Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Reply to "Comment on `Lattice determination of Sigma - Lambda mixing' "

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1507.07825 v1 pith:HXEEA64Q submitted 2015-07-28 hep-lat hep-phnucl-exnucl-th

R. Horsley , J. Najjar , Y. Nakamura , H. Perlt , D. Pleiter , P.E.L. Rakow , G. Schierholz , A. Schiller
show 2 more authors
H. Stüben J.M. Zanotti
This is my paper
classification hep-lathep-phnucl-exnucl-th
keywords commentdiscrepancieseffectslambdamixingreplysigmaabove
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

In this Reply, we respond to the above Comment. Our computation [Phys. Rev. D 91 (2015) 074512] only took into account pure QCD effects, arising from quark mass differences, so it is not surprising that there are discrepancies in isospin splittings and in the Sigma - Lambda mixing angle. We expect that these discrepancies will be smaller in a full calculation incorporating QED effects.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Pith tools