Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Implications of light charginos for Higgs observables, LHC searches and dark matter

High Energy Physics - Phenomenology · Submitted 14 May 2013

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim An important part of the models survive all the constraints and are able to give positive signals at LHC-14TeV and/or XENON1T.

how it is stated · asserted 0.94 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID1305.3274 (version 1)
Pith IDPJWDYJOM, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationBryan Zaldivar, J. Alberto Casas, Jesus M. Moreno, Krzysztof Rolbiecki. "Implications of light charginos for Higgs observables, LHC searches and dark matter." arXiv:1305.3274 (2013). https://pith.science/paper/PJWDYJOM
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 5,093 input tokens, $0.0002 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.02 · states limitation 0.21 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.29 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.66 · compares with prior results 0.43 · mentions code or data availability 0.01.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

A rather high Higgs mass, m_h = 126 GeV, suggests that at least a part of the supersymmetric spectrum of the MSSM may live beyond O(1TeV) and hence inaccessible to the LHC. However, there are theoretical and phenomenological reasons supporting a possibility that charginos and neutralinos remain much closer to the electroweak scale. In this paper, we explore such a scenario in the light of recent Higgs measurements, mainly its di-photon decay rate, where the data might indicate a slight excess over the SM prediction. That excess could be fitted by the contribution of light charginos provided tan(beta) is low to moderate, a possibility that is receiving much attention for other theoretical reasons. We investigate the implications of this scenario for other observables, such as dark matter constraints, electroweak observables and experimental signals at the LHC, like di-lepton, tri-lepton and same-sign dilepton. An important part of the models survive all the constraints and are able to give positive signals at LHC-14TeV and/or XENON1T.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 A rather high Higgs mass, m_h = 126 GeV, suggests that at least a part of the supersymmetric spectrum of the MSSM may live beyond O(1TeV) and hence inaccessible to the LHC. background 0.99 0.07 0.04 hedged possibility 1.00
s1 However, there are theoretical and phenomenological reasons supporting a possibility that charginos and neutralinos remain much closer to the electroweak scale. background 0.87 0.06 0.04 hedged possibility 0.94
s2 In this paper, we explore such a scenario in the light of recent Higgs measurements, mainly its di-photon decay rate, where the data might indicate a slight excess over the SM prediction. contribution 0.98 0.45 0.05 hedged possibility 0.68
s3 That excess could be fitted by the contribution of light charginos provided tan(beta) is low to moderate, a possibility that is receiving much attention for other theoretical reasons. result 0.48 0.15 0.09 hedged possibility 1.00
s4 We investigate the implications of this scenario for other observables, such as dark matter constraints, electroweak observables and experimental signals at the LHC, like di-lepton, tri-lepton and same-sign dilepton. contribution 0.98 0.80 0.06 asserted 0.87
s5 An important part of the models survive all the constraints and are able to give positive signals at LHC-14TeV and/or XENON1T. result 0.99 0.85 0.75 asserted 0.94

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 0.78 · evidence from analysis of existing data 0.61.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

A rather high Higgs mass, m_h = 126 GeV, suggests that at least a part of the supersymmetric spectrum of the MSSM may live beyond O(1TeV) and hence inaccessible to the LHC. However, there are theoretical and phenomenological reasons supporting a possibility that charginos and neutralinos remain much closer to the electroweak scale. In this paper, we explore such a scenario in the light of recent Higgs measurements, mainly its di-photon decay rate, where the data might indicate a slight excess over the SM prediction. That excess could be fitted by the contribution of light charginos provided tan(beta) is low to moderate, a possibility that is receiving much attention for other theoretical reasons. We investigate the implications of this scenario for other observables, such as dark matter constraints, electroweak observables and experimental signals at the LHC, like di-lepton, tri-lepton and same-sign dilepton. An important part of the models survive all the constraints and are able to give positive signals at LHC-14TeV and/or XENON1T.

Human review
References
How the literature uses it

11 arXiv papers cite this in 15 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 9 sentences without a confident label

Compares with it 1 paper
Cites it as support 2 papers
Cites it as background 2 papers

What it cites · 38 sentences without a confident label

Uses the method or tool of 5 papers
  • In order to find whether our benchmark models are constrained by the published LHC searches we simulate events using [ref] and analyze them using the fast detector simulation package [ref] .

    Herwig++ Physics and Manual · Collider constraints and detection prospects · 1.00

  • In order to find whether our benchmark models are constrained by the published LHC searches we simulate events using [ref] and analyze them using the fast detector simulation package [ref] .

    Delphes, a framework for fast simulation of a generic collider experiment · Collider constraints and detection prospects · 1.00

  • They have been obtained using the micrOmegas code [ref] , and are summarised in figure [ref].

    Indirect search for dark matter with micrOMEGAs2.4 · Dark Matter bounds · 1.00

Uses data or values from 4 papers
  • In particular, the $h→χ^0_1χ^0_1$ process contributes to the invisible width of the Higgs, which is at present bounded from above at roughly 20% [ref] .

    Status of invisible Higgs decays · Dark Matter bounds · 0.87

  • In particular, the $h→χ^0_1χ^0_1$ process contributes to the invisible width of the Higgs, which is at present bounded from above at roughly 20% [ref] .

    Higgs At Last · Dark Matter bounds · 0.87

  • In particular, the $h→χ^0_1χ^0_1$ process contributes to the invisible width of the Higgs, which is at present bounded from above at roughly 20% [ref] .

    The universal Higgs fit · Dark Matter bounds · 0.87

Compares with 1 paper
Cites as background 2 papers

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.