REVIEW 2 cited by
A survey of dimensionality reduction techniques
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Experimental life sciences like biology or chemistry have seen in the recent decades an explosion of the data available from experiments. Laboratory instruments become more and more complex and report hundreds or thousands measurements for a single experiment and therefore the statistical methods face challenging tasks when dealing with such high dimensional data. However, much of the data is highly redundant and can be efficiently brought down to a much smaller number of variables without a significant loss of information. The mathematical procedures making possible this reduction are called dimensionality reduction techniques; they have widely been developed by fields like Statistics or Machine Learning, and are currently a hot research topic. In this review we categorize the plethora of dimension reduction techniques available and give the mathematical insight behind them.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Quantum encodings that preserve persistent homology
Investigates which quantum encodings of classical datasets preserve persistent homology so that quantum algorithms can extract topological features directly from the data.
-
Stop Misusing t-SNE and UMAP for Visual Analytics
A review of 136 visual analytics papers and two interview studies show t-SNE and UMAP are frequently used for tasks they cannot support, and that practitioner literacy issues explain the persistent misuse.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.