Pith.

High Energy Physics - Phenomenology · arXiv:1502.07997 v2 · submitted 27 Feb 2015

Exploring neutrino physics at LHC via R-parity violating SUSY

Vasiliki A. Mitsou (U. Valencia, IFIC)

The paper says

“R-parity violating supersymmetric models (RPV SUSY) are becoming increasingly more appealing than its R-parity conserving counterpart in view of the hitherto non-observation of SUSY signals at the LHC.”

from the abstract · picked out as the main claim by a classifier

Pith says

Pith has not reviewed this paper.

Get a Pith Review, $5

Reviews

Reviews by people

No person has reviewed this paper on Pith yet. A scientist listed on Pith can review it for a fee, and their review is published here whatever it concludes.

Request a human review

How Pith checks papers · The full audit of this paper

The paper

Abstract

R-parity violating supersymmetric models (RPV SUSY) are becoming increasingly more appealing than its R-parity conserving counterpart in view of the hitherto non-observation of SUSY signals at the LHC. In this talk, RPV scenarios where neutrino masses are naturally generated are discussed, namely RPV through bilinear terms (bRPV) and the "mu from nu" supersymmetric standard model. The latter is characterised by a rich Higgs sector that easily accommodates a 125-GeV Higgs boson. The phenomenology of such models at the LHC is reviewed, giving emphasis on final states with displaced objects, and relevant results obtained by LHC experiments are presented. The implications for dark matter for these theoretical proposals is also addressed.

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

How the main claim is stated: asserted 0.96

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.02 · states limitation 0.09 · human participants 0.02 · controlled comparison 0.15 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.47 · compares with prior results 0.21 · mentions code or data availability 0.02

The abstract, sentence by sentence

This table labels the abstract only (arXiv listing abstract v2). The number is the probability the classifier gave the label.

SentenceRoleThe authors' own workStates the main conclusionStrength
R-parity violating supersymmetric models (RPV SUSY) are becoming increasingly more appealing than its R-parity conserving counterpart in view of the hitherto non-observation of SUSY signals at the LHC. background 1.00 0.05 0.09 asserted 0.96
In this talk, RPV scenarios where neutrino masses are naturally generated are discussed, namely RPV through bilinear terms (bRPV) and the "mu from nu" supersymmetric standard model. contribution 0.90 0.23 0.06 asserted 0.80
The latter is characterised by a rich Higgs sector that easily accommodates a 125-GeV Higgs boson. background 0.58 0.11 0.07 asserted 0.93
The phenomenology of such models at the LHC is reviewed, giving emphasis on final states with displaced objects, and relevant results obtained by LHC experiments are presented. contribution 0.93 0.25 0.09 asserted 0.91
The implications for dark matter for these theoretical proposals is also addressed. contribution 0.73 0.45 0.08 asserted 0.73

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: review 1.00 · evidence from literature 0.81

What was examined, and what was not

Sources read

  • arXiv listing abstract v2

Not examined

  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers

Levels run

  • P abstract

Not run

  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

How the labels were made

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 4,329 input tokens, $0.0002 reported.

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. This record as JSON

How the literature uses it

7 arXiv papers cite this in 7 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers whose main result relates to this one's

Found among the papers closest to this one by title and main claim. Pith's classifier compared each pair's main results and a second model family confirmed the relation; checked against two further families, shown conflicts agreed 118 times in 120 and shown same results 218 times in 239. The quoted sentence is the other paper's main claim.

States the same result 1 paper

Papers citing it · 2 sentences without a confident label

Cites it as background 5 papers

What it cites · 76 sentences without a confident label

Uses the method or tool of 1 paper
  • The six bRPV parameters for each mSUGRA point are determined by the [ref] spectrum calculator. uses as input the mSUGRA parameters and the neutrino physics constraints, and delivers as output the bRPV parameters (together with the mass spectra and the decay modes) compatible with these constraints.

    SPheno 3.1: extensions including flavour, CP-phases and models beyond the MSSM · Phenomenology at the LHC · 1.00

Compares with 1 paper
Cites as background 7 papers

Challenges and discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment.

No comments yet.

Sign in to comment