Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Deep Embedding for Spatial Role Labeling

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1603.08474 v1 pith:ZVAJ26II submitted 2016-03-28 cs.CL cs.CVcs.LGcs.NE

classification cs.CLcs.CVcs.LGcs.NE
keywords spatialdeepembeddingviewdatalabelingmethodmodel
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

This paper introduces the visually informed embedding of word (VIEW), a continuous vector representation for a word extracted from a deep neural model trained using the Microsoft COCO data set to forecast the spatial arrangements between visual objects, given a textual description. The model is composed of a deep multilayer perceptron (MLP) stacked on the top of a Long Short Term Memory (LSTM) network, the latter being preceded by an embedding layer. The VIEW is applied to transferring multimodal background knowledge to Spatial Role Labeling (SpRL) algorithms, which recognize spatial relations between objects mentioned in the text. This work also contributes with a new method to select complementary features and a fine-tuning method for MLP that improves the $F1$ measure in classifying the words into spatial roles. The VIEW is evaluated with the Task 3 of SemEval-2013 benchmark data set, SpaceEval.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Large Multi-modal Model Cartographic Map Comprehension for Textual Locality Georeferencing

    cs.AI 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Grid-based prompting lets GPT-4o georeference textual locality descriptions from natural history records using map excerpts, averaging about 1.03 km error on a 25-example dataset.

Pith tools