Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Higher-order interference and single-system postulates characterizing quantum theory

Quantum Physics · Submitted 17 Mar 2014

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim We give three postulates -- no higher-order interference, classical decomposability of states, and strong symmetry -- and prove that the only non-classical operational probabilistic theories satisfying them are real, complex, and quaternionic quantum theory, together with 3-level octonionic quantum theory and ball state spaces of arbitrary dimension.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID1403.4147 (version 4)
Pith IDG2HHUU2Z, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationCozmin Ududec, Howard Barnum, Markus P. Mueller. "Higher-order interference and single-system postulates characterizing quantum theory." arXiv:1403.4147 (2014). https://pith.science/paper/G2HHUU2Z
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 3,876 input tokens, $0.0002 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.12 · states limitation 0.58 · human participants 0.02 · controlled comparison 0.02 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.14 · compares with prior results 0.90 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v4. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

We present a new characterization of quantum theory in terms of simple physical principles that is different from previous ones in two important respects: first, it only refers to properties of single systems without any assumptions on the composition of many systems; and second, it is closer to experiment by having absence of higher-order interference as a postulate, which is currently the subject of experimental investigation. We give three postulates -- no higher-order interference, classical decomposability of states, and strong symmetry -- and prove that the only non-classical operational probabilistic theories satisfying them are real, complex, and quaternionic quantum theory, together with 3-level octonionic quantum theory and ball state spaces of arbitrary dimension. Then we show that adding observability of energy as a fourth postulate yields complex quantum theory as the unique solution, relating the emergence of the complex numbers to the possibility of Hamiltonian dynamics. We also show that there may be interesting non-quantum theories satisfying only the first two of our postulates, which would allow for higher-order interference in experiments while still respecting the contextuality analogue of the local orthogonality principle.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 We present a new characterization of quantum theory in terms of simple physical principles that is different from previous ones in two important respects: first, it only refers to properties of single systems without any assumptions on the composition of many systems; and second, it is closer to experiment by having absence of higher-order interference as a postulate, which is currently the subject of experimental investigation. contribution 1.00 0.87 0.18 asserted 1.00
s1 We give three postulates -- no higher-order interference, classical decomposability of states, and strong symmetry -- and prove that the only non-classical operational probabilistic theories satisfying them are real, complex, and quaternionic quantum theory, together with 3-level octonionic quantum theory and ball state spaces of arbitrary dimension. result 0.73 0.95 0.57 asserted 1.00
s2 Then we show that adding observability of energy as a fourth postulate yields complex quantum theory as the unique solution, relating the emergence of the complex numbers to the possibility of Hamiltonian dynamics. result 0.96 0.95 0.26 asserted 1.00
s3 We also show that there may be interesting non-quantum theories satisfying only the first two of our postulates, which would allow for higher-order interference in experiments while still respecting the contextuality analogue of the local orthogonality principle. result 0.93 0.91 0.05 hedged possibility 0.96

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 1.00 · evidence from proof or derivation 1.00.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v4
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

We present a new characterization of quantum theory in terms of simple physical principles that is different from previous ones in two important respects: first, it only refers to properties of single systems without any assumptions on the composition of many systems; and second, it is closer to experiment by having absence of higher-order interference as a postulate, which is currently the subject of experimental investigation. We give three postulates -- no higher-order interference, classical decomposability of states, and strong symmetry -- and prove that the only non-classical operational probabilistic theories satisfying them are real, complex, and quaternionic quantum theory, together with 3-level octonionic quantum theory and ball state spaces of arbitrary dimension. Then we show that adding observability of energy as a fourth postulate yields complex quantum theory as the unique solution, relating the emergence of the complex numbers to the possibility of Hamiltonian dynamics. We also show that there may be interesting non-quantum theories satisfying only the first two of our postulates, which would allow for higher-order interference in experiments while still respecting the contextuality analogue of the local orthogonality principle.

Human review
References
How later papers used it

65 later papers cite it

Evidence: substantial. 57 of the citing papers share no author with it, and 12 of those carry a confident label from Pith's citation classifier.

Pith read 19 of the 222 citing sentences, choosing only those whose citation markers point at this paper alone, and wrote the paraphrases from them. The summary, the counts, the evidence level, the links and the quotes come from code; the summary counts the papers listed below. A later paper is listed under a label when Pith's citation classifier gives one of its sentences that label at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), Pith's reading finds that the citing paper itself did it, and a second check confirms the paraphrase against the sentence. This section lists uses only. It does not list criticism or disagreement, so their absence here says nothing about how the paper has been received. Papers that share an author with this one are listed apart, under "By the same authors". A quote is the citing authors' own sentence, shown when their paper's licence is CC BY, CC BY-SA or CC0. JSON

Builds on it 1 paper · 1 by the same authors

By the same authors

  • Extended this paper's results showing that under Postulates 1 and 2 the existence of higher-order interference is equivalent to each of three other statements.

    Thermodynamics and the structure of quantum theory (2016) (same authors) · 1.00 · paraphrased: the licence does not allow quoting

Uses its method or tool 1 paper
Cites it as support 1 of 11 papers with this label
  • Said that Hamiltonian dynamics consistent with principles of branch locality may be a signifier of quantum theory, as it would expect from this paper's results.

    On defining the Hamiltonian beyond quantum theory (2018) · 0.98 · paraphrased: the licence does not allow quoting

How the literature uses it

24 arXiv papers cite this in 129 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 88 sentences without a confident label

Contests it 1 paper
  • The relation of energy observability to dynamical correspondence is, roughly, that a dynamical correspondence is a linear map (but not necessarily an injection[In [ref] (on p. 29) dynamical correspondences are mistakenly described as injections; they are injective in the simple case, which is the one under consideration there, but not in general.]) of observables into the Lie algebra, i.e. in the opposite direction from the map required by energy observability, and also that dynamical correspondence imposes some conditions of compatibility with the Jordan structure, while the notion of energy observability uses only the convex structure of the state space and does not need Jordan structure for its definition.

    Strongly symmetric spectral convex bodies are Jordan algebra state spaces · From Jordan state spaces to complex quantum theory via relations between continuous symmetries and observables · contest 0.88

Builds on it 1 paper
  • We extend the results of Ref. [ref] , where it was shown that in the context of Postulates 1 and 2 the existence of higher-order interference is equivalent to each of three other statements.

    Thermodynamics and the structure of quantum theory · Conclusions · 1.00

Uses its method or tool 1 paper
Compares with it 2 papers
Cites it as support 8 papers
Cites it as background 15 papers
  • Postulate 2 of [ref] is Strong Symmetry (SS): that every set of mutually distinguishable pure states can be taken to any other such set of the same size by a reversible transformation (affine automorphism of $Ω$).

    Entropy, majorization and thermodynamics in general probabilistic theories · Spectrality · 0.81

  • A series of recent papers [ref] have shown that any of various packages of probabilistic or information-theoretic axioms force the state spaces of a finite-dimensional probabilistic theory to be those of formally real, or euclidean, Jordan algebras.

    Some Nearly Quantum Theories · Introduction · 0.94

  • Section [ref] defines perfect distinguishability, spectrality and strong symmetry, and reviews important consequences (mostly from [ref] ) of the latter two properties that will be needed in proving the main theorem.

    Strongly symmetric spectral convex bodies are Jordan algebra state spaces · Introduction · 0.96

What it cites · 37 sentences without a confident label

Uses the method or tool of 2 papers
  • Following the definition of [ref] , expressed in the language of [ref] , every system satisfying Postulates 1 and 2 defines a contextuality scenario given by a hypergraph $H$, where the vertices of $H$ are the projective units $u_F$ ($F≠{0}$ any face of $A_+$), and the edges are collections of effects $u_F_1,…, u_F_n$ with $∑_i=1^n u_F_i=u_A$.

    (Non-)Contextuality of Physical Theories as an Axiom · Consequences of Postulates 1+2 · 0.85

  • Following the definition of [ref] , expressed in the language of [ref] , every system satisfying Postulates 1 and 2 defines a contextuality scenario given by a hypergraph $H$, where the vertices of $H$ are the projective units $u_F$ ($F≠{0}$ any face of $A_+$), and the edges are collections of effects $u_F_1,…, u_F_n$ with $∑_i=1^n u_F_i=u_A$.

    A Combinatorial Approach to Nonlocality and Contextuality · Consequences of Postulates 1+2 · 0.85

Compares with 11 papers
Cites as support 1 paper
Cites as background 25 papers

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.