Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Estimating individual treatment effect: generalization bounds and algorithms

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1606.03976 v5 pith:RGFC4V54 submitted 2016-06-13 stat.ML cs.AIcs.LG

classification stat.MLcs.AIcs.LG
keywords algorithmsrepresentationdistributionsboundscausalcontroldatadistances
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

There is intense interest in applying machine learning to problems of causal inference in fields such as healthcare, economics and education. In particular, individual-level causal inference has important applications such as precision medicine. We give a new theoretical analysis and family of algorithms for predicting individual treatment effect (ITE) from observational data, under the assumption known as strong ignorability. The algorithms learn a "balanced" representation such that the induced treated and control distributions look similar. We give a novel, simple and intuitive generalization-error bound showing that the expected ITE estimation error of a representation is bounded by a sum of the standard generalization-error of that representation and the distance between the treated and control distributions induced by the representation. We use Integral Probability Metrics to measure distances between distributions, deriving explicit bounds for the Wasserstein and Maximum Mean Discrepancy (MMD) distances. Experiments on real and simulated data show the new algorithms match or outperform the state-of-the-art.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Concrete Problems in AI Safety

    cs.AI 2016-06 accept novelty 7.0 of 10

    The paper categorizes five concrete AI safety problems arising from flawed objectives, costly evaluation, and learning dynamics.

  2. SCOPE: Sequential Causal Optimization of Process Interventions

    cs.LG 2025-12 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    SCOPE plans sequential intervention decisions in business processes by estimating outcomes with causal models, and generally beats two baselines on two simulated datasets.

  3. Deep Learning of Continuous and Structured Policies for Aggregated Heterogeneous Treatment Effects

    cs.LG 2025-07 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    A neural augmented Naive Bayes layer is proposed to rank subjects for treatments that combine continuous intensity and discrete assignment, but the causal estimator rests on an unjustified weighting identity.

Pith tools