Pith.

High Energy Physics - Lattice · arXiv:1512.05831 v2 · submitted 18 Dec 2015

The pole structure of the Lambda(1405) in a recent QCD simulation

R. Molina, M. Doring

The paper says

“The UCHPT calculation predicts the quark mass dependence remarkably well.”

from the abstract · picked out as the main claim by a classifier

Pith says

Pith has not reviewed this paper.

Get a Pith Review, $5

Reviews

Reviews by people

No person has reviewed this paper on Pith yet. A scientist listed on Pith can review it for a fee, and their review is published here whatever it concludes.

Request a human review

How Pith checks papers · The full audit of this paper

The paper

Abstract

The Λ(1405) baryon is difficult to detect in experiment, absent in many quark model calculations, and supposedly manifested through a two-pole structure. Its uncommon properties made it subject to numerous experimental and theoretical studies in recent years. Lattice-QCD eigenvalues for different quark masses were recently reported by the Adelaide group. We compare these eigenvalues to predictions of a model based on Unitary Chiral Perturbation Theory. The UCHPT calculation predicts the quark mass dependence remarkably well. It also explains the overlap pattern with different meson-baryon components, mainly πΣ and K̄N, at different quark masses. More accurate lattice QCD data are required to draw definite conclusions on the nature of the Λ(1405).

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

How the main claim is stated: asserted 1.00

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.03 · states limitation 0.88 · human participants 0.02 · controlled comparison 0.11 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.07 · compares with prior results 0.93 · mentions code or data availability 0.02

The abstract, sentence by sentence

This table labels the abstract only (arXiv listing abstract v2). The number is the probability the classifier gave the label.

SentenceRoleThe authors' own workStates the main conclusionStrength
The $\Lambda(1405)$ baryon is difficult to detect in experiment, absent in many quark model calculations, and supposedly manifested through a two-pole structure. background 1.00 0.04 0.08 asserted 0.61
Its uncommon properties made it subject to numerous experimental and theoretical studies in recent years. background 1.00 0.05 0.02 asserted 0.99
Lattice-QCD eigenvalues for different quark masses were recently reported by the Adelaide group. background 0.76 0.05 0.02 asserted 1.00
We compare these eigenvalues to predictions of a model based on Unitary Chiral Perturbation Theory. method 0.69 0.84 0.04 asserted 0.83
The UCHPT calculation predicts the quark mass dependence remarkably well. result 0.99 0.44 0.32 asserted 1.00
It also explains the overlap pattern with different meson-baryon components, mainly $\pi\Sigma$ and $\bar KN$, at different quark masses. result 0.87 0.42 0.16 asserted 1.00
More accurate lattice QCD data are required to draw definite conclusions on the nature of the $\Lambda(1405)$. future work 0.79 0.12 0.19 asserted 0.68

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 0.67 · evidence from analysis of existing data 0.76

What was examined, and what was not

Sources read

  • arXiv listing abstract v2

Not examined

  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers

Levels run

  • P abstract

Not run

  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

How the labels were made

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 5,460 input tokens.

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. This record as JSON

Cited by 8 Pith papers
How the literature uses it

24 arXiv papers cite this in 34 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 17 sentences without a confident label

Uses its method or tool 3 papers
Uses its data or values 1 paper
Cites it as support 1 paper
Cites it as background 12 papers

What it cites · 5 sentences without a confident label

Cites as background 1 paper

Challenges and discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment.

No comments yet.

Sign in to comment