Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

What to talk about and how? Selective Generation using LSTMs with Coarse-to-Fine Alignment

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1509.00838 v2 pith:XRWI6Z36 submitted 2015-09-02 cs.CL cs.AIcs.LGcs.NE

classification cs.CLcs.AIcs.LGcs.NE
keywords modelgenerationrecordscoarse-to-finedatasetdespiteneuralresults
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

We propose an end-to-end, domain-independent neural encoder-aligner-decoder model for selective generation, i.e., the joint task of content selection and surface realization. Our model first encodes a full set of over-determined database event records via an LSTM-based recurrent neural network, then utilizes a novel coarse-to-fine aligner to identify the small subset of salient records to talk about, and finally employs a decoder to generate free-form descriptions of the aligned, selected records. Our model achieves the best selection and generation results reported to-date (with 59% relative improvement in generation) on the benchmark WeatherGov dataset, despite using no specialized features or linguistic resources. Using an improved k-nearest neighbor beam filter helps further. We also perform a series of ablations and visualizations to elucidate the contributions of our key model components. Lastly, we evaluate the generalizability of our model on the RoboCup dataset, and get results that are competitive with or better than the state-of-the-art, despite being severely data-starved.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. VisEditBench: Can Vision-Language Models Edit Visualization Code from Multimodal Feedback?

    cs.CL 2026-08 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    A new benchmark of 1,395 human-annotated visualization code-editing tasks shows that even the best vision-language model (Claude-4.6-Sonnet) only passes 74.46% of edits, while render-grounded iterative refinement impr...

Pith tools