High Energy Physics - Theory · arXiv:1312.7410 v3 · submitted 28 Dec 2013
Six-dimensional origin of gravity mediated brane to brane supersymmetry breaking
The paper says
“The resulting theory has striking similarities with the one that follows from the single standalone N = 2, D = 5 supergravity, with no reference to the underlying higher dimensional D = 6 supergravity, and a structure that makes the supersymmetry breaking mechanisms studied in the past easily incorporated in higher dimensional schemes.”
from the abstract · picked out as the main claim by a classifier
Reviews
Reviews by people
No person has reviewed this paper on Pith yet. A scientist listed on Pith can review it for a fee, and their review is published here whatever it concludes.
The paper
Abstract
Four dimensional supergravities may be the right framework to describe particle physics at low energies. Its connection to the underlying string theory can be implemented through higher dimensional supergravities which bear special characteristics. Their reduction to four dimensions breaks supersymmetry whose magnitude depends both on the compactifying manifold and the mechanism that generates the breaking. In particular compactifications, notably on a S1/Z2 orbifold, the breaking of supersymmetry occuring on a hidden brane, residing at one end of S1/Z2, is communicated to the visible brane which lies at the other end, via gravitational interactions propagating in the bulk. This scenario has been exemplified in the framework of the N = 2, D = 5 supergravity. In this note, motivated by the recent developments in the field, related to the six-dimensional description of the supergravity theory, we study the N = 2, D = 5 supergravity theory as originating from a D = 6 supergravity which, in addition to the gravity, includes a number of tensor multiplets. This reduces to N = 1, D = 4 supergravity in a two step manner, first by Kaluza-Klein reduction followed by a S1/Z2 orbifold compactification. The resulting theory has striking similarities with the one that follows from the single standalone N = 2, D = 5 supergravity, with no reference to the underlying higher dimensional D = 6 supergravity, and a structure that makes the supersymmetry breaking mechanisms studied in the past easily incorporated in higher dimensional schemes.
The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. No sentence in this record was written by a model.
abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review
How the main claim is stated: asserted 1.00
What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.05 · states limitation 0.10 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.12 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.04 · compares with prior results 0.93 · mentions code or data availability 0.01
The abstract, sentence by sentence
This table labels the abstract only (arXiv listing abstract v3). The number is the probability the classifier gave the label.
| Sentence | Role | The authors' own work | States the main conclusion | Strength |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Four dimensional supergravities may be the right framework to describe particle physics at low energies. | background 1.00 | 0.05 | 0.03 | hedged possibility 1.00 |
| Its connection to the underlying string theory can be implemented through higher dimensional supergravities which bear special characteristics. | background 1.00 | 0.05 | 0.03 | hedged possibility 0.57 |
| Their reduction to four dimensions breaks supersymmetry whose magnitude depends both on the compactifying manifold and the mechanism that generates the breaking. | background 1.00 | 0.06 | 0.04 | asserted 1.00 |
| In particular compactifications, notably on a $S_1/Z_2$ orbifold, the breaking of supersymmetry occuring on a hidden brane, residing at one end of $S_1/Z_2$, is communicated to the visible brane which lies at the other end, via gravitational interactions propagating in the bulk. | background 0.99 | 0.08 | 0.09 | asserted 1.00 |
| This scenario has been exemplified in the framework of the $N=2$, $D=5$ supergravity. | background 1.00 | 0.11 | 0.04 | asserted 0.98 |
| In this note, motivated by the recent developments in the field, related to the six-dimensional description of the supergravity theory, we study the $N=2$, $D=5$ supergravity theory as originating from a $D=6$ supergravity which, in addition to the gravity, includes a number of tensor multiplets. | contribution 1.00 | 0.67 | 0.10 | asserted 0.91 |
| This reduces to $N=1$, $D=4$ supergravity in a two step manner, first by Kaluza-Klein reduction followed by a $S_1/Z_2$ orbifold compactification. | method 0.97 | 0.70 | 0.09 | asserted 1.00 |
| The resulting theory has striking similarities with the one that follows from the single standalone $N=2$, $D=5$ supergravity, with no reference to the underlying higher dimensional $D=6$ supergravity, and a structure that makes the supersymmetry breaking mechanisms studied in the past easily incorporated in higher dimensional schemes. | result 0.70 | 0.84 | 0.72 | asserted 1.00 |
What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 0.99 · evidence from proof or derivation 0.94
What was examined, and what was not
Sources read
- arXiv listing abstract v3
Not examined
- full text
- figures and tables
- references and citing sentences
- relations to other papers
Levels run
- P abstract
Not run
- S sections
- T body sentences
- C citations
- R cross-paper relations
How the labels were made
Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 6,627 input tokens, $0.0003 reported.
Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. This record as JSON
How the literature uses it
1 arXiv paper cite this in 1 sentence
What it cites · 25 sentences without a confident label
Uses the method or tool of 5 papers
-
That was also the treatment followed in [ref] .
The soft supersymmetry breaking in D=5 supergravity compactified on S_1/Z_2 orbifolds · The mediation of the supersymmetry breaking · 0.99
-
That was also the treatment followed in [ref] .
On the radion mediation of the Supersymmetry breaking in N=2, D=5 Supergravity Orbifolds · The mediation of the supersymmetry breaking · 0.99
-
Then we use the Dirac and gravitino propagators in the mixed momentum-configuration space representation [ref] which, suppressing indices, have the generic form $Δ(p, y, y^')$, to be given below.
Finite Radiative Electroweak Symmetry Breaking from the Bulk · The mediation of the supersymmetry breaking · 1.00
Compares with 1 paper
-
Other schemes [ref] , in which $D=6$ supergravity is compactified directly to a four dimensional supergravity, do not lead to models bearing the aforementioned no-scale structure.
Coupling Brane Fields to Bulk Supergravity · $S_1/Z_2$ orbifold and coupling of brane fields · 0.89
Cites as background 30 papers
-
Towards that goal there are several mechanisms proposed in literature [ref] and a popular scenario is the one in which the supersymmetry breaking takes place at the hidden brane and this breaking is radiatively communicated through the bulk to the visible world.
On the radion mediation of the Supersymmetry breaking in N=2, D=5 Supergravity Orbifolds · Introduction · 0.97
-
Towards that goal there are several mechanisms proposed in literature [ref] and a popular scenario is the one in which the supersymmetry breaking takes place at the hidden brane and this breaking is radiatively communicated through the bulk to the visible world.
The soft supersymmetry breaking in D=5 supergravity compactified on S_1/Z_2 orbifolds · Introduction · 0.97
-
Towards that goal there are several mechanisms proposed in literature [ref] and a popular scenario is the one in which the supersymmetry breaking takes place at the hidden brane and this breaking is radiatively communicated through the bulk to the visible world.
General Gauge Mediation in 5D · Introduction · 0.97
Challenges and discussion
Know something about this paper? Leave a comment.
Come back by email
A short list of the week's newly reviewed papers. Nothing is sent until you confirm from your inbox, and every email has a link that stops it. No account.
No comments yet.
Sign in to comment