REVIEW 1 cited by
Cosmological perturbations in an effective and genuinely phantom dark energy Universe
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
abstract
We carry out an analysis of the cosmological perturbations in general relativity for three different models which are good candidates to describe the current acceleration of the Universe. These three set-ups are described classically by perfect fluids with a phantom nature and represent deviations from the most widely accepted $\Lambda$CDM model. In addition, each of the models under study induce different future singularities or abrupt events known as (i) Big Rip, (ii) Little Rip and (iii) Little Sibling of the Big Rip. Only the first one is regarded as a true singularity since it occurs at a finite cosmic time. For this reason, we refer to the others as abrupt events. With the aim to find possible footprints of this scenario in the Universe matter distribution, we not only obtain the evolution of the cosmological scalar perturbations but also calculate the matter power spectrum for each model. We have carried the perturbations in the absence of any anisotropic stress and within a phenomenological approach for the speed of sound. We constrain observationally these models using several measurements of the growth rate function, more precisely $f\sigma_8$, and compare our results with the observational ones.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Evolution of matter perturbations in the context of cosmic slowing down
For five phantom-capable dark-energy parameterizations, the growth index at redshift zero is about 0.54 with a negative slope, and the f-sigma-8 combination lies below the Lambda-CDM prediction over most of the redshi...
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.