Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Human collective intelligence as distributed Bayesian inference

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1608.01987 v1 pith:EKLKUVWH submitted 2016-08-05 cs.CY cs.AIcs.GTcs.SIphysics.soc-ph

classification cs.CYcs.AIcs.GTcs.SIphysics.soc-ph
keywords bayesiancollectivedistributedhumaninferenceaccuratebeliefsdecision
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Collective intelligence is believed to underly the remarkable success of human society. The formation of accurate shared beliefs is one of the key components of human collective intelligence. How are accurate shared beliefs formed in groups of fallible individuals? Answering this question requires a multiscale analysis. We must understand both the individual decision mechanisms people use, and the properties and dynamics of those mechanisms in the aggregate. As of yet, mathematical tools for such an approach have been lacking. To address this gap, we introduce a new analytical framework: We propose that groups arrive at accurate shared beliefs via distributed Bayesian inference. Distributed inference occurs through information processing at the individual level, and yields rational belief formation at the group level. We instantiate this framework in a new model of human social decision-making, which we validate using a dataset we collected of over 50,000 users of an online social trading platform where investors mimic each others' trades using real money in foreign exchange and other asset markets. We find that in this setting people use a decision mechanism in which popularity is treated as a prior distribution for which decisions are best to make. This mechanism is boundedly rational at the individual level, but we prove that in the aggregate implements a type of approximate "Thompson sampling"---a well-known and highly effective single-agent Bayesian machine learning algorithm for sequential decision-making. The perspective of distributed Bayesian inference therefore reveals how collective rationality emerges from the boundedly rational decision mechanisms people use.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. When Influence Misleads: Informational and Strategic Limits of Social Learning in Trading Networks

    physics.soc-ph 2025-07 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    On eToro, traders mirror popular investors rather than profitable ones, and the simulation used to argue for performance-based signals depends on an autocorrelation in returns that the data do not show.

Pith tools