Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

First order algorithms in variational image processing

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1412.4237 v1 pith:URBFNOHZ submitted 2014-12-13 math.OC cs.CVstat.ML

classification math.OCcs.CVstat.ML
keywords algorithmsdatalikemethodsregularizationsomevariationalalpha
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
abstract

Variational methods in imaging are nowadays developing towards a quite universal and flexible tool, allowing for highly successful approaches on tasks like denoising, deblurring, inpainting, segmentation, super-resolution, disparity, and optical flow estimation. The overall structure of such approaches is of the form ${\cal D}(Ku) + \alpha {\cal R} (u) \rightarrow \min_u$ ; where the functional ${\cal D}$ is a data fidelity term also depending on some input data $f$ and measuring the deviation of $Ku$ from such and ${\cal R}$ is a regularization functional. Moreover $K$ is a (often linear) forward operator modeling the dependence of data on an underlying image, and $\alpha$ is a positive regularization parameter. While ${\cal D}$ is often smooth and (strictly) convex, the current practice almost exclusively uses nonsmooth regularization functionals. The majority of successful techniques is using nonsmooth and convex functionals like the total variation and generalizations thereof or $\ell_1$-norms of coefficients arising from scalar products with some frame system. The efficient solution of such variational problems in imaging demands for appropriate algorithms. Taking into account the specific structure as a sum of two very different terms to be minimized, splitting algorithms are a quite canonical choice. Consequently this field has revived the interest in techniques like operator splittings or augmented Lagrangians. Here we shall provide an overview of methods currently developed and recent results as well as some computational studies providing a comparison of different methods and also illustrating their success in applications.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Forward-Reflected-Backward algorithm with Linesearch

    math.OC 2026-07 reject novelty 6.0 of 10

    A new linesearch for forward-reflected-backward splitting is claimed to converge weakly for continuous monotone operators, but a gap in the termination proof and out-of-range numerical parameters weaken the result.

  2. Efficient Dynamic Image Reconstruction with motion estimation

    math.NA 2025-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    MMGKS-OF jointly estimates motion via optical flow and reconstructs dynamic tomography images using an MMGKS solver with automatic regularization parameter selection, outperforming non-motion baselines.

Pith tools