation 0.46 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.02 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.40 · compares with prior results 0.06 · mentions code or data availability 0.01.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v2. Results and the main claim are underlined; show every role.

We analyze the Type-II two Higgs doublets model in light of the newly discovered Higgs-like particle with mass 125 GeV. The observed 125 GeV particle is identified with the light CP-even Higgs boson in the two Higgs doublets model. We study the parameter space of the model consistent with the Higgs data, branching ratio of $\bar{B}\to X_s\gamma$ as well as precision electroweak measurements. We also incorporate theoretical constraints--- perturbativity of the couplings and vacuum stability, in our study. We find that only a small parameter space of the model remains viable. The phenomenology of the heavy Higgs bosons in the surviving parameter space is studied.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#	sentence	role	the authors' own work	states the main conclusion	strength
s0	We analyze the Type-II two Higgs doublets model in light of the newly discovered Higgs-like particle with mass 125 GeV.	contribution 0.68	0.84	0.03	asserted 0.94
s1	The observed 125 GeV particle is identified with the light CP-even Higgs boson in the two Higgs doublets model.	background 0.34	0.31	0.05	asserted 1.00
s2	We study the parameter space of the model consistent with the Higgs data, branching ratio of $\bar{B}\to X_s\gamma$ as well as precision electroweak measurements.	contribution 0.70	0.92	0.04	asserted 0.87
s3	We also incorporate theoretical constraints--- perturbativity of the couplings and vacuum stability, in our study.	method 0.83	0.91	0.03	asserted 0.99
s4	We find that only a small parameter space of the model remains viable.	result 1.00	0.96	0.86	asserted 1.00
s5	The phenomenology of the heavy Higgs bosons in the surviving parameter space is studied.	contribution 0.98	0.90	0.07	asserted 0.83

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 0.91 · evidence from analysis of existing data 0.76.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read

arXiv listing abstract v2

not examined

full text
figures and tables
references and citing sentences
relations to other papers

levels run

P abstract

not run

S sections
T body sentences
C citations
R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

Figures

**Figure 1.** The region of parameter space within 1- and 2-σ of the best fit values. The dashed line is the decoupling limit, α+β = ±π/2, where the couplings are SM-like (up to a possible sign flip for the down Yukawa couplings). We also impose the following perturbativity constraint on the couplings y 2 i 4π ≤ 1 , λi 4π ≤ 1. (4.2) We insist on these constraints up to the cutoff scale for all the Yukawa and scalar couplings. We list the beta-functions used in evolving the coupling constants in appendix B. 4.2 Experimental Bounds A wealth of experimental data, particularly from precision me

**Figure 2.** The viable particle spectrum for 0.75 ≤ tan β ≤ 2.75. The spectrum depends non-trivially on the charged Higgs mass (MH± ). In each plot the viable parameter space in MH-MA plane shrinks as MH± increases. MH± = 380 (420) GeV corresponds to the color blue (red). We end this section with a brief discussion of the sensitivity of the viable parameter space on the choice of perturbativity condition, eg. equation (4.2). Had we imposed instead that all the reduced couplings remain less than 1/2, there would be no viable parameter space. We find that relaxing the perturbativity constraint…

**Figure 3.** The heavy CP-even Higgs boson production cross-sections. For each plot, α is taken to be 0.78 (0.58) for tan β = 1.0 (1.5). This choice of α minimizes χ 2 |tan β for a given value of tan β. and branching ratios by scaling from the corresponding quantities for the SM Higgs boson. When this scaling procedure is not available, we compute the corresponding quantity at leading order. 5.1 Phenomenology of the CP-even H The couplings of the heavy CP-even Higgs boson H to the SM fermions and gauge bosons are modified with respect to the SM Higgs boson couplings by the rescaling factors c

**Figure 4.** The heavy CP-even Higgs boson branching ratios for the case of heavy MA. For each plot, α is taken to be 0.78 (0.58) for tan β = 1.0 (1.5). This choice of α minimizes χ 2 |tan β for a given value of tan β. bb ΤΤ gg tt AZ 360 380 400 420 10-4 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 MH@GeVD Branching Ratios tan Β = 1, MA = 150 GeV

**Figure 5.** The heavy CP-even Higgs boson branching ratios for the case of light MA. Here α is taken to be 0.78. This choice of α minimizes χ 2 |tan β for a given value of tan β. In a large portion of the available parameter space MH is lighter than 2Mh, MA and MH± ; see figure 2. When this is the case all the available decay channels for the heavy Higgs boson, H, are the same as for the SM Higgs boson. The branching ratios can be obtained by a simple rescaling from the corresponding values of the SM Higgs boson. When MH is sufficiently heavy, the decays H → hh, H → AZ and H → AA – 12 –

**Figure 6.** The heavy CP-odd Higgs boson production cross-sections. For each plot, α is taken to be 0.78 (0.58) for tan β = 1.0 (1.5). This choice of α minimizes χ 2 |tan β for a given value of tan β. SM Higgs. For sufficiently large MA, A can also decay into pair consisting of a neutral CP-even scalar boson and a vector boson, φZ, where φ = h, H. The partial decay widths for A → qq¯ is Γ(A → qq¯) = 3 GFM2 q 4 √ 2π δ 2 qMA q 1 − 4M2 q /M2 A , (5.5) where δq = cot β (tan β) for up-type (down-type) quark. The partial decay width into φZ is given by Γ(A → φZ) = GF 8 √ 2π δ 2 φ

**Figure 7.** The CP-odd Higgs boson branching ratios. For each plot, α is taken to be 0.78 (0.58) for tan β = 1.0 (1.5). This choice of α minimizes χ 2 |tan β for a given value of tan β. Diagrams on the top correspond to the case when MH is sufficiently heavy and cannot be in the decay product of A. Diagrams on the bottom are when MH is light enough to be in the decay product. For definiteness, we take MH = 130 GeV. Here we ignore the effect of near threshold production 5.3 Phenomenology of the Charged Boson H± The viable mass of the charged Higgs boson is larger than that of the top-quark. Thus…

**Figure 8.** The signal strength µ(A → γγ) and µ(A → γZ) for the case tan β = 1 in the low mass range. matrix. Thus its partial width Γ(H+ → t ¯b) at leading order is Γ(H + → t ¯b) = 3GF 8 √ 2π |Vtb| 2 s (M2 H± − (M2 t + M2 b ))(M2 H± − (M2 t − M2 b )) M2 H± 1 − M2 t M2 H± − M2 b M2 H±

**Figure 9.** The charged Higgs boson production cross-sections for the case tan β = 1.0 (1.5) for the left (right) plot with α = 0.78 (0.58). α is chosen such that it minimizes χ 2 |tan β for a given value of tan β. Diagrams on the top correspond to the 8 TeV LHC while the bottom are for 14 TeV. and perturbativity of the couplings, as well as experimental bounds from electroweak precision measurements and Br(B¯ → Xsγ) in our scan. We use a working assumption that the 2HDM-II is a valid low energy effective theory up to a cut-off scale Λ. We found that for Λ ≥ 2 TeV, there is no viable parameter s

**Figure 10.** The charged Higgs boson branching ratios for the case tan β = 1.0 (1.5) for the left (right) plot with α = 0.78 (0.58). α is chosen such that it minimizes χ 2 |tan β for a given value of tan β. The masses of the neutral Higgs boson are chosen so that they are consistent with the viable parameter space shown in figure 2 quarks. The charged Higgs, once produced, decays mostly into a top- and bottomquark pair which makes its detection difficult. However, in a corner of parameter space where the heavy CP-even H (or the CP-odd A) is light enough, the decay into H(A)W becomes comparable…

Figures reproduced from arXiv:1304.0028 by the authors.

References

Works cited (52)

[39]

T. Hermann, M. Misiak, and M. Steinhauser, ¯B→Xsγ in the Two Higgs Doublet Model up to Next-to-Next-to-Leading Order in QCD , JHEP 1211 (2012) 036, [arXiv:1208.2788]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2012
[1]

A TLAS Collaboration Collaboration, G. Aad et al., Observation of a new particle in the search for the Standard Model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC , Phys.Lett. B716 (2012) 1–29, [ arXiv:1207.7214]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2012
[2]

CMS Collaboration Collaboration, S. Chatrchyan et al., Observation of a new boson at a mass of 125 GeV with the CMS experiment at the LHC , Phys.Lett. B716 (2012) 30–61, [arXiv:1207.7235]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2012
[3]

CDF Collaboration, D0 Collaboration Collaboration, T. Aaltonen et al., Evidence for a particle produced in association with weak bosons and decaying to a bottom-antibottom quark pair in Higgs boson searches at the Tevatron , Phys.Rev.Lett. 109 (2012) 071804, [ arXiv:1207.6436]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2012
[4]

D. Carmi, A. Falkowski, E. Kuﬂik, T. Volansky, and J. Zupan, Higgs After the Discovery: A Status Report , arXiv:1207.1718. – 22 –

View on Pith Pith review arXiv
[5]

J. Espinosa, C. Grojean, M. Muhlleitner, and M. Trott, First Glimpses at Higgs’ face , arXiv:1207.1717

View on Pith Pith review arXiv
[6]

T. Corbett, O. Eboli, J. Gonzalez-Fraile, and M. Gonzalez-Garcia, Robust Determination of the Higgs Couplings: Power to the Data , Phys.Rev. D87 (2013) 015022, [arXiv:1211.4580]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2013
[7]

A. Azatov and J. Galloway, Electroweak Symmetry Breaking and the Higgs Boson: Confronting Theories at Colliders , Int.J.Mod.Phys. A28 (2013) 1330004, [arXiv:1212.1380]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2013
[8]

Observation of an excess of events in the search for the standard model higgs boson in the gamma-gamma channel with the atlas detector , Tech. Rep. ATLAS-CONF-2012-091, CERN, Geneva, Jul, 2012

View on Pith 2012
[9]

Observation of an excess of events in the search for the Standard Model Higgs boson in the H→ZZ (∗)→ 4𝓁 channel with the ATLAS detector. , Tech. Rep. ATLAS-CONF-2012-092, CERN, Geneva, Jul, 2012

View on Pith 2012
[10]

Update of the H →WW (∗) →eνµν analysis with 13 fb−1 of√s = 8 tev data collected with the atlas detector , Tech. Rep. ATLAS-CONF-2012-158, CERN, Geneva, Nov, 2012

View on Pith 2012
[11]

Combination of standard model higgs boson searches and measurements of the properties of the new boson with a mass near 125 gev , Tech. Rep. CMS-PAS-HIG-12-045, CERN, Geneva, Nov, 2012

View on Pith 2012
[12]

TEVNPH (T evatron New Phenomina and Higgs W orking Group), CDF Collaboration, D0 Collaboration Collaboration, Combined CDF and D0 Search for Standard Model Higgs Boson Production with up to 10.0 fb−1 of Data, arXiv:1203.3774

View on Pith Pith review arXiv
[13]

Measurements of the properties of the higgs-like boson in the four lepton decay channel with the atlas detector using 25 fb?1 of proton-proton collision data , Tech. Rep. ATLAS-CONF-2013-013, CERN, Geneva, Mar, 2013

View on Pith 2013
[14]

Properties of the higgs-like boson in the decay h to zz to 4l in pp collisions at sqrt s =7 and 8 tev , Tech. Rep. CMS-PAS-HIG-13-002, CERN, Geneva, 2013

View on Pith 2013
[15]

Evidence for a particle decaying to w+w- in the fully leptonic ﬁnal state in a standard model higgs boson search in pp collisions at the lhc , Tech. Rep. CMS-PAS-HIG-13-003, CERN, Geneva, 2013

View on Pith 2013
[16]

G. Branco, P. Ferreira, L. Lavoura, M. Rebelo, M. Sher, et al., Theory and phenomenology of two-Higgs-doublet models , Phys.Rept. 516 (2012) 1–102, [arXiv:1106.0034]. – 23 –

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2012
[17]

H. Cheon and S. K. Kang, Constraining parameter space in type-II two-Higgs doublet model in light of a 125 GeV Higgs boson , arXiv:1207.1083

View on Pith Pith review arXiv
[18]

Y. Bai, V. Barger, L. L. Everett, and G. Shaughnessy, The 2HDM-X and Large Hadron Collider Data , arXiv:1210.4922

View on Pith Pith review arXiv
[19]

W. Altmannshofer, S. Gori, and G. D. Kribs, A Minimal Flavor Violating 2HDM at the LHC, arXiv:1210.2465

View on Pith Pith review arXiv
[20]

A. Drozd, B. Grzadkowski, J. F. Gunion, and Y. Jiang, Two-Higgs-Doublet Models and Enhanced Rates for a 125 GeV Higgs , arXiv:1211.3580

View on Pith Pith review arXiv
[21]

J. Chang, K. Cheung, P.-Y. Tseng, and T.-C. Yuan, Implications on the Heavy CP-even Higgs Boson from Current Higgs Data , arXiv:1211.3849

View on Pith Pith review arXiv
[22]

C.-Y. Chen and S. Dawson, Exploring Two Higgs Doublet Models Through Higgs Production, arXiv:1301.0309

View on Pith Pith review arXiv
[23]

A. Goudelis, B. Herrmann, and O. Stl, Dark matter in the Inert Doublet Model after the discovery of a Higgs-like boson at the LHC , arXiv:1303.3010

View on Pith Pith review arXiv
[24]

P. Ferreira and D. Jones, Bounds on scalar masses in two Higgs doublet models , JHEP 0908 (2009) 069, [ arXiv:0903.2856]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2009
[25]

S. L. Glashow and S. Weinberg, Natural Conservation Laws for Neutral Currents , Phys.Rev. D15 (1977) 1958

View on Pith 1977
[26]

R. Peccei and H. R. Quinn, Constraints Imposed by CP Conservation in the Presence of Instantons, Phys.Rev. D16 (1977) 1791–1797

View on Pith 1977
[27]

S. Weinberg, A New Light Boson? , Phys.Rev.Lett. 40 (1978) 223–226

View on Pith 1978
[28]

F. Wilczek, Problem of Strong p and t Invariance in the Presence of Instantons , Phys.Rev.Lett. 40 (1978) 279–282

View on Pith 1978
[29]

P. P. Giardino, K. Kannike, M. Raidal, and A. Strumia, Reconstructing Higgs boson properties from the LHC and Tevatron data , JHEP 1206 (2012) 117, [arXiv:1203.4254]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2012
[30]

A. Azatov, R. Contino, and J. Galloway, Model-Independent Bounds on a Light Higgs , JHEP 1204 (2012) 127, [ arXiv:1202.3415]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2012
[31]

A TLAS Collaboration Collaboration, G. Aad et al., Search for the Standard Model Higgs boson in the diphoton decay channel with 4.9 fb-1 of pp collisions at sqrt(s)=7 TeV with ATLAS, Phys.Rev.Lett. 108 (2012) 111803, [ arXiv:1202.1414]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2012
[32]

Evidence for a new state decaying into two photons in the search for the standard model higgs boson in pp collisions , Tech. Rep. CMS-PAS-HIG-12-015, CERN, Geneva, Jul, 2012. – 24 –

View on Pith 2012
[33]

A TLAS Collaboration Collaboration, G. Aad et al., Search for the Standard Model Higgs boson in the decay channel H→ZZ (∗)→ 4𝓁 with 4.8 fb-1 of pp collision data at sqrt(s) = 7 TeV with ATLAS , Phys.Lett. B710 (2012) 383–402, [ arXiv:1202.1415]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2012
[34]

Combination of SM, SM4, FP Higgs boson searches , Tech. Rep. CMS-PAS-HIG-12-008, CERN, Geneva, Feb, 2012

View on Pith 2012
[35]

Search for the Standard Model Higgs boson in the H→WW (∗)→𝓁ν𝓁ν decay mode with 4.7 fb-1 of ATLAS data at sqrt(s) = 7 TeV , Tech. Rep. ATLAS-CONF-2012-012, CERN, Geneva, Mar, 2012

View on Pith 2012
[36]

Search for the standard model higgs boson in h →tau tau decays in proton-proton collisions with the atlas detector , Tech. Rep. ATLAS-CONF-2012-160, CERN, Geneva, Nov, 2012

View on Pith 2012
[37]

LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, S. Dittmaier, C. Mariotti, G. Passarino, and R. Tanaka (Eds.), Handbook of LHC Higgs Cross Sections: 1. Inclusive Observables , CERN-2011-002 (CERN, Geneva, 2011) [ arXiv:1101.0593]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2011
[38]

ALEPH Collaboration, DELPHI Collaboration, L3 Collaboration, OP AL Collaboration, The LEP working group for Higgs boson searches Collaboration, G. Abbiendi et al., Search for Charged Higgs bosons: Combined Results Using LEP Data , arXiv:1301.6065

View on Pith Pith review arXiv
[40]

ALEPH Collaboration, DELPHI Collaboration, L3 Collaboration, OP AL Collaboration, LEP W orking Group for Higgs Boson Searches Collaboration, S. Schael et al., Search for neutral MSSM Higgs bosons at LEP , Eur.Phys.J. C47 (2006) 547–587, [ hep-ex/0602042]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2006
[41]

M. Baak, M. Goebel, J. Haller, A. Hoecker, D. Kennedy, et al., The Electroweak Fit of the Standard Model after the Discovery of a New Boson at the LHC , arXiv:1209.2716

View on Pith Pith review arXiv
[42]

A. Djouadi, The Anatomy of electro-weak symmetry breaking. II. The Higgs bosons in the minimal supersymmetric model , Phys.Rept. 459 (2008) 1–241, [ hep-ph/0503173]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2008
[43]

Search for the standard model higgs boson in the h→zγ decay mode with pp collisions at√s = 7 and 8 tev , Tech. Rep. ATLAS-CONF-2013-009, CERN, Geneva, Mar, 2013

View on Pith 2013
[44]

Measurements of the properties of the higgs-like boson in the two photon decay channel with the atlas detector using 25 fb−1 of proton-proton collision data , Tech. Rep. ATLAS-CONF-2013-012, CERN, Geneva, Mar, 2013

View on Pith 2013
[45]

Search for the standard model higgs boson in the z boson plus a photon channel in pp – 25 – collisions at sqrt-s = 7 and 8 tev , Tech. Rep. CMS-PAS-HIG-13-006, CERN, Geneva, 2013

View on Pith 2013
[46]

Updated measurements of the higgs boson at 125 gev in the two photon decay channel , Tech. Rep. CMS-PAS-HIG-13-001, CERN, Geneva, 2013

View on Pith 2013
[47]

J. F. Gunion, H. E. Haber, G. L. Kane, and S. Dawson, THE HIGGS HUNTER’S GUIDE, Front.Phys. 80 (2000) 1–448

View on Pith 2000
[48]

F. Borzumati, J.-L. Kneur, and N. Polonsky, Higgs-Strahlung and R-parity violating slepton-Strahlung at hadron colliders , Phys.Rev. D60 (1999) 115011, [hep-ph/9905443]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1999
[49]

A. Celis, V. Ilisie, and A. Pich, LHC constraints on two-Higgs doublet models , arXiv:1302.4022

View on Pith Pith review arXiv
[50]

C.-W. Chiang and K. Yagyu, Implications of Higgs boson search data on the two-Higgs doublet models with a softly broken Z2 symmetry, arXiv:1303.0168

View on Pith Pith review arXiv
[51]

A. Barroso, P. Ferreira, I. Ivanov, and R. Santos, Metastability bounds on the two Higgs doublet model, arXiv:1303.5098

View on Pith Pith review arXiv
[52]

A. Djouadi, The Anatomy of electro-weak symmetry breaking. I: The Higgs boson in the standard model, Phys.Rept. 457 (2008) 1–216, [ hep-ph/0503172]. – 26 –

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2008

Forward citations

Cited by 24 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

Search for a light pseudoscalar Higgs boson in final states with boosted muon pairs and tau lepton pairs in proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 13 TeV
hep-ex 2026-09 accept novelty 7.0 of 10

No evidence is found for a light pseudoscalar Higgs boson in decays of the 125 GeV Higgs boson or a heavier scalar to muon and tau final states; 95% confidence level upper limits are set on the production cross sectio...
One-Loop Corrections to the Perturbative Unitarity Bounds in the $CP$-Conserving Two-Higgs Doublet Model with a Softly Broken $\mathbb{Z}_2$ Symmetry
hep-ph 2015-12 accept novelty 7.0 of 10

One-loop unitarity and perturbativity constraints in the CP-conserving two-Higgs doublet model cap the quartic couplings at roughly |λ_i(s)| ≲ 4 in the two scenarios studied.
Next-to-leading order unitarity fits in Two-Higgs-Doublet models with soft $\mathbb{Z}_2$ breaking
hep-ph 2016-09 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

Global fits with NLO unitarity conditions cap the 2HDM quartic couplings at 4.2 in magnitude and heavy Higgs mass splittings at 235 GeV (type I) and 100 GeV (type II) at 95% confidence.
Global fits of the two-loop renormalized Two-Higgs-Doublet model with soft $Z_2$ breaking
hep-ph 2015-03 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

Two-loop RGEs and global fits show that a stable Two-Higgs-Doublet model up to the Planck scale requires quartic couplings below about 1 and pushes the heavy Higgs masses above 340 to 360 GeV in type II and Y.
Echoes of the Electroweak Phase Transition: Discovering a second Higgs doublet through $A_0 \rightarrow H_0 Z$
hep-ph 2014-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

In two-Higgs-doublet models with a strongly first-order electroweak phase transition, the decay A0 → ZH0 dominates and is projected to be discoverable at the 14 TeV LHC with 20-60 fb^-1.

Show 19 more citing papers

Standard Model EFT and Extended Scalar Sectors
hep-ph 2017-04 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

Heavy singlet, triplet, and quartet scalars generate only a small subset of dimension-six operators, and for the singlet the effective theory reproduces the full gluon-fusion di-Higgs distributions well once the new s...
Search for light bosons in decays of the 125 GeV Higgs boson in proton-proton collisions at sqrt(s) = 8 TeV
hep-ex 2017-01 accept novelty 5.0 of 10

No sign of Higgs decays to pairs of light bosons in 19.7 fb^-1 of 8 TeV CMS data; 95% CL upper limits on the exotic branching fraction reach 17% (4 tau), 16% (2 mu 2 b), and 4% (2 mu 2 tau) in favorable 2HDM+S scenarios.
Search for neutral resonances decaying into a Z boson and a pair of b jets or tau leptons
hep-ex 2016-03 accept novelty 5.0 of 10

In 19.8 fb^-1 of 8 TeV CMS data, no significant deviation from standard model expectations is seen for H to ZA or A to ZH with Z to ll and A/H to bb or tautau, and 95% CL limits exclude part of the type-II 2HDM parame...
The Hunt for the Rest of the Higgs Bosons
hep-ph 2015-04 accept novelty 5.0 of 10

Three LHC search channels for additional Higgs bosons, heavy Higgs to top pairs, invisible Higgs with b or t quarks, and charged Higgs in tb, remain uncovered and are projected to give meaningful reach at 14 TeV.
Benchmarks for Higgs Effective Theory: Extended Higgs Sectors
hep-ph 2015-02 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

Explicit dimension-six matching coefficients are derived for singlet, two-Higgs-doublet, and dilaton extensions of the Higgs sector, and used to estimate where the effective field theory breaks down.
Maximally Symmetric Two Higgs Doublet Model with Natural Standard Model Alignment
hep-ph 2014-08 accept novelty 5.0 of 10

A maximally symmetric SO(5) two-Higgs-doublet model naturally realizes the Standard Model alignment limit, and its softly broken version predicts a quasi-degenerate heavy Higgs spectrum testable via four-top final states.
Higgs pair production via gluon fusion in the Two-Higgs-Doublet Model
hep-ph 2014-07 accept novelty 5.0 of 10

NLO-plus-parton-shower predictions for all seven Two-Higgs-Doublet-Model Higgs pair final states show K-factors of 1.5 to 1.7, roughly halved scale uncertainties, and resonant heavy-Higgs enhancements of the light pai...
Constraints on and future prospects for Two-Higgs-Doublet Models in light of the LHC Higgs signal
hep-ph 2014-05 accept novelty 5.0 of 10

Type I and Type II 2HDMs are scanned against LHC8 Higgs signal strengths, heavy-Higgs limits and feed-down constraints, showing where the 125.5 GeV state can be either h or H and what LHC14 can still discover.
Benchmarks for Higgs Pair Production and Heavy Higgs Searches in the Two-Higgs-Doublet Model of Type II
hep-ph 2014-03 accept novelty 5.0 of 10

Current data forbid the 2HDM triple-h coupling from exceeding its Standard Model value at three sigma, but still allow gluon-fusion Higgs-pair production to be enhanced by more than a factor of 50 when a heavy Higgs l...
Global fit to Higgs signal strengths and couplings and implications for extended Higgs sectors
hep-ph 2013-06 accept novelty 5.0 of 10

Combining all public 2013 LHC and Tevatron Higgs signal strengths into reusable two-parameter likelihood ellipses, the authors find Higgs couplings consistent with the Standard Model and derive limits on invisible dec...
A strong electroweak phase transition in the 2HDM after LHC8
hep-ph 2013-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

A broad scan of two-Higgs-doublet models finds that a strongly first-order electroweak phase transition favors a Standard-Model-like 125 GeV Higgs, a pseudoscalar heavier than 400 GeV, and the mass ordering m_H+ < m_H...
Searching for Signs of the Second Higgs Doublet
hep-ph 2013-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

Fits to the 126 GeV Higgs couplings in two Higgs doublet models leave H to hh and A to Zh as the highest-rate discovery channels for the heavier scalars, with gamma-gamma and tau-tau taking over in the exact alignment limit.
Status of the two-Higgs-doublet model of type II
hep-ph 2013-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

Combining Higgs signal strengths, electroweak precision and B-physics data, the type-II 2HDM is pushed into its Standard-Model-like limit, with charged Higgs masses below 322 GeV excluded at two standard deviations.
Extending two-Higgs-doublet models by a singlet scalar field - the Case for Dark Matter
hep-ph 2014-08 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

A singlet-scalar dark matter particle added to Type I and Type II two-Higgs-doublet models survives LUX and SuperCDMS direct-detection limits only for masses above roughly 55 GeV, except for a few Type II points near ...
Towards a general analysis of LHC data within two-Higgs-doublet models
hep-ph 2013-10 accept novelty 4.0 of 10

Current Higgs data fix the 126 GeV boson's top Yukawa sign to the Standard Model value but leave the bottom and tau Yukawa signs degenerate at 90% CL, splitting the surviving two-Higgs-doublet parameter space into dis...
Heavy Higgs Searches and Constraints on Two Higgs Doublet Models
hep-ph 2013-05 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

Searches for a heavy Higgs boson between 200 and 400 GeV exclude additional regions of two-Higgs-doublet parameter space beyond those already excluded by 125 GeV Higgs coupling measurements.
Constraining Type II 2HDM in Light of LHC Higgs Searches
hep-ph 2013-04 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

A full scan of the Type II two-Higgs-doublet model against LHC, precision and flavor data leaves narrow windows in the Higgs mixing angle and tan beta, while the heavy scalar masses stay largely unconstrained.
Implications of Higgs boson search data on the two-Higgs doublet models with a softly broken $Z_2$ symmetry
hep-ph 2013-03 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

A fit of four two-Higgs-doublet variants to 2013 LHC Higgs signal strengths marginally prefers Type-II and identifies a second, previously ignored allowed region where the light Higgs has flipped-sign bottom and tau c...
Update of Global Two-Higgs-Doublet Model Fits
hep-ph 2017-11 conditional novelty 3.0 of 10

Combining LHC Run 1 and Run 2 Higgs signal strengths and heavy-Higgs searches, the fit excludes deviations from the alignment limit larger than 0.03 in type I and 0.02 in types II, X and Y, and sets lower bounds on th...

How later papers used it

58 later papers cite it

Evidence: some. 56 of the citing papers share no author with it, and 5 of those carry a confident label from Pith's citation classifier.

Pith read 6 of the 72 citing sentences, choosing only those whose citation markers point at this paper alone, and wrote the paraphrases from them. The summary, the counts, the evidence level, the links and the quotes come from code; the summary counts the papers listed below. A later paper is listed under a label when Pith's citation classifier gives one of its sentences that label at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), Pith's reading finds that the citing paper itself did it, and a second check confirms the paraphrase against the sentence. This section lists uses only. It does not list criticism or disagreement, so their absence here says nothing about how the paper has been received. Papers that share an author with this one are listed apart, under "By the same authors". A quote is the citing authors' own sentence, shown when their paper's licence is CC BY, CC BY-SA or CC0. JSON

1 later paper by other authors is listed below: 1 used its method or tool.

Uses its method or tool 1 paper

Used the approximate expressions for the signal strengths given in this paper for loop level processes.

Standard Model EFT and Extended Scalar Sectors (2017) · 0.92 · paraphrased: the licence does not allow quoting

How the literature uses it

58 arXiv papers cite this in 72 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 24 sentences without a confident label

Contests it 1 paper

Contrary to statements in e.g. [ref] we find that scenarios where $β-α$ deviates significantly from $π/2$ are disfavoured at one standard deviation and excluded at two standard deviations for $tanβ<5$.

Status of the two-Higgs-doublet model of type II · Conclusions · contest 0.83

Uses its method or tool 1 paper

For loop level processes, we use the approximate expressions for the signal strengths given in Ref. [ref] .

Standard Model EFT and Extended Scalar Sectors · Single Higgs Production · 0.92

Compares with it 3 papers

If we remove the flavour observables and $R_b$ from our fit we confirm the results of previous analyses (e.g. [ref] ) where the lower strip in Fig. [ref](a) is still allowed at one standard deviation.

Status of the two-Higgs-doublet model of type II · Results · 0.95
This section is dedicated to the comparison of the ATHDM, with CP-conseving Yukawas and potential, with the usual THDMs with $𝒵_2$ symmetries [ref] .

Constraining the two-Higgs doublet models with the LHC data · ATHDM versus $𝒵_2$ models · 0.89
Points cluster along the ST line $α=β$, confirming the results in [ref] , see also [ref] .

Bounds to the Higgs Sector Masses in Minimal Supersymmetry from LHC Data · Introduction · 0.82

Cites it as support 1 paper

The choice of and $$ final states is motivated by the large branching fractions predicted in most of the 2HDM phase space [ref] .

Search for neutral resonances decaying into a Z boson and a pair of b jets or tau leptons · Introduction · 0.99

Cites it as background 38 papers

Various scenarios in the THDM have been analyzed by using the Higgs boson search data at the LHC before the Moriond conference [ref] , and those afterwards [ref] .

Implications of Higgs boson search data on the two-Higgs doublet models with a softly broken $Z_2$ symmetry · Introduction · 0.96
Ref. [ref] fit the observed Higgs signals in various 2HDM scenarios, taken into account theoretical and experimental constraints.

Constraining Type II 2HDM in Light of LHC Higgs Searches · Introduction · 0.93
A large number of papers [ref] performed fits of current data for the 125.5 GeV Higgs-like state (as per the status post Moriond 2013) within the context of 2HDMs, and investigated the consequent phenomenology of the other Higgs states present in the models.

Constraints on and future prospects for Two-Higgs-Doublet Models in light of the LHC Higgs signal · Introduction · 0.87

What it cites · 17 sentences without a confident label

Uses the method or tool of 1 paper

Experimental data are reported in terms of a signal strength, $μ$, defined as [equation] When the signal strength is not directly reported by the experimental collaboration, we extract it from the reported 95% exclusion limit following the procedure given in Ref. [ref] .

Reconstructing Higgs boson properties from the LHC and Tevatron data · Fit to the Higgs Data · 1.00

Uses data or values from 4 papers

By analyzing the branching ratio $Br(B̅→X_sγ)$, Ref. [ref] obtained the bound $M_H^±≥380$ GeV at 95% confidence level.

$\bar{B}\to X_s \gamma$ in the Two Higgs Doublet Model up to Next-to-Next-to-Leading Order in QCD · Experimental Bounds · 0.97
The theoretical SM Higgs boson predictions for the cross-sections and branching ratios are taken from the LHC Higgs Cross-section Working Group [ref] .

Handbook of LHC Higgs Cross Sections: 1. Inclusive Observables · Global Fit · 0.96
In the Standard Model, the best fit values for the $S$ and $T$ parameters for $M_h∼125$ GeV and $M_t=173$ GeV, as well as their correlation matrix ($M_corr$) are [ref] .

The Electroweak Fit of the Standard Model after the Discovery of a New Boson at the LHC · Experimental Bounds · 1.00

Cites as background 8 papers

There exists a large literature on the properties of the neutral scalar boson couplings of the two Higgs doublets model in light of the Higgs data; see for example Ref. [ref] .

Dark matter in the Inert Doublet Model after the discovery of a Higgs-like boson at the LHC · Introduction · 0.98
There exists a large literature on the properties of the neutral scalar boson couplings of the two Higgs doublets model in light of the Higgs data; see for example Ref. [ref] .

Constraining parameter space in type-II two-Higgs doublet model in light of a 126 GeV Higgs boson · Introduction · 0.98
There exists a large literature on the properties of the neutral scalar boson couplings of the two Higgs doublets model in light of the Higgs data; see for example Ref. [ref] .

A Minimal Flavor Violating 2HDM at the LHC · Introduction · 0.98

Discussion

Disagree with the review, or know something it missed? Leave a comment, highlight any passage above to comment on it, or challenge this review formally.

[1] [39]

T. Hermann, M. Misiak, and M. Steinhauser, ¯B→Xsγ in the Two Higgs Doublet Model up to Next-to-Next-to-Leading Order in QCD , JHEP 1211 (2012) 036, [arXiv:1208.2788]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2012

[2] [1]

A TLAS Collaboration Collaboration, G. Aad et al., Observation of a new particle in the search for the Standard Model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC , Phys.Lett. B716 (2012) 1–29, [ arXiv:1207.7214]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2012

[3] [2]

CMS Collaboration Collaboration, S. Chatrchyan et al., Observation of a new boson at a mass of 125 GeV with the CMS experiment at the LHC , Phys.Lett. B716 (2012) 30–61, [arXiv:1207.7235]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2012

[4] [3]

CDF Collaboration, D0 Collaboration Collaboration, T. Aaltonen et al., Evidence for a particle produced in association with weak bosons and decaying to a bottom-antibottom quark pair in Higgs boson searches at the Tevatron , Phys.Rev.Lett. 109 (2012) 071804, [ arXiv:1207.6436]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2012

[5] [4]

D. Carmi, A. Falkowski, E. Kuﬂik, T. Volansky, and J. Zupan, Higgs After the Discovery: A Status Report , arXiv:1207.1718. – 22 –

View on Pith Pith review arXiv

[6] [5]

J. Espinosa, C. Grojean, M. Muhlleitner, and M. Trott, First Glimpses at Higgs’ face , arXiv:1207.1717

View on Pith Pith review arXiv

[7] [6]

T. Corbett, O. Eboli, J. Gonzalez-Fraile, and M. Gonzalez-Garcia, Robust Determination of the Higgs Couplings: Power to the Data , Phys.Rev. D87 (2013) 015022, [arXiv:1211.4580]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2013

[8] [7]

A. Azatov and J. Galloway, Electroweak Symmetry Breaking and the Higgs Boson: Confronting Theories at Colliders , Int.J.Mod.Phys. A28 (2013) 1330004, [arXiv:1212.1380]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2013

[9] [8]

Observation of an excess of events in the search for the standard model higgs boson in the gamma-gamma channel with the atlas detector , Tech. Rep. ATLAS-CONF-2012-091, CERN, Geneva, Jul, 2012

View on Pith 2012

[10] [9]

Observation of an excess of events in the search for the Standard Model Higgs boson in the H→ZZ (∗)→ 4𝓁 channel with the ATLAS detector. , Tech. Rep. ATLAS-CONF-2012-092, CERN, Geneva, Jul, 2012

View on Pith 2012

[11] [10]

Update of the H →WW (∗) →eνµν analysis with 13 fb−1 of√s = 8 tev data collected with the atlas detector , Tech. Rep. ATLAS-CONF-2012-158, CERN, Geneva, Nov, 2012

View on Pith 2012

[12] [11]

Combination of standard model higgs boson searches and measurements of the properties of the new boson with a mass near 125 gev , Tech. Rep. CMS-PAS-HIG-12-045, CERN, Geneva, Nov, 2012

View on Pith 2012

[13] [12]

TEVNPH (T evatron New Phenomina and Higgs W orking Group), CDF Collaboration, D0 Collaboration Collaboration, Combined CDF and D0 Search for Standard Model Higgs Boson Production with up to 10.0 fb−1 of Data, arXiv:1203.3774

View on Pith Pith review arXiv

[14] [13]

Measurements of the properties of the higgs-like boson in the four lepton decay channel with the atlas detector using 25 fb?1 of proton-proton collision data , Tech. Rep. ATLAS-CONF-2013-013, CERN, Geneva, Mar, 2013

View on Pith 2013

[15] [14]

Properties of the higgs-like boson in the decay h to zz to 4l in pp collisions at sqrt s =7 and 8 tev , Tech. Rep. CMS-PAS-HIG-13-002, CERN, Geneva, 2013

View on Pith 2013

[16] [15]

Evidence for a particle decaying to w+w- in the fully leptonic ﬁnal state in a standard model higgs boson search in pp collisions at the lhc , Tech. Rep. CMS-PAS-HIG-13-003, CERN, Geneva, 2013

View on Pith 2013

[17] [16]

G. Branco, P. Ferreira, L. Lavoura, M. Rebelo, M. Sher, et al., Theory and phenomenology of two-Higgs-doublet models , Phys.Rept. 516 (2012) 1–102, [arXiv:1106.0034]. – 23 –

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2012

[18] [17]

H. Cheon and S. K. Kang, Constraining parameter space in type-II two-Higgs doublet model in light of a 125 GeV Higgs boson , arXiv:1207.1083

View on Pith Pith review arXiv

[19] [18]

Y. Bai, V. Barger, L. L. Everett, and G. Shaughnessy, The 2HDM-X and Large Hadron Collider Data , arXiv:1210.4922

View on Pith Pith review arXiv

[20] [19]

W. Altmannshofer, S. Gori, and G. D. Kribs, A Minimal Flavor Violating 2HDM at the LHC, arXiv:1210.2465

View on Pith Pith review arXiv

[21] [20]

A. Drozd, B. Grzadkowski, J. F. Gunion, and Y. Jiang, Two-Higgs-Doublet Models and Enhanced Rates for a 125 GeV Higgs , arXiv:1211.3580

View on Pith Pith review arXiv

[22] [21]

J. Chang, K. Cheung, P.-Y. Tseng, and T.-C. Yuan, Implications on the Heavy CP-even Higgs Boson from Current Higgs Data , arXiv:1211.3849

View on Pith Pith review arXiv

[23] [22]

C.-Y. Chen and S. Dawson, Exploring Two Higgs Doublet Models Through Higgs Production, arXiv:1301.0309

View on Pith Pith review arXiv

[24] [23]

A. Goudelis, B. Herrmann, and O. Stl, Dark matter in the Inert Doublet Model after the discovery of a Higgs-like boson at the LHC , arXiv:1303.3010

View on Pith Pith review arXiv

[25] [24]

P. Ferreira and D. Jones, Bounds on scalar masses in two Higgs doublet models , JHEP 0908 (2009) 069, [ arXiv:0903.2856]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2009

[26] [25]

S. L. Glashow and S. Weinberg, Natural Conservation Laws for Neutral Currents , Phys.Rev. D15 (1977) 1958

View on Pith 1977

[27] [26]

R. Peccei and H. R. Quinn, Constraints Imposed by CP Conservation in the Presence of Instantons, Phys.Rev. D16 (1977) 1791–1797

View on Pith 1977

[28] [27]

S. Weinberg, A New Light Boson? , Phys.Rev.Lett. 40 (1978) 223–226

View on Pith 1978

[29] [28]

F. Wilczek, Problem of Strong p and t Invariance in the Presence of Instantons , Phys.Rev.Lett. 40 (1978) 279–282

View on Pith 1978

[30] [29]

P. P. Giardino, K. Kannike, M. Raidal, and A. Strumia, Reconstructing Higgs boson properties from the LHC and Tevatron data , JHEP 1206 (2012) 117, [arXiv:1203.4254]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2012

[31] [30]

A. Azatov, R. Contino, and J. Galloway, Model-Independent Bounds on a Light Higgs , JHEP 1204 (2012) 127, [ arXiv:1202.3415]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2012

[32] [31]

A TLAS Collaboration Collaboration, G. Aad et al., Search for the Standard Model Higgs boson in the diphoton decay channel with 4.9 fb-1 of pp collisions at sqrt(s)=7 TeV with ATLAS, Phys.Rev.Lett. 108 (2012) 111803, [ arXiv:1202.1414]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2012

[33] [32]

Evidence for a new state decaying into two photons in the search for the standard model higgs boson in pp collisions , Tech. Rep. CMS-PAS-HIG-12-015, CERN, Geneva, Jul, 2012. – 24 –

View on Pith 2012

[34] [33]

A TLAS Collaboration Collaboration, G. Aad et al., Search for the Standard Model Higgs boson in the decay channel H→ZZ (∗)→ 4𝓁 with 4.8 fb-1 of pp collision data at sqrt(s) = 7 TeV with ATLAS , Phys.Lett. B710 (2012) 383–402, [ arXiv:1202.1415]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2012

[35] [34]

Combination of SM, SM4, FP Higgs boson searches , Tech. Rep. CMS-PAS-HIG-12-008, CERN, Geneva, Feb, 2012

View on Pith 2012

[36] [35]

Search for the Standard Model Higgs boson in the H→WW (∗)→𝓁ν𝓁ν decay mode with 4.7 fb-1 of ATLAS data at sqrt(s) = 7 TeV , Tech. Rep. ATLAS-CONF-2012-012, CERN, Geneva, Mar, 2012

View on Pith 2012

[37] [36]

Search for the standard model higgs boson in h →tau tau decays in proton-proton collisions with the atlas detector , Tech. Rep. ATLAS-CONF-2012-160, CERN, Geneva, Nov, 2012

View on Pith 2012

[38] [37]

LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, S. Dittmaier, C. Mariotti, G. Passarino, and R. Tanaka (Eds.), Handbook of LHC Higgs Cross Sections: 1. Inclusive Observables , CERN-2011-002 (CERN, Geneva, 2011) [ arXiv:1101.0593]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2011

[39] [38]

ALEPH Collaboration, DELPHI Collaboration, L3 Collaboration, OP AL Collaboration, The LEP working group for Higgs boson searches Collaboration, G. Abbiendi et al., Search for Charged Higgs bosons: Combined Results Using LEP Data , arXiv:1301.6065

View on Pith Pith review arXiv

[40] [40]

ALEPH Collaboration, DELPHI Collaboration, L3 Collaboration, OP AL Collaboration, LEP W orking Group for Higgs Boson Searches Collaboration, S. Schael et al., Search for neutral MSSM Higgs bosons at LEP , Eur.Phys.J. C47 (2006) 547–587, [ hep-ex/0602042]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2006

[41] [41]

M. Baak, M. Goebel, J. Haller, A. Hoecker, D. Kennedy, et al., The Electroweak Fit of the Standard Model after the Discovery of a New Boson at the LHC , arXiv:1209.2716

View on Pith Pith review arXiv

[42] [42]

A. Djouadi, The Anatomy of electro-weak symmetry breaking. II. The Higgs bosons in the minimal supersymmetric model , Phys.Rept. 459 (2008) 1–241, [ hep-ph/0503173]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2008

[43] [43]

Search for the standard model higgs boson in the h→zγ decay mode with pp collisions at√s = 7 and 8 tev , Tech. Rep. ATLAS-CONF-2013-009, CERN, Geneva, Mar, 2013

View on Pith 2013

[44] [44]

Measurements of the properties of the higgs-like boson in the two photon decay channel with the atlas detector using 25 fb−1 of proton-proton collision data , Tech. Rep. ATLAS-CONF-2013-012, CERN, Geneva, Mar, 2013

View on Pith 2013

[45] [45]

Search for the standard model higgs boson in the z boson plus a photon channel in pp – 25 – collisions at sqrt-s = 7 and 8 tev , Tech. Rep. CMS-PAS-HIG-13-006, CERN, Geneva, 2013

View on Pith 2013

[46] [46]

Updated measurements of the higgs boson at 125 gev in the two photon decay channel , Tech. Rep. CMS-PAS-HIG-13-001, CERN, Geneva, 2013

View on Pith 2013

[47] [47]

J. F. Gunion, H. E. Haber, G. L. Kane, and S. Dawson, THE HIGGS HUNTER’S GUIDE, Front.Phys. 80 (2000) 1–448

View on Pith 2000

[48] [48]

F. Borzumati, J.-L. Kneur, and N. Polonsky, Higgs-Strahlung and R-parity violating slepton-Strahlung at hadron colliders , Phys.Rev. D60 (1999) 115011, [hep-ph/9905443]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1999

[49] [49]

A. Celis, V. Ilisie, and A. Pich, LHC constraints on two-Higgs doublet models , arXiv:1302.4022

View on Pith Pith review arXiv

[50] [50]

C.-W. Chiang and K. Yagyu, Implications of Higgs boson search data on the two-Higgs doublet models with a softly broken Z2 symmetry, arXiv:1303.0168

View on Pith Pith review arXiv

[51] [51]

A. Barroso, P. Ferreira, I. Ivanov, and R. Santos, Metastability bounds on the two Higgs doublet model, arXiv:1303.5098

View on Pith Pith review arXiv

[52] [52]

A. Djouadi, The Anatomy of electro-weak symmetry breaking. I: The Higgs boson in the standard model, Phys.Rept. 457 (2008) 1–216, [ hep-ph/0503172]. – 26 –

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2008